segunda-feira, 2 de novembro de 2026

EU open to flexibility on euro and Schengen if UK tries to rejoin

 


EU open to flexibility on euro and Schengen if UK tries to rejoin

 

The clarification could be a boost for Andy Burnham’s ambition to see Britain return to the European Union in his lifetime.

Rejoin Rally Marks 10 Years Since The UK’s  EU Referendum

Demonstrators gather in London to mark 10 years since the Brexit referendum, on June 20, 2026. | Brook Mitchell/Getty Images

Exclusive

October 30, 2026 6:25 pm CET

By Jon Stone

https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-flexible-euro-schengen-uk-tried-rejoining/

 

LONDON — Brussels would be flexible on letting Britain stay out of the euro and the Schengen area if it applied to rejoin the European Union, two EU officials familiar with the bloc’s approach have told POLITICO.

Britain would not necessarily have to join the single currency or passport-free zone — a concern held by some British voters — according to the two officials, who were granted anonymity to speak freely about a sensitive matter.

Opening the door for the U.K. to return to the bloc on similar terms would be a serious boost to the prospects of restoring the country's EU membership, and a rejection of those who have argued it shouldn't be allowed back in without joining the euro or Schengen.

U.K. Prime Minister Andy Burnham has said Brexit isn’t working — and even suggested rejoining the EU could make it into Labour’s next election manifesto.

But some euroskeptics say a returning Britain would likely be strong-armed into making commitments to European integration that go beyond the membership deal it had before Brexit.

Polling conducted by YouGov earlier this month found that 55 percent of Brits want to reverse Brexit, with just 34 percent wanting to remain outside the EU, but the numbers shift significantly if joining the euro single currency and Schengen passport-free area become requirements — with just 35 percent in favor to 43 percent opposed.

EU officials stress that the union currently has no formal stance on Britain joining as London has not yet applied.

But they say the EU always takes the specific circumstances of a country into account when conducting negotiating talks. “In theory there is a standard approach but in practice you see that it is more flexible,” one of the officials told POLITICO. “There are different models.”

The clarification could be a boost for Burnham’s ambition to see Britain back in the EU in his lifetime.

The European Commission did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

‘More harm than good’

When it was an EU member, the U.K. had exemptions from Schengen and the euro — built on a series of opt-outs and agreements negotiated over decades of membership.

But states who have joined the union more recently have made commitments to move towards both goals.

Andy Burnham meets with Ursula von der Leyen in New York on Sept. 22, 2026. | Pool photo by Toby Melville via Getty Images

While Burnham has said he wants to eventually see the U.K. rejoin, he says he will be led by U.K. public opinion on the matter.

Crucially, he has said nothing will happen before the next general election when he seeks a fresh mandate at the polls. That is due no later than July 2029.

On Nov. 20 Burnham will meet with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels to sign off a package of measures meant to smooth the post-Brexit relationship.

These negotiations, begun under Burnham’s predecessor Keir Starmer, include an agreement to smooth food trade, new visas for young people, and a linking of emissions trading systems.

But the prime minister has also said he will use the occasion of the summit to set out options for an even bigger overhaul of Brexit, which he said "has caused more harm than good.”

Burnham has said the options could include membership of the single market or customs union, but also rejoining wholesale.

The chosen option is expected to make it into Labour’s next election manifesto, with the next contest due in 2029 but latitude given to the prime minister to call an earlier poll.

 

domingo, 1 de novembro de 2026

UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood will announce an overhaul to immigration rules on Monday, doubling the standard wait time for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) from five years to 10 years for most legal migrants.

 


Home secretary to make some migrants wait 10 years or more for right to settle in UK

UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood will announce an overhaul to immigration rules on Monday, doubling the standard wait time for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) from five years to 10 years for most legal migrants. The reforms establish an "earned settlement" system where a migrant's path to permanent residency depends directly on their income, occupation, and community contributions.

The opposition has heavily criticized the policy shift. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp called the care worker exemption a complete "U-turn" and a surrender to the Labour left, arguing that it forces taxpayers to permanently subsidize low-wage migration rather than requiring temporary workers to leave once their visas expire

 

The Tiered "Earned Settlement" Timelines

Under the new contribution-based model, the time required to qualify for settlement is split across several categories:

  • 3-Year Fast-Track: High earners, top-rate taxpayers, and entrepreneurs.
  • 5-Year Route: Frontline public service workers, including doctors, nurses, and teachers.
  • 10-Year Standard Baseline: Most standard work and family visa holders making regular National Insurance contributions. This timeline can be shortened slightly if individuals hit higher tax brackets or demonstrate verified local volunteering.
  • 15-Year Extended Route: Lower-paid or low-skilled foreign workers.
  • 20 Years or More: Individuals reliant on state benefits for extended periods. Additionally, the rules restrict access to public funds; migrants will only become eligible for state benefits and social housing upon securing full British citizenship, rather than immediately when receiving ILR. Tougher minimum criteria will also apply, requiring a clean criminal record, consistent National Insurance history, and higher English language proficiency.

Cabinet Pushback and the Social Care Exemption

The baseline plans initially sparked a severe internal Cabinet row. Housing Secretary Angela Rayner and other ministers strongly opposed making foreign social care workers—who migrated to the UK in good faith—wait 15 years for residency, calling retrospective rule changes "un-British".

Following a public consultation that drew over 200,000 responses, Mahmood is expected to exempt existing social care workers currently in the UK from the 15-year extension, allowing them to maintain their original shorter path to settlement. However, the 10-year baseline will still apply widely to other professions.

Political Reactions

The government framed the changes as a necessary fiscal mechanism to curb high net migration and control the long-term public costs of settlement. Internal Home Office assessments estimated that granting immediate benefit access to the massive wave of post-Brexit arrivals could cost the public purse £10 billion over their lifetimes.

The opposition has heavily criticized the policy shift. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp called the care worker exemption a complete "U-turn" and a surrender to the Labour left, arguing that it forces taxpayers to permanently subsidize low-wage migration rather than requiring temporary workers to leave once their visas expire

Home secretary to make some migrants wait 10 years or more for right to settle in UK

 


Home secretary to make some migrants wait 10 years or more for right to settle in UK

MPs say Shabana Mahmood’s new rules risk staff shortages in health and social care and second Windrush scandal

 

Jessica Elgot and Chris Osuh

Sun 1 Nov 2026 19.47 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/nov/01/home-secretary-shabana-mahmood-immigration-leave-to-remain-windrush

 

Shabana Mahmood will announce sweeping new rules on Monday on how long legal migrants must wait for settlement in the UK, with most likely to wait a decade and some up to 15 years.

Ministers – including the housing secretary, Angela Rayner – had raised concerns about the effect the rules would have on care workers already in the UK who would be likely to face a 15-year wait for settlement, also known as indefinite leave to remain (ILR).

The government’s response to the consultation on the reforms, which will be put before MPs on Monday, is expected give some exemption to care workers already in the UK, though most other professions will face the lengthy waits for settlement.

Mahmood, the home secretary, has proposed that the settlement wait could be reduced if legal migrants showed they had contributed to their local communities via a “points based system” or if they were earning higher incomes.

She is expected to meet union general secretaries on Monday – some of whom have raised alarm at the changes – to map out the final details.

The Guardian first reported in July that the prime minister, Andy Burnham, was considering exempting hundreds of thousands of care workers from the reforms to relieve pressure on the social care sector. The Home Office has granted about 200,000 health and care worker visas in the last five years, with many more people coming as their dependants.

Under the plans published for consultation, the standard qualifying period for settlement would double from five to 10 years, while some workers in occupations below graduate level, including care workers, could face a 15-year qualifying period, subject to proposed exemptions and reductions.

In June, Rayner described making care workers already in Britain wait up to 15 years for permanent residence as “un-British”. In September, the energy secretary, Miatta Fahnbulleh, said the plans would have been “tough” for her family, who came to Britain as refugees.

In a letter to Mahmood and the health secretary, Yvette Cooper, seen by the Guardian, parliamentarians and organisations representing migrant workers, racial equality campaigners and health professionals describe the proposals as “an iteration of Windrush era policies”.

The Windrush scandal, exposed by Guardian reporting in 2017, involved mainly Black Britons being wrongly detained, deported and denied access to work and essential services, despite having the right to live in Britain.

In their letter, dated 29 October, the signatories urge ministers to “stop history from repeating itself” by abandoning the proposals or, at a minimum, introducing extra safeguards.

Signatories argue that changing the rules for people who have planned their lives around existing settlement requirements would be unfair and could encourage essential workers to leave the country.

They warn that proposed exemptions for some public-service workers may fail to protect staff employed by independent health and social care providers, as well as workers’ family members.

The letter urges ministers to follow the recommendations of the Windrush Lessons Learned Review, conducted by Wendy Williams, which called for improvements in the development and scrutiny of immigration policy, including greater consideration of its impact on affected communities.

The Labour MPs Bell Ribeiro-Addy, Diane Abbott, Clive Lewis and Rachael Maskell are among the signatories, alongside the Green MPs Ellie Chowns, Carla Denyer, Siân Berry and Hannah Spencer. Organisations backing the letter include the Work Rights Centre, Action for Race Equality, Care England and the Society of Radiographers.

The signatories write: “Windrush was a scandal borne from racist immigration policies … this situation is not historic when this same wrong persists, and the same groups are targeted by current immigration proposals.”

The signatories warn the health and care sector is already “dangerously under-staffed” and that the proposed changes risk “worsening the health and wellbeing of everyone in the UK”.

The letter argues that the government could struggle to meet cancer treatment and NHS waiting-list reduction targets without retaining and expanding the workforce, particularly in professions heavily reliant on internationally trained staff, like radiography.

It raises particular concerns about adult social care, adding: “International workers are essential to maintaining current levels of care. Without them, services will contract, and unmet need will increase.”

Launching the consultation on earned settlement last year, Mahmood described Britain as a “multi-faith, multi-ethnic democracy” that demanded “contribution and integration”. She added: “To become a part of this country, permanently, is therefore not a right but a privilege – and one that must be earned.”

 

Inside Hitler's Eagle's Nest - Then & Now

 

Hitler’s Eagle’s Nest retreat was torched in an arson attack. Should it be rebuilt?

 


Hitler’s Eagle’s Nest retreat was torched in an arson attack. Should it be rebuilt?

 

With the far right resurgent in Germany, experts are divided as to whether the dictator’s former mountaintop retreat is better restored or left a ruin

Deborah Cole

Deborah Cole in Berlin

Sun 1 Nov 2026 05.00 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/nov/01/hitler-eagles-nest-retreat-arson-attack-should-it-be-rebuilt

 

One of the last structural relics of Adolf Hitler’s dictatorship was conceived to project indomitable power. Last month it was destroyed in a suspected arson attack. Will it, and should it, be rebuilt?

The historic Nazi mountaintop retreat known as the Eagle’s Nest is perched on an Alpine peak at an altitude of 1,834 metres (6,000ft), with stunning views over southern Germany and Austria. In German, its design is known as Überwältigungsarchitektur, intended to overwhelm and intimidate.

Now, despite the efforts of 200 firefighters battling through the night, only charred ruins remain of the former guest lodge, tourist magnet and remembrance site destroyed in the blaze which started on 23 October. It is closed indefinitely.

“Even if a British air force bomb had struck the building on 25 April 1945, as it did most of the other structures in what was then the ‘Führer’s no-go zone’ on the Obersalzberg near Berchtesgaden, Hitler’s former tea house … could scarcely have been more severely damaged than it was by the fire,” Munich’s Süddeutsche newspaper said.

A cartoon waitress cutout with a menu chalkboard stands near the Eagle’s Nest lift entrance.View image in fullscreen

A brass-plated lift, built into the rock, took 41 seconds to bring visitors up to the Eagle’s Nest. Photograph: Horst Friedrichs/Alamy

The fire has triggered a debate about whether, and how, to rebuild at the toxic site for the next generation of visitors, while mitigating the never-quite-banished risk of creating a shrine for neo-Nazis.

While the places associated with Hitler’s victims, including the former concentration camps, are preserved in perpetuity, the question of how to treat the perpetrators’ artefacts remains fraught, particularly given the resurgence of the far right in Germany and in Europe more broadly.

Local authorities believe the fire was deliberately started by a 33-year-old suspect with a history of mental illness. The site, which is owned by the German state of Bavaria, attracts more than 300,000 people each year but was closed to visitors that day. No one was injured.

A carved wooden sign with two ibex flanking a crest, reading Kehlsteinhaus, 1834m, Berchesgaden.View image in fullscreen

The Eagle’s Nest is known more prosaically in German as the Kehlsteinhaus, for the mountain it rests on. Photograph: DEA/W. BUSS/De Agostini/Getty Images

Bavarian state culture minister Markus Blume has said a commission of experts in heritage conservation, construction and Germany’s culture of Holocaust remembrance would be enlisted to help determine the future of the Eagle’s Nest.

Given the building’s inextricable links to the Nazi regime and its crimes, Blume said, “any reconstruction must do justice to this historical responsibility”.

The marvel of Alpine engineering, which took 3,800 workers just over a year to build, is known more prosaically in German as the Kehlsteinhaus, for the mountain it rests on.

After a coach ride on serpentine roads through five tunnels, visitors rode a brass-plated lift, built into the rock, for 41 seconds to reach its portal.

Crowds with blue umbrellas gather outside the Eagle’s Nest, overlooking misty mountain peaks.View image in fullscreen

The Eagle’s Nest pictured in 2019. Photograph: Maurice Savage/Alamy

“The prestige project and the road leading to it cost about 30 million Reichsmarks, equivalent to about 130 million British pounds today,” said Nazi-era historian Felix Bohr, author of Before the Downfall: Hitler’s Years in the Wolf’s Lair, which is being published in the UK in November.

“Hitler loved architecture that made other people look small. He insisted on being involved in the planning and construction of propaganda buildings.”

The lodge was completed in 1938, and mainly used to welcome and impress state guests, diplomats and select foreign journalists.

Just a short distance down the mountain at the Obersalzberg complex was Hitler’s own residence, the Berghof, where he spent about a quarter of his 12 years in office.

The Eagle’s Nest teahouse sits atop a mountain ridge near Berchtesgaden, with distant peaks visible.View image in fullscreen

The Eagle’s Nest pictured in 1940. Photograph: Hulton Deutsch/Corbis/Getty Images

“Important decisions about prosecution and crime, about war and genocide were taken there,” said Sven Keller, director of the Obersalzberg Documentation Centre, an educational facility at the site.

“The surrounding mountain scenery was used as a backdrop for the construction of Hitler’s ‘Führer’ image. It offered spectacular, awe-inspiring views, and demonstrated technical prowess to subjugate even this rough natural environment.”

Inside, it had many of the trappings of Nazi bling, including Untersberg marble donated by Mussolini, Venetian mirrors and plump green leather armchairs recalling an English country manor house.

Hitler is known to have visited the Eagle’s Nest only 14 times until 1939 and then never again due to the second world war’s outbreak, when the tea house no longer matched the warrior-statesman image he wished to project, Bohr said. Close associates including his companion Eva Braun still used it regularly, however.

Adolf Hitler seated at a table with Eva Braun and others on a terrace.View image in fullscreen

Heinrich Hoffmann, Eva Braun and Adolf Hitler at the Berghof in 1942. Photograph: Prisma by Dukas Presseagentur GmbH/Alamy

After the war, Obersalzberg became a recreation centre for occupying US troops, but the last vestiges of the Berghof were torn down and hundreds of trees were planted in its place – a fateful decision that has served as a cautionary tale.

“The Americans and the Bavarian state tried to prevent it from becoming a pilgrimage site for old Nazis and Hitler admirers. It didn’t work. If anything, a hidden site in the woods is even more interesting and mysterious,” Keller said. Nazi swastikas were often found carved into the tree bark.

He said a 180-degree pivot toward clearly marking the site and exposing its history, including how it fit into the Nazi power apparatus, proved the healthier approach.

“Public accessibility creates transparency whereas barriers or fences encourage rumours and legends,” Keller said. “Today, a popular public trail crosses the site, and mundane activities such as hiking keep it from becoming a sacred space (for neo-Nazis).”

A short Austrian corporal and his girlfriend stand outside the Berghof, each holding a dog on a leash.View image in fullscreen

Hitler with Eva Braun at the Berghof in June 1942. Photograph: Pictorial Press Ltd/Alamy

Keller said transparency should be the watchword going forward.

“I cannot imagine that those responsible would opt for [a] simple reproduction of Nazi architecture, but it also can’t be left as a ruin – those tend to be even more fascinating,” he said.

“Instead, we should find ways to integrate the material remains and new information and education, showing the temporal layers, including the use as a tourist destination since the 1950s. The fire added a new layer to the history to Obersalzberg, and this should be visible too.”

New political realities in Germany and Austria, where the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) and Freedom Party lead the respective national polls, will have to be taken into account as well, he said.

A soldier stands on stone steps at the Eagle’s Nest, overlooking the clouds below.View image in fullscreen

A US soldier at the Eagle’s Nest, 4 May 1945. Photograph: Eric Schwab/AFP/Getty Images

Bohr said that troubling context led him to oppose any reconstruction of the Eagle’s Nest. “Hitler’s megalomania should remain a ruin. My suggestion would be to secure the remaining structure as far as possible and to use it to convey the history of the site,” he said.

“Particularly in view of the strength of the AfD and the rise of right-wing extremism in Germany, the focus should be on coming to terms with Nazi ideology, not on restoring its stage sets.”

 

A homemade incendiary bomb explodes at the feet of a police officer in Paris / Marine Le Pen a fermement condamné l'attaque survenue le 31 octobre 2026 à Paris, qualifiant d'« insupportables » les images du gendarme mobile en proie aux flammes après avoir été ciblé par un engin incendiaire en marge des manifestations.


Marine Le Pen a fermement condamné l'attaque survenue le 31 octobre 2026 à Paris, qualifiant d'« insupportables » les images du gendarme mobile en proie aux flammes après avoir été ciblé par un engin incendiaire en marge des manifestations.

Voici les détails clés de sa déclaration et du contexte de l'événement :

  • Demande de sanctions sévères : Sur ses réseaux sociaux, la dirigeante du Rassemblement national a exigé que les auteurs de cette agression soient « retrouvés et condamnés avec la plus grande sévérité ».
  • Mise en cause politique : Elle a exprimé son soutien total aux forces de sécurité et de secours, tout en attribuant directement la responsabilité des violences aux « hordes d'extrême gauche » présentes lors du rassemblement.
  • Qualification pénale : Le ministre de l'Intérieur, Laurent Nuñez, a lui aussi réagi en désignant explicitement ce jet de cocktail Molotov comme une « tentative de meurtre ». Le parquet de Paris a officiellement ouvert une enquête sous ce chef d'accusation pour « tentative d'homicide sur personnes dépositaires de l'autorité publique »

"Est-ce une tentative de meurtre ?" : E. Deval sur les graves violences envers les forces de l'ordre