sexta-feira, 17 de julho de 2026

REMEMBERING MARCH 7, 2024: Has Portugal's António Costa struck his last deal?

 


Has Portugal's António Costa struck his last deal?

 

A problem-solving prime minister faces his greatest challenge ever: Clearing his name in time to become president of the European Council.

 


By AITOR HERNÁNDEZ-MORALES

in Lisbon

MARCH 7, 2024 4:00 AM CET

https://www.politico.eu/article/antonio-costa-portugal-election-2024-european-council-last-deal/

 

On a bright sunny morning last November, the spectacular political career of Portuguese Prime Minister António Costa came to an abrupt halt as police officers launched a dramatic raid on his official residence in Lisbon’s Palacete de São Bento.

 

As investigators began to comb through the elegant neoclassical mansion overlooking the country’s parliament, authorities descended on ministries throughout the capital, the private homes of several officials, and the headquarters of the Portuguese Socialist Party.

 

Within hours, both Costa’s Chief of Staff Vítor Escária and his personal adviser Diogo Lacerda Machado were under arrest. Shortly thereafter, Minister of Infrastructure João Galamba and the head of the country’s environment agency, Nuno Lacasta, were indicted for suspected acts of corruption, embezzlement and influence-peddling in connection to lithium mining and hydrogen-production schemes, as well as the creation of a new state-of-the-art data center in Sines.

 

If there were initial doubts as to whether Costa had been caught up in the probe, by mid-morning the Portuguese Public Prosecution Service put those to rest with an explosive statement that turned the socialist leader’s world upside down.

 

Prosecutors had evidence that the prime minister’s name had been invoked by suspects in the course of their shady dealings, which meant Costa was now the subject of an official investigation in the hands of the Supreme Court of Justice — the only body with the power to punish crimes committed by Portugal’s head of government.

 

By lunchtime that day, Nov. 7, Costa was out.

 

In a televised speech, he announced that he was resigning after eight years as prime minister. Although he proclaimed his innocence, Costa said the gravity of the charges driving the investigation were “incompatible with the dignity of the office.”

 

The news landed like a bombshell not only in Lisbon but in capitals across Europe, where many of Costa’s peers saw him as the ideal successor to European Council President Charles Michel, whose term ends next fall.

 

Well-liked by EU leaders as diverse as French President Emmanuel Macron and Hungarian strongman Viktor Orbán, Costa was trumpeted as an able administrator and a skillful negotiator — the perfect qualities to fill that top job.

 

But the prime minister’s fall highlighted flaws that had long been an open secret in Lisbon. Costa’s governance style may have allowed him to claim big victories, but these were achieved with tactics that ultimately undermined his rule — and anyone looking beyond the dazzling Portuguese tiles would have noticed serious cracks in his seemingly solid executive.

 

Costa has yet to be formally charged with any crime, and many of his peers still hold out hope that he will be cleared in time to bring his undeniable talents to the office at the top of the Europa building.

 

But as Portugal heads to the polls this weekend in a national election triggered by Costa’s resignation, doubts are growing as to whether the man famed for the deals he struck in Lisbon is truly suited to make new ones in Brussels.

 

Costa’s path to prime minister

During an interview with POLITICO in a sitting room within the same official residence that was raided in November, Costa emphasized the central role that deal-making has played in his approach to governance.

 

“In democracy, politics has to be based on compromise,” he insisted. “One goes into politics to make deals.”

 

Costa first displayed a talent for negotiation in the 1980s, when he got his start in politics serving in Lisbon’s municipal assembly.

 

The young assembly member, who joined the Socialist Party’s youth wing shortly after the Carnation Revolution brought down the dictatorial Estado Novo regime in 1974, had grown up in a progressive household in central Lisbon. His father, Orlando da Costa, was a prolific writer of Goan descent who was persecuted for his communist ideology; his mother was one of Portugal’s first female journalists, and led the charge to decriminalize abortion.

 

Whereas his parents used the written word to make their living, Costa employed dialogue to interact with constituents of all classes and backgrounds and hammer out agreements. In time, he cemented his reputation as a problem-solver skilled at finding pragmatic solutions to everyday dilemmas.

 

His talents eventually caught the attention of national leaders like then-Prime Minister — and current U.N. Secretary-General — António Guterres, who drafted Costa to serve first as secretary of state and then minister of parliamentary affairs.

 

Political commentator Luís Marques Mendes, who spent years working with Costa while occupying different roles within the center-right Social Democratic Party, said the politician took to the post with gusto, easily interacting with the opposition.

 

“Costa has always had an incredible talent for dialogue and for reaching agreements,” Marques Mendes said. “Ideology isn’t an issue for him; he can sit down and talk with just about anyone in order to get things done.”

 

In 2015, Costa’s ability to build bridges with others won him control of Portugal.

 

Though he didn’t score the most votes in that year’s national election, Costa managed to unseat the center-right incumbent by forging an unprecedented parliamentary alliance with the far-left Portuguese Communist Party and the Left Bloc group.

 

“Between 1975 and 2015 there was barely any dialogue within the left,” Costa recalled. Topics like NATO membership and the adoption of the euro had become insurmountable “dividing walls” between parties at the time.

 

“We tore down those walls by acknowledging that there were some topics on which we would never see eye to eye … and instead asking, ‘okay, well, what can we all agree on?’” he said.

 

“We reached a deal to work together to end economic austerity and restore the rights that were taken away by the troika,” he added, referring to Portugal’s international creditors represented by the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund, which had bailed the country out but imposed strict economic conditions in return.

 

The delicacy of the coalition talks was underscored by the fact that a single common agreement wasn’t on the table. Instead, Costa drew up individual pacts with each of his partners over the course of several weeks, securing the needed parliamentary support to take office.

 

According to a high-ranking Portuguese official who spent years working with Costa, and who was granted anonymity to speak freely, the socialist politician’s ability to make deals is directly related to his delight in “solving problems.”

 

“António Costa is driven by objectives,” the official said. “He’s always looking for creative solutions … Including some that are sometimes perhaps too creative.”

 

How Costa turned around the Portuguese economy

When Costa became prime minister in November 2015, Portugal was still under the thumb of the troika, which had bailed the country out of its sovereign debt crisis in 2011.

 

To gain power, the socialist leader had promised to reverse the cost-cutting measures imposed by Portugal’s creditors — a plan that elicited a mix of skepticism and open hostility in EU capitals.

 

“A lot of people thought I was another [Yanis] Varoufakis,” Costa said, referring to the fiery left-wing economist who had a brief but tumultuous stint as Greek finance minister earlier that year.

 

Costa, a master of realpolitik, understood that if his government was to avoid the chaos that befell Greece, it would need to adhere to the EU’s fiscal rules and assuage the doubts of the international economic establishment. He did so by appointing technocrat Mário Centeno, a veteran of the European Union’s Economic and Financial Committee, as his finance minister, and by striking a conciliatory tone with his counterparts in the European Council.

 

“It was a double negotiation that involved dialoguing with partners within our left-wing parliament, like the Communist Party, and at the same time, parlaying with Brussels,” Costa said. “It wasn’t always easy to reach agreements which broke with austerity at home but also guaranteed the sustained consolidation of our public finances in Brussels.”

 

Costa considers this balancing act, which allowed his government to “turn the page on austerity,” as the greatest achievement of his eight years in office.

 

He also delights in recalling how he won over skeptics like the late German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble — nicknamed “the ayatollah of austerity” — who initially viewed Centeno with unease but came to refer to him as “the Ronaldo of the ECOFIN,” the gathering of the eurozone’s economic and finance ministers.

.

Pedro Nuno Santos, the socialist candidate in Sunday’s national election, said Costa showed Europe that austerity wasn’t the answer. “When it came time to formulate the Covid economic recovery plan, the EU copied what we did in Portugal,” he said, stressing that the bloc’s Next Generation EU recovery package reflected the “spirit and philosophy” of Costa’s financial strategies.

 

Under Costa’s leadership, Portugal’s public debt has steadily declined — as has its deficit. In 2017 the country was able to exit an EU scheme in which the Commission monitored its spending, while in 2019, it registered its first budget surplus since the end of the Salazar dictatorship. Meanwhile, the minimum wage has increased more than 60 percent since 2015, and average salaries have grown by 27.7 percent.

 

While Portugal is undoubtedly in better financial shape now than when Costa arrived, the “Portuguese miracle” and “end of austerity” narrative that his supporters push garners mixed reviews.

 

Nova Business School public economist Susana Peralta said the country’s economy had already begun to recover under Costa’s predecessor, and that it was turbocharged by a tourism boom driven by the country’s viral popularity with influencers and celebrities like Madonna.

 

“It’s true that Costa did things like get rid of the cuts to civil servant salaries imposed by the troika — which is no small thing — but austerity continued in other ways: To pay off the public debt, the government limited public spending dramatically,” she said.

 

 

“To this day, teachers, police officers and courts complain about poor working conditions and lack of funding,” Peralta added. “Our public services are a disaster, with people obliged to get up at dawn and stand in line for hours to get an appointment at their local health center.”

 

However, she did concede that Costa’s austerity was at least accompanied by a hopeful smile.

 

Unlike the previous government’s “hurtful, moralizing tone,” Peralta said, “Costa spoke to people with empathy and gave them the idea of hope, of positive energy that we had turned the corner. And by negotiating the support of the wider left wing — especially the Portuguese Communist Party — he got the unions to stop going on strike and holding protests, which helped reinforce the idea that things were getting better.”

 

Portuguese voters were certainly convinced that life was better with Costa than without him. During his eight years in office, support for his Socialist Party grew with each successive election.

 

Those advances irritated Costa’s far-left allies, who complained the prime minister was failing to enact sufficiently progressive policies. Refusing to back his budget, they triggered a snap election in 2022 — but instead of punishing Costa, electors rewarded his party with majority control of parliament.

 

Costa as president of the European Council?

Costa’s apparent success in Lisbon and popularity in Brussels made him a front-runner in the race for the bloc’s top jobs, which are expected to be allocated shortly after June’s European Parliament election.

 

That’s why news of the Nov. 7 raid and Costa’s resignation felt like a sucker punch for Europe’s socialists. Set once again to be the second-largest group in the European Parliament, the socialists had pinned their hopes on the Portuguese PM taking the Council presidency.

 

In the past, EU leaders have managed to overlook domestic problems that shadowed their picks for key positions. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, after all, was tapped for the post even while an investigative committee of the German parliament was examining whether lucrative contracts had been awarded without proper oversight during her time as defense minister.

 

But after two successive terms with controversial European Council President Charles Michel, there’s an appetite for a successor who isn’t a constant source of headaches. The ideal candidate is now someone who won’t use the job as a springboard for their personal ambitions, but will instead stick to the agenda and focus on forging compromises — all things Portugal’s prime minister is known to do well.

 

Few in Brussels would argue that Costa doesn’t have the chops for the job, but a realization is dawning that he would come with a truckload of baggage.

 

EU diplomats told POLITICO that while Costa remains the favored pick of French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, other leaders have cooled on his prospective candidacy. The Portuguese socialist’s links to corruption scandals are seen as a liability in the context of bloc-wide elections in which the far right is expected to make inroads by campaigning on the rot within Europe’s mainstream parties.

 

The Qatargate cash-for-influence scandal, which mainly involved socialists from southern Europe, may have raised the bar even further. “Especially in the North, there are leaders who have very strict requirements for the job” said an EU official familiar with the discussions. “Some of them say that Costa’s acquittal will not be enough: The people around him must also be cleared in order to dispel any kind of suspicion.”

 

Just how much legal trouble Costa is in remains unclear, in part because the Portuguese Prosecutor’s Office has not commented on the case since December.

 

“I don’t even know what I am suspected of because that’s never been explicitly stated,” Costa said in his interview with POLITICO. “No one has spoken to me about this matter; the only things I know are what everybody else knows.”

 

Most updates come from Portuguese press reports based on court transcripts and leaks from police sources; those suggest that the handling of the case has been flawed.

 

Among the various incidents that have damaged confidence in the prosecution is an error in the transcription of a wiretap in which “António Costa” was mentioned by suspects. During a court hearing, investigators were obliged to admit that the voices in the recording had not been discussing the prime minister, but rather his economy minister, António Costa Silva.

 

Costa is confident he will eventually be cleared of suspicion, but he also acknowledged it may be a while before Portugal’s notoriously slow judicial system makes any such announcement.

 

“I don’t know how many chapters this particular story will have,” he said. “But I’m sure that the last one will involve the recognition that I have done nothing illegal, that I did not witness anything illegal, and that there was nothing objectionable regarding my involvement in any of these processes.”

 

Rui Gustavo, a veteran judicial reporter with Portuguese weekly Expresso, said that what is known about the allegations against Costa suggests they are “very, very weak;” however, he dismissed the notion that this was a “nonsense case.”

 

“If the prime minister interfered to favor a company, if he’s been involved in influence-peddling, it’s tremendously serious and it has to be investigated,” he said.

 

If Costa isn’t cleared, socialist support will likely coalesce around Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen to preside over the Council. But Frederiksen isn’t an ideal choice: Her country’s tough immigration policies are disliked by other European socialists, and there’s a desire to have a southern European occupying at least one of the EU’s top jobs.

 

“Having Costa as European Council president would be an honor for Portugal, and having such an obvious Europhile in the post would be good for Europe,” said commentator Marques Mendes. “Everyone knows he wants the job, and he definitely has the negotiating skills to strike deals between left and right.”

 

“This case is a shame,” he added. “I don’t think he’ll ultimately be indicted, but if this investigation is ongoing when it comes time to make the choice, I don’t think he’ll be able to occupy that post.”

 

Costa government’s long list of scandals

Costa’s reputation in Brussels was dealt a major blow by the Nov. 7 raid, but in Portugal his governance style has aroused doubts for years.

 

Indeed, it’s unclear how long Costa’s current government would have lasted even without the probe. His Socialist Party held an absolute majority of seats in the parliament, but the executive was falling apart: Over a dozen senior officials had resigned in the two years since the last election, some with indictments for corruption or malfeasance.

 

Few in Lisbon believe Costa himself is corrupt: The socialist leader’s personal reputation has remained untarnished during three decades in executive roles within the Portuguese government. But it is broadly perceived that questionable deeds were committed within his inner circle by less pristine “problem solvers” whom the prime minister tapped to get things done.

 

One of the most notorious figures in Costa’s clique was his self-proclaimed “best friend”, attorney Lacerda Machado, who was drafted by the prime minister to represent his executive in extremely sensitive talks — including on the future of state-owned airline TAP.

 

These mediations were initially done on a pro-bono basis, freeing Lacerda Machado of the oversight to which a bureaucrat or government official would be subject. It was only after the opposition complained that Costa grudgingly signed a service contract with his friend, insisting there was “no reason to call into question the collaboration as it has been provided.”

 

Lacherda Machado was among those arrested in last November’s raids and is suspected of attempting to use his influence within the government to favor a company that had hired him as a consultant.

 

Commentator Marques Mendes said while it was normal for a politician driven by goals to become frustrated with Portugal’s slow bureaucracy, Costa’s desire to achieve his objectives had led him to tolerate “informal structures that turned out badly.”

 

“Pragmatism can be a good thing, but it can be problematic when you try to solve matters of State the way you would some problem at home,” he said.

 

Costa was additionally handicapped, Marques Mendes observed, by his tendency to surround himself with people with whom he has a personal relationship — even if there are public doubts about their suitability for a given post.

 

One such example is economist Escária, a former adviser to disgraced Prime Minister José Sócrates, the former socialist leader who has been the subject of a corruption, money laundering and tax fraud case for the past decade.

 

Escária was tapped by Costa to serve in his first government but resigned in 2017 after he was accused of accepting undisclosed gifts in the form of trips to the UEFA Euro football final paid for by a Portuguese oil company.

 

Costa unexpectedly re-hired him in 2020 and elevated him to the post of chief of staff; Escária was the reason the prime minister’s official residence was raided on Nov. 7. When the police came to arrest him for alleged influence-peddling, they discovered €75,800 in undeclared cash stashed in his office.

 

Costa’s decision to rehire Escária underscores his almost irrational loyalty to his inner circle, whom he has relied on and defended even when they’ve become a liability to his government.

 

In 2017 the prime minister insisted on standing by Internal Administration Minister Constança Urbano de Sousa, who oversaw the country’s crisis management structure as scores died in catastrophic forest fires that overwhelmed Portugal’s emergency services. Although she attempted to resign, Costa only let her go after the country’s president gave a speech suggesting he would dissolve parliament if the government didn’t do a better job of protecting its citizens.

 

The prime minister similarly stood by a defense minister indicted in connection with an arms-theft scandal; an internal administration minister implicated in a grisly car accident; and an infrastructure minister suspected of lying to a parliamentary commission.

 

Costa rejected the criticisms of his team, saying he had to respect the presumption of innocence and couldn’t drop members of his government based on media rumors. “I note with satisfaction that all the members of my governments who have been investigated have subsequently had their cases dismissed, or ultimately been acquitted,” he added.

 

Presidency Minister Mariana Vieira da Silva also disputed the idea that Costa had made poor choices when assembling his inner circle, or had turned a blind eye to shady dealings within his administration.

 

“Our decision process has always followed the government’s normal timings and procedures,” she said. “I have not seen anything out of the ordinary when it comes to making decisions and solving problems; the process is transparent and known to everyone.”

 

In his interview, Costa — whose term as caretaker prime minister could end as early as next week, when Portugal’s president is expected to ask the winner of Sunday’s national election to form a new government — said he was confident citizens would remember him for his successes in office, and not for the scandals that forced him out.

 

“A case like this is obviously frustrating for someone who has dedicated the past 30 years of their life to public service,” he said. “But where there’s doubt, there has to be an investigation … And I have absolute peace of mind about what it will conclude.”

 

Unfortunately for Costa, those set to decide his political future may not feel the same way.

 

Jacopo Barigazzi contributed reporting.

REMEMBERING 10 de octubre de 2025: The discrediting of von der Leyen is harming EU credibility

 


QUESTIONED LEADERSHIP

The discrediting of von der Leyen is harming EU credibility

 

Ursula von der Leyen has just survived the third motion of censure against her Commission. European correspondent Bernardo de Miguel gathers statements from several experts to analyse "the discredit the EU is exposed to" if the political situation is not brought under control. A year after starting her second term, von der Leyen has gone from “being compared to Jacques Delors” to seeing how Draghi is now regarded as "a sort of shadow president of the Commission" as a result of the German’s weakness.

 

Bernardo de Miguel

Bernardo de Miguel

10 de octubre de 2025

https://agendapublica.es/noticia/20261/discrediting-of-von-der-leyen-is-harming-eu-credibility

 

Ursula von der Leyen on Thursday became the first head of the European Commission to face two motions of censure in a single day – and three within as many months. The president of the Commission has so far managed to survive these attacks, directed almost exclusively from the extreme right or extreme left, with the majority of MEPs declining to second the censures. Nonetheless, von der Leyen has not been strengthened by her victory; instead, the declining prestige that has dogged her presidency since December continues unabated. This downward spiral threatens to affect the EU’s credibility, both in the eyes of international partners and in European public opinion, which could be even more dangerous.

 

"In less than a year, von der Leyen’s second stint as EC president has seen her squander the reputation forged during her first term"Second acts aren’t always great, but rarely do they play out as poorly as they have in this case. In less than a year, von der Leyen’s second stint as EC president has seen her squander the reputation forged during her first term (2019-2024). Analyst Sophie Russack of the CEPS think-tank reminds us that, since 1972, a total of 15 no-confidence motions have sought to bring a Commissioner down, and all have failed. Of those 15, three have been lodged against von der Leyen in the space of just three months (two this week and one in July).

 

Russack warns that the no-confidence motions weathered by von der Leyen may prove more perilous than those faced by her predecessors, also noting that in this year’s motions, the actors promoting censure want more than just electoral gains in their home countries – they’re aiming to make "a broader impact." Far-right groups in particular "also want to undermine confidence in the Commission and question the legitimacy of the European institutions."

 

"Our adversaries are not only ready to exploit division but are actively provoking it"

Ursula von der Leyen - President of the European Commission

 

On Thursday in Strasbourg, von der Leyen suggested much the same in a speech responding to the failed motions. She warned the honorable members that "our adversaries are not only ready to exploit division but are actively provoking it," alluding to the hybrid war being waged against the Union by Russia. "This is a trap that we cannot fall into," she urged.

 

Still, the discrediting of von der Leyen has served the ultra factions – many of them allies of Trump and/or Putin – in their strategy of calling out the alleged ineffectiveness and inoperability of the EU, to a point where even the most pro-European voices are starting to worry that the tarnished image of the Commission and its president will adversely affect the community.

 

Thus far, the German politician has been unable to articulate a European response to salient issues, and this disorientation (or passivity) is taking a toll. Her complicit silence amid Israel’s atrocities in Gaza and her humiliating submission to Donald Trump’s outrages have sparked the ire of a segment of the public alarmed by the autocratic drift in the U.S. and appalled by the war crimes attributed to Netanyahu’s government.

 

At the other extreme, populist forces have not forgiven von der Leyen’s fierce support for Ukraine or the aggressively pro-European tenor of her first term, when she managed to forge robust responses to the pandemic and the energy crisis. Those maneuvers earned her favorable comparisons with Jacques Delors, previously considered the Commission’s best-ever president.

 

"After a year in office, von der Leyen has not yet decided which parliamentary majority to use to push through her reform agenda"In contrast, her second term began on the wrong foot, with von der Leyen opting for uncertain triangulation in the European Parliament by seeking to rely on both the pro-European flank (socialist, liberal, popular, and green) and the increasingly convergent conservatives and ultraconservatives. Von der Leyen’s evident difficulty in handling these disparate groups has left the Commission in dangerous paralysis, at a time of major and accelerating changes worldwide. "After a year in office, she has not yet decided which parliamentary majority to use to push through her reform agenda," remarked Alberto Alemanno, professor of European Law at the HEC Paris school of business. "Her political problems are self-inflicted."

 

Further complicating von der Leyen’s lack of initiative is the absence of heavyweight voices in the Commission. During her first term, and usually in spite of herself, she benefited from the drive of socialists like Frans Timmermans and Josep Borrell as well as liberals like Margrethe Vestager and Thierry Breton. Her authoritarian style overshadowed many of those assets, but never completely. Now the Commission resembles a political wasteland where von der Leyen merely imposes her will, with scant explanation offered to her fellow commissioners.

 

Also during her first term, stiff competition between von der Leyen and Charles Michel (the liberal president of the European Council) provided a similar a spur. Both fought to assume leadership of the club, even devolving into absurd struggles for prominence. Today, that risk of cacophony has been replaced by silence and indifference, with von der Leyen idling and the Council’s current president, socialist António Costa, looking on mildly as the EU’s public image worsens.

 

The vacuum of power is so obvious that Italy’s Mario Draghi has stepped in as a sort of shadow president of the Commission. Formerly president of the European Central Bank, Draghi is received with reverence whenever he speaks at a community forum. Indeed, his voice seems the only one brave enough to mention the EU’s flagrant shortcomings, or to point the way forward through the geopolitical squalls created by Trump and by tense relations between the U.S. and China. Nevertheless, Draghi’s personal reputation won’t be enough to compensate for the persistent loss of European prestige should von der Leyen fail to correct her course through the remainder of this legislature.

Bernardo de Miguel

Corresponsal para asuntos europeos

Is Von Der Leyen using the mediocre Costa and neutralizing the Council to become the Supreme leader of the EU?



Is Von Der Leyen using the mediocre Costa and neutralizing the Council to become the Supreme leader of the EU?

No, Ursula von der Leyen cannot become the "Supreme Leader" of the EU, as the European Union is a union of sovereign states where ultimate power resides with member governments, not the Commission. However, her highly centralized leadership style and the shifting dynamic with European Council President António Costa have sparked intense debate about the concentration of power in Brussels.

The evolving institutional power dynamics break down as follows:

The "Dynamic Duo" vs. The Past

  • An Era of Cooperation: Unlike her famously combative relationship with former Council President Charles Michel, von der Leyen and Costa have established a highly cooperative, frictionless working relationship. Costa has openly described their dynamic as a "wonderful" friendship built on years of collaboration.
  • No "Neutralization": Costa is a seasoned political operator and former Prime Minister of Portugal. Rather than being neutralized, his diplomatic, consensus-driven style is viewed by EU capitals as a necessary mechanism to quietly rebalance power and smoothly negotiate tough dossiers, like the multi-year EU budget.

Accusations of a Power Grab

  • Centralized Decision-Making: Critics and diplomats frequently push back against von der Leyen, accusing her of acting like a "prime minister" and pushing unilateral decisions without seeking broad consensus.
  • Bypassing Capitals: Major policy moves—such as pushing forward the Mercosur trade deal despite French opposition, or implementing duties on Chinese electric vehicles despite German frustration—have exasperated EU capitals who feel sidelined.
  • Foreign Policy Friction: Despite their close alliance, Costa and von der Leyen do not completely overlap. They have struck diverging tones on foreign policy, with Costa leaning more heavily on strict adherence to international rules and multilateralism than von der Leyen’s unilateral geopolitical approach.

Hard Institutional Limits

  • Veto Power: The ultimate check on von der Leyen remains the European Council itself. National leaders retain veto power over key areas like foreign policy, defense, and taxation.
  • Backlash: Member states regularly push back when the Commission oversteps. For instance, EU capitals threatened legal action when the Commission attempted to grant the European Parliament extra powers, proving that national governments strictly police the balance of power

September 19, 2024: From queen to empress: Inside Ursula von der Leyen’s power grab

 



From queen to empress: Inside Ursula von der Leyen’s power grab

 

After unveiling her new team, the European Commission president holds more influence than ever.

 

September 19, 2024 4:01 am CET

By Barbara Moens, Max Griera and Jacopo Barigazzi

https://www.politico.eu/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-europe-commission-brussels-power/

 

BRUSSELS — When Ursula von der Leyen unveiled her team for the next European Commission, she simultaneously silenced the doubters about who was really in charge in Brussels.

 

As she revealed the 26 commissioners and their roles to the public, one point was immediately clear: she would have unfettered control over European Union politics. In a matter of minutes, she introduced a big title with little responsibility for one of the most powerful countries in the European Union, she propped up her buddies, and she diluted powerful portfolios by dividing them among multiple people.

 

The power grab was complete.

 

“She will be even more in control of everything,” said one EU official who, like others quoted in this piece, was granted anonymity to speak freely. “Who thought that was even possible?”

 

It was the culmination of months of public and private strategy to remove the dissenting voices of her first term as European Commission president. From the first team, none of the naysayers remain. Big personalities such as France’s Thierry Breton and the Netherlands’ Frans Timmermans are now gone.

 

During her first term — in which she faced a global pandemic and a war on the EU’s doorstep — she developed a reputation for making unilateral decisions, overstepping her job description, cutting other EU leaders out of the decision-making, and speaking only to a handful of advisers. As a result, she gained the nickname Queen Ursula in Brussels.

 

The morning of von der Leyen’s announcement of her second top team, she refused to tell the European Parliament, her partners in the process of approving commissioners,  who she was assigning to which job. Instead, she left a meeting with the Parliament’s top leaders and went straight into a press conference in which she revealed all the details. She was later accused of “contempt” for the Parliament.

 

Hours before, she convinced the French she would give their commissioner nominee an exceptionally important job if they swapped out Breton. On Tuesday, as she revealed job descriptions, they realized they’d been bamboozled into a watered-down position.

 

“Anyone who thought that she could have changed her style, her will to keep tight control, was at the very least naive,” said an EU diplomat.

 

A Commission of equals?

The public language around the 26 commissioners, one from every EU member country (apart from Germany, because von der Leyen is its commissioner), was diplomatic, if not assuring.

 

She told them they were a group of “equals.”

 

Ripping up the old org chart, von der Leyen said she was ridding the Commission of “the former relatively rigid stovepipes,” making the institution less hierarchical.

 

While the socialists secured a mega portfolio for Spain’s Teresa Ribera, they were left with less important portfolios and inflated job titles. | Pierre Philippe Marcou/Getty Images

She claimed it would allow for greater cooperation between commissioners, and their civil servants, and give them an “equal responsibility” to deliver on their priorities. But EU diplomats and officials, including some of her own employees in the Commission, say her new structure will allow von der Leyen to divide and conquer.

 

“I don’t think that is a bug but a feature in the system of the new college,” said René Repasi, who leads the German Socialists in the European Parliament, of von der Leyen’s strategy.

 

While the socialists, the second biggest political force in the European Parliament, secured a mega portfolio for Spain’s Teresa Ribera, including the powerful competition job, elsewhere they were left with less important portfolios and inflated job titles. Von der Leyen announced that little-known socialist Romanian nominee Roxana Mînzatu would be the executive vice president for people, skills and preparedness.

 

As an added buffer, she’s set up trusted loyalists such as Slovakia’s Maroš Šefčovič, Latvia’s Valdis Dombrovskis and Dutchman Wopke Hoekstra to be “the guard dogs” keeping their new colleagues in check, a second EU diplomat said.

 

She was even ruthless with her ally Emmanuel Macron, who, along with then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel, pushed for her to get the Commission job back in 2019.

 

One day before her announcement, France swapped Breton for the less experienced Stéphane Séjourné, having been guaranteed a more powerful role by von der Leyen if her biggest internal critic was axed.

 

But French officials feel von der Leyen played Macron, giving his protege Séjourné a weaker job than the one Breton had.

 

Macron “switched someone who dared to stand up against von der Leyen for someone with a much weaker personality,” a third EU diplomat said. The diplomat added that Paris’ big fear ahead of this past June’s European election was an emboldened von der Leyen.

 

A senior Commission official pushed back against the characterization of the new Commission, stressing the current structure allows for a more “holistic” approach.

 

“The logic is trying to improve the structure and the ability to coordinate, that’s the logic behind it,” the official said. “But … at the end of the day, it’s the college that decides the political questions that we have ahead of us.”

 

Act II

Von der Leyen amassing power shouldn’t come as a surprise.

 

Once powerful leaders who steered the EU are weakened, leaving a void for von der Leyen to fill. France’s Macron suffered a major loss in June’s European election to the far-right and then went through a bruising national vote. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz is worried about his own future and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk is preoccupied with domestic politics.

 

“You don’t have to teach von der Leyen how to play the power game,” the third EU diplomat said. “She saw the vacuum left by the European capitals and jumped into it.”

 

She’s also fortunate that former Portuguese Prime Minister António Costa was chosen by EU leaders as her counterpart at the European Council. He may be widely respected but he is not expected to push back against von der Leyen (and certainly is unlikely to butt heads with her, as outgoing Council chief Charles Michel did).

 

Still, von der Leyen won’t be able to fully run Europe on her own for the next five years.

 

She needs the European Parliament to give the green light to her team so they can start work — ideally sooner rather than later. And von der Leyen needs to keep European leaders and their ambassadors in Brussels close enough to ensure they’ll be on board with her plans for Europe’s future — and that they will open up their wallets to pay for it all.

 

Clea Caulcutt contributed reporting from Paris. Sarah Wheaton contributed reporting from Strasbourg.

Is Von Der Leyen trying to become the leader of the foreign policy of the EU disrespecting the Democratic principles of the EU?

 


Is Von Der Leyen trying to become the leader of the foreign policy of the EU disrespecting the Democratic principles of the EU?

Ursula von der Leyen's centralization of foreign policy during her presidency of the European Commission has sparked significant debate, drawing heavy criticism from EU lawmakers, member states, and the EU's diplomatic corps. 

The tension centers on the institutional boundaries set by EU treaties: 

  • The Mandate: According to EU treaties, official foreign policy and global representation are the domain of the High Representative (currently Kaja Kallas) and the European Council (representing the 27 member states). 
  • The Allegations: Critics, including European Parliament members, argue that von der Leyen's ambitious rhetoric and direct engagement with international leaders on global conflicts often bypass the High Representative, undermining the EU’s unified, consensually-agreed diplomatic positions. 
  • Institutional Imbalance: Critics have characterized her approach as "authoritative," alleging that her moves to expand the Commission's authority over foreign affairs encroach on the democratic representation of member states. 
  • The Defense: The European Commission has rejected these accusations, maintaining that von der Leyen's actions fall within her legitimate mandate to demonstrate political leadership and manage the external economic, trade, and geopolitical dimensions of the EU's global strategy. 

While the debate highlights deep frustrations over the balance of power within Brussels, whether her actions amount to an active "disrespect" for democratic principles remains a subjective issue, generally framed by critics as institutional overreach and by supporters as necessary geopolitical pragmatism.

 

"The EU, quietly and discreetly, is seizing powers it doesn't have!" - Thierry Mariani

"Britain Is Being Invaded" | MPs Demand Toughest Crackdown Yet on Illegal Migration