It's not Russia
that is destabilising Ukraine
The west has been
needlessly whipping up tension – if we don't co-operate soon, chaos may take
hold
Sergei
Lavrov
The
Guardian, Monday 7 April 2014 / http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/07/sergei-lavrov-russia-stabilise-ukraine-west
The
profound and pervasive crisis in Ukraine
is a matter of grave concern for Russia . We understand perfectly
well the position of a country which became independent just over 20 years ago
and still faces complex tasks in constructing a sovereign state. Among them is
the search for a balance of interests among its various regions, the peoples of
which have different historical and cultural roots, speak different languages
and have different perspectives on their past and present, and their country's
future place in the world.
Given these
circumstances, the role of external forces should have been to help Ukrainians
protect the foundations of civil peace and sustainable development, which are
still fragile. Russia
has done more than any other country to support the independent Ukrainian
state, including for many years subsidising its economy through low energy
prices. Last November, at the outset of the current crisis, we supported Kiev 's wish for urgent consultations between Ukraine , Russia and the EU to discuss
harmonising the integration process. Brussels
flatly rejected it. This stand reflected the unproductive and dangerous line
the EU and US have been taking for a long time. They have been trying to compel
Ukraine
to make a painful choice between east and west, further aggravating internal
differences.
Assertions
that Russia
has undermined efforts to strengthen partnerships on the European continent do
not correspond to the facts. On the contrary, our country has steadily promoted
a system of equal and indivisible security in the Euro-Atlantic area. We
proposed signing a treaty to that effect, and advocated the creation of a
common economic and human space from the Atlantic
to the Pacific which would also be open to post-Soviet countries.
In the
meantime, western states, despite their repeated assurances to the contrary,
have carried out successive waves of Nato enlargement, moved the alliance's
military infrastructure eastward and begun to implement antimissile defence
plans. The EU's Eastern Partnership programme is designed to bind the so-called
focus states tightly to itself, shutting down the possibility of co-operation
with Russia .
Attempts by those who staged the secession of Kosovo from Serbia and of Mayotte from the Comoros to
question the free will of Crimeans cannot be viewed as anything but a flagrant
display of double standards. No less troubling is the pretence of not noticing
that the main danger for the future of Ukraine is the spread of chaos by
extremists and neo-Nazis.
We are not
imposing anything on anyone, we just see that if it is not done, Ukraine will
continue to spiral into crisis with unpredictable consequences. We stand ready
to join international efforts aimed at achieving these goals. We support the
appeal by foreign ministers of Germany ,
France and Poland to
implement the 21 February agreement. Their proposal – to hold Russia-EU talks
with the participation of Ukraine
and other Eastern Partnership states about the consequences of EU association
agreements – corresponds to our position.
The world
of today is not a junior school where teachers assign punishments at will.
Belligerent statements such as those heard at the Nato foreign ministers
meeting in Brussels
on 1 April do not match demands for a de-escalation. De-escalation should begin
with rhetoric. It is time to stop the groundless whipping-up of tension, and to
return to serious common work.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário