Firefighters tackle major blazes across tinderbox Britain | The Wrap with Anna Botting

 

What Does Farage’s Win Mean for Reform UK?

Farage wins by-election but Reform’s troubles are far from over | The Daily T

Reform’s Core Voter Base Is ‘Here To Stay’ | Patrick Maguire

The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards has officially resumed its investigation into Nigel Farage over allegations that he failed to declare millions of pounds in financial gifts.

 

Standards watchdog resumes investigation into Nigel Farage over financial gifts

The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards has officially resumed its investigation into Nigel Farage over allegations that he failed to declare millions of pounds in financial gifts. The investigation, which was temporarily paused when the Reform UK leader resigned his seat in July to trigger a by-election, automatically reactivated hours after he won back his Clacton-on-Sea constituency on August 14, 2026.

The Core Allegations

The investigation, originally launched in May 2026, focuses on several high-value undeclared financial advantages:

• The £5 Million Crypto Gift: In April 2024, Farage received £5 million from Christopher Harborne, a Thailand-based British cryptocurrency investor. Under parliamentary rules, new MPs must report any relevant financial benefits received in the 12 months prior to their election.
• The George Cottrell Support: The inquiry has been widened to look into whether Farage should have declared substantial backing from his long-time ally, convicted fraudster George Cottrell. This includes the free use of a luxury London home and funding for social media filming during the 2024 campaign.

Farage's Defense

Farage has strongly denied any wrongdoing, dismissing the investigation as a "political tool" and a "kangaroo court" orchestrated by the political establishment. His defense rests on two main arguments:

• The timing: The money was given before he changed his mind and decided to stand in the 2024 General Election.
• The intent: He insists the £5 million was a purely personal, unconditional gift intended to fund his lifetime personal security and act as a reward for his Brexit campaigning.

Why the By-Election Didn't Stop the Probe

Farage triggered a flash by-election in Clacton, challenging his constituents to "be the judges of my actions". Critics and rival parties, like the Liberal Democrats, labeled the move a taxpayer-funded "vanity project" designed to dodge accountability. Farage's team reportedly believed that resigning would permanently kill the investigation. However, parliamentary rules dictate that stepping down merely suspends the process, which reopens immediately if the individual is re-elected.

Farage comfortably won the by-election with 63.3% of the vote after all main political parties boycotted the ballot in protest, leaving him to defeat a slate of independent and fringe candidates, including Count Binface. Within hours of the win, the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner updated its portal to show the case is no longer suspended.

Next Steps and Potential Consequences

Because the UK Parliament is in summer recess, formal progression on the case is expected to pick up pace when MPs return in September.

Potential Outcomes	Mechanism / Consequences
Exoneration or Rectification	If the breach is deemed minor or inadvertent, Farage may simply be asked to apologize or retroactively correct the register.
House Suspension	If found guilty of a serious transparency breach, the Commissioner can recommend a formal suspension from the House of Commons.
A Second By-Election	If Farage is suspended for 10 or more sitting days, it will automatically trigger a recall petition. If 10% of local Clacton voters sign it, he will face a genuine, fully contested by-election

Standards watchdog resumes investigation into Nigel Farage over financial gifts

 

Standards watchdog resumes investigation into Nigel Farage over financial gifts

 

Reform UK leader’s return to Clacton restarts inquiry into £5m gift from crypto-billionaire and support from fraudster

 

Peter Walker and Rowena Mason

Fri 14 Aug 2026 09.17 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/aug/14/standards-watchdog-investigation-nigel-farage-financial-gifts

 

The suspended parliamentary standards investigation into Nigel Farage over accusations he failed to declare gifts and donations has resumed after the Reform UK leader’s re-election as the MP for Clacton.

 

The twofold investigation by Daniel Greenberg, the parliamentary commissioner for standards, was paused after Farage resigned from his seat and called a byelection in protest at what he said was unfair scrutiny of his finances.

 

Now the investigation had restarted, according to the commissioner’s website, which said previously that the process had been suspended from 8 July, when the MP resigned.

 

Farage said he wanted voters in Clacton to decide if he was fit to be an MP. However, all the main parties declined to stand, leaving him taking on dozens of novelty and fringe candidates, most prominent among them Count Binface.

 

Greenberg is looking into whether Farage should have declared a £5m gift from the Thailand-based businessman Christopher Harborne, given to him before the last election. Farage has always said he was not in politics at the time the gift was made.

 

 

The inquiry was later widened to look at whether he should have declared support from his friend, the fraudster George Cottrell, who let Farage use one of his London homes and also paid for some social media filming in 2024.

 

If Farage is found to have broken parliamentary rules and is suspended from the Commons for at least 10 sitting days he could face a recall petition, where a byelection is called if at least 10% of local voters demand it.

 

According to one report, Farage called his own byelection after his team advised that leaving parliament would end the investigation. In fact it only pauses such processes, which resume if the person is re-elected.

 

Farage has said the investigation was “being used as a political tool”. One Reform MP, Sarah Pochin, called the process a “kangaroo court”.

 

Labour said on Friday that the resumption of the investigation showed Farage could not outrun questions about his finances, with at least 10 questions still outstanding, including whether Harborne had given money to any other Reform-linked figures.

 

Bridget Phillipson, the Labour chair, said: “He forced a byelection he didn’t need to have. He stood again. He spent most of the summer chasing a bin around Clacton.

 

“And now he’s going to come back to parliament and have to answer some very serious questions, questions he’s been seeking to dodge, distracting and deflecting from the £5m … gift, his connections to a convicted fraudster. You know, the scandal just keeps piling up. And now he’s through that byelection, there’s no hiding place.”

 

A Conservative party spokesperson said the byelection was a “farce started by Nigel Farage to try and dodge scrutiny of his fishy £5m personal donation”.

 

“All Farage can brag about this morning is beating a bloke with a bin on his head. What he should do is answer the serious outstanding questions about why he hid his £5m from the public,” the spokesperson said.

 

However, Farage said the result showed he had “stuck up two fingers to the entire political establishment”.

Moroccan minors in Ceuta: Why their return to Morocco remains complicated

 

Moroccan minors in Ceuta: Why their return to Morocco remains complicated

 

After the return to Morocco of almost all Moroccan adults who entered Ceuta during the crisis of July 30 and 31, the situation of unaccompanied minors has now become one of the main issues between Rabat and Madrid. Morocco has requested their return and said it is ready to cooperate with Spain to identify them and arrange for their care. But unlike adults, these young people cannot simply be sent back across the border.

 

Omar Soussi

Publié

Le 12/08/2026 à 18h30

https://en.yabiladi.com/articles/details/200565/moroccan-minors-ceuta-their-return.html

 

Moroccan Justice Minister Abdellatif Ouahbi has called for the return of Moroccan minors currently in Spain, including those who arrived in Ceuta during the latest wave of migration. His appeal follows royal instructions issued to the relevant Moroccan ministries to facilitate the identification and return of the children.

 

The precise number of minors concerned, however, remains unclear. According to the latest figures released on August 12, Spanish authorities registered 1,527 unaccompanied minors in Ceuta following the crisis. That figure does not necessarily correspond to the number who arrived on July 30 and 31, as some were already in the city before the mass crossings.

 

An agreement already exists between Rabat and Madrid

Contrary to what is sometimes suggested, Spanish law does not prohibit the return of Moroccan minors. Since 2007, Madrid and Rabat have had a specific agreement on cooperation in preventing the irregular migration of unaccompanied minors, protecting them and arranging their «agreed return».

 

The agreement provides for cooperation between the two countries to trace the minors’ families and, where the necessary conditions are met, return them to their relatives or place them in the care of the competent Moroccan services.

 

It does not, however, allow collective or automatic returns. Spanish law requires the authorities to determine, in each individual case, whether returning a child is in their best interests. The administration must gather information about the child’s family circumstances, consult the Moroccan authorities and give the minor an opportunity to be heard. The public prosecutor’s office must also be involved in the procedure.

 

The requirement for an individual assessment explains why minors could not be treated in the same way as adults during immediate border pushbacks. Entering Spanish-administered territory irregularly does not deprive them of their status as children under the protection of the Spanish authorities.

 

The 2021 precedent looms large

This caution is directly linked to the previous Ceuta crisis. In August 2021, following another large influx, Spanish authorities returned several hundred minors to Morocco.

 

Spanish courts subsequently ruled that the procedure was unlawful. In January 2024, the Supreme Court confirmed that the 2021 returns were illegal because the safeguards required under Spanish law had not been observed. The court pointed, in particular, to the absence of an adequate individual assessment of each minor’s circumstances.

 

That precedent now represents a major obstacle to any collective operation. Even if Rabat is requesting the return of its nationals, and Madrid wants to ease the long-term pressure on Ceuta, the Spanish authorities must demonstrate that every return complies with the applicable legal safeguards.

 

Another option: relocating minors within Spain

While possible returns are being examined, Madrid must also address the immediate overcrowding of Ceuta’s reception system.

 

The Spanish government has activated mechanisms to transfer some unaccompanied minors to other autonomous communities. This does not prevent the authorities from simultaneously considering their possible return to Morocco, as the two are separate procedures.

 

The issue is already fuelling sharp political tensions in Spain. The central government is defending the distribution of minors among the regions as a way to ease pressure on Ceuta, while the People’s Party wants returns to Morocco to be treated as the priority. Melilla President Juan José Imbroda has also urged the authorities to apply the 2007 agreement with Rabat.

 

The situation therefore appears to be less a refusal by the Spanish government to return the minors than a process constrained by legal requirements. Rabat says it is ready to receive them, but Madrid must assess and organize each return individually.

 

The key question in the coming weeks will be whether cooperation between the two countries allows families to be identified quickly and the conditions required for return to be met. The 2021 precedent nevertheless makes one point clear: another hastily organized collective operation would expose the Spanish authorities to fresh legal challenges.