VHILS. Photo: João Pedro Moreira.
|
Lisbon, Tattooed City
01 November 2013 / DAMn°41
Oh, graffiti. Like pigeons, it is found in urban
centres all over the world. And, as with pigeons in a town square, an expanse
of graffiti emits an overall appearance that reads as a mass of similarity and
muchness. There are the occasional stunning ones that command attention, and
should you stop to examine each of the others individually, you can usually
find something of interest. Lisbon has accumulated a particularly potent array
of accomplished urban artwork that warrants inspection. DAMN° perambulated
through the streets of the city with VHILS, one of its master urban artists,
who lent his perspective.
VHILS team in action, Shanghai, picture by João Pedro
Moreira. –
|
When Alexandre Farto was born in Lisbon some 26 years ago,
the city was still recovering from over 40 years of dictatorship and poverty.
On the walls of the city were the remnants of revolutionary graffiti.
“Unfortunately, only very few examples were kept. That’s the fate of graffiti:
“It’s ephemeral”, says VHILS, the moniker adopted by the Portuguese urban
artist who was launched by Banksy. We meet him at his brand new studio, from
where we embark on an extended walk along the many ‘worked’ walls of Lisbon, a
much-tattooed entity stretched-out along the sunny banks of the river Tejo.
Some of the surfaces bear his own work, while many others feature the work of
fellow urban artists.
After a couple of years as a London resident, VHILS – who excavates layers of paint, graffiti, and billboards with the dedication of an archaeologist, while creating his signature carved portraits in cities all over the world – is now back in his hometown. “The decaying beauty and many layers of history make Lisbon a nostalgic city – a capital full of crumbling buildings and, due to Portugal’s colonial heritage, of many different faces from various continents. And now that so many young people are leaving the country because of the harsh economic crisis and defaulting government, I have decided to come back and set up a studio here.” Not that he suddenly became sedentary – on the contrary, VHILS and his team regularly fly to Shanghai, Rio, New York, and everywhere in-between. “We use the streets to bring a message.”
With the crisis, artists started to do more political
pieces, which is quite interesting. Some Portuguese urban artists get really
critical, like MAISMENOS”, VHILS says, showing us some of his work at Underdogs
Gallery, the venue for urban art he launched last summer in a part of Lisbon
once destined to become the creative district, but which was scuttled when the
crisis hit in 2008. Now there is an atmosphere particular to dying
neighbourhoods, where urban art flourishes. MAISMENOS or + , aka Miguel
Januário, is an emerging talent. "He’s vetting society, which is increasingly
becoming a supermarket", VHILS explains while pointing to another work
that states ‘Until debt tear us apart’ at LX Factory, a 23,000 square-metre
former industrial complex that was transformed into an arts centre and has now
become so gentrified that the first occupants cannot afford it anymore and have
to move out – to places like the Underdogs hood.
VHILS in Providência (Brazil), picture by João Pedro
Moreira. –
|
VHILS, who declares that gentrification is an unavoidable
urban development – Lisbon is increasingly sold-out to foreign real estate
groups, to be transformed into yet another Barcelona-like mass tourism paradise
– turns out to be no-less-than an urban activist when carving out portraits of
the inhabitants who had been evicted in Providência – the oldest favela in Rio
– on the sides of what remained of their homes. He did the same kind of
socially engaged work in Shanghai, and he’s planning more such projects. A book
about these and other ‘social’ projects will be published by Gallimard in March
2014. “I’m not against gentrification when it comes naturally. But if it’s
top-down and if it comes with the extinction of the inhabitants, like because
of the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics in Brazil, it can’t be tolerated. We
drew attention from the world press to the cause of these poor, powerless
locals, and gave them a face – the result is that they can now stay and the
government will finally provide the services they should have provided years
ago.” It proves that urban artists can do slightly more than just tag trains –
in Lisbon, it’s hard to find walls, trains, or street furniture without
signature tags. VHILS defends this as being a necessary evil: “Every great
urban artist once started by tagging. And by handling trains you learn to work
fast, organise yourself, and perform under pressure (if the police catch you,
it’ll cost you a fortune). This offers excellent informal learning
opportunities.”
Portuguese architectural historian António Sérgio Rosa de
Carvalho nevertheless thinks it a shame, even if buildings are covered with
masterpieces like the ones from the Brazilian twin brothers, Os Gêmeos, and the
Italian urban artists in Lisbon’s business district. “That kind of graffiti,
however beautiful, shouldn’t be on the only four remaining historic buildings
in that neighbourhood. Those precious buildings should be renovated, not painted.
Even a masterpiece like the one by Os Gêmeos denotes that this heritage is
worth nothing and is ready for demolition. Governments pretend to be modern by
inviting artists, but they’re actually using them to demolish the city’s
heritage!” Lisbon City Hall recently launched a campaign against graffiti,
consisting of an abundant cleaning programme in the city centre (so tourists
who don’t leave the beaten track won’t see any disturbing tags), huge fines for
those who are caught, and legal urban galleries for ‘artistic graffiti’. VHILS
seems to have inspired the authors of the new law, since they explicitly
mention ‘carving´ as a practice to be eradicated. If it’s up to the city
government, urban artists will only be allowed to work at spots like the wall
of fame near the 25 de Abril Bridge, named after the revolution, where we halt
for a moment to look at a carved portrait by VHILS and many other works by
fellow urban artists. “Places like these are important, where artists can work
steadily without fear of the police catching them. But it can’t only be this…”
Pray for Portugal (by Nomen, born in the year of the
revolution, 1974). VHILS: “With the crisis more artists make political work.” –
|
VHILS’s own 3D crew recently finished a piece on another, not-yet-legally-tolerated
wall in front of the biggest shopping mall in the city centre. The wall is
covered in a variety of old and new, Portuguese and international masterpieces,
most of them quite critical, some merely artistic. “You’ll probably get more
from the walls in a city than from television and other media… People write
what they want on a wall. And that’s the good thing about graffiti, too: people
can get their word out, without having to sign their message. Which means
freedom of speech still exists on walls. Urban art makes the public space
interesting again in a time when it’s losing importance due to social media –
thus, it reanimates the public space as an environment where people can discuss
things: abandoned buildings, for instance, are overlooked until there’s
graffiti on them... Then, all of a sudden, people start to notice and to
discuss what should happen with the abandoned heritage. It’s important that
with modern technology and so on, real public space gets as interesting as
virtual environments on the internet, and urban art can help a great deal in
doing that job. And hey, if you have space for advertising in a city, just for
the sake of selling things, you should also have space for artists in the
public domain, just for the sake of art”, concludes VHILS, reluctant to show
his face – “the message, not the messenger”.
Don't let urban art cover up neglect of Lisbon's
crumbling heritage
Officially sanctioned
graffiti artists are not the answer to revitalising a beautiful city
John Chamberlain
The
Guardian, Friday 4 February 2011 / http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/feb/04/street-art-urban-planning-lisbon-portugal
Rachel Dixon suggests that Lisbon council's liberal offering
of derelict buildings to graffiti artists provides some alternative landscape
for the itinerant tourist (Quick on the draw, Travel, 29 January). Highlighting
recent examples in the city, she seems torn between viewing the results
"either as a scourge or what makes a city unique".
However attractive to the art buff roaming around Europe,
Lisbon highlights a disturbing practice of trying to disguise urban eyesores
with alternative art – a pervasive form of official neglect. Dixon rightly
identifies that she's talking about "a cluster of grand but derelict
buildings". In Lisbon much is derelict!
Architecturally, Lisbon is the "Cinderella city"
of Europe – much neglected, constantly abused, derelict and dilapidated. The
buildings Dixon refers to are in the main centre and have been empty for 30
years. Graffiti is a scourge, as the Bairro Alto district amply proves, with
itinerant, wall-to-wall scrawlings and illiterate hieroglyphics everywhere.
Residents despair.
The graffiti initiative highlights poignantly the total
absence of an urban strategy for regenerating the city centre. Estimates
suggest there are more than 4,600 buildings empty in the central area, 50%
either abandoned awaiting demolition or approval. Dixon mentions the Crono
Project as an alternative to "abandoning Lisbon's crumbling heritage to
the developers". Everyone likes to demonise developers, but in this case
the responsibility for such a state should be laid at the door of the planning
authorities.
Dixon refers to Barcelona, whose "policy crackdown in
2004 caused the disappearance of much graphic and performance art from the
streets" – but the small-scale urban regeneration there was so successful
that the Royal Institute of British Architects awarded the place a gold medal,
the first time a city has been so glorified.
The historic centre of Lisbon is commercially in decline,
and has fewer than 10 residents. Small businesses are closing, franchising is
everywhere. The Chiado area, close to Bairro Alto and destroyed by fire in
1988, is renovated and improving but too slowly. British architect Terry
Farrell's proposals for the river frontage are now forgotten after being
demonised by the local architectural community. Thirty years ago, as an
architect involved in Bristol's and London's urban partnerships, I made
proposals here to the Lisbon council and was ignored.
Dixon enjoyed Bairro Alto's restaurants and hectic nightlife
with its "mix of trendy locals and knowledgable tourists". This
classic residential area has grown gradually over the years without official
intervention. The examples highlighted – the Crono Project, Hall of Fame, the
Galeria de Arte Urbana – may well provide opportunities, as Dixon says,
"to distinguish between meaningless scrawls and impressive pieces of urban
art". But few locals are impressed. Many don't appreciate Lisbon council
"turning over derelict buildings to street artists with stunning
results" and would rather see more positive use of public money.
However, it's a beautiful city. Dixon should ignore the
artwork, report the dereliction, and visit the few conservation projects that
can be found. These are what make Lisbon unique, not itinerant spray jobs.
|
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário