Chris Van Hollen accuses Trump of lying about negotiations with Iran | RISING

 

What is the Israel plan called the "Greater Israel"?

 

 What is the Israel plan called the great Israel?

"Greater Israel" (Hebrew: Eretz Yisrael HaShlema) refers to an ideological, often territorial, concept proposing an expanded State of Israel. It can mean a narrower area encompassing Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza, or a wider, more expansionist vision stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates, rooted in specific biblical interpretations and Zionist history, according to Wikipedia.

 

Key aspects of this concept include:

Biblical and Historical Context: The most expansive vision is based on interpretations of Genesis 15:18-21, promising land from the Nile to the Euphrates, which critics suggest implies taking territory from neighboring countries like Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq, say Facebook and YouTube.

Political Usage: It is often associated with revisionist Zionism and right-wing Israeli factions, notably the Likud party, which historically held that sovereignty should exist between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River.

Modern Implications: In recent years, it has been used by critics to describe the ongoing occupation and annexation of the West Bank and Gaza, say ProQuest and Al Jazeera.

Controversy: The vision is highly contested, with Arab and Muslim nations strongly condemning references to "Greater Israel" as a threat to regional stability, notes Al Jazeera.

GREATER ISRAEL Expands As Minister Demands Lebanon Annexation

ORBAN DECLARES WAR On Brussels Elite: EU Faces Conservative Surge, Ukraine Membership Sparks Fury

 

FVD’s rise: how far-right ideology is becoming normal

 

Forum voor Democratie (FvD) has normalized far-right ideology in the Netherlands by pushing anti-immigrant and Euroskeptic rhetoric into the mainstream, shifting political boundaries. Their rise, alongside parties like PVV and BBB, was facilitated by mainstream parties adopting similar stances, media attention, and voter disillusionment.

 

 Forum voor Democratie (FvD) has normalized far-right ideology in the Netherlands by pushing anti-immigrant and Euroskeptic rhetoric into the mainstream, shifting political boundaries. Their rise, alongside parties like PVV and BBB, was facilitated by mainstream parties adopting similar stances, media attention, and voter disillusionment. While FvD saw internal splits and reduced support by 2021, the overall normalized, populist landscape persists.

 

Key Aspects of FvD's Impact and Normalization

Mainstream Adoption: Traditional parties have shifted towards more radical positions, often legitimizing arguments previously considered marginal, a process that Dr. Rooduijn notes is key to normalization.

Shifting Rhetoric: FvD, and similar parties, normalized anti-immigrant and nativist stances, transforming them into accepted public discourse.

Media Entanglement: The media has played a role in amplifying these viewpoints, often blurring the lines between mainstream journalism and alternative, far-right narratives.

Fragmentation of the Right: While FvD experienced significant losses in 2021 due to internal conflicts and extreme positions (e.g., regarding COVID-19), its voters often shifted to other, newer radical right parties, maintaining the overall strength of the populist bloc.

Impact on Democracy: The normalization of these views is often described as a challenge to liberal democratic values, with increased skepticism towards existing democratic institutions and increased focus on "anti-woke" issues.

 

The influence of FvD, alongside other actors like PVV, has significantly shifted the Dutch political spectrum toward the right, a development that suggests long-term changes in the country's political landscape.

The Lidewij effect: landslide victory for FVD in municipal elections