China's Empty Cities and the Law of
Supply and Demand
Why Beijing
needs to keep on building, snarky bloggers be damned.
BY Daniel Altman
MARCH 21, 2014 / http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2014/03/21/china_s_empty_cities_and_the_law_of_supply_and_demand
An old friend of my mother had a saying about cooking for
guests: "If there isn't too much food, then there isn't enough." Most
mathematically inclined people would agree that the chance of guessing exactly
the right amount of food to leave everyone at a dinner party full and happy --
that is, on a continuous spectrum ranging from no food to infinite food -- is
virtually zero. But the analysis of economic growth, and China's urban planning
in particular, has not always heeded this simple insight.
On March 16, the Chinese government released a seven-year
plan for the continuing urbanization of its population. So far, the process has
been an important engine of China's growth, making workers more productive by
giving them better access to capital, services, and economies of scale. There
have been plenty of bumps in the road, though, with huge urban districts built
under government orders still waiting for their first inhabitants.
This is where the adage about cooking comes in. How likely
was Beijing to guess exactly the right size and number of cities to house its
enormous population? Just like having food left over at the end of a meal, the
risk-averse strategy was to build a little extra, in case the technocrats
didn't guess correctly the first time.
This situation repeats itself millions of times every day
around the world, and it's not unique to planned economies. Almost any
industry, let alone the economy of an entire country, involves myriad decisions
about how much to invest, produce, sell, pay, or save. It's inevitable that
some of those decisions are wrong, and a few are inevitably wrong in a big way.
As the Great Recession took hold in the United States,
thousands of new homes were left vacant or abandoned -- notably in Florida, but
in many other states as well. Spain today also has hundreds of thousands of
empty properties, as jobs are much scarcer than newly built apartments. And
booming Australia may have as many as 125,000 unneeded houses.
Whatever the economic system, whatever the point in the
economic cycle, the market for newly constructed buildings does not always
clear. Developers make bets based on expectations that turn out to be
incorrect. Sometimes, they might not even expect the market to clear right
away; they might want to build property while construction is cheap, even if
the right time to sell might be a few years away. But other developers may
simply overestimate demand. Indeed, it would be astonishing if all of their
forecasts for demand were correct, all the time.
And yet that's what pundits seem to expect. The results of
overbuilding are easily visible, and just as easy to poke fun at. But if
China's overbuilding is the worst planning mistake in its past quarter-century
of economic development, I call that not too bad at all. Moreover, it's not as
though those empty buildings will have zero value for eternity. Just consider
what happened with fiber optic cable.
During the previous recession in the United States, after
the bursting of the dotcom bubble in 2000, the fiber optic cable industry
suffered almost as much ridicule as China's ghost towns. Firms like Global
Crossing built enormous fiber networks on the "if you build it, they will
come" theory, but not enough people came. That has started to change. Last
June, fiber accounted for almost 8 percent of broadband connections in the
United States, after growing 12 percent in the previous 12 months, far
outpacing the overall increase in broadband penetration of less than 4 percent.
Today, major cities are posing like contestants in a beauty contest in hopes
that Google will choose them to launch its ultra-high-speed fiber hook-up.
By the same token, Chinese people may yet move into some of
those empty districts, especially if the relaxing of the one-child policy and
increased immigration lead to higher population growth. Changes to China's
strict internal migration rules, which are likely to occur as part of the
agenda released this week, will help as well. In the grand sweep of China's
post-reform growth, any waste associated with overbuilding will probably end up
as a footnote -- just like those vacant condos in South Florida and the Great
Recession.
Of course, being out of phase with demand is not the only
reason why an industry might suffer a gap between investment and revenue.
Sometimes the pace of innovation is out of step with consumers' preferences,
necessary infrastructure, or the economy's absorptive capacity. In recent
times, these factors combined to create decades-long delays between the
invention and mainstream adoption of personal computers, mobile phones, and
electric cars, to name a few.
But innovation can also lag behind the economy's wants and
needs. We don't have good synthetic substitutes for copper and rare earth
metals, so their availability can be a constraint on the size of electric grids
and the production of electronics. Supply can fall short of demand in
traditional markets, too, where innovation is hardly an issue. For instance, as
incomes rose in the last global boom, people wanted to buy more food. Harvests
couldn't just expand instantaneously, though, and the slow response of supply
to higher demand led to higher commodity prices and shortages.
These are normal growing pains in a world economy that is
complex and full of frictions. In the short term, they can result in odd
mismatches of supply and demand. In the long term, however, they tend to smooth
themselves out. The critical question is whether it's worse to have too much of
something or too little.
In the case of Chinese housing, the answer is clearly too
little. Empty cities might spawn a thousand jokey articles in the Western
media, but they don't spawn many riots or rebellions at home. Millions of
homeless Chinese, who can find jobs but not a place to sleep, might be another
story. So get back into that kitchen -- the guests will be here ... eventually.
WANG ZHAO/AFP/Getty Images
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário