Merkel
'gambling away' Germany's reputation over Greece, says Habermas
Exclusive:
Intellectual figurehead of European integration says efforts of
previous generations put at risk by Angela Merkel’s hardline stance
on Greece
Philip Oltermann
Thursday 16 July
2015 12.21 BST /
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jul/16/merkel-gambling-away-germanys-reputation-over-greece-says-habermas
Jürgen Habermas,
one of the intellectual figureheads of European integration, has
launched a withering attack on the German chancellor, Angela Merkel,
accusing her of “gambling away” the efforts of previous
generations to rebuild the country’s postwar reputation with her
hardline stance on Greece.
Speaking about the
bailout deal for the first time since it was presented on Monday, the
philosopher and sociologist said the German chancellor had
effectively carried out “an act of punishment” against the
leftwing government of Alexis Tsipras.
“I fear that the
German government, including its social democratic faction, have
gambled away in one night all the political capital that a better
Germany had accumulated in half a century,” he told the Guardian.
Previous German governments, he said, had displayed “greater
political sensitivity and a post-national mentality”.
Habermas, widely
considered one of the most influential contemporary European
intellectuals, said that by threatening Greece with an exit from the
eurozone over the course of the negotiations, Germany had
“unashamedly revealed itself as Europe’s chief disciplinarian and
for the first time openly made a claim for German hegemony in
Europe.”
The outcome of the
negotiations between Greece and the other eurozone member states, he
said, did “not make sense in economic terms because of the toxic
mixture of necessary structural reforms of state and economy with
further neoliberal impositions that will completely discourage an
exhausted Greek population and kill any impetus to growth.”
Habermas added:
“Forcing the Greek government to agree to an economically
questionable, predominantly symbolic privatisation fund cannot be
understood as anything other an act of punishment against a leftwing
government.”
The Düsseldorf-born
philosopher, a former assistant of the prominent Frankfurt School
theorist Theodor Adorno, rose to prominence during the student
protests in the late 1960s. His works on the establishment of a
pan-European political and cultural identity, such as Structural
Transformation of the Public Sphere, went on to influence and shape
policy debate around the European Union. At the start of the
millennium, Habermas was one of the leading drivers behind calls for
a European constitution.
Recently, the
86-year-old has aggressively criticised Merkel’s leadership in
Europe in books such as The Lure of Technocracy, while also coming
under criticism himself. In 2013, Habermas clashed in a series of
articles with another influential German leftwing intellectual,
sociologist Wolfgang Streeck, who has identified the kind of European
federalism espoused by Habermas as the root of the continent’s
crisis.
Habermas told the
Guardian that he agreed with many of his critics’ main points.
“Streeck and I also share the view that this technocratic hollowing
out of democracy is the result of a neoliberal pattern of
market-deregulation policies,” he said. “The balance between
politics and the market has got out of sync, at the cost of the
welfare state.
“Where we differ
is in terms of the consequences to be drawn from this predicament. I
do not see how a return to nation states that have to be run like big
corporations in a global market can counter the tendency towards
de-democratisation and growing social inequality – something that
we also see in Great Britain, by the way.
“Such tendencies
can only be countered, if at all, by a change in political direction,
brought about by democratic majorities in a more strongly integrated
‘core Europe’. The currency union must gain the capacity to act
at the supra-national level. In view of the chaotic political process
triggered by the crisis in Greece, we can no longer afford to ignore
the limits of the present method of intergovernmental compromise.”
Habermas argued that
Europe was “stuck in a political trap”.
“Without a common
financial and economic policy, the national economies of
pseudo-sovereign member states will continue to drift apart in terms
of productivity. No political community can sustain such tension in
the long run,” he said. “At the same time, by focusing on
avoidance of open conflict, the EU’s institutions are preventing
necessary political initiatives for expanding the currency union into
a political union. Only the government leaders assembled in the
European council are in the position to act, but precisely they are
the ones who are unable to act in the interest of a joint European
community because they think mainly of their national electorate.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário