A look inside a US child migrant facility - BBC News

Vaccine rollout in EU 'unacceptably slow' says WHO | COVID Update

Dozens feared dead after train derails in Taiwan; rescue efforts continue

Brazil's Bolsonaro says he is not politicizing the military after shakeup

Dr. Osterholm: Clearly We Are In Another Surge Of Virus Cases | Morning ...

Derek Chauvin trial: police chief to testify against former officer in 'remarkable move'

 

Derek Chauvin trial: police chief to testify against former officer in 'remarkable move'

 

Chief Medaria Arradondo’s testimony over George Floyd’s death may be unprecedented, experts say

 

Oliver Laughland

@oliverlaughland

Fri 2 Apr 2021 11.00 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/02/george-floyd-derek-chauvin-trial-police-chief-testimony

 

As the prosecutor Jerry Blackwell addressed the jury for the first time in the murder trial of Derek Chauvin last week, he reeled off a list of witnesses expected to testify: from eyewitnesses who watched as the former officer held his knee on George Floyd’s neck for nine minutes and 29 seconds, to forensic pathologists, use of force experts and members of the Minneapolis police department.

 

Among the most significant on this long list was the most senior member of that department, Chief Medaria Arradondo.

 

It is, of course, rare for an officer-involved death to make it to criminal trial, but it is rarer still – perhaps unprecedented, experts say – for a police chief to testify against one of their own former officers.

 

Arradondo’s testimony is likely to be a powerful weapon in the prosecution’s case as the defense will attempt to argue that Derek Chauvin’s protracted use of a knee-to-neck restraint was in line with use of force guidance.

 

“It’s a pretty remarkable move on the part of the prosecution,” said Dr Cedric Alexander, the former police chief and public safety director of DeKalb county, Georgia.

 

He added: “It’s very rare that you’re going to see a chief either appear for the defense or the prosecution. But each one of these kinds of events brings its own set of circumstances. And in this particular case, where you have a knee to the neck and it’s being questioned ‘was that trained technique?’ To be able to have the chief of police… to under oath testify is clearly going to be of importance.”

 

Although a spokesperson for the Minneapolis police department would not comment on the nature of the chief’s testimony, Blackwell made clear in his opening statement that Arradondo was not likely to pull his punches.

 

“He is going to tell you that Mr Chauvin’s conduct was not consistent with Minneapolis police department training,” Blackwell said. “He will not mince any words. He’s very clear. He will be very decisive, that this was excessive force.”

 

A unanimous decision is needed to convict Chauvin on any of the three counts he faces, of second degree murder, third degree murder and manslaughter, making forceful testimony alongside the plethora of video and medical evidence imperative for the prosecution.

 

By contrast, in 2016, at the murder trial of the former North Charleston police officer Michael Slager, who shot unarmed Walter Scott from behind as he ran away, in a fatal incident also captured on shocking video, North Charleston’s police chief, Eddie Driggers, testified for the defense. Driggers told the jury that Slager had appeared to comply with department guidance before he opened fire and described him as a “very good officer” during testimony.

 

The judge eventually declared a mistrial with the jury deadlocked 11 to 1 favoring conviction. Slager later pleaded guilty to federal civil rights charges in a separate indictment and was sentenced to 20 years.

 

Arradondo, Minneapolis’s first Black police chief and a lifelong veteran of the beleaguered police force, assumed his position in 2017 and was thrust into the national spotlight as soon as Floyd’s death occurred. He moved to fire the four officers involved in the incident within days, in the face of significant criticism from Minneapolis’s police union, who accused him of acting “without due process”.

 

“This was a violation of humanity,” Arradondo said a few days after Floyd was killed. “This was a violation of the oath that the majority of the men and women that put this uniform on [take] – this goes absolutely against it. This is contrary to what we believe in.”

 

At the same time, a majority of the city council explored efforts to disband the entire police force and later voted to divert significant police funding, $8m, into other public services including new mental health teams created to respond to certain 911 calls. The department also saw a “staggering” number of officers seeking disability payments in the wake of the uprising that gripped the city, sparking fears of a staffing shortage.

 

“The chief is under tremendous pressure,” said Laurie Robinson, former assistant US attorney general and the co-chair of Barack Obama’s Taskforce on 21st-Century Policing, created in the wake of the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. “This may be the hardest police chief job in the country at this point, between the tensions around this trial, pressures from the community dealing with the aftermath of the George Floyd death, the calls for changes in the department and the protection of the community that’s dealing with rising gun violence and crime.”

 

Some local activists acknowledged the significance of Arradondo’s coming testimony but argued it was only a first step.

 

“It’s a good thing that he’s going to testify against Chauvin but at the same time we need justice,” said DJ Hooker, a 26 year-old local organizer with the Black Lives Matter movement. “Getting Chauvin convicted, that’s a way to get justice. Getting the other three killer cops convicted, that’s another way to get justice. But also, getting systemic change. That’s also justice. And that’s also what we need to work on getting.”

 

Hooker pointed to the demand for greater community control over the hiring and firing of officers via an elected civilian council as one example of systemic change.

 

Alexander, also the former president of the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, said the fact that Arradondo was the city’s first Black chief could add more pressure on the testimony. In 2007, then a lieutenant, Arradondo himself, along with four other officers, sued the department over racial discrimination in a case that was settled $740,000.

 

“Certainly being the chief of color in a situation that involves a white officer and a Black subject and is so sensitized around race could put an additional stress on a chief of color. But the reality is you approach this just like you would any other situation. And that is with facts, and that is with balance.”

 

Both Robinson and Alexander agree that Arradondo’s testimony could lead to more police chiefs being called to the witness stand in the future.

 

“The public is certainly asking for more transparency and and more accountability. So I would not be surprised in the future if you see more police executives that are being requested to testify, either for the defense or the prosecution,” Alexander said.

A nossa condição zombie

 

CRÓNICA ACÇÃO PARALELA

A nossa condição zombie

António Guerreiro

2 de Abril de 2021, 9:56

https://www.publico.pt/2021/04/02/culturaipsilon/cronica/condicao-zombie-1956630

 

Muito antes da era zoom e da instalação do teletrabalho como regra geral, na qual entrámos em corrida forçada há cerca de um ano, já estava em acção o processo que nos transforma em zombies. Esta zombificação do mundo já estava latente numa fase anterior, quando ainda se preferia utilizar uma palavra da psiquiatria do século XIX, em vez de nomes inquietantes concedidos por filmes de género, e se falava de uma hipnose geral, isto é, dos poderes hipnotizadores, alucinatórios e fantasmagóricos dos media. Basta, aliás, declinar a palavra media no singular, e dizer medium, para que a esfera do mediúnico seja evocada e entremos assim na ZAD dos fantasmas (ZAD: zona a defender): onde começa o mundo da medialidade começa também a dança dos fantasmas e dos mortos-vivos.

 

Antes de Baudrillard ter designado a “sociedade dos simulacros”, antes de Vilém Flusser ter definido as “tecno-imagens”, antes de Debord ter configurado a “sociedade do espectáculo”, antes da espectrologia do nosso tempo que até produziu leituras sofisticadas de Marx, Günther Anders descreveu longamente, no seu livro de 1956 sobre o ser humano como um ser antiquado (o título original é Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen; na tradução inglesa do livro, Antiquiertheit é traduzido por Outdatedness, e na tradução francesa, por Obsolescence), o modo como os media de massa nos condenam ao estatuto de zombies. É num capítulo intitulado Considerações Filosóficas sobre a Rádio e a Televisão que Günther Anders desenhou o “mundo como fantasma” e apontou o que ele entendia ser o principal efeito mediúnico da rádio e da televisão: o de fazer de cada consumidor “um trabalhador em domicílio, não remunerado, que contribui para a produção do homem de massa”. Noutro momento, Günther Anders utiliza a expressão “eremitas de massa”.

 

 

Talvez seja conveniente apresentar Günther Anders: filósofo e ensaísta alemão que viveu entre 1902 e 1992, o verdadeiro nome deste judeu alemão é Günther Stern. Foi o primeiro marido de Hannah Arendt (entre 1929 e 1937), que conheceu quando ambos eram alunos de Heidegger. Com a ascensão do nazismo, seguiu os passos de muitos outros intelectuais judeus: fugiu da Alemanha, em 1933, para Paris (foi aí que se divorciou de Hannh Arendt) e de Paris foi para os Estados Unidos, tendo regressado à Europa em 1950. A sua obra só a partir do início deste século começou a ter uma forte projecção. O teor apocalíptico dos seus textos sobre a ameaça da bomba atómica, no tempo da guerra fria, assim como as cores negras com que pintou o progresso da civilização técnica, fizeram com que fosse muitas vezes assimilado ao pessimismo cultural que tinha tido uma forte expressão na Alemanha, após a Primeira Guerra. Mas Günther Anders não pertenceu de facto a essa constelação que também albergou alguns representantes da “revolução conservadora”, um ambiente político-cultural do qual Anders sempre esteve distante.

 

Lido hoje o livro mais importante da obra de Günther Anders, as suas teses e intuições parecem análises e descrições do nosso presente mais imediato. “ A nossa normalidade é uma história de fantasmas”, escreveu ele, para a seguir acrescentar: “Muitos habitantes do mundo real já foram definitivamente vencidos pelos fantasmas e são já reproduções de fantasmas”. É provável que as teses de Anders só recentemente tenham chegado ao momento em que se tornaram legíveis. A condição zombie, na época do zoom e do teletrabalho, deixou de ser um cenário especulativo. Mas entre o mundo de Anders e aquele com que estamos confrontados há uma linha de continuidade e de ascensão progressiva do zombie. No início deste século começou-se a assistir em várias cidades do Estados Unidos a marchas de indivíduos mascarados de zombies, de “corporate zombies”, que pareciam paradas carnavalescas. Numa delas, em Wall Street, os manifestantes (silenciosos, sem pronunciar qualquer mensagem) mascaram notas de banco do jogo do Monopólio, parodiando a pulsão nutritiva do capitalismo financeiro. O filme de George Romero, A Noite dos Mortos-vivos , parece ter servido de inspiração a este “povo zombie” que foi mais longe do que o simples “Occupy Wall Street”. A palavra de ordem desta massa zombie era “Occupy everything”.

 

Livro de recitações

“Quase metade dos portugueses fez menos sexo durante a pandemia. Satisfação sexual também diminuiu.”

In Expresso, 30 de Março de 2021

 

Sobre as questões do sexo, as sondagens são sempre pouco fiáveis. Mas esta é muito verosímil. Toda a gente sabe que o ambiente familiar, doméstico, conjugal, é pouco favorável à subida da tensão libidinal e à satisfação do desejo. Sem as incursões fora de casa, a única coisa que cresce é o deserto. Este tipo de inquéritos e sondagens permite dar uma ideia aproximada do nomadismo e da infidelidade. Mas faltam sondagens que dêem conta de outro fenómeno: muitos casais, após algum tempo de conjugalidade, passam à situação de jejum permanente e apenas partilham o espaço e a economia domésticos, a amizade, o companheirismo, a solidariedade e um afecto que nada tem de sexual. Quando não partilham nada disto, passa-se á violência doméstica. Mas a miséria sexual entre os membros do casal é talvez o tema mais recalcado da história da conjugalidade.