The Conservatives have been planning to
block further onshore windfarm construction. Photograph: Danny
Lawson/Photograph: Danny Lawson/PA
|
UN urges huge increase in green energy to avert
climate disaster
'Triple or
quadruple renewables', say experts, as pressure grows for UK to deliver
on eco priorities
Robin McKie
and Toby Helm
The
Observer, Saturday 12 April 2014 / http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/apr/12/un-urges-increase-green-energy-avert-climate-disaster-uk
David
Cameron's commitment to the green agenda will come under the fiercest scrutiny
yet this week when top climate-change experts will warn that only greater use
of renewable energy – including windfarms – can prevent a global catastrophe.
A report by
the world's leading authorities will expose a growing gulf between a Tory party
intent on halting construction of more onshore windfarms and the world's
leading scientists, who see them as one of the cheapest ways to provide energy
while at the same time saving the environment.
Mitigation
of Climate Change, by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC), a panel of 200 scientists, will make it clear that by far the most
realistic option for the future is to triple or even quadruple the use of
renewable power plants. Only through such decisive action will carbon dioxide
levels in the atmosphere be kept below the critical level of 480 parts per
million (ppm), before the middle of the century. If levels go beyond this
figure, the chances of curtailing global mayhem are poor, they will say.
The report
– the third in a series by the IPCC designed to highlight the climate crisis
now facing the planet – is intended as an urgent wake-up call to nations to
commit around 1-2% of GDP in order to replace power plants that burn fossil
fuels, the major cause of global warming, with renewable sources.
Its conclusions represent a huge challenge
for Cameron and the Conservative party – which is now laying plans to block the
construction of new onshore windfarms in Britain, the country's only realistic,
reasonably priced renewable energy option other than solar power, which has
limited potential in the UK.
Having promised to lead "the greenest
government ever", Cameron now stands accused by the green lobby of
watering down his commitments in response to the threat of Ukip, which
campaigns heavily against windfarms.
The prime minister's green credentials have
also been called into question by the appointment in 2012 of Owen Paterson, a
climate-change sceptic, as environment secretary. Paterson said in September 2013: "People
get very emotional about this subject and I think we should just accept that
the climate has been changing for centuries."
An Opinium/Observer poll – which today puts
Ukip on 18% support – also finds that just 15% of voters think Cameron has
lived up to his promises on the environment, against 46% who think he has not.
In addition, only 20% disagreed with the suggestion that the government was
giving priority to short-term economic growth over the sustainable use of the
environment.
Last week local government secretary Eric
Pickles announced he had taken personal control over all future decisions about
new onshore windfarms, while Grant Shapps, the Conservative party chairman,
said wind turbines were no longer "environmentally friendly". Shapps
also suggested that the Tories would pledge to curb them in their 2015 election
manifesto and instead approve only offshore windfarms.
However, the move would cripple the ability
of the government to play a full part in curtailing carbon dioxide emissions,
and experts warn it could lead to higher energy prices.
Onshore wind power costs around £90 per
megawatt hour to generate, but for offshore windfarms this rises to £150. Other
renewable energy sources are either of limited use in Britain or are
not yet fully developed, such as tidal power. Nuclear energy is one
alternative, but is controversial, and a major construction programme would
take decades to approve and construct.
"Renewable energy is backed by the
public; wind power has the support of two thirds (66%) of Britons and the CBI
has called on action to tackle climate change," said Christian Aid's
senior climate change advisor, Mohamed Adow. "The government should be
doing all it can to put the UK
at the forefront of this energy revolution not blowing hot and cold on the
issue.
Joss Garman, Greenpeace's deputy political
director, said: "These scientists have shown us that it's not too late and
we can still avoid the worst impacts of climate change, but only if we get
behind the clean energy solutions that can slash carbon pollution. Renewable
energy technologies are already the least-cost option in a growing number of
major markets, and they're getting cheaper all the time.Rather than turning
back towards dirty fuels like coal and gas, now is the time for Ministers to
double down on our transition towards a cleaner energy system. This report
shows that the sooner we act, the cheaper it will be."
The new report has taken four years to
compile. It is expected to say the UN target – to limit global warming to 2
degrees celsius (3.6 degrees fahrenheit) – is feasible only if surging carbon
emissions are swiftly braked and then reversed.
The first report forecast that global
temperatures would rise by 0.3-4.8C
this century, on top of roughly 0.7C
since the industrial revolution. Seas are forecast to rise by 26-82cm by 2100.
The second report, which was issued last month, dwelt on the likely impacts and
warned that the risk of conflict, hunger, floods and mass displacement
increased with every minuscule rise in temperature.
The panel will issue a résumé of all three
reports in Copenhagen in October, prior to the
next major UN climate summit, which is scheduled to open in Paris in December 2015.
The last IPCC assessment report, published
in 2007, formed the core of the international debate on climate at the UN's Copenhagen
Summit in 2009. The event degenerated into a political brawl and climate
negotiations have been stuttering ever since. Climate experts say this failure
to act cannot be allowed to continue. UN members must agree to a climate pact
that will come into force in 2020. Any later and the costs of mitigating
climate change will soar exponentially because there will then be so much
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário