We’re all a
bit confused as to how women – in
|
Nothing is wrong with Renee Zellweger's face. There's something wrong
with us
Pity the woman so brazen as to pull back the curtain on our hypocrisy by
letting herself be seen in public past a certain age
Jennifer
Gerson Uffalussy
theguardian.com,
Tuesday 21 October 2014 / http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/21/renee-zellweger-face-nothing-wrong
To be a
female celebrity is to lose at every turn. Dare to age? Face-shame at best and
be out of work at worst. Get noticeable plastic surgery on your face to combat
the inevitable ageing? At best, you will be mocked for your narcissism and
delusional attempts at hanging on to your youth; at worst, you’ll be out of
work again. The continued evolution of our obsession with famous people has
birthed a strange phenomenon: the bodies of total strangers are considered
collective public property to be casually evaluated, critiqued ... and
discarded.
As
disturbing as it may be sometimes to see a public figure physically transform
before our eyes, it’s even more troubling to see how effortlessly we rush to
say something about that transformation.
“Where did
Renee Zellweger’s face go?”
To ask a
question like that, as so many did on Tuesday is to cut in all directions,
commodifying a woman’s body even as you seemingly seek to champion it.
What did
Renee Zellweger do to deserve that kind of knee-jerk reaction? She attended
Elle magazine’s 2014 Women in Hollywood event on Monday night – which is
exactly the kind of thing you would expect a woman in Hollywood to do,
especially one marking her first appearance in a film in more than five years.
But no one, it seems, was happy to see her again: instead, on Tuesday morning,
the media gatekeepers – including many women – were aghast at the appearance of
Zellweger’s face, which seemed markedly different since her last memorable
red-carpet appearance, which was more than five years ago. The outcry was loud
and universal – which is exactly, sadly, the kind of thing a woman in Hollywood has learned to
expect anytime she does anything to her appearance.
From
fashion blogs to CNN, the horror and disgust was palpable: What kind of monster
is this, the world seemed to beg, that would shed her skin so easily, hoping to
avert ageing and death – or at least the death of her career by physically
becoming another person altogether? Heavy internet-sighers bemoaned how akin
Zellweger has become to Jennifer “No One Puts Baby in a Corner” Grey, who
infamously cut off her own nose to spite her face, and – like a spooky campfire
tale – supposedly never ever worked again.
Yet one
trope was notably absent from the Greek chorus of judgment decrying Zellweger’s
physical appearance. In all the hand-wringing and all the awfulness aimed at
Zellweger, nary but a few finger-pointers noted that, the public doesn’t just
feel entitled to freely comment on celebrity bodies and faces. No, the same public
that apparently believes Zellweger did something untoward to her greatest asset
(which is, apparently, not her acting chops) is also busy gasping even more
loudly should any woman dare to let a wrinkle, a glimmer of cellulite or a
bravely untoned abdominal muscle besmirch her appearance.
(Odd how
it’s never mentioned that even the legendary Jennifer Grey elected to get
plastic surgery only after she turned 30, which is also known as the age when
the same women in Hollywood
that Elle was celebrating on Monday night so often find themselves challenged
to find substantive work.)
And the
famous women who do dare to age at all – and beautifully so – are breathlessly
glorified as possessing a talent so exceptional – so perfect – that it allowed
them to transcend their own decaying forms.
Of course
Meryl Streep is still working and racking up awards, we say, smiling
respectfully every time a younger actress states that their greatest goal is to
share the screen with her. Of course Jessica Lange is the new face of Marc
Jacobs, we nod, proud of our own progressive, subversive standards of beauty.
We allow ourselves a few exceptional exceptions ... if they’re pretty enough
and we can believe that they would never sully themselves with a trip to a
medical professional.
We expect
our celebrity women to truly have it all: beauty, youth, talent, humility and a
conscientious disdain for how their appearances figure into their ability to
practice their art unless, of course, it is somehow serving their art. Pity the
woman so brazen as to pull back the curtain on these expectations by letting
herself be seen in public past a certain age – with or without the help of the
medical community.
Pity poor
Renee Zellweger, we say, for she is supposed to know when a famous woman no
longer meets our standards for unobtainable and effortless beauty. Spare us the
sight, we demand, of what our hypocrisy wreaks on our all-too-human idols
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário