EU forces through refugee
relocation deal
By JACOPO
BARIGAZZI AND MAÏA DE LA BAUME 9/21/15, 7:19 PM CET Updated 9/22/15, 5:56 PM
CET
EU
countries on Tuesday approved a controversial proposal to relocate 120,000
refugees across the continent, forcing the measure through over the objection
of several member states that opposed mandatory criteria for the acceptance of
asylum-seekers.
Diplomatic
sources confirmed that four member states voted against the proposal —
Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Czech Republic — but that other countries had
the votes to get it passed under EU rules that allow certain decisions to be
made in the absence of a consensus. Finland abstained, the sources
said.
Interior
ministers from the EU’s 28 countries held an emergency meeting in Brussels Tuesday to
approve the proposal, which was left on the table after they failed to agree on
it a week ago. Diplomats spent most of Monday and part of Tuesday trying to
break the impasse between countries over whether the plan would set mandatory
quotas for accepting refugees.
Eastern
European countries remained opposed to any plan that included a requirement
from Brussels
to take in asylum-seekers.
The
pressure to move on the refugee issue has been building throughout the week,
leading ministers to use a political “nuclear option” of qualified majority
voting to adopt the relocation scheme.
On
Wednesday, EU leaders will gather for an emergency summit on the migration
issue, and officials pushed to have the relocation dispute settled before then
so they can focus on other issues, such as tighter border controls and funding
for Turkey ,
where many refugees are currently being housed in camps.
According
to official sources, the agreement adopted Tuesday would relocate the 120,000
refugees from Greece and Italy , but not from Hungary as originally proposed by
Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker in his State of the Union speech
earlier this month.
Juncker
made another appeal during a presentation on the EU budget Tuesday, calling on
countries to show “solidarity” in dealing with the crisis.
“Closing
borders is not a solution,” Juncker said. “If you have survived bombing and a
rubber boat in the Mediterranean , a fence will
not stop you.”
Members of
the Visegrad group, which brings together leaders of Hungary ,
Poland , Slovakia and the Czech
Republic , met Monday afternoon in Prague to discuss “possible solutions” to the
refugee crisis. After the meeting the countries reiterated their opposition to
mandatory quotas.
But Poland shifted
away from the other Visegrad countries, indicating it was ready to take
refugees though it remained opposed to mandatory quotas imposed by the
Commission.
“We are
prepared to accept migrants but not quotas,” said Poland ’s
interior minister, Teresa Piotrowska, before the meeting in Brussels Tuesday.
In the end Poland voted
with the majority in favor of the proposal.
Front-line
states
The scope
of the problem was underlined this week when the EU released new figures
showing that more than 210,000 asylum-seekers applied for protection in the Union in the second quarter of 2015. Those numbers do not
take into account the thousands of refugees now arriving daily at Europe ’s borders.
Both of the
Commission proposals now left out of the new agreement — the inclusion of Hungary in the
relocation plan and the criteria for distributing refugees across member states
— have faced fierce resistance in recent weeks.
After
changing its line several times, Hungary
refused to be considered as a front-line state for the arrival of refugees,
along with Italy and Greece , and in
draft conclusions being worked on Monday by the Council it had been removed
from the plan.
The
original Commission proposal was to relocate 54,000 migrants from Hungary , 50,400 from Greece
and 15,600 from Italy .
The problem for diplomats is what to do with the 54,000 refugees that Hungary is now
refusing to relocate.
“Voluntary”
An earlier
agreement on the Commission’s proposal from May to relocate 40,000 refugees
required a delicate compromise making the target figure mandatory but the
method for reaching it voluntary. That less-ambitious agreement was finalized
last week by ministers, but the headline goal has still not been reached.
EU
officials are trying to avoid a similar problem on this larger plan. To
sidestep the mandatory versus voluntary problem, this time the number of
refugees each country will take in will not be imposed by the Commission but
rather agreed by the various member states.
It would
not possible for a member state to completely opt out of taking refugees
“Numbers
have been roughly agreed with each member state, so [sovereignty] is safe,” the
EU diplomat said.
“The fact
that in many cases the number of refugees to take in is very similar to the
numbers proposed by the Commission is a pure coincidence,” noted another EU
diplomat.
Many of the
larger questions will have to be dealt with over dinner Wednesday by EU heads
of state and government. The leaders will hold an “informal” summit to discuss
how to tackle migration at its roots, in Turkey
and Syria ,
and how to ensure control of the EU external borders.
Authors:
Jacopo
Barigazzi and Maïa de La Baume
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário