terça-feira, 23 de junho de 2020

IMAGEM DE OVOODOCORVO / EU considering blocking Americans from entering - report



EU considering blocking Americans from entering - report

The European Union is looking to soon reopen its borders, and it is reportedly considering denying entry to Americans because of how the US has handled the coronavirus pandemic.

The New York Timess reports:

That prospect, which would lump American visitors in with Russians and Brazilians as unwelcome, is a stinging blow to American prestige in the world and a repudiation of President Trump’s handling of the virus in the United States, which has more than 2.3 million cases and upward of 120,000 deaths, more than any other country.

European nations are currently haggling over two potential lists of acceptable visitors based on how countries are faring with the coronavirus pandemic. Both include China, as well as developing nations like Uganda, Cuba and Vietnam.

Travelers from the United States and the rest of the world have been excluded from visiting the European Union — with few exceptions mostly for repatriations or ‘essential travel’ —- since mid-March. But a final decision on reopening the borders is expected early next week, before the bloc reopens on July 1.

The report comes as nearly half of US states report increases in coronavirus cases after starting to reopen their economies.

Testifying before the House today, Dr Anthony Fauci warned some parts of the country are seeing a “disturbing surge” in coronavirus infections and commended states like New York for taking a more cautious approach to reopening.

Trump wants to slow down coronavirus testing. Hear Fauci's response

Trump says he will issue executive order on historical monuments

Nigel Farage investigated over US trip to attend Trump rally



Nigel Farage investigated over US trip to attend Trump rally

The Brexit Party leader was allowed to travel despite coronavirus restrictions.

By LAURENZ GEHRKE 6/23/20, 1:57 PM CET Updated 6/23/20, 6:06 PM CET

A Democratic member of the U.S House of Representatives launched an investigation after Nigel Farage flew to the States to attend a Donald Trump rally despite the coronavirus pandemic.

"The decision of the Trump Administration to admit Mr. Farage to the United States ... at a time when most travel from the United Kingdom to the U.S. has been suspended raises numerous troubling questions, as does the claim that such travel was in the national interest," Bennie Thompson, chairman of the House's committee on homeland security, wrote in a letter to the acting director of the Department of Homeland Security, Chad Wolf.

In order to slow the spread of the coronavirus, only U.S. citizens, their family members and "individuals who meet specified exceptions," are allowed to travel to the U.S. from Britain.

But on Saturday, Brexit Party leader Farage posted a picture of himself on Twitter, captioning it: "In the USA, only twenty four hours from Tulsa." The city in Oklahoma was the location of a Trump campaign rally, which was beset with problems.

Thompson said a statement sent to his staff by U.S. Customs and Border Protection confirmed Farage was initially denied boarding while attempting to fly from the U.K. to the U.S., due to coronavirus restrictions, but the Department of Homeland Security later said his travel was "permissible" as his entry to the States "would be in the national interest."

Farage has attended Trump rallies in the past and in 2016 met with the president at Trump Tower in New York. Trump once said Farage would be a good fit for U.K. ambassador to the U.S.

Authors:
Laurenz Gehrke

Trump Accuses Obama Of Treason, Pushes Mail-In Voting Conspiracy | Morni...




During an interview Monday, President Trump considered Barack Obama of treason for 'spying on my campaign'. Also, on Monday, Trump tweeted conspiracies about mail-in voting. The panel discusses. Aired on 06/23/2020.

Dr. Fauci Testifies In Congress




Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic. Also testifying are Adm. Brett Giroir, assistant secretary for health at the Department of Health and Human Services; Stephen Hahn, Food and Drug Administration commissioner; and Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Covid-19. Portugal pode ser excluído da lista de países considerados seguros pelo Reino Unido



Covid-19. Portugal pode ser excluído da lista de países considerados seguros pelo Reino Unido

23.06.2020 às 9h43

De acordo com o diário “The Times”, o Governo de Boris Johnson está perto de fechar uma lista de 10 países considerados seguros para os turistas britânicos viajarem sem que seja necessário ficarem em isolamento durante duas semanas no regresso, como acontece atualmente. O caso português é alvo de “debate intenso”

LUSA

O Governo britânico vai dispensar o cumprimento de quarentena a pessoas que viajem entre o Reino Unido e alguns países com um risco baixo de infeção com covid-19, mas a inclusão de Portugal está incerta, noticia esta terça-feira o "The Times".

De acordo com o diário, o Governo de Boris Johnson está perto de fechar uma lista de 10 países considerados seguros para os turistas britânicos viajarem sem que seja necessário ficarem em isolamento durante duas semanas no regresso, como acontece atualmente.

A lista inclui países como França, Espanha, Grécia, Itália e Turquia devido aos baixos níveis de infeção com coronavírus, mas Portugal, adianta o "Times", é objeto de um "debate intenso" devido ao recente surto no Algarve.

Uma fonte do governo disse ao jornal que "qualquer decisão em aceitar corredores de viagens com outros países será baseada em critérios rigorosos de saúde pública".

Uma festa em Odiáxere, no concelho de Lagos, resultou em pelo menos 111 pessoas infetadas, das quais 19 são crianças com menos de 9 anos, indicou a Administração Regional de Saúde (ARS) do Algarve, que terá realizado cerca de 2.500 testes covid-19 para conter o surto.

O Governo português tem sido ativo na pressão junto das autoridades britânicas para abrir um "corredor aéreo" para Portugal, destino de mais de 2,5 milhões de britânicos todos os anos, que representaram quase 20% das dormidas de estrangeiros em 2019.

O ministro dos Negócios Estrangeiros, Augusto Santos Silva, a disse à BBC no início de junho estar em negociações com Londres e manifestou esperança de alcançar um acordo até ao final do mês e no sábado o embaixador de Portugal no Reino Unido, Manuel Lobo Antunes, voltou a manifestar interesse num entendimento.

"Nós pensamos que a situação está sob controlo e ficaríamos felizes em receber, como antes, o maior número possível de britânicos", afirmou também à BBC.

Desde 8 de junho que todas as pessoas que chegam do estrangeiro ao Reino Unido, incluindo britânicos, são obrigadas a permanecer em isolamento durante 14 dias para reduzir a probabilidade de contágio da covid-19.

As transgressões serão puníveis com multas de mil libras (1.100 euros), estando isentas pessoas vindas da Irlanda, motoristas de transportes de mercadorias, médicos que estejam envolvidos no combate à pandemia de covid-19 e trabalhadores agrícolas sazonais.

A data formal para as condições desta medida serem revistas é na próxima semana, mas o ministro da Saúde, Matt Hancock, revelou na segunda-feira que o anúncio poderá acontecer antes.

"Temos uma data formal de reavaliação da política da quarentena no final do mês e vamos garantir a publicação com antecedência do que planeamos fazer em termos de para onde pensamos, com base nos pareceres epidemiológicos, sermos capazes de formalizar corredores de viagem", afirmou.

De acordo com os dados de segunda-feira, o Reino Unido registou 42.647 mortos desde o início da pandemia covid-19, o mais alto na Europa e o terceiro maior número a nível mundial, atrás dos EUA e Brasil.

Portugal contabiliza pelo menos 1.534 mortos associados à covid-19 em 39.392 casos confirmados de infeção, segundo o último boletim da Direção-Geral da Saúde (DGS).

A nível global, a pandemia de covid-19 já provocou mais de 469 mil mortos e infetou mais de 9 milhões de pessoas em 196 países e territórios, segundo um balanço feito pela agência francesa AFP.

Trump faces pressure to reset campaign after Tulsa rally caps gloomy week / VIDEO:AZ ER Doctor: With COVID-19, Not Wearing A Mask Is 'Really Selfish' | Th...




Trump faces pressure to reset campaign after Tulsa rally caps gloomy week

President heads to Arizona for border-wall event in what amounts to a relaunch of a relaunch

David Smith in Washington
@smithinamerica
Published onTue 23 Jun 2020 07.30 BST

Donald Trump flies to Arizona on Tuesday under pressure to change course in his re-election bid after a dismal week culminated in the debacle of thousands of empty seats at a campaign rally.

The US president was reportedly angry on Saturday when his first rally in three months, a defiant gamble amid the coronavirus pandemic intended as a daunting show of force, backfired with poor attendance in Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Republican heartland.

In what amounts to a relaunch of a relaunch, Trump now travels to Arizona, a battleground state, to embrace his most comfortable signature issue with an event marking the 200th mile of his wall on the US-Mexico border (most of the construction has in fact replaced existing barriers).

The president will then speak at a “Students for Trump” event in Phoenix. Despite soaring cases of coronavirus in Arizona, his campaign team will be hoping for an enthusiastic turnout to get back on track. It is not known when Trump will hold his next full rally.


Why was Donald Trump's 'comeback' rally in Tulsa, the site of a massacre?
Read more
Trump trails his Democratic opponent Joe Biden in numerous polls, both nationally and in competitive states such as Arizona, in some cases by double digits. Observers argue that Tulsa was a warning that he needs to reset, not least because of the health risks of big indoor rallies - but there appears to be little chance of him heeding advice.

“From what I’ve been told, Trump just insists on these rallies and he wants more and not fewer compared to 2016 because he’s got all of the trappings of office and he can fly Air Force One low so people can be awed and all the rest of it,” said Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia.

“Obviously, he didn’t calculate properly for the pandemic and other factors. He thinks they can correct it and go on. He wants one every couple of weeks or more frequently. He didn’t learn a thing. His campaign staff would gladly give them up, along with the tweets, if they could. But they can’t.”

Trump aides claimed that more than a million people had requested tickets for the Tulsa rally. The city fire marshal’s office reported a crowd of just less than 6,200 in the 19,000-seat venue, with few wearing face masks; eight members of the campaign’s advance team have tested positive for Covid-19.

The president’’s meandering one-hour-41-minute speech may come to be seen as exhibit A of a campaign struggling for direction and at risk of defeat in November. He was criticised for taking a scattergun approach to Biden, a reflection of how his team’s various and shifting lines of attack on the former vice-president have failed to gain traction.

The remarks also defended Confederate statues and indulged racist terms such as “Kung flu” while failing to mention Black Lives Matter or George Floyd, the African American man killed last month by police in Minneapolis whose death sparked nationwide protests. Polls suggest Trump’s unwillingness to strike a chord of national unity alienates voters of colour, suburban women and independents.

Frank Luntz, a pollster and Republican consultant, said: “He uses words that make his re-election less likely. Calling his supporters ‘warriors’ appeals to his supporters, but nobody else. Americans are not looking for a warrior. They are looking for empathy and understanding and compassion. If you’re looking for a warrior, you’ve already decided you want Donald Trump. If you’re looking for social justice, you’ve already decided you’re voting for Joe Biden.

“There’s only 6% of the American people that are truly undecided; 94% have made up their minds. That means your words and your phrases have to be precise. He keeps talking about law and order. The public wants public safety. He talks about draining the swamp. The public wants a more efficient, more effective and more accountable government. The words that he’s using are actually making his case more difficult because they don’t resonate with that 6%.”

The White House and the Trump campaign, however, denied media reports that Trump had rebuked his staff or that campaign manager Brad Parscale was skating on thin ice after overpromising and underdelivering so spectacularly.

Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary, insisted on Monday: “The President was very pleased with the rally. I was with him. And I just have to say these media reports that he was somehow furious on the plane – there is no grounding in fact to that.”

She added: “A political pundit wrote to him that it was one of the all-time great speeches they’d ever heard … The speech made his message so clear and compelling that no one could possibly have missed it. And it was so great to be out of the swamp and in the country. And those comments are how the president feels, too.”

Tim Murtaugh, the campaign’s director of communications, said: “President Trump is eager to keep hitting the campaign trail and holding more rallies to speak directly to the American people ... There was a massive media push to crush the Trump rally, and still 12,000 people bravely showed up.

“This is approximately 11,990 more people than attended the last Biden event. The enthusiasm is with President Trump. As of Monday morning, more than 11.3 million people had watched the President’s speech on our digital platforms. There is an enthusiasm gap – it is real and it is wide.”

But with Trump under fire for boasting at the rally that he told staff to slow virus testing, Tuesday’s stop in Arizona will not be straightforward. The state’s positive test rate is at a seven-day average of more than 20%, the highest in the country.

Fact-Checking Trump’s Claim That Mail-In Ballots Lead To Voter Fraud | N...




Trump attacks mail-in voting with new series of false claims

President suggests foreign countries will print millions of ballots and send them to voters



Donald Trump has been issuing false claims about mail-in voting for months, amid concerns he is laying the groundwork to contest the election.

Sam Levine in New York
Published onMon 22 Jun 2020 22.18 BST

Donald Trump launched a fresh attack on mail-in voting on Monday, making a series of false allegations to suggest the 2020 election will be tainted by fraud.

The president has been advancing untrue claims about mail-in balloting for months, fueling concerns he is laying the groundwork to contest the results of the 2020 election.

On Monday, he put forward a new theory, claiming that foreign countries would print millions of mail-in ballots and mail them to voters.

The idea was previously advanced by US attorney general William Barr earlier this month and the attorney general repeated it in a television interview on Sunday.

Trump made the claims after reports he was seething after a campaign rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, where attendance was far below what his campaign had projected. Trump told the Politico news site last week that expanding vote-by-mail was his “biggest risk” as he seeks re-election.

Experts have said that it would be nearly impossible for a foreign country to orchestrate the kind of fraud Trump and Barr are hyping.

Many election offices have systems in place to closely track mail-in ballots and have other methods of verifying the identity of a voter such as comparing the signature on the ballot to ones on file.

“There are many checks and balances in place to ensure that nobody could just print ‘millions’ of ballots and vote them,” said David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, who works with election officials across the country.

“We have decades of experience enforcing these security measures, including during world war II, confirming the integrity of mail voting. That’s why election officials from both parties, including most Republicans, promote mail voting and vote by mail themselves.”

Different jurisdictions are required to print ballots with different combinations of races and layouts, depending on where a voter lives. There can even be specific paper stocks required for ballots – all measures that would make it extremely difficult for a foreign power to simply print and mail out ballots.

In Wake county, North Carolina, for example, there are nearly 100 different ballots for voters this fall depending on where they live, tweeted Gerry Cohen, a member of the county board of election. All of mail-in ballots are examined at a public meeting by all five members of the county board, he added.

“It’s ridiculous. You can’t just print ballots. There is a specific process with vendors or internal to election offices. Ballot tracking is a way that you can add security,” said Amber McReynolds, CEO of the National Vote at Home Institute and a former election official in Denver. “If either Barr or Trump had toured an election office or had advisers that know the process, they would know this is not feasible.”

In a separate tweet on Monday, Trump pointed to the fact that Americans have voted during times of war to suggest that Covid-19 was merely being used as an excuse to “cheat”. But members of the military have long voted by mail and there is a long history of expanding access to the ballot because of war, Alexander Keyssar, a historian who has studied elections, told NBC News in April.

Trump has continued to attack voting by mail even though he and other members of his administration have frequently used it. On Monday, Business Insider reported that the vice-president, Mike Pence, and his wife, Karen, voted in the Indiana primary this month using the Indiana governor’s mansion as their address. Pence had done the same in 2018.

Indiana’s constitution says that someone does not lose their residency if they are called away from the state on federal service, said Ian Hauer, a spokesman for the Indiana secretary of state, Connie Lawson. A Pence spokesman tweeted that the governor’s mansion was still the legally correct address for the Pences to vote absentee.


O estado de alarme está de volta / Coimas de 120 a 350 euros a quem participar em ajuntamentos além do permitido

IMAGEM DE OVOODOCORVO


EDITORIAL
O estado de alarme está de volta

Foi pena esta reacção do Governo não ter acontecido há um mês, quando os números de Lisboa mostravam já sem margem para dúvidas que algo estava a correr mal. Mas pior do que um erro de avaliação é virar a cara à realidade e persistir nele.

MANUEL CARVALHO
23 de Junho de 2020, 5:30

O Governo voltou a olhar com olhos de ver o problema da covid-19 e depois da série de medidas que anunciou nesta segunda-feira após uma reunião com autarcas vamos poder recordar algumas das discussões do estado de emergência. Serão as medidas proporcionais? Haverá legitimidade para se imporem medidas severas que restringem direitos básicos dos cidadãos, como o de reunião? Vai ainda ser possível encontrar novos focos de discussão, como o que levanta perguntas sobre a inexistência de cercas sanitárias como a que houve em Ovar ou sobre os custos políticos para o Governo, que andou semanas a virar a cara à realidade e agora tem de correr atrás do prejuízo. Mas por muito atendíveis ou complexas que sejam todas estas perguntas, dúvidas ou opiniões, o Governo fez o que tinha de fazer: reconheceu que a situação na região de Lisboa é grave e adoptou medidas para a debelar.

Vivemos tempos duros, ansiosos e novos. Temos de estar preparados para lidar com um vírus e com uma crise que não vêm nos livros, em que tudo exige experiência, aprendizagem e erros. Mas entre o confinamento rigoroso e o desconfinamento relaxado, sentiu-se por parte dos poderes públicos uma descontinuidade que denunciava uma óbvia falta de coerência. Numa semana, o primeiro-ministro avisava que a experiência da abertura podia ser revertida a qualquer momento, na seguinte pedia às pessoas para virem para a rua; num momento, o Governo alertava para os perigos das concentrações, no seguinte as televisões mostravam António Costa e o Presidente na praia. Com o anúncio desta segunda-feira, o Governo regressa à sua primeira narrativa.

Faz bem. Porque ao disponibilizar meios para reforçar as condições de transporte das pessoas das zonas mais afectadas, ao mobilizar as forças da autoridade para operações dissuasórias, ao dar as mãos às autarquias para aumentar a protecção nos bairros ou ao restringir os horários do comércio obriga a comunidade a reflectir sobre a dimensão do problema com que se confronta e a reforçar as precauções. Não está em causa o desconfinamento, mas sim a forma como o país tem de o encarar. Não em estado de lassidão, mas em estado de alarme.

Foi pena esta reacção não ter acontecido há um mês, quando os números de Lisboa mostravam já sem margem para dúvidas que algo estava a correr mal. Mas pior do que um erro de avaliação é virar a cara à realidade, que aqui criticámos, e persistir nele. Com o regresso de medidas de excepção para acudir a uma situação de excepção, será mais fácil consciencializar todas as pessoas para uma evidente e infeliz realidade: ainda é cedo para vivermos como gostaríamos de de poder viver.

Coimas de 120 a 350 euros a quem participar em ajuntamentos além do permitido

Em alguns concelhos e freguesias da zona de Lisboa, o acompanhamento da pandemia pelos serviços de saúde será presencial. Em toda a área metropolitana há retrocesso e horários restritos no comércio, sobretudo de bebidas alcoólicas. Em todo o país as forças de segurança vão passar da pedagogia à notificação e autuação.

São José Almeida e Liliana Borges 23 de Junho de 2020, 0:17

As coimas variam entre 120 e 350 euros para quem for detectado pelas forças de segurança, em todo o território nacional, a desrespeitar as normas de saúde pública de prevenção e combate à covid-19, soube o PÚBLICO. A medida entra em vigor a partir de domingo e ficará estipulada no decreto que irá extinguir a situação de calamidade em todo o país, à excepção de concelhos e freguesias da Área Metropolitana de Lisboa (AML).

Já às zero horas desta terça-feira, entram em vigor normas específicas para alguns concelhos e freguesias da AML. Em causa estão os concelhos de Amadora, Loures, Odivelas, Sintra e Lisboa, cujos presidentes de câmara se reuniram nesta segunda-feira de manhã com o primeiro-ministro, que no final da reunião afirmou, em conferência de imprensa, ter sido “consensual entre todos que a situação de calamidade irá continuar em determinadas freguesias e concelhos”.

Em causa estão dois concelhos na íntegra e freguesias que pertencem a outros três concelhos da AML. O primeiro-ministro assumiu que Amadora e Odivelas continuarão em regime de situação de calamidade. O PÚBLICO sabe que esta decisão foi exigida pelos próprios autarcas, devido à densidade populacional e às características da malha urbana.

Em declarações ao PÚBLICO, a presidenta da Câmara da Amadora, Carla Tavares, elogiou os resultados das decisões tomadas no encontro, que considera indispensáveis para o sucesso do combate ao aumento de casos. “Estamos muito satisfeitos com as conclusões da reunião de trabalho”, resumiu a autarca socialista. Carla Tavares considerou que o encontro com o primeiro-ministro foi “profícuo” e disse ter a expectativa de que o reforço das medidas, “absolutamente necessárias”, ajude a reduzir o nível de contágio.

Em Sintra, são seis as freguesias que se mantêm em situação de calamidade. A medida obedece à lógica do eixo da mobilidade ferro-rodoviária, ou seja, da linha de comboio e do IC19. De fora fica a Sintra litoral, rural e histórica. Assim, ficam com medidas de excepção as freguesias de Queluz-Belas, Massamá-Monte Abraão, Agualva-Mira Sintra, Algueirão-Mem Martins, Rio de Mouro e Cacém-São Marcos.

No fundo, são zonas residenciais de muitas pessoas que andam de transportes públicos e que trabalham em limpezas ou obras de construção civil. Daí que o primeiro-ministro tenha anunciando a intensificação da fiscalização em estaleiros da construção civil e no transporte de trabalhadores deste sector.

Esta conclusão está associada a uma outra, a de que o padrão de contaminação identificado nos últimos dias na AML, e assumido na reunião, consiste em que, em primeiro lugar está a contaminação em casa, por alguém que contrai o vírus no trabalho ou nos transportes, só depois vêm os comportamentos de convívio social, mesmo entre jovens.

A prioridade dada aos transportes colectivos rodoviários na AML foi assumida pelo primeiro-ministro na conferência de imprensa, na qual lembrou estar inscrita no Orçamento Suplementar uma verba destinada a reforçar a contratação de transportes rodoviários. Quando a maioria do sector é de empresas privadas, que aderiram praticamente todas ao layoff -embora tenham reduzido o serviço, nalguns casos, em perto de 50%, como garantiu ao PÚBLICO um presidente de câmara -, o Governo espera que haja “sentido de interesse nacional” por parte dos operadores. Ou seja, que aceitem negociar e reforçar as rotas desde já, para reduzir lotações, mesmo que só recebam do Estado o pagamento após o Orçamento Suplementar estar em vigor.

O caso que ficou em aberto na reunião da manhã foi o de Lisboa. Uma freguesia da capital que estará certamente incluída é a de Santa Clara (antiga Musgueira e Ameixoeira), no fundo uma zona que é contigua à cintura periférica onde os surtos persistem. Já o Lumiar deverá ficar de fora, uma vez que o surto que aí existe está limitado ao Lar dos Inválidos do Comércio.

Como sublinhou o primeiro-ministro na conferência de imprensa após a reunião, “em algumas freguesias, o número de casos tem que ver em locais já em si confinados, como são os lares”. E justificou: “Temos de pensar se vale a pena adoptar uma restrição para a freguesia, tendo em conta que se deve a um surto localizado”.

Mais presença
Para melhorar o acompanhamento dos casos, o Governo irá também apostar na georreferenciação, de modo a monitorizar melhor a situação de potenciais contágios. Este método tem sido utilizado pela Câmara de Loures, desde que o seu presidente, Bernardino Soares, foi a isso autorizado a 1 de Junho, na reunião que manteve com a ministra da Saúde Marta Temido. Aliás, Loures, tem diminuído as zonas de contaminação e reduziu-as a duas freguesias.


Neste plano de acompanhamento das zonas críticas da AML, o primeiro-ministro, anunciou o programa Bairros Saudáveis, que visa diminuir os prazos de notificação de resultados laboratoriais e dos inquéritos epidemiológicos. Será também assegurada a visita mais assídua e regular de equipas mistas de elementos da autarquia, dos serviços de saúde, da Segurança Social, da Protecção Civil e das Forças de Segurança - ou mesmo das Forças Armadas, afirmou um membro do Governo ao PÚBLICO -, aos domicílios de pessoas contaminadas com covid-19, em confinamento obrigatório ou em quarentena, por estarem inseridas em cadeias de transmissão. Até aqui estas visitas têm sido feitas, pelo menos no município de Loures e Amadora, por decisão das respectivas câmaras, depois da reunião de 1 de Julho com a ministra da Saúde.

O reforço do acompanhamento médico nestas zonas, libertando-os de outras, foi assumido pelo primeiro-ministro, na conferência de imprensa: “Serão adoptadas medidas que permitam libertar os profissionais de saúde pública para visitas domiciliárias a quem está sob confinamento ou em regime de vigilância.”

Depois de ter sido autorizado o ajuntamento de 20 pessoas, com a entrada em vigor da situação de calamidade em todo o país, a AML volta ao limite das dez pessoas.

Também em toda a Área Metropolitana de Lisboa, o comércio vai ter como hora limite de fecho as 20h. Só os restaurantes poderão continuar a servir até as 23h, mas apenas refeições. Ou seja, mesmo nos restaurantes as bebidas alcoólicas só podem ser servidas no contexto do jantar. Isto, porque a venda de bebidas alcoólicas, após as 20h passa a ser proibida em toda a AML.

A interdição de venda está associada à proibição de consumo de bebidas alcoólicas na via pública. Depois das 20h passa a ser proibida. Para garantir que esta medida será respeitada, as forças de segurança, PSP e GNR, serão dotadas de um reforço de poder de autuação.

Reforço das autoridades
A nível nacional os ajuntamentos continuam a poder ter até 20 pessoas. Mas há uma clara afirmação da autoridade do Estado: o reforço da intervenção das forças de segurança, a PSP e a GNR. Os agentes passarão de uma atitude pedagógica, que incentivava o recolhimento em casa e a obediência ao distanciamento social, à atitude mais musculada de identificar, para posterior notificação, dos cidadãos que tiverem comportamentos de risco de contágio da comunidade.

Agravadas medidas de vigilância em 15 freguesias da Área Metropolitana de Lisboa

Daí que o Governo vá aprovar legislação de forma a que as forças de segurança possam aplicar coimas aos prevaricadores. Essas coimas estarão equiparadas às que são aplicadas nos transportes públicos a quem viaje sem máscara. Serão também de 120 a 350 euros. Mas que podem ir até 600 euros em relação a pessoas colectivas. Será mantida a norma de que serão fechados os estabelecimentos públicos que não respeitem as normas de saúde pública e de distanciamento social.

tp.ocilbup@adiemla.esoj.oas
tp.ocilbup@segrob.anailil

Michael O’Leary: “Vai ser muito difícil a TAP cumprir condições” do apoio estatal / VIDEO:Packed Ryanair flight not following social distancing rules



A Ryanair devia simplesmente ir à falência.
OVOODOCORVO


AVIAÇÃO
Michael O’Leary: “Vai ser muito difícil a TAP cumprir condições” do apoio estatal

Presidente do grupo Ryanair considera que o dinheiro a injectar na TAP “seria melhor distribuído através das várias companhias aéreas que operam em Portugal em proporção do seu contributo para a conectividade do país”.

Luís Villalobos
Luís Villalobos 23 de Junho de 2020, 6:30

A trabalhar no sector há mais de 30 anos, o presidente do grupo Ryanair, Michael O’Leary, diz que apoios estatais, como os empréstimos feitos à Air France e à Lufthansa, distorcem a concorrência e que se devia antes suspender impostos e taxas a todas as companhias, “na proporção do seu contributo para a conectividade aérea”. Em respostas por escrito, diz que no actual panorama haverá “uma recuperação rápida dos níveis de tráfego à boleia de tarifas baixas. As companhias de bandeira vão “oferecer preços abaixo do custo nos próximos anos” e as tarifas do grupo que lidera, conhecido por apostar no baixo custo, “terão de ser mais baixas para competir e sobreviver”. Essa estratégia tem repercussões imediatas ao nível do número de trabalhadores e salários, com a perspectiva de corte de cerca de três mil trabalhadores, incluindo Portugal, onde o Sindicato Nacional do Pessoal de Voo da Aviação Civil (SNPVAC) já veio falar em tentativas de acordo “ilegais”. Sobre esse tema, Michael O’Leary, de 59 anos, diz que apela “à participação” dos trabalhadores e sindicatos para “diminuir a perda de empregos e o encerramento de bases”.

Tem criticado os apoios estatais às companhias aéreas, como os que já envolveram a Iberia, Air France e Lufthansa. Porquê? Não é esta uma conjuntura extraordinária, do ponto de vista negativo, que atingiu fortemente tudo e todos?
Nós opomo-nos a qualquer ajuda de Estado que seja opaca e discriminatória. Operações de salvamento massivas, compostas por muitos milhares de milhões de euros, a um punhado de companhias aéreas nacionais, são regressivos, injustos e ilegais numa crise que, como refere, afectou tudo e todos. O panorama do sector aéreo vai ser distorcido pelos mais de trinta mil milhões de euros que, a nível estatal, estão a ser entregues ao grupo Lufthansa, Air France-KLM, SAS e Finnair, entre outros. Este tipo de ajuda discriminatória vai prejudicar o sector europeu de aviação e os danos no mercado único vão ser sentidos muito tempo após a pandemia ter passado.

Tem falado, proactivamente, com diversos órgãos de comunicação social para mostrar o seu ponto de vista contrário aos apoios de Estado. Porquê esta iniciativa? Qual o objectivo?
Estes são tempos sem precedentes. A covid-19 tem sido uma catástrofe para todas as companhias aéreas e os governos devem aplicar medidas para ajudar à recuperação do tráfego de forma transversal ao sector. O mecanismo de apoio mais justo seria o de suspender, reduzir ou adiar os impostos na aviação e as taxas de aeroporto e de controlo aéreo, beneficiando assim todas as companhias áreas na proporção do seu contributo para a conectividade aérea na Europa. Em vez disso, governos ricos estão a distorcer as regras do jogo ao entregar mais de trinta mil milhões de euros a um punhado de companhias áreas que asseguram menos de 30% da conectividade a nível europeu. Isto é mau para a concorrência e mau para os consumidores, numa altura em que a economia europeia precisa de voos directos a preços acessíveis para as várias regiões, algo que apenas as companhias aéreas com tarifas baixas podem disponibilizar.

A Ryanair não recebeu nem um cêntimo de apoios estatais?
A Ryanair não recebeu qualquer ajuda discriminatória. Acedemos a mecanismos de apoio para o pagamento de salários em vários países, acessíveis a todas as companhias aéreas, e aproveitámos o financiamento do Reino Unido ligado aos efeitos da covid-19, que está disponível para todas as empresas que contribuam para a economia britânica.

 O que teme que poderia acontecer à Ryanair se aceitasse receber apoios de Estado?
Queremos condições idênticas para todos. Não somos uma companhia aérea nacional [de bandeira], somos uma verdadeira companhia aérea europeia, e sempre reagimos às crises sem apoios estatais. O nosso instinto numa crise é sempre o de inovar, reduzir os custos e as tarifas, procurar novas rotas e crescer ao nível do tráfego.

Sem apoios estatais, vão cortar empregos, reduzir a frota e as rotas, bem como fechar algumas bases, certo? A perspectiva é a de despedir cerca de 3000 trabalhadores, o equivalente a 15% da vossa força de trabalho…
Desde o início da pandemia, implementámos uma série de medidas para preservar dinheiro e reduzir os custos. Estamos a trabalhar com os nossos funcionários e com os seus sindicatos a nível europeu, bem como com os nossos fornecedores, para baixar custos de modo a conseguir responder a este novo contexto e sobreviver numa realidade de concorrência distorcida. Estamos a negociar reduções de salários com os sindicatos de modo a ajudar a reduzir de forma significativa o número de 3000 potenciais despedimentos e apelamos à sua participação para diminuir a perda de empregos e o encerramento de bases.

Isso não seria evitável se a Rynair recebesse apoios estatais?
Há uma crescente oposição na Europa à defesa, por parte da Alemanha, França e Holanda, dos seus “campeões nacionais”, incluindo companhias aéreas, com resgates massivos. Outros governos europeus simplesmente não se podem dar ao luxo de efectuar esse nível de gastos. A forma de ajudar as companhias aéreas sem distorcer o mercado único é ajudar a recuperação do tráfego de maneira justa e transparente. Isso protegeria empregos e a conectividade, em benefício da indústria de turismo da Europa.

Acha que a sua empresa fica em desvantagem face aos concorrentes que receberam apoios? Há quem considere que a Ryanair pode ter vantagens, porque com a sua política de cortes conseguirá ter mais margem de manobra para recuperar passageiros com base numa política agressiva de tarifas… e pode aproveitar as exigências impostas por Bruxelas à Lufthansa, como é o caso das slots no aeroporto de Frankfurt, ou não?
Lufthansa, Air France-KLM e Alitalia, entre outras, receberam muitos milhões dos seus governos, o que distorce a concorrência e coloca a Ryanair, a Easyjet e a Wizz em desvantagem. A Comissão Europeia deu luz verde aos sete mil milhões de euros de apoio à Air France sem impor condições e os nove mil milhões de euros para a Lufthansa foram autorizados numa sexta-feira à noite depois de a Alemanha ter feito pressão para que a Comissão exigisse apenas um compromisso simbólico por parte da Lufthansa e que nada faria para restringir os seus instintos anti-concorrenciais. Vamos enfrentar uma concorrência intensa a nível europeu, com as companhias de bandeira a oferecer preços abaixo do custo nos próximos anos, e as nossas tarifas terão de ser mais baixas para competir e sobreviver.

Como será o mercado este ano, e no próximo?
Esperamos uma recuperação rápida aos níveis de tráfego de 2019 à boleia de tarifas baixas. Em termos de preços, [a recuperação] vai demorar um pouco mais, cerca de dois a três anos.

Vai-se assistir ao fim de muitas companhias aéreas? E, se sim, quem vai ocupar o seu espaço? A Ryanair? As companhias de bandeira?
Já assistimos a várias falências no sector, como a Flybe no Reino Unido. É inevitável que mais pequenas companhias aéreas desapareçam.

O que é que vai mudar na forma como viajamos?
Vamos assistir a um regresso gradual à normalidade. Após quatro meses de restrições necessárias, é altura de colocar a Europa a voar outra vez, de salvar o que resta da época de Verão, de reunir amigos e famílias e de relançar a indústria de turismo europeia, que é responsável por imensos postos de trabalho. Precisamos de nos adaptar a uma nova realidade, e todos devem fazê-lo de forma responsável, através do uso de máscaras, da introdução de controlos de temperaturas nos aeroportos e da redução das interacções entre pessoas quando for possível.

No caso de Portugal, qual vai ser o nível de redução da operação? Quantas pessoas emprega actualmente e quantas poderão ser despedidas? Vão fechar, ou não, alguma base, como a de Faro?
Estamos a trabalhar com os nossos funcionários e com os sindicatos a nível europeu em medidas de emergência para responder a esta nova realidade, incluindo a perda de até 3000 postos de trabalho e a redução temporária de 20% dos pilotos com salários mais altos e de 10% para os tripulantes de cabine. Apelamos ao envolvimento dos sindicatos e dos funcionários, de modo a mitigar a perda de empregos em Portugal.

Como vê os apoios públicos que estão a ser preparados para a TAP? Neste caso, o Estado até é dono de 50% do capital…
Vai ser muito difícil para a TAP conseguir cumprir com as condições do programa, uma vez que tem de pagar os [até] 1,2 mil milhões de euros do empréstimo em seis meses ou apresentar um plano de reestruturação. Já assistimos a esta situação com a Alitalia. Acabam por nunca pagar o empréstimo nem reestruturar devidamente a empresa, pelo que continuam a ser resgatadas pelo Estado. O dinheiro que o Governo português vai gastar na TAP seria melhor distribuído através das várias companhias aéreas que operam em Portugal em proporção do seu contributo para a conectividade do país.

Anunciaram recentemente que vão restabelecer cerca de 120 rotas envolvendo Portugal a 1 de Julho. Quantas eram antes da covid-19? Alguma vez pensam voltar a esse nível anterior?
Recuperámos mais de 90% da rede de rotas em Portugal e esperamos voltar aos níveis pré-covid num futuro próximo.

E ao nível de frequências, quantas eram e quantas serão a 1 de Julho?
Planeámos operar mais de 400 frequências a partir de 1 de Julho, contras as 650 frequências que tínhamos planeado para o Verão antes da pandemia.

tp.ocilbup@sobolalliv.siul

Fleeing the “huge fire ball” threatening Portugal | #EUClimateMigrants E6

Facebook faces advertiser revolt over failure to address hate speech



Facebook faces advertiser revolt over failure to address hate speech

The North Face, REI and other brands pause advertising on the platform in ‘Stop Hate for Profit’ campaign

Facebook makes $70bn in annual advertising revenue while ‘amplifying the messages of white supremacists’, according to the campaign.

Kari Paul in San Francisco
Published onTue 23 Jun 2020 00.26 BST

Several companies have suspended advertising on Facebook over the company’s failure to address hate speech on the platform.

The outdoor apparel and product retailers the North Face, REI, and Patagonia have pledged not to pay for advertising on Facebook platforms as part of the “Stop Hate for Profit” campaign, launched Wednesday by advocacy groups including the Anti-Defamation League, the NAACP, and the Color Of Change. The freelance job listing site Upwork and the internet company Mozilla have also joined the pledge.

The movement asks advertisers to pressure the tech giant to adopt stricter policies against racist and hateful content on its platforms by pausing all spending on advertising with the company for the month of July.

Facebook makes $70bn in annual advertising revenue while “amplifying the messages of white supremacists” and “permitting incitement to violence”, according to the campaign.

“We have long seen how Facebook has allowed some of the worst elements of society into our homes and our lives,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive officer of the Anti-Defamation League, in a statement. “Our organizations have tried individually and collectively to push Facebook to make their platforms safer, but they have repeatedly failed to take meaningful action. We hope this campaign finally shows Facebook how much their users and their advertisers want them to make serious changes for the better.”

James Steyer, founder and CEO of Common Sense, a partner in the campaign, said he expected more companies to join in coming weeks. “Companies clearly have heightened awareness around issues of racial justice in the US right now,” he said. “We are heartened by the progress and we think it is the right time for this.”

The campaign cites a number of examples to argue Facebook has failed to address misinformation and hate speech: it made Breitbart News a “trusted news source” despite its history of working with white nationalists and neo-Nazis, was accused of allowing housing discrimination against communities of color, and failed to remove Holocaust denial posts.

Facebook is also the social media platform where the most Americans – 55% – reported experiencing hate and harassment, according to a 2019 ADL survey of Americans using the services.

The company has faced increased pressure to address hate speech and misinformation in recent months as its competitor Twitter began to flag false and incendiary statements from Donald Trump. Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, has refused to rein in the American president or flag his posts despite the urging of more than 100 scientists, coordinated walkouts of employees protesting the decision, and criticisms from civil rights leaders.

Carolyn Everson, vice-president of Facebook’s global business group, said in a statement: “We deeply respect any brand’s decision, and remain focused on the important work of removing hate speech and providing critical voting information.”

Upwork said it would pause its advertising for the month of July. Its CEO, Hayden Brown, said the company “cannot stand by and be complicit to or complacent about the spread of hate, racism, and misinformation”. REI in a statement said that it would “put people over profits” by pulling its advertising.

The North Face is halting paid advertising on Facebook and Instagram for the next 30 days “to support the implementation of stricter policies to stop racist, violent or hateful content and misinformation from circulating on the Facebook platform”, a spokeswoman said by email. It will continue to post unpaid, non-advertising content on its Instagram page.

“We stand in support of the NAACP and #StopHateforProfit organizations asking that Facebook stop promoting hate, bigotry, racism, antisemitism and violence,” she said. “We will re-evaluate our position over the next 30 days depending on these outcomes.”

John Bolton responds to Trump, talks new book l ABC News

Anderson Cooper: Trump's joke came at the expense of thousands of people

Seattle will move to dismantle protest zone, mayor says



LEGAL
Seattle will move to dismantle protest zone, mayor says

The mayor did not give an immediate timeline for clearing out the occupation.

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
06/22/2020 11:23 PM EDT

SEATTLE — Faced with growing pressure to crack down on an “occupied” protest zone following two weekend shootings, Seattle’s mayor said Monday that officials will move to wind down the blocks-long span of city streets taken over two weeks ago that President Donald Trump asserted is run by “anarchists.”

Mayor Jenny Durkan said the violence was distracting from changes sought by thousands of peaceful protesters opposing racial inequity and police brutality. She said at a news conference that the city is working with the community to bring the “Capitol Hill Occupied Protest” zone, or CHOP, to an end and that police soon would move back into a precinct building they had largely abandoned in the area.

Durkan also vowed to address some of the protesters’ demands, including investing more in Black communities, reimagining policing in cooperation with community leaders, and pushing for accountability measures and statewide reform of police unions.


The mayor did not give an immediate timeline for clearing out the occupation but said “additional steps” would be examined if people don’t leave voluntarily. With scores of people camping in a park in the protest zone, Durkan said peaceful demonstrations could continue, but nighttime disorder had to stop.

“The cumulative impacts of the gatherings and protests and the nighttime atmosphere and violence has led to increasingly difficult circumstances for our businesses and residents,” Durkan said. “The impacts have increased and the safety has decreased.”

A shooting Sunday night was the second in less than 48 hours at the edge of the zone, which is named for the Capitol Hill neighborhood near downtown Seattle and emerged during nationwide protests over the killing of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police.

The 17-year-old victim was shot in the arm and declined to speak with detectives, police said. Gunfire early Saturday left a 19-year-old man dead and another person critically wounded.

The victims were taken to a hospital by volunteer medics in private cars, and police said they were met by a hostile crowd that prevented them from immediately getting to the scene.

It was not apparent if the shootings had anything to do with the protest — gunfire sometimes occurs in the neighborhood, especially on warm summer nights.

Protesters cordoned off the several-block area near the police’s East Precinct after Seattle riot squads unleashed tear gas, pepper spray and flash-bangs on large crowds of mostly peaceful protesters, drawing condemnation from many city leaders and a federal court order temporarily banning the use of the weapons on demonstrators.

After police largely abandoned the building, protesters took over the area — with demonstrators painting a large “Black Lives Matter” mural on the street, handing out free food, playing music and planting a community garden. Its existence incensed Trump, who criticized Durkan and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, both Democrats.

Peace has prevailed during the day. On Monday, people lounged on the turf at a park, while volunteers handed out food, water and toiletries. Artists painted designs on wooden barricades, and a few candles burned in front of a sign on the police building listing people killed by officers.

At night, however, the atmosphere has become more charged, with demonstrators marching and armed volunteer guards keeping watch.

Italy’s far right has a new rising star




Italy’s far right has a new rising star

Luca Zaia, the governor of Veneto, is surging in the polls thanks to his management of the COVID-19 crisis.

By GRETA PRIVITERA 6/23/20, 4:04 AM CET

Luca Zaia, who leads Veneto's government, is seeing a surge in popularity in Italy over his handling of the coronavirus pandemic in his region | Marco Bertorello/AFP via Getty Images

MILAN — Six months ago, Matteo Salvini could not have imagined that the biggest threat to his leadership of the far-right League party would be one of his closest allies.

But as the coronavirus pandemic redraws Italy’s political map, the polls are pointing to a dangerous new challenger: Luca Zaia, the governor of Veneto, has become a household name in the country and skyrocketed in popularity. His 51 percent approval rating makes him the second-most loved politician in Italy, behind Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, at 59 percent.

That Zaia’s star is rising is in no small part thanks to his handling of the health crisis in Veneto, one of the most severely affected regions in Italy. His administration’s success stands in stark contrast to the catastrophe that took place in Lombardy, which had one of the highest death rates in the country and whose governor, fellow League-member Attilio Fontana, has been accused of negligence and incompetence.

Zaia’s surge in the polls is fueling speculation he could soon supplant Salvini at the helm of the party following regional elections in September. Already extremely popular in his Veneto region, Zaia won the last two regional elections by a high margin and has earned widespread admiration from outside the League party for his crisis management.

Speaking to POLITICO, Zaia insists he is not after the party’s top job, and brushes aside speculation he may be the new League chief.

“Salvini should not be afraid of me” — Luca Zaia, president of Veneto's government

"They are wrong if they think I want to fill Matteo Salvini’s shoes," Zaia said. “My history in the League has been about respect for our roles, I have no ambition to rise up in the party.”

He added that he has an excellent relationship with Salvini, who congratulated him on how he managed the crisis in Veneto.

Known for keeping a low profile, Zaia downplayed recent polls, which predict he could be reelected by a greater majority than Salvini, whose own popularity has dropped to 37 percent.

"It's normal,” Zaia said. “These surveys are the result of recent times. They are conditioned by COVID-19. At university, I also studied statistics and I know that the data is a result of the time in which it was collected.”

He added: “Salvini should not be afraid of me.”

 * * *

Others beg to differ. And Salvini himself appears to paying attention.

Out of the public eye for much of the pandemic, Salvini has returned to public squares to denounce the government’s leadership during the crisis and attempt to recapture lost ground ahead of the regional election.

For the League leader, the stakes are high.

The party has historically been split into two factions: the Lombardy League, now dominated by Salvini, a firebrand who took the party mainstream on an anti-immigration platform, and the Venetian League, whose members have long felt marginalized. They are likely to rally behind Zaia, whom they consider one of their own.

If the September elections confirm Zaia's far greater popularity within the party, Salvini could be forced to step aside and make room for a rising star who could take the League in a new direction.

According to Flavio Tosi, a former mayor of Verona and a former League member, the greatest difference between Zaia and Salvini is that one knows how to govern and the other does not.

"Salvini is OK when there is a big mess, but when there is a need to govern, no,” Tosi told Italian media Il Foglio. “So much so that today he is gone. He ran out of slogans. With immigration gone and attacks on Europe subdued, Salvini has nothing to say.”

By contrast, he added, “Zaia has continued to be an administrator.”

Zaia’s management of the crisis — on exhibit, particularly, in the village of Vo’ near Padua — has become a powerful symbol of his political style and potential leadership, also earning him plaudits from outside his own party.

If public criticism of Zaia is scarce, he does have detractors, who bristle at the credit he's received for his work in Veneto.

The village made headlines in late February when it recorded Italy’s first victim of COVID-19 and immediately became a so-called red zone, along with other municipalities in the area.

With all eyes trained on the region, Zaia made a choice later heralded as a rare example of political level-headedness: He introduced the systematic testing of the village’s 3,300 inhabitants, closed the hospital where the first COVID-19 patient was treated to avoid further infections, and arranged for triage tents to be set up for incoming suspected cases, before these were common practice elsewhere.

“We went looking for the virus,” Zaia told POLITICO in an interview, even though at the time, he added, the World Health Organization “said I was exaggerating.”

The campaign to test residents for COVID-19 and for antibodies to the virus, which Zaia developed in collaboration with the epidemiologist Andrea Crisanti, was later expanded to the rest of the region. It has been credited with saving Veneto’s residents from the kind of tragic outcomes seen in neighboring Lombardy.

These displays of pragmatism help explain why Zaia is doing so well in the polls, even as Italy has seen a “rally-around-the-flag effect” that seen support for his party dip on a national scale, falling from 34 percent in last year’s European election to just 24 percent today.

But if public criticism of Zaia is scarce, he does have detractors, who bristle at the credit he's received for his work in Veneto.

The region's success in fighting the virus is down to Crisanti, the epidemiologist, not Zaia, according to Piero Ruzzante, Veneto's regional councilor.

"Zaia, who now tries to obscure the importance of the part Crisanti played, owes everything to the professor," Ruzzante told POLITICO, adding that Zaia had overseen cuts to health services in previous years.

"Today it seems he made a miracle in Veneto, but few remember that at the beginning of the emergency, he was against the red zones and said things like 'Veneto does not close,' like many other Italian politicians."

 * * *

The prospect of a League party headed by someone like Zaia could indeed mark a major change in direction for the party, and help it regain the support it lost in recent months, some say.

Unlike Salvini, who gained notoriety for his anti-immigration positions as interior minister, Zaia is mostly still unknown outside Italy’s borders. He is a member of the League’s old guard: The son of a mechanic, he entered politics at the age of 25 and was an agriculture minister in Silvio Berlusconi’s government between 2008 and 2010.

He is, by his own description, “a convinced Europeanist,” even if he has said he doesn’t agree with some decisions the European Union has made.

If everyone does politics his own way, this may be Zaia’s: Keep a low profile and admit no ambition.

Unlike Salvini, Zaia is known to avoid political fights. He is not a shouter, doesn’t take selfies or post livestreams on Instagram.

If Salvini conquered Italian’s minds by appealing to baser instincts via social media, waving rosaries and popularizing slogans against immigration, Zaia appears to have gained support more quietly, through the success of his work as governor of Veneto.

Not to be drawn out on the differences between him and his party leader, Zaia dodged a question on whether he agrees with Salvini’s often inflammatory rhetoric.

“I am part of the League that shouts less, but we work well together,” he said. “Everyone has his own language and his own way of communicating.”

If everyone does politics his own way, this may be Zaia’s: Keep a low profile and admit no ambition. Let the polls do the rest.

segunda-feira, 22 de junho de 2020

Europe struggles to seed the forest for the trees



Europe struggles to seed the forest for the trees

With warm weather stressing native species, new types of trees may be needed to absorb carbon dioxide.

By KALINA OROSCHAKOFF 6/20/20, 12:00 PM CET Updated 6/22/20, 4:15 PM CET

Voiced by Amazon Polly

This article is part of the special report The World in 2050.

Europe can’t stop climate change without forests. But climate change is killing trees.

Forests cover almost half of Europe’s land area, and that proportion is set to grow over the next three decades. Policymakers are planning to plant billions of trees in an effort to absorb emissions and slash the European Union’s greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050.

But even with tree cover set to expand across the bloc, it’s becoming less clear what Europe’s wooded areas will actually look like when the middle of the century arrives.

“Forests are biting the dust before our eyes,” said Philipp zu Guttenberg, who ran the German Forest Owners Association between 2010 and 2019.


Dead spruce trees are suffering from drought; while beeches, above left, are thriving in a forest near Iserlohn, Germany | Ina Fassbender/AFP via Getty Images

As the world warms, trees are being ravaged by drought, fires, bark beetles and other species gnawing away at their bark and trunks. Not all tree species might pass the test of time and temperatures, experts warn.

That means the trees making up mid-century forests might be very different from those of today — and they might not be nearly as good at pulling CO2 from the atmosphere. Even worse, climate change might turn trees into a source of emissions.

Such a change poses a huge problem for the European Commission’s 2050 plans. It notes that trees already absorb about 10 percent of the bloc’s greenhouse gas emissions every year, “which means they are also crucial in adapting to climate change.” They’re also meant to maintain and enhance biodiversity, to replace cement and other carbon-intensive materials in construction and other areas, and to fuel much of the EU’s renewable energy use over the next decades.

Last October the Commission warned that Europe’s woodlands were removing less carbon every year because climate change makes wildfires more frequent, and because of higher harvesting rates aimed at satisfying increased demand for wood.

“It’s far too dry and far too warm. Our forests aren’t conditioned for that. There are more pests — mushrooms, bark beetles, butterflies — than we’ve ever seen before,” Guttenberg said. “They’re finding ideal living conditions ... Everything’s come together at once: there are invasive species we never had, they find weakened trees with barely any resin and reduced immune systems.”

Frying forests
Satellite data shows 2019 was the warmest on record in Europe. There were summer droughts across much of Central Europe. Soil moisture was the second-lowest for 40 years.

Two drought years have triggered a “dramatic dying of trees,” said Martin Häusling, the Greens’ spokesperson on agricultural matters in the European Parliament, who used to run a small organic farm before becoming a politician.

He warned that it’s not just the artificially planted forests consisting of endless ranks of spruce and pine trees that are withering, but also beech trees which typically mark the Central European landscape.

The bad news about forests is at odds with the optimistic sounds coming out of the European Commission. EU Green Deal chief Frans Timmermans has put forward a headline-grabbing scheme to plant 3 billion trees, but experts and campaigners say the plan is largely a distraction which doesn’t address forest degradation.

“I understand politicians, they want headlines and simple solutions. Planting trees — it’s very easy to say,” said Marc Palahí, director of the European Forest Institute.

“Many people forget that planting the tree is not the end of the issue. Planting the tree is the beginning of a long-term project to nurture a tree, which can last 100 years,” said Palahí. “Many politicians think you plant and clap and there’s the tree.”

Instead, political energy should turn to adapting forests to warmer temperatures and more frequent droughts.

“Politicians would like to have a big tree-planting program for Europe. What we need is an adaptation plan for European forests,” Palahí said.

That’s echoed by foresters.

“It’s about maintaining our forests,”  said Guttenberg, who’s also a leading lobbyist for the Confederation of European Forest Owners. “It’s about keeping them alive.”

Calculating how climate change will affect forests in the coming decades is also a problem for government advisers trying to model what it will take to slash emissions to net zero.

“One of the challenges in our modeling is to factor in climate change itself,” Chris Stark, the chief executive of the U.K.’s Committee on Climate Change, told POLITICO. That matters for trees and peatlands.

“Planting trees is not a panacea,” he added. “You need the right climate to grow these trees. So, a big question is, can you put the trees in the right place so they grow successfully, and can you do that in a way that isn’t damaging to nature?”

Tree planting
Inside the EU’s political institutions, officials are aware that forests are already under huge pressure and that there are no easy solutions.

“We’re losing forest cover every summer [from fires] to begin with, let alone speaking about pests, diseases, etc.,” Mauro Petriccione, the head of the climate change department, said in February.

The challenge facing policymakers is to find the right balance to satisfy environmental, climate and commercial interests.

In its recently announced Biodiversity Strategy, the European Commission acknowledges that in “addition to strictly protecting all remaining EU primary and old-growth forests, the EU must increase the quantity, quality and resilience of its forests, notably against fires, droughts, pests, diseases and other threats likely to increase with climate change.”

Another question forest experts are grappling with is what type of tree will weather the future’s changing climate.

“In parts of Germany, spruce is saying goodbye,” Guttenberg said. “Beech and ash, they’re all kicking the bucket. But we don’t even know what home-grown species we should plant instead.” The German government earmarked €700 million for forests in its pandemic recovery package earlier this month.

“We know that climate change is changing faster than the capacity of natural species to move to the right regions,” Palahí said. “What is clear the forest in 2050 will look quite different from the forest we have now.”