sábado, 25 de julho de 2026

Firefighters across France and Spain continue to battle wildfires that have displaced almost 270,000 people.

 


2h ago

18.07 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/jul/25/france-spain-wildfires-latest-news-updates-madrid-cap-ferret-bordeaux-gironde?page=with%3Ablock-6a64ec7f8f0890a39cdc66a0#block-6a64ec7f8f0890a39cdc66a0

 

A summary of today's developments

Firefighters across France and Spain continue to battle wildfires that have displaced almost 270,000 people.

 

A ‌man has died in a wildfire near the Spanish city of Valencia, the countrys interior ministry said. The victim was found in a car in a ravine in the town of Manises, west of the city.

 

In France, 197,000 people have been evacuated near Bordeaux, including in the suburbs of the city. The French armed forces significantly expanded its military response to the major wildfires in the south-west, deploying 1,500 soldiers to support firefighters, assist with evacuations and provide medical care, transport, accommodation, and logistical support. The armed forces are also supplying specialist equipment, including bulldozers, helicopters, drones, and A400M military aircraft equipped for aerial firefighting, to help contain the fires and support the wider emergency response.

 

The French prime minister, Sébastien Lecornu, convened new government crisis meeting later on the wildfires in south-west France, his office announced.

 

The Spanish interior ministry said a total of 70,000 people have been evacuated from villages west of Madrid. Spain’s prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, said the wildfire situation near Madrid remained “complex” as he visited affected areas. “We don’t know how the wind will develop, even though temperatures have dropped,” he said.

 

The first minister of Scotland has asked for military aid from the UK government as more than 500 firefighters continue to tackle a firewhich has raged in the Cairngorms national park for the past 11 days and forced the evacuation of homes in the remote region.

Michael Kretschmer, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) premier of Saxony and a prominent ally of Chancellor Friedrich Merz, has ignited a fierce political debate by publicly challenging Germany's longstanding "firewall" (Brandmauer) against the far-right

 


Michael Kretschmer, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) premier of Saxony and a prominent ally of Chancellor Friedrich Merz, has ignited a fierce political debate by publicly challenging Germany's longstanding "firewall" (Brandmauer) against the far-right POLITICO. In a recent interview with Handelsblatt, Kretschmer explicitly stated that political leaders "need to talk to anyone who wants to talk," directly undermining Merz’s strict policy of total non-cooperation with the Alternative for Germany (AfD) POLITICO.

Context of the Rift

  • The Firewall Fracture: Traditional German parties maintain a strict taboo against forming coalitions or working with the far-right AfD POLITICO Instagram. Kretschmer’s comments argue that this strategy ignores current political realities POLITICO.
  • Surging AfD Support: The AfD has risen rapidly in popularity CP24 Instagram. The party is currently polling as Germany's top political force nationally POLITICO Instagram.
  • Crucial State Elections: Major regional elections are scheduled for September, particularly in eastern states like Saxony-Anhalt CP24. The AfD is highly competitive and could win its first-ever state governorship CP24.

Political Fallout

  • Backlash from the Left: Left-leaning politicians, including representatives from the Social Democratic Party (SPD), strongly criticized the comments Harici. They warned that treating the AfD as a normal political partner compromises democratic values Verity.
  • AfD's Composed Stance: An AfD spokesperson stated that the party remains open to talks with any group Harici. However, some regional AfD lawmakers argue that simply supporting a conservative minority government without being given executive power would not serve their voter base Harici.
  • Merz's Balancing Act: Chancellor Merz faces immense pressure CP24. He has consistently vowed to protect Germany from being ruined by the far-right Instagram. Yet, his federal government remains deeply unpopular due to a slow economic turnaround, forcing him into active damage control and cabinet reshuffles to counter the AfD's momentum CP24

 

Merz ally challenges Germany’s far-right firewall ahead of crucial state elections

 



Merz ally challenges Germany’s far-right firewall ahead of crucial state elections

 

The far-right AfD is set to perform well in elections in September in its political heartland in the eastern part of the country.

 

July 24, 2026 4:00 am CET

By Nette Nöstlinger

https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-friedrich-merz-michael-kretschmer-challenge-afd-saxony-elections/

 

BERLIN — A key ally of Friedrich Merz has ignited a major political debate by suggesting the chancellor’s centrist conservatives should break a taboo and cooperate with the country’s most popular party: the far-right Alternative for Germany.

 

Michael Kretschmer, premier of the eastern state of Saxony and a member of the chancellor’s center-right Christian Democratic Union, is challenging Merz’s insistence on keeping the country’s firewall against the surging AfD ahead of crucial elections in September that could put the far-right party in charge of a region for the first time.

 

“Anyone who still talks about firewalls hasn’t recognized the signs of the times,” Kretschmer, who leads a minority government in Saxony, told the Handelsblatt newspaper in an interview earlier this week. “We need to talk to anyone who wants to talk.”

 

With those comments, Kretschmer stirred up tensions that Merz has stubbornly sought to avoid.

 

Merz rules out cooperation with the far right — invoking the country’s Nazi past — but the political realities of eastern Germany are piling on the pressure for a rethink. Polls show that the AfD has a chance of winning an outright majority in Saxony-Anhalt on Sept. 6 and is poised to perform well in Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania and Berlin later that month.

 

At the national level, POLITICO’s Poll of Polls puts the AfD as the single most popular party with 28 percent support, with the Christian Democrats on 22 percent.

 

For now, however, Merz is sticking to his line that Germany has a special historic responsibility that means it cannot follow the course of other EU countries where the far right has worked with the centrist mainstream.

 

“If a far-right party were to enter the government in Germany, it would have a completely different significance than if that were to happen in another country,” he told reporters at a press conference. “This is also tied to our history, and that’s why, for me, it’s neither a benchmark nor an example, nor something to learn from. It is, quite simply, something different. I will do everything in my power in Germany to prevent it.”

 

Instead, Merz said the government’s goal had to be to seek to create a climate where the far right could be defeated.

 

“Between now and September 6, we will strive to facilitate and achieve stable political conditions in both Saxony-Anhalt and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania,” he said.

 

The challenge on the left

But the reality in the election battlegrounds is that the AfD is polling well ahead of all other parties in the eastern German states of Saxony-Anhalt (41 percent) and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (36 percent).

 

The former communist East has long been a stronghold for the far-right force. It is also in this region that the AfD is known to be most radical, both in terms of personnel and the positions it represents. Out of the five regions in Germany’s East, four regional party branches are classified as right-wing extremist organizations by domestic intelligence agencies.

 

 

 

Even if the AfD fails to secure an absolute majority in Saxony-Anhalt, Merz’s conservatives will be confronted with harsh political dynamics in September: To keep the far right out of power, they would almost certainly have to work with the populist anti-capitalist Left Party — which is also particularly strong in the East and against whom the conservatives are also maintaining a firewall, as outlined in a party resolution from 2018.

 

“We have clear party convention resolutions here, and I have no reason to doubt that we will abide by them,” Merz said about cooperation with the Left Party last week.

 

Regional politicians within his own conservative party are, however, increasingly questioning whether such promises can be upheld given the strength of parties at both ends of the political spectrum.

 

Kretschmer’s comments are widely seen as an attempt to start a debate about how to govern after the September elections without radically breaking pre-election promises and further eroding the CDU’s credibility.

 

It is an approach that is not welcomed by party leaders in Berlin.

 

“We are currently in the midst of a fierce political battle in three federal states, particularly with — or against — the AfD,” Steffen Bilger, one of the CDU’s parliamentary group leaders in the Bundestag, told Deutschlandfunk on Thursday. “And that’s what we should be focusing on right now, rather than starting debates like this.”

 

Politicians from the center-left Social Democratic Party have, meanwhile, demanded clarity from their federal coalition partners. The lead candidate for the Berlin election called on the CDU to “come clean” about whether it still ruled out cooperation with the AfD at regional level, while urging the party to open up to the far left.

 

“The CDU should finally admit that it can cooperate with the Left Party, because it’s simply already doing so,” Steffen Krach told news portal t-online Wednesday in view of the minority governments it leads in Saxony and Thuringia. “Anyone who now demonizes the Left Party and equates it with the AfD is deceiving voters,” he added. 

 

The AfD, meanwhile, sounded relaxed about all the fuss, telling German media outlets via a spokesperson that the party was open to talking to everyone who wanted to. 

 

Torben Braga, an AfD Bundestag lawmaker from the eastern state of Thuringia, however, argued that, given the party’s current strength, it would not be in its strategic interest to support a minority government in Saxony-Anhalt after the September vote.

 

“I don’t see why a party like the AfD, [that is polling around] a near-absolute majority, would have to keep ensuring that a minority government remains in office by securing majorities but not participating in executive decisions,” he said. “That is a situation that cannot be in the interest of our voters.”

‘We DON’T Want More STUPID WARS!’ 10 Years of MAGA & Andrew Tate Masculinity Debate

Tucker Carlson Calls Ben Shapiro A "Little..."

LAURA LOOMER on Trump, Zelensky, Russian Propaganda - and the Ukrainian Family Secret She Never Knew

 

What’s behind Maga influencer Laura Loomer’s about-face on Ukraine?

 


Analysis

What’s behind Maga influencer Laura Loomer’s about-face on Ukraine?

James Risen

After a Kyiv visit, rightwing firebrand now supports Ukraine – but perhaps it’s just because Trump favors a winner

 

Sat 25 Jul 2026 11.00 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/25/laura-loomers-ukraine-visit

 

Laura Loomer, the online Maga provocateur, has never worked in the White House or anywhere else in the government, but her sudden conversion to the Ukrainian cause this week is significant because her social media posts often have real policy implications in the second Trump administration.

 

The rightwing commentator has spent the last few days in Kyiv, where she announced a newfound sympathy for Ukraine in its long war with Russia, and admitted that she had previously fallen for Russian propaganda.

 

Loomer – who has previously echoed Kremlin talking points to her 2 million followers on social media – has enjoyed direct access to Trump since the 2024 presidential campaign. During the early months after Trump returned to office, Loomer used her online presence to push for ideological purges of government personnel, including many in the national security arena.

 

For a time, her power to break careers among foreign policy officials made her seem as if she were Trump’s de facto national security adviser.

 

It is unclear whether she still has that kind of pull inside the White House, but Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, certainly took her seriously when she arrived this week, holding a private meeting with her on Thursday.

 

Three days earlier, Loomer posted about experiencing her first air raid, as Russian missiles pounded the Ukrainian capital

 

“This is everyday for every Ukrainian,” she posting, adding she felt that she had been “an asshole for minimizing the struggle of Ukrainians for the last 5 years”.

 

“I often said I don’t care. Looking back, that wasn’t very nice of me to say. There are people in Ukraine who have to run to a bomb shelter everyday and some of us had the audacity to say Russia wasn’t wrong because we believed the lie that Ukraine is a country full of Nazi sympathizers. We have been so propagandized by Russia and we don’t even realize it.”

 

Before their meeting on Thursday, Zelenskyy’s office posted a statement saying: “It is really important that @LauraLoomer is in Ukraine and sees things with her own eyes as they are.”

 

Loomer’s change of heart is potentially important not only because she is close to Trump, but also because she has long served as a reliable barometer of Maga attitudes.

 

Loomer has long been disdainful of Ukraine, adopting what could only be described as a pro-Russian perspective. Many in Maga circles have for years held positive views of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, thanks to Russian propaganda that portrayed him as a bulwark against homosexuality and a defender of fundamentalist Christianity. They became convinced that the Russia-Ukraine war was a proxy fight between Russia’s fundamentalist Christianity and the EU’s western secularism.

 

Loomer’s shift comes at a critical moment for Ukraine, which recently lost one of its strongest supporters in Washington with the death this month of Lindsey Graham, the Republican senator from South Carolina who had consistently pushed for increased sanctions on Russia to punish Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine.

 

But Loomer’s change also coincides with what appears to be an important recent shift in Trump’s own views on Ukraine.

 

Trump returned to office openly hating Ukraine, at least in part because of the 2019 impeachment over his attempt to hold up aid to Ukraine in exchange for dirt on Joe Biden. Early in his second term, Trump humiliated Zelenskyy in an Oval Office meeting, cut off direct the supply of US weapons and forced Ukraine’s European allies to buy American weapons for Kyiv instead.

 

But Trump likes winners, and even without full support from Washington, Ukraine has been able to slow Russia’s advance. Kyiv has become a global leader in drone technology, and it has taken the war to Russia itself with long-range missile attacks on the country’s oil infrastructure, leading to an energy crisis in one of the world’s biggest oil-producing nations.

 

Clearly impressed with Ukraine’s performance, Trump announced at the Nato summit in Turkey earlier this month that the US would license Patriot missile technology to Ukraine, allowing Kyiv to produce the advanced air defense missiles on its own.

 

At the same time, Trump also supported a move in Congress, which had been backed by Graham, to impose new sanctions on Russia, while also seeming to back off an earlier insistence that Ukraine would have to agree to give up large swaths of territory in exchange for any US-brokered peace deal with Russia.

 

Trump’s policy shifts were modest, but significant; it is possible that Loomer changed her position simply in order to stay in lockstep with Trump.

 

But her about-face could be even more politically significant if it represents a broader thawing of Maga attitudes towards Ukraine and an awakening to the dangers of Russian propaganda.