MH17:
Buk missile finding sets Russia and west at loggerheads
Acrimonious
legal standoff likely after inquiry says Buk brought from Russia hit
Malaysia
Airlines flight, killing 298 people
Luke
Harding and Alec Luhn in Moscow
Wednesday
28 September 2016
Moscow faces the
prospect of an acrimonious legal standoff with the west after an
international investigation concluded that a Buk missile brought
across the border from Russia had shot down flight MH17.
The Dutch-led joint
investigation team (JIT) said the missile had been fired from a
village under the control of pro-Russia rebels. At a press conference
in the Dutch town of Nieuwegein, its investigators said there was
“irrefutable evidence” that a Buk 9M38 missile downed the
Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777, killing all 298 people on board.
Russia immediately
dismissed the findings, which could lead to attempts to extradite
Russian citizens to stand trial. Dmitry Peskov, Vladimir Putin’s
press spokesman, said the “whole story is unfortunately surrounded
by a huge amount of speculation and unqualified, unprofessional
information.”
The investigators,
who include representatives from Australia, Malaysia, Ukraine, and
Belgium, said their conclusions were based on a wealth of supporting
evidence, including forensic examinations, witness statements,
satellite images, radar data and intercepted telephone calls.
The investigation
found:
The missile was
fired from an arable field 6km south of the town of Snizhne, an area
was under the control of pro-Russia fighters.
The Buk came from
Russian territory into eastern Ukraine and was later transported on a
white Volvo truck. Witnesses, photographs and video show it escorted
by several other vehicles and by “armed men in uniform”.
Around 100 people
have been identified who can be linked to the downing of MH17 or the
transport of the Buk.
Witnesses at the
launch site near the village of Pervomaiskyi reported hearing “a
very loud noise” and “a high whistling sound”. They also saw a
plume of smoke.
Investigators are
now examining who gave the order to smuggle the Buk system into
Ukraine, and who gave the order to shoot down MH17.
Wilbert Paulissen,
the head of the Dutch national detective force, told the press
conference: “MH17 was shot down by a 9M38 series missile, launched
from a Buk-Telar. This Buk-Telar was brought in from the territory of
the Russian Federation, and after launch was subsequently returned to
Russian Federation territory.”
Satellite data from
the US and the European Space Agency identified the launch site,
along with testimony from numerous witnesses, he said.
Paulissen said the
JIT had examined and ultimately rejected other scenarios. They
included the possibility that there was a terrorist attack on board
the flight, or that it was shot down by a military aircraft. Radar
data from Russia and Ukraine proved there were no other planes in the
vicinity.
The investigators
said they had demonstrated that a ground-based air defence system
downed the Boeing 777. They compared pieces of the Buk retrieved from
the crash site with various types of missile from the 9M38 series.
They also exploded a missile in a controlled test in Finland.
Forensic
examinations gave further clues. Fragments of the Buk missile were
found in the bodies of MH17’s pilot and crew during autopsies.
There were traces of cockpit glass, showing the fragments pierced the
plane “from the outside”. A twisted piece of metal from the
missile shot “with great force” was recovered from the cockpit
window.
The JIT said it had
identified a large part of the route taken by the Buk after it
arrived from Russia and was deployed inside rebel-held eastern
Ukraine.
The evidence
includes damning intercepted telephone calls between rebel leaders.
There are also photos, analysed and authenticated, plus a previously
unknown video obtained from a witness. Several anonymous witnesses
had come forward following an appeal for information on the JIT’s
website, Paulissen said.
A video
reconstruction shown at the press conference revealed the Buk’s
journey. It was seen leaving rebel-held Donetsk on a low-loader,
heading east. After arriving in Snizhne on the afternoon of 17 July,
the Buk was offloaded and drove to a field south of town. Early the
next day it was taken back across the Russian border via the
rebel-held city of Luhansk.
Wednesday’s press
conference raises the prospect of a long and bitter standoff with the
Kremlin, which vehemently denies all involvement.
“The conclusions
by the working group on the crash of the Malaysian Boeing are
extremely politicised. I don’t believe any of their conclusions,”
Leonid Slutsky, the newly appointed head of the foreign affairs
committee in Russia’s parliament, told the RBC newspaper.
Eduard Basurin, a
representative of the Russia-backed separatist forces in Donetsk,
said the rebels “couldn’t have shot down the Boeing” because
they did not have Buk anti-aircraft missiles.
Basurin also said no
one had seen the US satellite imagery that allegedly recorded the
missile launch. He accused Ukraine of not presenting information on
“what aircraft were in the air at the time”, even though the
Russian military has backtracked on its claims that a Ukrainian jet
could have shot down MH17.
The JIT has so far
not identified the 100 suspects it now has under investigation. Nor
did it say which country they were from, but they are widely believed
to be serving Russian soldiers and officers.
It seems highly
unlikely Moscow would allow suspects to be extradited from Russia to
stand trial. It is also unclear where a possible trial would take
place, though the international criminal court in The Hague is the
obvious choice. Two-thirds of the victims were Dutch. The others came
from nine countries and included ten Britons.
Will Mayne, whose
20-year-old brother Richard was killed on board MH17, said he and
other relatives were satisfied with the investigation. “They went
into a lot of depth. The Buk came from Russia and went back after a
day. This highlights once again how Russia has been lying and
manipulating.”
Mayne said he was
cautiously optimistic that the suspects would eventually be
extradited from Russia. “It’s going to be a struggle, but you
always have to be hopeful,” he said.
Investigators were
unable to say how long their inquiry would now take, adding on
Wednesday that it would be a “long haul”. “I told the grieving
relatives that I can’t make any promises,” the chief Dutch
prosecutor Fred Westebeke said. “The work is going on with all
countries, and our best people,” he said.
The JIT’s interim
report is a vindication for the British-led online investigation team
Bellingcat. It correctly identified the field from which the missile
was fired. On the basis of social media posts it traced the Buk to
Russia’s 53rd anti-aircraft unit, based in the city of Kursk. As a
result Bellingcat has come under withering attack from Russian state
media.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário