Planet likely to warm by 4C by 2100, scientists warn
New climate model taking
greater account of cloud changes indicates heating will be at higher end of
expectations
Damian Carrington
The Guardian, Tuesday 31 December 2013 / http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/dec/31/planet-will-warm-4c-2100-climate
Temperature rises resulting from unchecked climate change
will be at the severe end of those projected, according to a new scientific
study.
The scientist leading the research said that unless
emissions of greenhouse gases were cut, the planet would heat up by a minimum
of 4C by
2100, twice the level the world's governments deem dangerous.
The research indicates that fewer clouds form as the planet
warms, meaning less sunlight is reflected back into space, driving temperatures
up further still. The way clouds affect global warming has been the biggest
mystery surrounding future climate change.
Professor Steven Sherwood, at the University of New South
Wales, in Australia, who led the new work, said: "This study breaks new
ground twice: first by identifying what is controlling the cloud changes and
second by strongly discounting the lowest estimates of future global warming in
favour of the higher and more damaging estimates."
"4C
would likely be catastrophic rather than simply dangerous," Sherwood told
the Guardian. "For example, it would make life difficult, if not
impossible, in much of the tropics, and would guarantee the eventual melting of
the Greenland ice sheet and some of the Antarctic ice sheet", with sea
levels rising by many metres as a result.
The research is a "big advance" that halves the
uncertainty about how much warming is caused by rises in carbon emissions,
according to scientists commenting on the study, published in the journal
Nature. Hideo Shiogama and Tomoo Ogura, at Japan's National Institute for
Environmental Studies, said the explanation of how fewer clouds form as the world
warms was "convincing", and agreed this indicated future climate
would be greater than expected. But they said more challenges lay ahead to
narrow down further the projections of future temperatures.
Scientists measure the sensitivity of the Earth's climate to
greenhouse gases by estimating the temperature rise that would be caused by a
doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere compared with pre-industrial levels – as is
likely to happen within 50 years, on current trends. For two decades, those
estimates have run from 1.5C
to 5C , a
wide range; the new research narrowed that range to between 3C and 5C , by closely examining the
biggest cause of uncertainty: clouds.
The key was to ensure that the way clouds form in the real
world was accurately represented in computer climate models, which are the only
tool researchers have to predict future temperatures. When water evaporates
from the oceans, the vapour can rise over nine miles to form rain clouds that
reflect sunlight; or it may rise just a few miles and drift back down without
forming clouds. In reality, both processes occur, and climate models
encompassing this complexity predicted significantly higher future temperatures
than those only including the nine-mile-high clouds.
"Climate sceptics like to criticise climate models for
getting things wrong, and we are the first to admit they are not perfect,"
said Sherwood. "But what we are finding is that the mistakes are being
made by the models which predict less warming, not those that predict
more."
He added: "Sceptics may also point to the 'hiatus' of
temperatures since the end of the 20th century, but there is increasing
evidence that this inaptly named hiatus is not seen in other measures of the
climate system, and is almost certainly temporary."
Global average air temperatures have increased relatively
slowly since a high point in 1998 caused by the ocean phenomenon El Niño, but
observations show that heat is continuing to be trapped in increasing amounts
by greenhouse gases, with over 90% disappearing into the oceans. Furthermore, a
study in November suggested the "pause" may be largely an illusion resulting
from the lack of temperature readings from polar regions, where warming is
greatest.
Sherwood accepts his team's work on the role of clouds
cannot definitively rule out that future temperature rises will lie at the
lower end of projections. "But," he said, for that to be the case,
"one would need to invoke some new dimension to the problem involving a
major missing ingredient for which we currently have no evidence. Such a thing
is not out of the question but requires a lot of faith."
He added: "Rises in global average temperatures of [at
least 4C by
2100] will have profound impacts on the world and the economies of many
countries if we don't urgently start to curb our emissions."
Flood-hit Colombia in 2011, when the rain almost never
stopped
|
We ignore the disastrous storms in the Caribbean at our
peril
Storms have taken lives in
the Caribbean, and caused chaos in the UK – climate change is eroding
certainties across the globe
Carrie Gibson
theguardian, Tuesday 31 December 2013 / http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/31/storms-caribbean-uk-climate-change
As tens of thousands people suffered through a flooded and
powerless Christmas in Britain, 5,000 miles away unexpected weather was also
unleashing havoc on the Caribbean.
Torrential rains on Christmas Eve, with 15in falling in 24
hours, led to dramatic floods and landslides that washed through St Vincent and
the Grenadines, St Lucia and Dominica. So far eight people in St Vincent and
five in St Lucia have died, water and electricity are down and thousands of
properties have been damaged. The clean-up bill is expected to be in the
millions.
The crisis cut short the holiday of the prime minister of St
Vincent, Ralph Gonsalves, who happened to be in storm-hit London, after a trip
to see the pope in Rome. Gonsalves – whose cousin was killed in a landslide
during the rains – said it was "a disaster of a proportion the likes of
which we have not seen in living memory". The secretary general of the
Organisation of American States, José Miguel Insulza, also noted the
"unreasonable nature" of the rains, and said "the flooding
raises once again the impact of climate change in the Caribbean region".
Many years ago, during a rainy spell in Britain, a South
African colleague at my office grumbled that Britain didn't have a climate – it
only had weather. I chuckled at the time, but it seems that this now goes well
beyond the UK. Unmoored from what usually happens during a given season, we are
increasingly vulnerable to the brutal force of extreme weather events at short
notice.
The Caribbean's climate does involve a rainy period – it is
part of the hurricane season, which starts around June and usually lasts until
around mid to late November. The 2013 hurricane season was the quietest in 30
years, with only two storms, and they did not even reach an intensity of
category three or above. With regards to these recent rains, public opinion
appears to agree with Gonsalves: these downpours were unprecedented.
There is no doubt that something is amiss in the tropics,
and has been for some time. For instance, in 2011 in the north-east
region of Colombia, the rain almost never stopped, and floods devastated the
country, with hundreds of thousands of homes damaged and millions of people
left suffering. And Trinidad and Tobago, too, has been experiencing severe and
often unexpected flooding in the past few years, due to heavy rains.
The Caribbean is on the receiving end of the effects of
climate change – it has to adapt and respond to the consequences, even though
it has contributed little to the problem. Like other island nations, rising sea
levels are a particular threat. A recent report by the Inter-American
Development Bank claims that the tourism industry could lose some $900m a year
(£550m) by 2050, and that flat, non-volcanic islands like the Bahamas are
considered especially vulnerable.
There is also the risk that more people on the islands will
choose to live abroad – if they are not evacuated first. But erosion is not
something from a computer model – it's happening now. For instance, Varadero,
Cuba – where more than a million tourists descend every year – has lost between
40,000 and 50,000
cubic metres of shoreline (430,000 to 537,500 sq ft),
and a recent report says around 84% of the island's beaches are threatened.
For the Caribbean, unpredictable weather and eroding beaches
could harm the vital tourism trade. In addition, the islands have a range of
environmental issues to tackle, from mining in Jamaica to deforestation in
Haiti. There is a rich ecosystem across the region – forests and biodiversity
above water, and precious coral reefs and aquatic life below – that is
increasingly under threat. The islands are trying to cope, earmarking scarce
funds to deal with these challenges, set against a backdrop of economic
struggle and often poor infrastructure. But moves have long been under way in places
such as Belize, Dominica, and Costa Rica to encourage eco-tourism. The
Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre was set up in 2005, which involves
most of the Caricom members (18 of the English-speaking states of the
Caribbean, as well as Haiti and Suriname), and most islands have scientists
monitoring changes in climate patterns, and taskforces to attempt to deal with
the consequences.
Whatever you think about climate change, the onset of
erratic and extreme weather erodes any pretence of certainty. Modern life, as
recent events in Britain have shown, has no time for floods, storms, downed
power lines, delayed trains or flights – but this is our future. So in this
sense, small islands, whose tribulations are often are ignored, are really the
canaries in the coal mine.
This Christmas the impact of climate change reached across
the Atlantic: developed and developing worlds were brought together in a misery
of rising flood waters. We ignore what is happening to the places on the
frontline of this changing climate at our peril.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário