Martin
Schulz’s presidential agonies
Apart
from Jean-Claude Juncker, hardly anyone else wants the Parliament
chief to stay on in 2017.
By MAÏA DE LA BAUME
7/13/16, 5:33 AM CET Updated 7/13/16, 5:57 AM CET
http://www.politico.eu/article/martin-schulzs-presidential-predicament-parliament-cdu-epp-elections/
What should have
been relatively good news for Martin Schulz — an endorsement of
sorts from Jean-Claude Juncker, who said the Parliament president
should stick around for another term in the interest of European
“stability” — has turned into another headache for the
ambitious German as he plots his political future.
The statement from
Juncker about his “friend” Schulz surprised and angered many in
the European Parliament, who have been expecting the assembly’s
president to step aside in January 2017. Doing so would fulfill the
terms of a power-sharing deal between the Parliament’s two main
political groups that Schulz agreed to when he began his current term
as president in 2014.
But it would also
force Schulz from a level of political prominence he has worked hard
to cultivate. His post-Parliament president career choices, apart
from entertaining potential offers from lecture agents, think tanks
and investment banks, are fairly limited: to step down from the
presidency and return to being an MEP, or try to find a role in
German domestic politics.
The German option
has proven challenging. The one attractive, immediate opening was to
run as the Social Democrats’ (SPD) nominee for the chancellorship
in Germany’s general elections in fall of 2017. Until a few months
ago that’s a job no one envied the natural candidate for, current
SPD head Sigmar Gabriel, given that polls suggest another defeat
against Chancellor Angela Merkel’s CDU.
The polls are
slightly better now for the SPD, and as Die Welt reported Monday,
suddenly Gabriel seems more interested in running himself. That means
Schulz would have to try to push aside someone he calls a “friend,”
and possibly run against other viable contenders.
That’s left Schulz
to focus on keeping the Parliament presidency. He’s been working
behind the scenes for months to convince colleagues that he should
stay on in the role, arguing that it is important not to let all
three EU presidencies be held by center-right politicians (European
Council President Donald Tusk is, like Juncker, a member of the
European People’s Party).
The Juncker comment,
in a rollicking joint interview the two politicians gave to German
magazine Spiegel last week, was the first real public acknowledgement
of Schulz’s campaign to stay on, and was pitched as part of a need
to show solidarity and preserve stability among EU leaders in the
wake of the Brexit vote.
Rather than solidify
Schulz’s ambition to stay on past his presidential sell-by date,
the backing from Juncker may have helped fuel more opposition to him
— even among the audience it was clearly intended to influence, the
Commission chief’s own allies in the assembly’s center-right
European People’s Party bloc. Instead of opening the door for
Schulz to keep the post, it may have closed it further.
Only a few days
before the Spiegel interview, Germans in the EPP said they would
insist on the group taking over the Parliament presidency. The issue
was the subject of a discussion among leading members of the EPP from
several countries at a group meeting in Strasbourg on Wednesday.
After the Juncker comment was made public on Friday, EPP politicians
reacted angrily and dug in further. They not only said they would
hold Schulz to his word, they also criticized Juncker, one of their
own, for overstepping his role as Commission president.
“What is important
to us is to replace Schulz,” said Gunnar Hökmark, a prominent
Swedish member of the EPP, the largest political group in the
European Parliament. “This has to do with democracy.”
Added Alain
Lamassoure, leader of the French delegation of the EPP and a
potential contender to replace Schulz, “It is not the president of
the Commission who elects the president of the Parliament. It is the
Parliament who elects the president of the Commission.”
The EPP’s leader
in the Parliament, Manfred Weber, told German paper Bild am Sonntag
that while he appreciated Juncker’s “advice,” the party
expected to stick to the agreement to take over the presidency in
2017. He also got in a little dig at Juncker, too. “It is for the
European Parliament to elect its president as well as the Commission
president though, not the other way around,” Weber said.
An EPP source said
Juncker’s comments had prompted talk among some MEPs about
collecting signatures for a motion of no confidence in Juncker if the
Commission president “continues sticking out his neck” for
Schulz.
“They want to send
out a signal, saying ‘Juncker, don’t do this, this is not very
clever, otherwise we will withdraw support from you,'” the EPP
source said. “There’s a lot of resentment about his comments. For
us, they are too close.”
Many in the assembly
acknowledge that Schulz has helped boost the image of the Parliament
as a political force.
Lamassoure said the
move toward a censure motion was only a “threat” and wouldn’t
go further. “It only reflects the reaction of irritation against
that Spiegel joint interview.”
Others like Hökmark
said Juncker should avoid having “a special relation” with Schulz
on the question of leadership of the assembly.
“It is important
to defend the integrity of the Commission and of the Parliament,”
Hökmark said.
Another EPP source
warned that if Schulz doesn’t stand behind the deal, “whatever
other solution is found, it would have unpredictable consequences on
the future not only of the Parliament in its functioning, but also on
the European Commission itself, because it is supported by a
political majority that would blow up.”
Schulz’s office
did not respond to a request for comment about his plans for 2017 and
beyond. But in recent months he has worked hard behind the scenes
courting key MEPs in a bid to keep the Parliament presidency he has
held since 2012. Many in the assembly acknowledge that during that
time Schulz has helped boost the image of the Parliament as a
political force.
But there is no
shortage of contenders to replace him as president and — apart from
members of his own Socialists & Democrats party, and apparently
Juncker — little support for letting him stay in the post. Leaders
of the other main political groups in the assembly, including the EPP
and the Greens, oppose letting him have a third term, as do some key
members of the centrist liberal bloc.
The selection
process for the January 2017 election is likely to start in the fall.
Under their power-sharing deal, the EPP and S&D blocs have agreed
to support each other’s candidate for a two-and-a-half-year term.
The names of the
potential EPP contenders for the presidency, including Antonio
Tajani, Lamassoure and Mairead McGuinness, have been circulating in
Parliament corridors for months, though apart from Lamassoure, all
are coy about their efforts so far.
Herbert Reul and
Angelika Niebler, two German EPP members, said their group would
submit a name for a new EPP president in the fall. “Schulz
committed himself to stay for only half of the legislature, so he
would break his word if he didn’t do so,” Reul said.
Tajani said he did
not want to comment on Juncker’s endorsement of Schulz because of
“institutional correctness.”
Florian Eder
contributed to this article.
Authors:
Maïa de La Baume
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário