quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2022

Why Trump Hosted Ye And White Nationalist Nick Fuentes At Mar-a-Lago Dinner / Milo Yiannopoulos claims he set up Fuentes dinner ‘to make Trump’s life miserable’ / The inside story of Trump’s explosive dinner with Ye and Nick Fuentes


 Milo Yiannopoulos claims he set up Fuentes dinner ‘to make Trump’s life miserable’

 

Rightwing provocateur says he helped arrange for white supremacist to attend dinner with Trump and Kanye West

 

@adamgabbatt

Wed 30 Nov 2022 15.13 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/nov/30/milo-yiannopoulos-nick-fuentes-donald-trump-dinner

 

As fallout from Donald Trump’s meeting with the white supremacist Nick Fuentes continues, a far-right activist has claimed the meeting was a set-up, meant to “make Trump’s life miserable”.

 

NBC News reported that in an attempt to “send a message” to the former president, Milo Yiannopoulos, a rightwing provocateur and former Breitbart editor, helped arrange for Fuentes to travel to Mar-a-Lago in Florida for a dinner between Trump and the rapper Ye, formerly known as Kanye West.

 

Trump dined with Fuentes and Ye at his resort on 22 November. Since the meeting, Trump has been criticized by senior Republicans and by conservative Jewish leaders.

 

Trump said Ye was invited to dinner and “unexpectedly showed up with three of his friends … whom I knew nothing about”. He has not condemned Fuentes and his views. Fuentes has been described by the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League as “among the most prominent and unapologetic antisemites in the country”.

 

Speaking to NBC, Yiannopoulos said he came up with a plan for Fuentes to travel with Ye and hopefully gain access to the former president.

 

“I wanted to show Trump the kind of talent that he’s missing out on by allowing his terrible handlers to dictate who he can and can’t hang out with,” Yiannopoulos said.

 

“I also wanted to send a message to Trump that he has systematically repeatedly neglected, ignored, abused the people who love him the most, the people who put him in office, and that kind of behavior comes back to bite you in the end.”

 

Yiannopoulos was once a leading figure in the alt-right movement but he has been banned by most major social media networks and lost a book deal in 2017 after appearing to endorse paedophilia.

 

He told NBC he also arranged the meeting “just to make Trump’s life miserable”, because he was aware news of the dinner would leak.

 

Trump has engaged with racists in the past, including claiming there were “very fine people on both sides” of a white supremacist rally in Virginia which resulted in the death of a counter-protester.

 

Criticism for hosting Fuentes has come from senior Republicans including his former vice-president, Mike Pence, and the former New Jersey governor Chris Christie.

 

On Tuesday, Fuentes disputed Yiannapoulos’s suggestion the dinner was an attempt to make Trump’s life miserable.

 

“This is just not true at all,” Fuentes said on the messaging app Telegram, below a screenshot from the NBC article. “My intention was not to hurt Trump by attending the dinner, that is fake news. I love Donald Trump.”

 

Ye, who like Trump is running for president in 2024, said he used the dinner to ask Trump to be his vice-president, only for Trump to insult his ex-wife, Kim Kardashian.

 

“Trump started basically screaming at me at the table telling me I was going to lose,” Ye said in a video since deleted from social media but transcribed by Newsweek. “I mean, has that ever worked for anyone in history? I’m like, ‘Woah, woah hold on hold on Trump, you’re talking to Ye.’”

 

Ye also said Trump was “really impressed” by Fuentes.

 

A source close to Trump told NBC the former president was left furious by the meeting.

 

“He’s crazy. He can’t beat me,” Trump said of Ye, according to the source, who also said “Trump was totally blindsided” by Fuentes’s presence, adding: “It was a set-up.”

 

On Wednesday, the Associated Press reported that Trump’s campaign was “putting new protocols in place to ensure that those who meet with him are approved and fully vetted”. Among those protocols, the AP said, citing unnamed sources, is a requirement that Trump is accompanied by a senior official at all times.

 

The inside story of Trump’s explosive dinner with Ye and Nick Fuentes

What was supposed to be a private dinner ended up being a political nightmare.

 

Nov. 29, 2022, 7:05 PM CET

By Marc Caputo

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/story-trumps-explosive-dinner-ye-nick-fuentes-rcna59010

 

Just two days before Thanksgiving, Donald Trump was planning to have a private, uneventful dinner with an old friend: Ye, the rapper formerly known as Kanye West.

 

The two had arranged to break bread Tuesday night at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Florida after weeks of private phone conversations as Ye lost lucrative partnerships and became a mainstream cultural pariah for his antisemitic remarks, according to those familiar with the talks between the two men.

 

But Trump may have been walking into a trap in Mar-a-Lago’s gilded halls — one that leveraged his own penchant for spectacle and showmanship against him. Ye arrived with three guests, including white nationalist and antisemite Nick Fuentes.

 

Trump has since said he didn’t know Fuentes or his background when they dined together, a claim Fuentes confirmed in an interview, but others at the crowded members-only club figured out his identity. News of the meeting prompted an avalanche of criticism, from some Republican rivals and allies of Trump and his then-week-old presidential campaign.

 

In damage control, Trump’s campaign is now instituting new vetting procedures and gatekeeping efforts as details emerge about how Fuentes and the former president found themselves at the same table, according to two people briefed on the plans.

 

The uproar underscores long-standing issues with Trump as Republicans consider whether they want him back as president again in 2024.

 

Both his campaigns and his administration were often characterized by chaos and buffeted by the consequences of his impulses as they stumbled from crisis to crisis. And Trump has repeatedly put himself in the center of controversies over racism, from falsely accusing the first Black president of not being a natural-born citizen to announcing his 2016 presidential bid by portraying most Mexican migrants as rapists and drug runners.

 

‘The master troll got trolled’

The headline-grabbing attention on his guests — and therefore the subsequent fallout — were all but ensured by Trump before the dinner when he made a grand entrance at about 8 p.m. on Nov. 22 to meet his guests.

 

“We saw everybody in the dining room get up and start applauding, and then the president entered,” Fuentes told NBC News. “He greeted us, and he invited Ye into dinner and Ye said that he wanted to bring us with him to the table. So we walked in and Ye took some pictures with some of the guests in the dining room and then we sat down at the table.”

 

Trump made sure they sat at his specially reserved table on the patio, for all to see, according to Fuentes.

 

But the dinner wasn’t the happy photo-op the president had planned.

 

Ye criticized Trump for not doing enough to help pay the legal bills of those arrested in the Jan. 6 Capitol riots; and he also told Trump he might run for president against him and said Trump should instead be his running mate — all of which angered the former president, who attacked Ye’s ex-wife, Kim Kardashian, according to two dinner participants and Ye, who blasted out a “Mar-a-Lago debrief” video to his 32.2 million Twitter followers the next day.

 

“Trump is really impressed with Nick Fuentes,” Ye said in the video.

 

Fuentes said that he praised Trump as “my hero” and criticized Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis for his potential GOP primary challenge to Trump, but he also told him to his face at the dinner that the onetime 2016 insurgent was in danger of becoming a scripted establishment bore who could lose in 2024.

 

Some Republicans, including former Vice President Mike Pence, have condemned the dinner, with Pence calling on Trump to apologize.

 

One longtime Trump adviser, who didn’t want to go on the record criticizing his preferred candidate, said it was clear that Fuentes’ presence was part of a headline-grabbing setup.

 

“The master troll got trolled,” the adviser said. “Kanye punked Trump.”

 

As advisers to Trump have attempted to quell the backlash, some have insisted that the former president was essentially tricked by the rapper and his guests — a suspicion backed up by Milo Yiannopoulos, the anti-Trump, far-right provocateur who is now acting as a political adviser to Ye.

 

Nick Fuentes speaks as America First protesters are gathered in front of the Gracie Mansion to protest vaccination mandates in New York City on Nov. 13, 2021.

Nick Fuentes speaks as America First protesters are gathered in front of the Gracie Mansion to protest vaccination mandates in New York City on Nov. 13, 2021. Tayfun Coskun / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images file

Yiannopoulos, a former Breitbart editor who was banned from Twitter in 2016 for inciting a racist campaign against the comedian Leslie Jones, told NBC News that he was “the architect” of the plan to have Fuentes travel with Ye in the hopes of slipping him into the dinner with Trump. The intent, according to Yiannopoulos, was for Fuentes to give Trump an unvarnished view of how a portion of his base views his candidacy.

 

Yiannopoulos persuaded a former Trump 2016 campaign adviser from Florida, Karen Giorno, to give Ye a ride to Mar-a-Lago, which she said led her to become an accidental member of Ye’s dinner party. Yiannopoulos said he also wanted Giorno to brief Ye on Trump and politics and, if she went to the dinner, to lend a sense of political gravitas to the discussion. The fourth member of the party was a man Ye later identified as a parent of a student at his private school in California, Donda Academy. (Donda shut down for the year after Ye’s antisemitic remarks.) Yiannopoolos said he was unsure of why the man traveled with them.

 

Yiannopoulos said Fuentes is serving in an advisory capacity to Ye. Giorno is not an official member of the unofficial Ye campaign team but flew to Los Angeles to meet with them this week.

 

“I wanted to show Trump the kind of talent that he’s missing out on by allowing his terrible handlers to dictate who he can and can’t hang out with,” Yiannopoulos told NBC News.

 

“I also wanted to send a message to Trump that he has systematically repeatedly neglected, ignored, abused the people who love him the most, the people who put him in office, and that kind of behavior comes back to bite you in the end,” he added.

 

And, Yiannopoulos said, he arranged the dinner “just to make Trump’s life miserable” because news of the dinner would leak and Trump would mishandle it.

 

Fuentes echoed the sentiment: “I hate to say it, but the chickens are coming home to roost. You know, this is the frustration with his base and with his true loyalists.”

 

Trump fumed afterward that Ye had betrayed him by ambushing him. “He tried to f--- me. He’s crazy. He can’t beat me,” Trump said, according to one confidant, who then relayed the conversation to NBC News on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.

 

“Trump was totally blindsided,” the source said of Fuentes’ presence. “It was a setup.”

 

Some in Trump’s orbit had cautioned him not to have dinner with Ye, under fire for antisemitism, in the first place, according to two sources who had been briefed on an internal damage assessment the campaign performed after the controversy erupted.

 

But Trump is known for refusing to heed cautious counsel, guardrails and gatekeepers. So he went ahead with the dinner alone, telling confidants that he thought Ye needed his counsel. One confidant told NBC that Trump acknowledged he wanted the rapper to be seen because “it would be fun for the members” of Mar-a-Lago.

 

Trump issued three successive statements in as many days on his Truth Social media platform admitting Fuentes was there while disavowing knowledge of his identity prior to and during the dinner.

 

But none of his statements disavowed the hate speech associated with Fuentes, prompting more criticism that the former president is reluctant to distance himself too much from racists because they’re part of his political base of support.

 

“Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, was asking me for advice concerning some of his difficulties, in particular ‘having to do with his business,’” Trump said in his last statement about the dinner, issued Saturday. “We also discussed, to a lesser extent, politics, where I told him he should definitely not run for President, ‘any voters you may have should vote for TRUMP.’ Anyway, we got along great, he expressed no anti-Semitism, & I appreciated all of the nice things he said about me on ‘Tucker Carlson.’ Why wouldn’t I agree to meet? Also, I didn’t know Nick Fuentes.”

 

Amid the backlash, however, the campaign began reviewing internal procedures to ensure someone like Fuentes never winds up with Trump again, according to two sources familiar with the discussions.

 

U.S. Secret Service distanced itself from the incident and said in a statement Monday that, as “a private club,” Mar-a-Lago’s security is in charge of “who may have been allowed access to their facilities.”

 

On Monday, Ye, Yiannopoulos and Fuentes were scheduled to discuss how the dinner came together in a joint appearance on a conservative webcast, but the rapper stormed out after he was challenged about his statements suggesting Jewish people control banks and the news media.

 

His entourage followed.

 

Getting into Mar-a-Lago

The pre-Thanksgiving dinner was the third shock to ripple through Trump’s presidential campaign, which was exactly one week old on the night of the dinner.

 

Hours before the turkey and stuffing were served, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered Trump to turn over his income tax forms to Congress, capping a yearslong fight that followed Trump’s declaration in 2014 that he would “love” to release them if he ran for president. And four days before the Ye dinner, on Nov. 18, the Justice Department appointed a special counsel to examine the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riots and Trump’s possession of highly sensitive government documents at Mar-a-Lago when he was no longer president.

 

Hours before Ye’s flight arrived in Florida, Yiannopoulos enticed Giorno to pick up the rapper in Miami and take him to Mar-a-Lago, 70 miles away. Giorno said that Yiannopoulos only told her that Ye would be with two people, including someone named “Nick,” but he didn’t give a last name. Yiannopoulos confirmed that he gave limited information to Giorno.

 

Both say Giorno was not told in advance of the plan to confront Trump.

 

But some Trump loyalists and advisers in Trump’s inner circle still fault Giorno for not giving the former president or his team a heads-up about Fuentes, whose identity she said she learned on the drive.

 

“Given Milo’s multiyear, anti-Trump posts since 2020 and his self-proclaimed desire to get a vengeance on President Donald Trump, Karen Giorno cannot in good faith say that she didn’t know what Milo was planning to do … Karen and Milo set Trump up to make him look bad,” said Laura Loomer, a Trump loyalist who ran for Congress in Florida in 2020 and hired Giorno, who then met and hired Yiannopoulos to work for Loomer.

 

Both had separate clashes with Giorno, in 2022 and 2020, respectively. Yiannopoulos and Giorno dismissed Loomer’s criticisms as the result of their falling out.

 

Loomer was one of the first high-profile right-wing activists banned from Twitter in 2018, after calling one of the nation’s first Muslim congresswomen, Democrat Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, “anti Jewish” and attacking Islam for abusing women.

 

Loomer also criticized Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., for being complicit in the alleged Trump setup because she is an ally of Yiannopoulos and had hired him as a summer intern.

 

A spokesperson for Greene denied the accusation of her involvement but declined to comment further to NBC News; Greene fired back at Loomer on her Telegram social media channel. Greene also has a Fuentes connection: She spoke at his America First Political Action confab in Florida in February but then said she didn’t know who he was.

 

Giorno said she had been caught in the blast radius of the dinner with Ye and Fuentes but was an unwitting participant. On the night she drove the crew to Mar-a-Lago, she said, she didn’t realize there was going to be a confrontation and she didn’t have time to call or text anyone with a heads-up because Ye’s flight landed about 5 p.m., in the middle of the South Florida metropolis’ rush hour on a rainy day. It took the party three hours to get to Mar-a-Lago, double what it normally takes. 

 

About halfway to Mar-a-Lago, Giorno said in an interview, she realized that Ye, Fuentes and the other man weren’t properly attired.

 

“All of you are wearing jeans. Did they not tell you about the dress code?” she said she asked.

 

Ye said he hadn’t been informed and that “I doubt Nick is going to get in anyway.”

 

“Nick,” she said she asked, “what’s your last name?”

 

Fuentes gave his last name.

 

“I’m going to kill Milo,” Giorno said she thought.

 

Giorno kept driving and said they would probably have trouble getting into Mar-a-Lago because of private security and Secret Service. Giorno said she also realized she had forgotten her driver’s license, so she had to use a credit card with her name on it to prove her identity to get in.

 

Because she had Ye in her car and she is a frequent visitor to the property, having attended Trump’s campaign announcement seven days before, Giorno said, the four of them were able to get in.

 

Trump met the party in the foyer and warmly greeted everyone, but he was puzzled that his old adviser was somehow with Ye, Giorno said. Giorno said she tried to leave Trump with Ye privately.

 

“Sir, it’s really good to see you again,” she said she told Trump. “My understanding is you’re supposed to have a private meeting with Ye and I’m happy to go to the bar with these two guys while you have dinner.”

 

But Trump deferred.

 

“I’ll leave that to Ye. Do you want them to join?” Trump asked, according to Giorno.

 

“Yes,” Ye replied. “Let’s all eat.”

 

“Great,” Trump said. “Let’s go out to the patio.”


China Covid Protests Paint Xi Jinping Into a Corner: Opinion's Ghosh

Are China’s lockdown protests the beginning of the end for Xi Jinping?

 


Are China’s lockdown protests the beginning of the end for Xi Jinping?

 

Here’s what you need to know about the demonstrations that swept across China in recent days.

 


BY STUART LAU

NOVEMBER 29, 2022 9:43 PM CET

https://www.politico.eu/article/are-chinas-lockdown-protests-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-xi-jinping/

 

The wave of demonstrations across China demanding an end to the draconian zero-COVID measures is like nothing the country has seen in decades.

 

From university campuses to busy streets in the downtown areas, people held up pieces of white paper as a symbol of protest after a deadly fire in a Xinjiang neighborhood under lockdown. The most dramatic moments happened over the weekend, when protesters could be heard shouting "Xi Jinping, step down."

 

It is a brave and risky gesture to defy the Chinese president so publicly. Beijing's strongman has only recently secured a third term in office, breaking with tradition and consolidating his unchallenged power base.

 

POLITICO breaks down what this means for China's leader.

 

How bad is it for Xi?

So far, there's no sign to suggest any significant damage to Xi's position at the top of the Communist Party.

 

Nevertheless, it is the first major show of resistance from the public under Xi's rule, and the grievances directed against the top of the Chinese government are too loud to be unheard.

 

Xi has made zero-COVID a personal political project. With the public now openly opposing the symbols of that policy — such as the strict PCR test requirements and mask regulations — he will no doubt be seen as personally liable for the public anger.

 

Ho-fung Hung, an academic at Johns Hopkins University specializing in China's protest movements, says the government and society "are in the process of seeking a new equilibrium. There can be conflicts and instability in the process.”

 

Still, the timing could have been worse for Xi, if the protests had taken place before the 20th Communist Party congress last month, when he was confirmed in his position for a precedent-breaking third term.

 

How significant is the public defiance?

The last comparable episode was the 1989 student protest in Tiananmen Square, but back then the demonstration was much larger in scale and occupied the iconic square at the heart of Beijing.

 

Most of the young people protesting against COVID restrictions this year had little or no recollection of that deadly protest more than 30 years ago. Not only were they not yet born, but there's also no footage of Tiananmen Square available under the censorship regime.

 

In a way, the most dangerous shock to Xi could be the political awakening of so many young, educated minds who are ready publicly to come out against him.

 

Students from more than 100 universities have shown solidarity with the protesters, according to Cai Xia, a defector from the Communist Party's ideology school who now lives in the U.S.

 

Is brutal repression avoidable?

For now, the police have refrained from a bloody crackdown on the protesters, even though there were arrests. Cases of physical assaults were also reported, like BBC journalist Ed Lawrence, who was covering the protest in Shanghai.

 

After an intense weekend, the police presence was significantly beefed up on Monday. Some of the streets in Shanghai, for instance, had been cordoned off with barricades, turning some of the country's wealthiest neighborhoods into no-go zones.

 

On Tuesday, there was no word of protests in Beijing, Shanghai or other major mainland cities due to the heavy police presence, according to the Associated Press.

 

At this stage, it is unclear whether the unrest is over or whether the protesters are simply waiting for their next opportunity.

 

Some universities also announced plans to send students back home for the winter break earlier than scheduled, in an apparent move to stop them from organizing further protests.

 

How's the market reacting?

Not great — initially. The immediate reaction across global stock markets was pessimistic on Monday, fuelled by a sense of political uncertainty.

 

The benchmark Chinese market, Shanghai Composite, dropped by 2.2 percent briefly, while the Shenzhen Component Index, with a focus on tech, fell by 0.7 percent.

 

On Tuesday, however, both indexes rose 2 percent, as there were no reports of new protests overnight. “Mass protests would deeply tilt the scales in favor of an even weaker economy,” Stephen Innes, managing partner of SPI Asset Management, said.

 

How does the West see it?

In the U.K., Foreign Secretary James Cleverly weighed in. "Protests against the Chinese government are rare and when they do happen, I think the world should take notice, but I think the Chinese government should take notice," Cleverly told reporters.

 

European Council President Charles Michel will arrive in Beijing on Thursday, as he faces calls to send a strong message to Xi to respect the peaceful protests.

 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s spokesman questioned why China’s still not using Western vaccines and instead relying on the policy of draconian lockdowns.

 

Speaking at a regular press conference in Berlin on Monday, spokesperson Steffen Hebestreit said Germany had "taken note" of the protests as well as "reports about partly violent actions of the [Chinese] security forces against the demonstrators."

 

In the U.S., the Biden administration is responding cautiously, reflecting in part a U.S. desire to stabilize a vital but increasingly adversarial relationship with Beijing.

 

There were no statements or tweets from President Joe Biden. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and national security adviser Jake Sullivan also avoided comment.

 

Some slightly critical comments came from an unnamed National Security Council spokesperson.

 

“As we’ve said, we think it’s going to be very difficult for the People’s Republic of China to be able to contain this virus through their zero Covid strategy,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

 

What are Xi's options?

They're limited. In the battle to contain the coronavirus, strict lockdown measures have been Xi's preference from the start. China remains opposed to using Western mRNA vaccines — which have proven to be much more effective in dealing with the latest variants of the coronavirus. The number of cases in Beijing, for instance, doubled over the weekend and remained on a rise by Tuesday.

 

Still, the nationwide statistics over recent days — over 30,000 daily new cases — account for only a tiny minority of the country's 1.4 billion population. Officially, just over 5,200 have died from the virus since the pandemic began.

 

A sudden removal of lockdown measures would likely trigger a surge in infections among a population that has not been well vaccinated. Opting for Western vaccines, however, would entail a very public loss of face for the man in charge. It seems more of the same is the likeliest course of action in Beijing.

House Republicans Face a Triple Threat

 


OPINION

GUEST ESSAY

House Republicans Face a Triple Threat

Nov. 30, 2022, 5:00 a.m. ET

By Matthew N. Green

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/30/opinion/kevin-mccarthy-house-republicans.html

 Mr. Green has written extensively about the Republican House Freedom Caucus and is an author of “Newt Gingrich: The Rise and Fall of a Party Entrepreneur.”

 


In the new year, Republicans will hold a majority in the House of Representatives. They will have the opportunity to set the chamber’s agenda, conduct oversight of the White House and amplify their platform in the run-up to the 2024 presidential election.

 

That’s the good news for the G.O.P. The bad news is that Democrats will still hold the presidency and control of the Senate. Also, with the new Congress in January, there will be no more than 222 Republicans in the chamber, just four more than a bare majority.

 

A narrow majority is not in itself sufficient to cripple a majority party. In the past two years, Democrats in the House and Senate proved that.

 

But House Republicans face low odds of success because of a triple threat: a fragile majority, factional divisions and untested leadership. Still, there are steps that party leaders should take to improve their chances of avoiding a partisan circus and perhaps even preside over a productive two years in power — and real risks if they defer instead to extremists in their ranks.

 

 

The House Freedom Caucus, an assertive faction of 40-odd lawmakers, includes the likes of Jim Jordan of Ohio, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Lauren Boebert of Colorado. Generally, the caucus embraces confrontation over compromise, is disdainful of party loyalty — which extends to the selection of its leaders — and has a track record of killing its party’s own bills. In a slim majority, it holds greater leverage over any legislation.

 

Kevin McCarthy has made assiduous efforts to court the caucus over the past few years to become speaker, yet the caucus members’ skepticism of him in that role remains: In a recent vote for the party’s nominee for speaker, over 30 Republicans voted against him, and at least five conservatives have said that they will oppose him when the full House votes for its next speaker in January. That is more than enough to deny him the speakership, since the nominee must get a majority of the entire House, and no Democrat is expected to vote for Mr. McCarthy.

 

This makes Mr. McCarthy vulnerable. Freedom Caucus members are making demands that could ultimately be fatal to any hope of Republican success in the House. They want rules changes that, among other things, would weaken the speakership by making bipartisan coalitions harder to build, allowing only bills supported by a majority of the G.O.P. to come to the floor. Such a rule would constrain the speaker’s agenda-setting power and make it extremely hard to pass much-needed legislation unpopular with Republicans, like raising the debt ceiling.

 

Mr. McCarthy should not empower the Freedom Caucus at the expense of his own influence. Yes, he has to navigate a delicate path. But if he is elected speaker but gives away the store in the process, it will be a Pyrrhic victory.

 

At the moment, he seems inclined to give away the store. By not refusing caucus demands, he has most likely put himself along a troubled path similar to those of his predecessors Newt Gingrich and John Boehner. Mr. McCarthy has vowed to block an increase in the debt limit unless Democrats agree to spending cuts and suggested that the Homeland Security secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, could face impeachment.

 

These ill-conceived pledges create false hopes among Republican lawmakers and voters of what the party can accomplish. It’s true that in seeking the speakership, Mr. McCarthy cannot simply ignore the Freedom Caucus, since it commands more than enough votes to torpedo his quest for speaker and any partisan Republican bill in the next Congress.

 

But political power comes in part from perceptions. If Mr. McCarthy surrenders too much to the caucus, it will reinforce the impression that he is less a leader than a follower and erode the clout he will need to lobby lawmakers on tough votes.

 

Furthermore, if as speaker he consistently defers to the Freedom Caucus, he risks alienating more moderate or swing-district Republicans (or both). Only a handful of these lawmakers would need to cross party lines in order for the minority party to get its way.

 

Republicans have made it clear that we should expect a buzz of activity in oversight hearings and committee-led investigations — possibly of elements of the F.B.I. and the Justice Department and a heavy dose of Hunter Biden.

 

Republican leaders can avoid making Congress look like a space exclusively for partisan show trials by being flexible in their agenda and seeking out majorities wherever they can find them. That could include partisan measures from the party’s Commitment to America platform, like funding for the police as well as some symbolic, non-consequential legislation that will please the party’s base. (Think resolutions that declare lawmaker opposition to “woke” teaching and illegal immigration.)

 

The G.O.P. might also try to pursue bipartisan legislation in areas like health or family care, since securing the votes of minority-party members on bills can make up for any defections within their own ranks. Bipartisan bills also have at least a plausible chance of getting the approval of the Democratic-led Senate and White House that they will need to become law.

 

When it comes to bills that the House must pass, like appropriations and an increase in the debt ceiling, Mr. McCarthy might have to follow in the footsteps of Speaker Boehner, who let party conservatives resist the passage of such measures until, facing economic catastrophe, he deferred to Republican moderates to pass them with Democrats.

 

None of these strategies is a guarantee of success. And with such a slim majority, there is also the possibility, if remote, that the Republican Party loses power altogether because a few of its members resign or die in office or one or more members leave the party. In 1930, enough of the G.O.P.’s lawmakers passed away and were replaced by Democrats in special elections that the party was robbed of its majority.

 

In 2001, Senate Republicans failed to heed the warnings of Senator Jim Jeffords of Vermont that he would leave the Republican Party. When he did, control of the Senate flipped to Democrats.

 

Even if Republicans don’t lose power this way, the conditions are far from ideal for House Republicans to take advantage of being a governing party. Don’t be surprised if the next two years in the House of Representatives are more soap opera than substance.

 

But if the party remains in charge in the House and can assuage its right flank, its leaders should take steps to temper expectations, protect their authority and be open to working with Democrats if they hope to build a record of legislative success in what will be a challenging political environment.

 

Matthew N. Green is a professor of politics at Catholic University, a co-author of “Newt Gingrich: The Rise and Fall of a Party Entrepreneur” and the author of “Legislative Hardball.”

Herschel Walker Rented Out Atlanta Home Just Before Launching Campaign: ...

Hear what Herschel Walker said about his residency

'So relieved': Ex-wife of Oath Keepers founder reacts to verdict

House Democrats Elect Rep. Hakeem Jeffries As Leader

Is Hungary Russia's Trojan horse inside NATO? | Conflict Zone

Russian hardliners put pressure on Putin | DW News

2022 FIFA World Cup: Iran’s politically divided fans face each other • F...

China's lockdown protests and the future of Xi Jinping | Ai Weiwei

Covid restrictions lifted in Chinese city of Guangzhou after protests

 


Covid restrictions lifted in Chinese city of Guangzhou after protests

 

Police still searching for protesters in other cities as top security body urges crackdown on ‘hostile forces’

 

Helen Davidson and agencies

Wed 30 Nov 2022 10.49 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/30/us-and-canada-urge-china-not-to-harm-zero-covid-protesters-amid-calls-for-crackdown

 

Authorities have abruptly lifted Covid restrictions in the Chinese city of Guangzhou, where protesters scuffled with police on Tuesday night, as police searched for demonstrators in other cities and the country’s top security body called for a crackdown on “hostile forces”.

 

After days of extraordinary protests in the country that also prompted international demonstrations in solidarity, the US and Canada urged China not to harm or intimidate protesters opposing Covid-19 lockdowns.

 

On Wednesday afternoon, authorities suddenly announced a lifting of lockdowns in about half of the districts across the southern city of Guangzhou. Official announcements told local officials to variously remove “temporary control orders” and to redesignate areas as low risk. They also announced an end to mass PCR testing.

 

One resident told the Guardian that within an hour of the announcement they had seen apartment security staff quickly leave, and neighbours hurrying out with luggage “to escape”.

 

The easing of restrictions, which came despite rising cases in the city, did not extend to all districts. Some areas, including parts of Haizhu, where protesters scuffled with police on Tuesday night, according to witnesses and footage, remained under restrictions.

 

The city recorded almost 7,000 Covid cases on Tuesday. In Haizhu there had been several protests and clashes with police over the past month, and it was the site of the most recent protests in a wave of civil disobedience that escalated dramatically on Friday.

 

Late on Tuesday, security personnel in hazmat suits formed ranks shoulder-to-shoulder, taking cover under riot shields, to make their way down a street in Haizhu district as glass smashed around them, videos posted on social media showed.

 

In the footage – geolocated by Agence France-Presse – people could be heard screaming and shouting as orange and blue barricades were pictured strewn across the ground. Others threw objects at the police and later nearly a dozen men were filmed being taken away with their hands bound by cable ties.

 

A Guangzhou resident told AFP on Wednesday he witnessed about 100 police officers converge on Houjiao village in Haizhu district and arrest at least three men on Tuesday night.

 

Haizhu, a district of more than 1.8 million people, has been the source of the bulk of Guangzhou’s Covid-19 cases. Much of the area has been under lockdown since late October.

 

 

On Tuesday, the White House national security spokesperson John Kirby said the US stood up for peaceful protesters. “We don’t want to see protesters physically harmed, intimidated or coerced in any way. That’s what peaceful protest is all about and that’s what we have continued to stand up for whether it’s in China or Iran or elsewhere around the world,” he told CNN.

 

Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, said on Tuesday that everyone in China should be allowed to protest and enjoy freedom of expression, and that Canadians were closely watching the protests against the country’s zero-Covid policy.

 

“Everyone in China should be allowed to express themselves, should be allowed to share their perspectives and indeed protest,” Trudeau said. “We’re going to continue to ensure that China knows we’ll stand up for human rights, we’ll stand with people who are expressing themselves.”

 

Discontent with China’s stringent Covid prevention strategy three years into the pandemic has ignited into protests in cities across the country, in the biggest wave of civil disobedience since the country’s leader, Xi Jinping, took power a decade ago.

 

Chinese authorities have been seeking out people who gathered at weekend protests, some who were at the Beijing demonstrations told Reuters. The number of people who have been detained at the demonstrations and in follow-up police actions is not known.

 

China’s foreign ministry says rights and freedoms must be exercised within the framework of the law.

 

Police were out in force in Beijing and Shanghai on Tuesday to prevent further protests against pandemic restrictions that have disrupted the lives of millions, damaged the economy and briefly led to rare calls for Xi to step down.

 

Hugh Yu, who says he participated in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and now lives in Canada, called on Canadians and the Canadian government to speak out against China’s actions. “A lot of people don’t want to die in silence,” he said of protesters in China. “I don’t want to stand here and speak to you guys. But I have no choice.”

 

On Tuesday, China sent university students home and flooded streets with police in an attempt to disperse the most widespread anti-government protests in decades, as the country’s top security body called for a crackdown on “hostile forces”. In an apparent effort to tackle anger at the zero-Covid policies, authorities also announced plans to step up vaccination of older people.

 

Such a move is a vital precursor to loosening controls without mass deaths or overwhelming the health system in a country where there is almost no natural immunity to Covid, after nearly three years of trying to eliminate the virus. China has not yet approved mRNA vaccines, proven to be more effective, for public use.

 

National health officials said on Tuesday that China would respond to “urgent concerns” raised by the public and that Covid rules should be implemented more flexibly, according to each region’s conditions.

 

Hours later in Zhengzhou, the site of a Foxconn factory that makes Apple iPhones and has been the scene of worker unrest, officials announced the “orderly” resumption of business, including at supermarkets, gyms and restaurants. However, they also published a long list of buildings that would remain under lockdown.

 

On Wednesday, health authorities in Shanghai ordered subordinate units to stockpile at least 60 days’ worth of anti-epidemic materials, prompting rumours of a pending return to the lengthy lockdown the city was under from March until June. Shanghai Disneyland was closed again on Tuesday, only four days after reopening following a Covid-related shutdown.

 

In a sign of official concern, the Communist party’s central political and legal affairs commission, which oversees all domestic law enforcement in China, met on Tuesday. Its members blamed “infiltration and sabotage” by “hostile forces” and called for a crackdown, according to a readout of a meeting in the state news agency Xinhua.

 

Residents of at least one compound in Guangzhou were allegedly told by building managers that Taiwanese and American-paid trolls had “infiltrated the homeowner [chat] groups of various residential areas, inciting the people to resist the epidemic prevention policy”.

 

Screenshots of the message, seen by the Guardian, warned against attending any protests and urged people to report any neighbours making inflammatory remarks to national security agencies. A resident of that compound said friends elsewhere in the city had received the same message.

 

Chinese authorities often blame discontent on “foreign forces”, although the claim is likely to be shrugged off by many people in China frustrated by the fierce restrictions deployed to try to keep Covid out of the country. One weekend protest video showed a sarcastic crowd asking whether accusations about “foreign forces” referred to Marx and Engels, the fathers of communism, whose works still feature on the Chinese syllabus.

 

The protests appear to have blindsided authorities. The foreign ministry spokesperson, Zhao Lijian, a champion of hyper-aggressive “wolf-warrior” diplomacy, was rendered briefly speechless on Tuesday by a question about whether the government would consider changing course on Covid after the demonstrations.

 

China’s zero-Covid policy has helped keep case numbers lower than those of the US and other major countries, but global health experts including the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) increasingly say it is unsustainable. China dismissed the remarks as irresponsible.

 

Beijing needs to make its approach “very targeted” to reduce economic disruption, the head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) told the Associated Press in an interview on Tuesday. “We see the importance of moving away from massive lockdowns,” said the IMF managing director, Kristalina Georgieva, in Berlin. “So that targeting allows to contain the spread of Covid without significant economic costs.”

 

Economists and health experts, however, warn that Beijing cannot relax controls that keep most travellers out of China until tens of millions of older people are vaccinated. They say that means zero-Covid controls might not end for another year.

Guangzhou announces easing of restrictions as China tries to quell COVID...

Meghan's racism claims 'validated' after William's godmother resigns

Analysis: Keir Starmer attacks Rishi Sunak on privilege and weakness

The Daily Climate Show: Water company fines directed back into environment

Prince William's godmother quits after asking guest 'where in Africa are you from?'


Prince William’s godmother quits palace over comments to black charity boss

 

Former lady-in-waiting to queen issues apology after Ngozi Fulani questioned over where her ‘people’ came from

 



Caroline Davies and Hannah Summers

Wed 30 Nov 2022 16.18 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/nov/30/buckingham-palace-aide-resigns-black-guest-traumatised-by-repeated-questioning

 

The late queen’s lady-in-waiting has resigned and apologised after a black guest at a reception hosted by the queen consort was left feeling traumatised and violated after she questioned her repeatedly about where she “really came from”.

 

Ngozi Fulani, the founder of the charity Sistah Space, claimed Susan Hussey moved her hair to reveal her name badge and persistently questioned her over where her “people” came from, despite having been told she was a British national.

 

The Prince of Wales, who is Lady Hussey’s godson, said the comments were unacceptable and that “racism has no place in our society”.

 

The encounter on Tuesday at a violence against women and girls reception was witnessed by two other women: Mandu Reid, the leader of the Women’s Equality party, who is of mixed heritage, and another black female charity representative.

 

Hussey, 83, the widow of the former BBC chair Sir Marmaduke Hussey, had recently been appointed one of the ladies of the household. She is a close friend of the king. Her daughter, Katherine Brooke, has just been appointed as one of Camilla’s new queen’s companions.

 

Buckingham Palace described the remarks as “unacceptable and deeply regrettable”. Hussey has offered her “profound apologies” for hurt caused and resigned her honorary position with immediate effect.

 

Fulani wrote on Twitter: “Mixed feelings about yesterday’s visit to Buckingham Palace. 10 mins after arriving, a member of staff, Lady SH, approached me, moved my hair to see my name badge. The conversation below took place. The rest of the event is a blur.”

 

She then described the conversation:

 

Lady SH: Where are you from?

 

Me: Sistah Space.

 

SH: No, where do you come from?

 

Me: We’re based in Hackney.

 

SH: No, what part of Africa are YOU from?

 

Advertisement

 

Me: I don’t know, they didn’t leave any records.

 

SH: Well, you must know where you’re from, I spent time in France. Where are you from?

 

Me: Here, UK

 

SH: NO, but what Nationality are you?

 

Me: I am born here and am British.

 

SH: No, but where do you really come from, where do your people come from?

 

Me: ‘My people’, lady, what is this?

 

SH: Oh I can see I am going to have a challenge getting you to say where you’re from. When did you first come here?

 

Me: Lady! I am a British national, my parents came here in the 50s when …

 

SH: Oh, I knew we’d get there in the end, you’re Caribbean!

 

Me: No Lady, I am of African heritage, Caribbean descent and British nationality.

 

SH: Oh, so you’re from …”

 

Buckingham Palace said: “We take this incident extremely seriously and have investigated immediately to establish the full facts. In this instance unacceptable and deeply regrettable comments have been made. We have reached out to Ngozi Fulani on this matter, and we are inviting her to discuss all elements of her experience in person if she wishes.

 

“In the meantime, the individual concerned would like to express her profound apologies for the hurt caused and has stepped aside from her honorary role with immediate effect.”

 

The comments were condemned widely on Twitter. Replying to messages of support, Fulani tweeted: “I think it is essential to acknowledge that trauma has occurred and being invited and then insulted has caused much damage.

 

She wrote: “There was nobody to report it to. I couldn’t report it to the Queen Consort, plus it was such a shock to me and the 2 other women we were stunned into temporary silence. I just stood at the edge of the room, smiled & engaged briefly, with those who spoke to me until I could leave.”

 

She added: “It was such a struggle to stay in a space you were violated in.”

 

She told the Guardian the first “no no” was Hussey moving her hair.

 

“Here I am in this place as part of the 16 days of activism, experiencing non-physical violence – you feel like you have the right to approach me, put your hand in my hair and insist I don’t have the right to British nationality. In a space like that, what do you do?”

 

She said she had “never felt so unwelcome or so uncomfortable”.

 

She said: “I was almost forced to say that I’m not really British. I don’t know what she meant by ‘my people’. It was incomprehensible for her to consider that I have British citizenship. When she heard my parents were from the Caribbean she said: ‘Finally we are getting somewhere’ … It was overt racism.

 

Of Hussey’s resignation, she said: “It’s tragic for me that it has ended that way. I would have preferred that she had been spoken to or re-educated.”

 

Reid, who witnessed the encounter, said it left the three women “shell-shocked”. They were invited as guests, she said. “We were made to feel in a way like trespassers.

 

“It was pretty shocking, because we didn’t feel welcome. We didn’t feel that we belonged. We felt our legitimacy in a way was challenged and questioned. It’s the last thing I’d expect when I have been invited.”

 

She suggested the palace household could benefit from cultural competency training of the sort run by Sistah Space. “You can’t, on the one hand, wang on about the Commonwealth and embracing the Commonwealth family, and yet people like us, the three of us, are treated as if we don’t belong.”

 

Describing it as an example of “institutional racism”, she said: “They have to take responsibility for it.They’ve got to show leadership. Not only in their own realm, but they have to take leadership for the country and for the Commonwealth they claim to preside over.”

 

She said: “It’s about the culture within the institution of the royal family. We’ve got a new king now who has a chance to actually signal that he wants to do something better, to do something different.”

 

It is not the first time the royal institution has faced claims of racism. In their interview with Oprah Winfrey, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex made claims of racism against the family, which were denied by Prince William.