sábado, 31 de dezembro de 2022

Fireworks frustrating authorities after two-year pandemic ban

 



SATURDAY, 31 DECEMBER 2022 - 09:50

https://nltimes.nl/2022/12/31/fireworks-frustrating-authorities-two-year-pandemic-ban

 

Fireworks frustrating authorities after two-year pandemic ban

After a two-year ban due to the pandemic, fireworks can be set off again on New Year's Eve. While the fireworks industry expects to sell 10 percent more legal fireworks than in 2019, police and unions are particularly concerned about heavy illegal firecrackers. Twelve municipalities are also preparing to impose a total ban at the turn of the year.

 

In Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Schiedam, Nijmegen and Apeldoorn for instance, fireworks are not allowed to set off at all. The capital sees enforcement as a "major challenge" due to limited police capacity. In Rotterdam however, special enforcement officers monitor compliance with the ban on setting off fireworks. In Heumen, on the border between Gelderland and Limburg, and in neighboring Mook and Middelaar, where a ban also applies, a security service carries out checks at the turn of the year.

 

In addition to enforcing the regulations, the municipalities also want to encourage people in other ways not to set off fireworks. For example, New Year's celebrations have been organized in several cities, but the predicted bad weather with strong winds threatens to put a stop to the festivities.

 

In Apeldoorn, one of the three planned shows, the drone light show at Zuiderpark, was canceled as well as firework shows in the Hague and Zoetermeer. In Amsterdam and Rotterdam however, a decision will be made on Saturday whether the parties planned there can go ahead.

 

The police claimed they have an "uncertain" feeling about the upcoming New Year. "It remains a beautiful and special evening, but my heart goes out to the thousands of officers who will take to the streets," said Peije de Meij, New Year's Eve coordinator at the police. He anticipates a "violent" New Year's Eve.

 

In the past two years, the general fireworks ban imposed in connection with the coronavirus crisis resulted in fewer arrests and incidents than in previous years. Police advocated for a ban on fireworks for some time. "But ultimately it remains a political decision," De Meij explained.

 

Furthermore, the police is concerned about the strength of fireworks and that emergency personnel are being pelted with them. "Unacceptable," De Meij said. In his opinion, things don't go wrong in more places. "But where it goes wrong, it goes wrong even more violently. For example, because these heavy illegal fireworks are thrown at emergency workers.”

 

The Dutch Police Union (NPB) signaled that more and heavier illegal fireworks were sold this year. "We hope it will be a folk festival, but it could turn into a battle," chairman Jan Struijs expressed his concerns about the upcoming New Year's Eve. For instance, investigating authorities have already seized three times as many fireworks this year as last year.

 

Reporting by ANP

Three-quarters of the Dutch think that polarization is increasing

 


Three-quarters of the Dutch think that polarization is increasing

Search within Social and Cultural Planning Office

News item | 29-12-2022 | 00:01

https://www.scp.nl/actueel/nieuws/2022/12/29/ergernis-over-harde-toon-en-extreme-uitingen-in-politieke-en-publieke-debat

 

Annoyance at harsh tone and extreme expressions in political and public debate

 

A large majority of the Dutch are worried about polarization. They think of deteriorated manners and hardening in the political and public debate. They are also annoyed by expressions that they experience as extreme or radical. This is evident from research by the Social and Cultural Planning Office (SCP) that appears today. In their immediate environment, people experience less polarization than in politics and in (social) media. In order not to increase the feeling that groups of people are opposed to each other, it is important to pay attention to the tone in the political debate and to focus on the content.

 

Many people are worried about the way of living together in our country. This edition of the Continuous Survey on Citizen Perspectives (COB) shows that three-quarters of the Dutch think that differences of opinion on social issues are increasing. However, scientific research contradicts that view: on many subjects there is more agreement than people think and differences in views do not grow. In the way of living together, the Dutch also see things going well. For example, they cite mutual helpfulness as a strong point. Two-thirds also think that other people can be trusted.

 

Harsher tone and sharp expressions

The group discussions and surveys that the SCP conducted for this research show that people's concerns about polarisation are mainly about the manners in the political and social debate. They mention the harsh tone of the debate, not listening well to each other and sticking to their own right. In addition, it appears that many people are annoyed by extreme expressions in their eyes. People experience that especially small groups with a harsh tone demand and receive a lot of attention, including in the media. They sometimes understand groups that make themselves heard because they are disadvantaged or because they are not listened to. Yet for many people impatience and annoyance about strongly expressed opinions and harsh protest actions prevail.

 

Less polarization in one's own living environment

While the polarization and hardening in the political debate and on (social) media are widely felt, the experiences in one's own living environment are variable. People indicate that this is because they usually surround themselves with like-minded people. In addition, one often avoids discussions with friends, family and colleagues about difficult issues in order to avoid conflicts. It does matter who and what it is about. If someone is personally touched by a topic, it is more difficult to avoid the discussion about it. For example, about racism, LGBTIQ+ rights or nitrogen. People in majority positions can often more easily afford to withdraw from the debate on such issues. Corona was an exception to this: it affected everyone and discussions about vaccination have also caused tensions in the personal circle.

 

Impact on social cohesion and democracy

Strong images of polarization are not without consequences. A polarized society — whether it's actually that way or perceived by people — can fuel perceived hostility between political opponents. This may, in the long run, affect social cohesion and the functioning of democracy. That is why it is important to avoid a harsh tone and hostile attitude in the political debate and to focus on the content. In addition, both media and politics would do well not to immediately call disagreements polarization. After all, differences in opinions and opinions are always there and are part of a democracy. However, emphasizing contradictions can unnecessarily magnify differences.


 

Has the war in Ukraine changed Russia? - BBC News

Economic ‘mega threats’ – star economist Nouriel Roubini on the dangers ...

What were the best good news stories from around the world in 2022? | DW...

The World in 2023: Russia's Ukraine invasion, Europe's energy scramble, ...

Republicans' House win set to BACKFIRE in stunning reversal

UN vote on Israel's occupation 'a victory,' say Palestinians • FRANCE 24...

Watch All In With Chris Hayes Highlights: Dec. 30

Watch The 11th Hour Highlights: Dec. 30

CNN correspondent says Trump’s tax returns appear to reflect a ‘major failure’ from the IRS

Trump taxes show foreign income from more than a dozen countries

 


TAX

Trump taxes show foreign income from more than a dozen countries

 

While Trump surrendered day-to-day control of his business empire, his sons continued to make deals around the globe that Trump benefited from.

 

By BERNIE BECKER and BENJAMIN GUGGENHEIM

12/30/2022 03:29 PM EST

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/30/trump-taxes-foreign-income-00075872

 

Donald Trump’s tax returns show the former president received income from more than a dozen countries during his time in office, highlighting a string of potential conflicts of interest.

 

Trump’s returns, which were made public by House Democrats on Friday after a lengthy legal fight, disclosed income from 2015 to 2020 from a wide range of foreign countries, including Canada, Panama, the Caribbean island of Saint Martin, the Philippines, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom, among others.

 

While the documents did not provide details on the money flows, Trump owns golf courses in Scotland and Ireland, and his name has adorned luxury hotels from Panama to Canada.

 

The former president was known for fusing his business interests with America’s highest public office, drawing allegations of using his role to promote his private resorts, direct federal money to his hotels and encourage foreign governments to spend money that would directly benefit the Trump family interests.

 

His far-flung concerns, foreign and domestic, are nested in more than 400 separate business entities. A 2019 report by the watchdog group OpenSecrets said he had more than $130 million in assets in more than 30 countries.

 

The six years of tax returns disclosed Friday show that Trump received extensive income from Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom — including gross business income of at least $35.3 million from Canada in 2017, the year he entered office.

 

That year, Trump also brought in $6.5 million from China, $5.8 million from Indonesia and $5.7 million from India.

 

By 2020, his last full year in office, Trump reported $8.8 million in income from the U.K. and another $3.9 million in Ireland.

 

It’s not a surprise that Trump continued to receive money from foreign interests while he was president. While he handed over day-to-day operation of his business empire to his children, he still kept ownership.

 

Trump’s sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, made deals around the globe while their father was president.

 

At the same time, previous leaks of the former president’s tax returns to The New York Times and required annual disclosure forms also showed that the Trumps had ties to more autocratic countries, including Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The Biggest Loser of 2022 Was Elon Musk's Bank Account

Elon Musk Jumps Into Andrew Tate Drama with BIZARRE Tweet About The Matrix

How to Destroy a Brand, Musk Style

 


Paul Krugman

OPINION

How to Destroy a Brand, Musk Style

Dec. 30, 2022

.



Paul Krugman

By Paul Krugman

Opinion Columnist

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/30/opinion/elon-musk-tesla-democrats.html

 

True story: When I won the Nobel Prize in 2008, Princeton quickly set up a special event on campus and reserved a parking space for me in front of Robertson Hall. But when I drove up in my 2004 Jetta, the security people frantically tried to wave me away. They clearly didn’t find it plausible that a laureate would be driving such a modest car.

 

I’m still driving that car today.

 

The point is that I’m not one of those people who cares much about what he drives. (No doubt I act out my egotism in other ways.) But many people do, in fact, use their cars to symbolize their status — indeed, their identity.

 

There’s no point being censorious. Conspicuous consumption is a very human thing, going back as far as civilization itself. Over time, however, the form has changed. These days it’s relatively hard to tell how rich people are by the clothes they wear, which gives other status markers like cars a more important role. Also, in modern times people use consumer goods to display their values as well as their wealth. A fancy pickup truck sends one kind of message; a Tesla sends another.

 

And yes, speaking of Tesla, today’s newsletter is partly about Elon Musk.

 

As I wrote in my last newsletter, the main reason to believe that Tesla’s huge market value doesn’t make sense has little to do with Musk’s antics at Twitter. The problem instead is that Tesla’s dominance of the electric vehicle market is already fading as we speak, so the company is unlikely to generate the kind of extraordinary long-term profits that would justify its stock price.

 

That said, Musk has indeed been acting very oddly — and in ways that seem almost perfectly calculated to drive away his best customers.

 

After all, what does it mean to buy a Tesla? It’s a luxury car, but there are other luxury cars. What’s special about a Tesla is that it’s an electric, zero-emission luxury car — one that purports to be a glitzy ride to a sustainable future.

 

Also, until just the other day, Musk himself was widely seen as a cool guy. And cool in a futuristic sense: His company sends rockets into outer space; he was living with a popular musician who released an album inspired by the science-fiction novel “Dune” (a book that, by the way, was recently made into a terrific movie).

 

So what message was someone sending by driving a Tesla? Basically — I don’t think I’m being unfair — it was: “I’m rich but I’m woke.” Mock that stance all you like, but it really did increase Tesla sales. And it means that many Tesla buyers are probably also Democrats.

 

I’m not just guessing here. The other day a friend of mine who writes under the nom de internet Invictus used New York State data to compare county-level political leanings with Tesla registrations. Sure enough, in 2020, counties that voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump — they do exist, even in New York — purchased far fewer Teslas per capita than those that voted overwhelmingly for Joe Biden.

 

Charles Gaba, known, among other things, for his documentation of the correlation between political leanings and vaccination status, has replicated these results for several states. Here, for example, is what it looks like in California:

 

To delve a bit deeper, here’s a comparison — using data from Invictus and the American Community Survey — between Steuben County, a very Trumpy area southeast of Buffalo, and Westchester County, a wealthy and very Democratic New York suburb that includes Scarsdale:

 

So, yes, there are a lot of Teslas in Westchester, hardly any in Steuben. To some extent this may reflect the fact that people in Westchester have more income. But despite what you sometimes hear about the parties reversing class roles lately, Americans with incomes over $100,000 still vote Republican by a fairly large margin. What has reversed is the educational divide: College graduates have become a Democratic bloc, which supports the view that what we might call the Tesla divide is also linked to the culture war. And Westchester has far more college graduates than Steuben does.

 

Tesla, then, is a brand whose customer base largely consists of wealthy cultural liberals who were attracted in part by Elon Musk’s perceived with-it persona. Given all that, Musk’s public embrace of MAGA conspiracy theories is an almost inconceivably bad marketing move, practically designed to alienate his main buyers. What’s going on?

 

To a large extent Musk may simply be revealing who he always was — basically, a typical technology oligarch. In general, authoritarian instincts and contempt for the little people are a lot more prevalent among the Silicon Valley elite than people realized when information technology still felt cool.

 

Even among his class, however, Musk stands out for his lack of impulse control. This was obvious, if you paid attention, long before he bought Twitter. More than four years have passed since he called a cave rescuer who rejected Musk’s offer of a mini-submarine a “pedo guy.”

 

Furthermore, Musk’s behavior is becoming even more bizarre. (A favorite line of mine is that people get worse as they grow older because they become more like themselves.) Since when do captains of industry respond to random critics by mocking their imagined anatomies?

 

Now, as I wrote in my last newsletter, Tesla was probably headed for a fall eventually, even if Musk had been who his fans imagined him to be; the economics of the electric vehicle business just aren’t conducive to long-term market domination. But Musk might have been able to postpone the day of reckoning, at least for a while, if he had managed to hide who he was from his best customers a little longer.

 

Paul Krugman has been an Opinion columnist since 2000 and is also a distinguished professor at the City University of New York Graduate Center. He won the 2008 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his work on international trade and economic geography. @PaulKrugman

Elon Musk’s Twitter leadership is ‘a Nightmare on Elm Street — doesn’t end’: Analyst

Tesla CEO Elon Musk tells workers not to worry about 'stock market craziness'

The 2022 High School Yearbook of American Politics

 


OPINION

MICHELLE COTTLE

The 2022 High School Yearbook of American Politics

Dec. 30, 2022

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/30/opinion/kevin-mccarthy-george-santos-donald-trump.html

 


Michelle Cottle

By Michelle Cottle

Ms. Cottle is a member of the editorial board.

 

It wasn’t exactly a feel-good year. With brutal inflation, the war in Ukraine, periodic pandemic surges, gun massacres and the Supreme Court’s ruling that women do not have a right to bodily autonomy, 2022 had its dark spots. Then again, we avoided a presidential impeachment, and no one stormed the Capitol trying to overthrow the government. So that was a step up. Plus, Sarah Palin lost her House race. Twice.

 

As always, at every step there were political players and events that stood out from the general chaos in ways good, bad and bizarre. It is once again time to recognize these special few.

 

Most Egregious Nepo Couple

Clarence & Ginni Thomas

With the Trump clan out of the White House, this category was competitive once more. But ultimately the Thomases pulled the win, in part as a lifetime achievement award. While the Jan. 6 hearings cast a fresh spotlight on the conflicts between Ginni’s wing-nut activism and her husband’s role as neutral arbiter of the law, she has been riding his robetails for decades.

 

Best New Imaginary Government Agency

Nancy Pelosi’s “Gazpacho Police”

Tomato, tomahto. Gestapo, gazpacho. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene may not be much of a legislator, but that gal is one heckuva creative linguist.

 

Most Expensive Midlife Crisis

Elon Musk

The standard cliché is for an aging man to buy an expensive sports car. But what if he already owns a company that makes expensive sports cars? Mr. Musk opted to drop $44 billion on a social media platform he has no clue how to run in an effort to paint himself as a free-speech crusader. All he has achieved thus far is to fuel rumors of Twitter’s demise, damage Tesla and convince much of the world that he is less mad genius than narcissistic ass. Well played.

 

Biggest Winner

Ron DeSantis

Florida’s governor romped to re-election, capturing even the traditionally blue Miami region. With national Republicans drooling all over him, Mr. DeSantis is perfectly positioned to run for the Big Chair in 2024. The ever-looming question: What is Donald Trump going to do about it?

 

Biggest Loser

Donald Trump

His legal troubles are piling up. He backed a bunch of losers in the midterms. That upstart DeSantis is eating into his presidential polling numbers. And his fancy new NFT trading cards have been widely mocked. In a word: sad.

 

Biggest Electoral X Factor

The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision

By overturning Roe v. Wade, the conservative justices made abortion a red-hot campaign topic that mobilized pro-choice voters and damaged Republicans in the midterms. Here’s hoping this is the start of an electoral trend.

 

Most Likely to Wind Up a Tin-Pot Dictator

Kari Lake

The Republican contender for governor of Arizona looked so promising as a next-generation MAGA demagogue. She had the charisma, the media savvy, the antidemocratic tendencies, the love of conspiracy theories and a loose relationship with the truth. But she lost, and her claims of voter fraud are going nowhere fast. Time to see if Tucker Carlson needs a co-host?

 

Most Outrageous Political Stunt

Migrants on Martha’s Vineyard

Was Ron DeSantis’s flying a group of hapless migrants to this playground of the rich and famous cruel and sketchy? Absolutely. But it also drew public attention to the border crisis and outraged blue-state America, both of which served his purposes.

 

Most Impressive Survivor

Brian Kemp

Georgia’s governor not only prevailed against Donald Trump’s crusade to unseat him but also emerged with his brand enhanced. Victory and vindication have rarely smelled sweeter.

 

Most Stylish Exit

Nancy Pelosi

After 19 years herding the Democratic cats, America’s first female speaker and perennial badass is passing the leadership torch. The House is unlikely to produce a leader even half as effective any time soon.

 

Top Con Man

George Santos — if that’s even his real name

Pick a campaign claim by the representative-elect from New York’s Third Congressional District, and chances are it was false. Veteran of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs? Nope. Beleaguered landlord with 13 properties? Nope. College grad? Nope. Lost four employees in the Pulse nightclub shooting? Nope. Mysteries remain. There is an ongoing debate about his claiming to be Jewish — or was it Jew-ish? And it’s still unclear how, with a long trail of unpaid debts, he was in a position to loan his campaign $700,000. Even in a Republican Party trained to embrace “alternative facts,” this guy is testing the limits.

 

Best Reality Show

The Jan. 6 committee hearings

There may have been only two Republican lawmakers on the House panel, but there was a whole host of Republican consultants, lawyers and former officials on the witness list. And these folks had many disturbing things to say about Donald Trump’s scheming to overturn the 2020 election. Like some dystopian “Schoolhouse Rock!” video, the proceedings offered an extended civics lesson in how not to run a democracy.

 

Most Likely to Appear in a Future Season of ‘White Lotus’

Donald Trump Jr. and his bride-to-be, Kimberly Guilfoyle

Of course, the real genius would be to set the whole season at Mar-a-Lago, co-starring Javanka, Melania and the rest.

 

Best Electoral Joke

Dr. Oz

One word: Crudité.

 

Worst Electoral Joke

Herschel Walker

A guy who is accused by multiple women of abusive or threatening behavior (much of which he denies); revealed to have apparently semisecret kids; alleged to have paid for women to have abortions (which he also denies) — despite his anti-abortion politics — and seems to lie as casually as most folks breathe should never have been a serious contender for the Senate. Full stop.

 

Least Surprising Electoral Outcome

Florida going red.

 

Most Surprising Electoral Outcome

New York going red.

 

Biggest Political Gambler

Kyrsten Sinema

It’s one thing to be a perennial burr in your party’s backside. It’s quite another to quit the party and try to go it alone as an independent. Even in a politically quirky place like Arizona, the electoral system is not kind to third-party players.

 

Most Underestimated

Joe Biden. Again.

This year’s policy wins included the CHIPS Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, the first major gun safety legislation in decades, an overhaul of the Electoral Count Act and a law to protect same-sex and interracial marriage. As promised, he put the first Black woman on the Supreme Court. And, as the midterms heated up, he kept his head down as the Republicans’ red wave shrank to more of a pink dribble. You have to give the boring, moderate, pragmatic old guy his due.

 

Best Political Euphemism

A tie!

The Republican National Committee pooh-poohing the Jan. 6 insurgency as “legitimate political discourse” looked tough to beat. But then came election season, and “candidate quality” roared into contention as the Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell’s martini-dry nod to his party’s weak Senate field.

 

Most Likely to Have a Miserable 2023

Hunter Biden

The new Republican House majority has one aim for the next Congress: paralyze the Biden administration with investigations. The president’s son Hunter makes for a juicy target. Expect Hunter and his infamous laptop to be the pet topic of Ms. Taylor Greene et al for the foreseeable future.

 

Runner-up

Kevin McCarthy

With Republicans’ super-skinny House majority, the next speaker will need to spend a painful amount of time sucking up to the conference’s lunatic fringe. Mr. McCarthy desperately wants the gig, but his best hope for a bearable 2023 might be to lose the speaker’s race. Would that be humiliating? Sure. But it would almost certainly be less scarring than trying to wrangle all the wing nuts.

 

Stupidest Faux Outrage

Tucker Carlson

His freak-out over the rise of “less sexy” M&M mascots. Yep. You read that right.

 

Best Karmic Smackdown

Alex Jones

He was ordered to pay nearly $1.5 billion to the Sandy Hook families (and an F.B.I. agent) whom he has spent years tormenting with crackpot claims that the 2012 mass shooting was a hoax.

 

Cringiest Hitler Fanboy

Ye

The rap star formerly known as Kanye West has been flirting with antisemitism for a while. But he really upped his game in early December, when, in a sit-down with Alex Jones, he shared his affection for Hitler and the Nazis — while wearing a bondage hood, no less.

 

Most Shameless Christmas Grift

The aforementioned NFT trading cards that Donald Trump rolled out this holiday season for the low, low price of $99!

 

Happy New Year to all our winners — and to all the rest of us who endured the entire political circus.

 

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

 

Michelle Cottle is a member of the Times editorial board, focusing on U.S. politics. She has covered Washington and politics since the Clinton administration. @mcottle

Dame Vivienne Westwood: Fashion icon dies aged 81


Obituary

Dame Vivienne Westwood obituary

Fashion designer who from punk origins created an international brand with a dissident edge

 

Veronica Horwell

Fri 30 Dec 2022 13.18 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2022/dec/30/dame-vivienne-westwood-obituary

 

No fashion designer ever had a Paris show like the one staged by Vivienne Westwood in 1991. Although she was by then 50 and had been making clothes for sale for 20 years – and the British Fashion Council had named her designer of the year – she stitched much of that collection on her own sewing machine in her shabby south London flat, hand-finishing it in the van that transported her, and the models, to France, where the couturier Azzedine Alaïa had invited her to guest-show. Despite those limitations, the collection was a major success.

 

The life of Westwood, who has died aged 81, was like that, both rackety and responsible. She went on behaving as an eternal student, although she had dropped out after one term at Harrow Art School because, as a working-class teen, she had no idea how to make a living from art. She was candid with biographers and interviewers that her real, worldly education came from relationships, usually with men for whom she was the practical back-up, paying the bills or totting up the till receipts.

 

Westwood handcrafted the rips in her punk gear; when she was appointed OBE in 1992, she went to Buckingham Palace in a finely tailored suit, but wore no knickers beneath. She never had any intention of becoming an international designer – running her own market stall would have been enough – let alone Dame Vivienne Westwood, eminence and brand, “dowager empress of the west”, as she was known in China. It had all been one pragmatic response after another to chance and exigency.

 

She was born in Tintwistle, just outside the mill town of Glossop, Derbyshire, the daughter of Dora (nee Ball) and Gordon Swire. Her father was a factory worker; her mother had been in the mills and appreciated a length of good wool worsted – although everything was in short supply during Viv’s childhood. Her education at Glossop grammar school ended in 1958, when the Swires saved enough to buy a little post office business in London, and moved to Harrow. Viv soon left her art school course, frustrated that it prohibited sewing. Her own style was beehive hair, pencil skirts, stiletto heels – all the music-allied experiments of London’s first teen generation.

 

She became a primary school teacher and in 1962 married Derek Westwood, a toolmaker with ambitions, which he achieved, to be an airline pilot. Their son, Ben, was born in 1963, but the couple separated soon after, divorcing in 1966. She returned to her parents, and began to make jewellery for a stall in Portobello Road.

 

Among those sharing a rented flat with her brother, Gordon, was a charismatic art student, Malcolm McLaren. Westwood and her son moved in, too, and she became McLaren’s first girlfriend, soon pregnant with their son, Joe, who was born in 1967 – but only, Westwood claimed, after she had decided against an abortion and spent the money on a cashmere sweater instead.

 

McLaren, far into situationist politics of consumption and display, fizzed around the leftist landscape, trying to reach Paris in revolutionary 1968, while Westwood and her sons decamped to live in her parents’ holiday caravan. When McLaren wooed her back, they moved to a small, worn flat in an art deco block off Clapham Common, to a life neither romantic nor domestic.

 

Their first collaboration was flogging vintage rock records, as McLaren promoted music, and when they were left with unsold T-shirts from a concert, Westwood reworked and embellished them as fashion. Her original ideas about appearance came out of an instinctive understanding of the early, brief, sexual appeal society traditionally permitted to working-class women. As she told her biographer Ian Kelly, they were “people who’ve had a harder life and more dramatic experience … the poor have the status … of having more experience”. Gabrielle (Coco) Chanel had had a similar revelation around 1918.

 

In the late 60s, No 430 Kings Road, located just where Chelsea swerves towards Fulham, had been the cartoony Mr Freedom boutique, before being let to a fading jeans store, where McLaren began selling his records at the back. In 1971 Westwood borrowed £100 from her mother and rented the whole place, contracting a partnership with McLaren, and running up stock on her machine to supplement the bought-in goods. They called it Let It Rock, changed within a year to Too Fast to Live, Too Young to Die, selling biker jackets and Westwood’s tough T-shirts. These she printed with slogans and lewd images, gay and straight; she distressed and adorned them, dyed them in her bath and stitched on chicken bones boiled clean in the kitchen.

 

McLaren, who grasped publicity better than politics, regularly revamped the shop according to the zeitgeist. Its next incarnation was as SEX, in 1974, with Westwood sourcing its stock of rubber fetish-wear through the pages of Exchange & Mart. To promote the business, McLaren and Westwood visited New York, where he got hooked on rough new music, while she was picked up by Andy Warhol’s Factory crowd, a sexy eccentric with hair like a bleached loo brush, who pub-talked radical politics.

 

Back in London, McLaren recruited his own punk band, the Sex Pistols, with Westwood encouraging their creative destruction in music, gigs and clothes. She did claim the credit for some Pistols’ lyrics, but never for punk’s emblematic safety pin, though, as a craftworker, she appreciated all the young punks’ improvisations, their black bin bags and loo chains. SEX morphed into Seditionaries during the Pistols’ short, sensational career, making Westwood spokeswoman for punk at its gobby height in the silver jubilee summer of 1977.

 

The shop’s clothes were attributed to both McLaren and Westwood, although both later furiously disputed ownership of ideas. As Seditionaries drew international attention, it needed stock to be manufactured rather than sourced and worked over, so Westwood found a tailor, cutter, sample machinist, and a few specialist hands, and began producing on a small craft scale. McLaren went full-time into music management.

 

Westwood acknowledged McLaren’s early awareness that clothes were turning fantastic and theatrical, and that he gave her the keywords “romantic” and “pirate”. Further inspiration came from a historical pattern handbook, Norah Waugh’s The Cut of Men’s Clothes, and volumes about art history. This homework provided the basis of her Pirates collection of 1981, saved from being fancy dress by Westwood’s feeling for the erotic potential of period detail. It was her first catwalk collection, shown at Olympia, and sold in 430 Kings Road, which again had been revamped melodramatically and renamed Worlds End; in 1982, Westwood and McLaren tried a second London shop, Nostalgia of Mud. They also began a protracted split that left her without cashflow.

 

Westwood accepted an offer of management from the fashion PR Carlo D’Amario, and they travelled to Italy to seek backing for a label of her own. He showed Westwood, whose parameters had been the Clapham flat and teeny tatty premises in Camden, how Italy managed its high-tech, craft-based production, yet no big deals happened, and they lived as renegades, commissioning sample lines for collections that had guest showings in Paris and Tokyo.

 

Westwood was discovering that her work was known, and admired, more outside Britain than in it. After the economic turmoil of the 1970s, international couture had turned towards ostentation and ready-to-wear towards conservatism, so she was a rare surviving rebel.

 

Nostalgia of Mud closed in 1984, and, still on the run, she staged a 1985 show in New York, the “mini-crini” collection – tutu-skirted, body-fitting clothes, with shoes far madder than the winklepickers she had worn as a teen; Westwood loved platforms, and later elevated them so high that the model Naomi Campbell fell off 9in soles on her catwalk.

 

By this time Westwood was broke, but with practical help and a modest loan from family and friends, reopened the shuttered Worlds End, lit by candles after the electricity was cut off, and easily sold her limited supplies.

 

The Harris tweed, tartan and barathea of her collection of 1987, again sewn in the flat, recalled Glossop’s stout wool stuffs, respecting tradition yet radically cut. Other ideas, such as an 18th-century-style corset bodice with Rigilene plastic instead of whalebones, came from her favourite London museum, the Wallace Collection. Westwood acknowledged the help, too, of her friend Gary Ness, who for years advised her on what to look at and for, and what to read.

 

The Harris tweed and later, far wilder, Brit collections gave Westwood her second, and permanent, fashion identity: London tailoring plus romantic gowns, with a dissident edge, labelled with her logo, a coronation orb circled by Saturn’s rings.

 

Her finances remained unsound. With introductions from rag trade friends, she moved incrementally into bank loans and business funding to pay off the debts of Worlds End, and to buy rather than rent her second shop, in Davies Street, Mayfair. Westwood earned where she could, teaching fashion at the Academy of Applied Arts, Vienna (1989-91), and the Hochschule der Künste, Berlin (from 1993). In the Vienna lecture room, she fell in love with her best student, Andreas Kronthaler. He moved to London, then into her flat, and they married in 1993.

 

Westward’s 1990s Paris shows attracted Italian backers who realised that her core belief in women dressed not as dreams or goddesses but as heroes already had a following in Japan and was building another in China’s then very new market. Over time, her agglomerated business was structured into a global company with headquarters in Battersea, south London. Her own clothing preferences had become a genre in which other staff, especially Kronthaler, could work, and with her encouragement, he showed his first independent collection in 2016. Although Westwood kept the old Clapham flat, she and Kronthaler moved in to a Queen Anne house on the other side of the common.

 

Westwood’s politics, unstoppably advocated, were anti-establishment, whatever the current establishment might be, and settled in the direction of Green party-pro-environmentalism, although there were problems over her company’s tax-related fine for undervaluing its assets, and its corporate tax wriggles. She never resolved the conflict between her personal disapproval of consumerism and fashion’s worsening profligacy. Still, by the time she was made a dame in 2010, she had matured into a national institution.

 

Kronthaler and her sons survive her. Joe, who used his father’s maternal grandmother’s surname, Corré, founded a lingerie business, Agent Provocateur, inspired by his mother’s outrageous bra and corset designs.

 

 Vivienne Isabel Westwood, designer, born 8 April 1941; died 29 December 2022


Vivienne Westwood Interview | Screen Test | The New York Times

Vivienne Westwood on the Wallace Collection

Russia may be readying border closure and new mobilisation order - Ukrainian minister / Ukraine fighting is deadlocked, spy chief Kyrylo Budanov tells BBC

 


5m ago

10.13 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2022/dec/31/russia-ukraine-war-live-ukraine-troops-fighting-fiercest-battles-in-donbas-says-zelenskiy#top-of-blog

 

Russia may be readying border closure and new mobilisation order - Ukrainian minister

 

Russia’s leadership may be preparing a new mobilisation order and could close its border to men within a week, according to Ukraine’s defence minister.

 

Oleksii Reznikov addressed Russian citizens in a video message on Friday. Speaking Russian, he warned people who might qualify for mobilisation. “I know for a fact that you have about one week left before you still have any choice.

 

“In early January, the Russian authorities will close the borders to men, declare martial law, and begin another wave of mobilisation. Borders will also be closed in Belarus.”

 

Reznikov warned that Russians living in cities would be at particular risk.

 

Kryrylo Budanov, the head of Ukraine’s intelligence directorate told the BBC on Friday that Russia’s new mobilisation order would start on 5 January

 


Ukraine fighting is deadlocked, spy chief Kyrylo Budanov tells BBC

 

Kyrylo Budanov told the BBC that the war was at a stalemate

By Hugo Bachega

BBC News, Kyiv

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-64109024

 

Fighting in Ukraine is currently at a deadlock as neither Ukraine nor Russia can make significant advances, the head of the Ukrainian military intelligence agency has said, while Kyiv waits for more advanced weapons from Western allies.

 

"The situation is just stuck," Kyrylo Budanov told the BBC in an interview. "It doesn't move."

 

After Ukrainian troops recaptured the southern city of Kherson in November, most of the fiercest battles have been around Bakhmut, in the eastern Donetsk region. Elsewhere, Russian forces appear to be on the defensive while winter has slowed down the pace of Ukraine's ground operations across the 1,000km (620-mile) front line.

 

Mr Budanov said Russia was "now completely at a dead end" suffering very significant losses, and he believed the Kremlin had decided to announce another mobilisation of conscripts. But, he added, Ukrainian forces still lacked resources to move forward in multiple areas.

 

"We can't defeat them in all directions comprehensively. Neither can they," he said. "We're very much looking forward to new weapons supplies, and to the arrival of more advanced weapons."

 

Earlier this month, after a series of Russian military setbacks, Ukrainian officials warned about the possibility of another ground offensive by Moscow's forces from Belarus at the start of 2023. The push, they said, could include a second attempt to seize the capital, Kyiv, and involve tens of thousands of reservists being trained in Russia.

 

Mr Budanov, however, dismissed Russia's activities in Belarus, including the movement of thousands of troops, as attempts to make Ukraine divert troops from the battlefields in the south and east to the north.

 

Recently, he said, a train loaded with Russian soldiers stopped in a location close to the Belarus-Ukraine border and returned, several hours later, with everyone on board.

 

"They did it openly during the day, so that everyone would see it, even if [we] didn't want to," adding that he saw no real, imminent threat from the troops in Belarus. "As of now, I don't see any signs of preparations for an invasion of Kyiv or northern areas from Belarus."

 

The interview in Mr Budanov's dimly lit office in Kyiv took place days after Russian President Vladimir Putin travelled to the Belarusian capital, Minsk, for the first time in more than three years. His visit raised speculation that he might try to persuade President Alexander Lukashenko, a long-time ally, to send Belarusian troops to Ukraine.

 

Belarus has been used by Russian forces as a launchpad for attacks, but Mr Budanov believes Belarusian society will not support any further involvement in the war and analysts have questioned the level of preparedness of its 48,000-strong army. "That's why President Lukashenko is taking all steps to prevent a disaster for his country," he said.

 

Since retaking Kherson, Ukrainian forces have been engaged in brutal fighting with Russian troops around Bakhmut, in trench warfare that has been compared to World War One. For Russia, capturing the city would disrupt Ukraine's supply lines and open a route for an advance towards other Ukrainian strongholds in the east, including Kramatorsk and Sloviansk.

 

The offensive, Mr Budanov said, was being led by the Wagner Group, a Russian mercenary army. Its founder, Yevgeniy Prigozhin, is believed to want to capture the town as a political prize, amid rivalries between senior Russian officials.

 

Away from the battlefields, Russia has carried out a relentless air campaign since mid-October, targeting Ukraine's critical infrastructure with missiles and drones, leaving millions without electricity, heating and water. Mr Budanov said the strikes were likely to continue, but suggested Russia would not be able to sustain the level of the attacks because of dwindling missile reserves, and the inability of Russian industry to replenish them.

 

Although Iran has provided most of the drones used in Russia's attacks, the spy chief says it has so far refused to deliver missiles to Russia, aware that Western countries are likely to impose measures on Tehran, already under crippling sanctions because of its nuclear programme.

 

The war may be deadlocked for now, but Mr Budanov is adamant that Ukraine will ultimately retake all the territory now under occupation, including Crimea, the peninsula that Russia seized in 2014. He envisages Ukraine returning to its 1991 borders, when independence was declared with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

 

Additional reporting by Hanna Tsyba and Robbie Wright.

Russian troops in Ukraine exempted from income tax

 


From 2h ago

07.40 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2022/dec/31/russia-ukraine-war-live-ukraine-troops-fighting-fiercest-battles-in-donbas-says-zelenskiy

 

Russian troops in Ukraine exempted from income tax

 

Russian authorities have announced that soldiers and state employees deployed in Ukraine will be exempt from income tax, in the latest effort to encourage support for its military operation there.

 

Agence France-Presse reported that the new measure concerned all those fighting in the four Ukrainian territories Russia has declared as its own, although it does not completely control them: Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.

 

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitri Peskov cited an exemption contained in an anti-corruption law, which the Russian authorities published the details of on Thursday evening.

 

Soldiers, police, members of the security services and other state employees serving in the four regions no longer had to supply information on “their income, their expenditure, their assets”, the decree said.

 

The decree also granted them the right to receive “rewards and gifts” if they were of “a humanitarian character” and received as part of the military operation in Ukraine.

 

It applies to the partners and children of those serving, and is back-dated to February 24 2022 – the date Russia invaded Ukraine.

 

The Kremlin has rolled out a series of incentives for Russians to fight in Ukraine, offering cash incentives, banking and property facilities and promising financial aid to families in the case of the death or injury of loved ones.

 

In Russia, soldiers and senior officials close to the country’s military-industrial complex are regularly convicted in corruption cases in which large sums of money have been embezzled.

Ukraine’s latest estimates of Russian losses show another 710 troops killed on 30 December.

 


1h ago

09.01 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2022/dec/31/russia-ukraine-war-live-ukraine-troops-fighting-fiercest-battles-in-donbas-says-zelenskiy

 

Ukraine’s latest estimates of Russian losses show another 710 troops killed on 30 December.

 

The figures, which have not been verified by the Guardian, say nearly 106,000 Russian armed forces members have been killed since the invasion began on 26 February.

 

Another 16 armed personnel vehicles (APVs) were taken out, along with three tanks, six drones and six artillery systems.

 

Russian figures differ, but independent estimates show heavy losses for the Kremlin’s forces.

UK’s problems will not ‘go away’, admits Sunak after ‘tough’ 2022

 


UK’s problems will not ‘go away’, admits Sunak after ‘tough’ 2022

 

Prime minister’s new year message makes no mention of the chaos that has plagued the Tory party in 2022

 

Peter Walker Political correspondent

@peterwalker99

Sat 31 Dec 2022 00.01 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/dec/31/uks-problems-will-not-go-away-admits-sunak-after-tough-2022

 

Rishi Sunak has blamed Covid and the Ukraine war for what he acknowledged had been a “tough” 12 months, and warned in a prime ministerial new year message that the country’s problems will not disappear in 2023.

 

Often taking an openly party political stance, Sunak praised his government’s record and made no mention of the chaos within the Conservative party that contributed to 2022’s difficulties.

 

The year now ending had been tough, the prime minister said in a video address. “Just as we recovered from an unprecedented global pandemic, Russia launched a barbaric and illegal invasion across Ukraine. This has had a profound economic impact around the world, which the UK is not immune to.”

 

Passing over the impact of the disastrous September mini-budget under Liz Truss, one of three Tory prime ministers to serve in 2022, Sunak said the government had “taken difficult but fair decisions to get borrowing and debt under control”.

 

“Three months ago, I stood at the steps of Downing Street and promised I would work relentlessly on the things that matter most to you,” he said. “Since then, this government has taken decisive action to back our NHS with record resources to tackle the backlogs – more funding, more doctors and more nurses.

“We’re also tackling illegal migration and stopping criminals from abusing our asylum system. Now, I’m not going to pretend that all our problems will go away in the new year. But 2023 will give us an opportunity to showcase the very best of Britain on the world stage.”

 

With a general election expected in 2024, Keir Starmer’s new year message also contained clear partisan elements, saying 2023 would be “a new chapter for Britain” with the coronation of King Charles.

 

“We must look forward to that with hope,” the Labour leader said. “But for hope to flourish, Britain needs to change.”

 

During 2023, Starmer said, Labour would “set out the case for change”, including more equal economic growth, a green jobs revolution and what he called “a completely new way of doing politics”, based on trust.

 

Like Sunak and Starmer, Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader, noted the death of Queen Elizabeth II, and along with Starmer he hailed the England women’s football team for their triumph in the Euros.

 

Also saying change was needed in 2023, Davey condemned what he called “political chaos in the Conservative party, inflicting economic chaos on the rest of us.”