terça-feira, 27 de outubro de 2026

Why Germany is watching the Israeli election closely | DW News

Israel election: Can Netanyahu survive after October 7, Gaza and Iran?

Israelis head to polls in key election with Netanyahu fighting for political future

Israel’s High-Stakes Election, Explained | WSJ News

 

What you need to know about the most consequential election in Israel’s history

 


Explainer

What you need to know about the most consequential election in Israel’s history

 

Benjamin Netanyahu is seeking a new mandate in Israel’s first election since the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks

Emma Graham-Harrison in Jerusalem

Mon 26 Oct 2026 12.17 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/oct/26/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-most-consequential-election-in-israels-history

 

On Tuesday Israel holds its first election since the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks, the deadliest day in the country’s history, which resulted in the deaths of about 1,200 people, the majority of them civilians.

Since then Israel has pursued a war of annihilation in Gaza, launched two inconclusive wars with Iran, and intensified a campaign of state-backed ethnic cleansing in the occupied West Bank.

Domestically the coalition formed by Benjamin Netanyahu has taken aim at democratic institutions, including the supreme court. Many Israelis have described this election as the most consequential in their country’s history.


Who are the main players?

The prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has led Israel for 19 out of the last 30 years, most recently at the head of a far-right coalition. He is seeking a new mandate with the endorsement of the US president, Donald Trump, and the fight is personal as well as political. He is on trial for corruption; losing power may mean a greater risk of jail time.

His main rival is Gadi Eisenkot, a former head of the Israeli military and relative political newcomer, the son of Moroccan immigrants who rose to the heart of Israel’s establishment from humble beginnings. His son and two nephews were killed fighting in Gaza in 2024.

He lacks Netanyahu’s charisma, but has embraced that as part of a campaign positioning him as the opposite of Israel’s current leader, down to the name of his new party – Yashar, or “Honesty”.


What are the key issues for voters?

Israel’s security is at the heart of the election, overshadowing even the soaring cost of living. Opponents of the current government point to the catastrophe of the 7 October attacks, the erosion of democratic institutions, rise of religious extremism and the cost of open-ended, multi-front wars.

They have promised a state commission of inquiry into 7 October, and most have pledged to end draft exemption for ultra-Orthodox men, a source of deep resentment among families whose loved ones are serving or have been killed.

They are also concerned about international isolation, amid broadening sanctions over settlement expansion, and an accelerating brain drain among the elite.

Netanyahu has tried to shift blame for 7 October on to Israel’s security establishment, and despite presiding over the deadliest day in Israel’s history, he claims to be the only leader with the experience and international contacts to keep the country safe.

He recently posted an AI image of a nuclear bomb hitting Tel Aviv on social media, with the claim “anyone who cares about their physical existence” should pause before voting for the opposition.

His far-right allies have called for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and the occupied West Bank, and expansion of settlements.

His ultra-Orthodox partners want to preserve a decades-old exemption from conscription and subsidies for religious study.


What are the polls saying?

Most polls show Netanyahu’s Likud and his current coalition parters losing their majority. That fall in voter support has been fairly consistent for more than two years.

They also show a clear anti-Netanyahu majority. However, those opposition seats are divided between the bloc of Jewish Israeli parties, led by Eisenkot’s Yashar, and parties representing Palestinian citizens of Israel.

The Jewish Israeli parties are unlikely to have a majority on their own, but have mostly ruled out going into coalition with Palestinians.

Palestinian politicians have indicated they might support a minority government of the Jewish Israeli parties in order to unseat Netanyahu’s far-right coalition.


How does the system work and when might we get results/a new government?

The Knesset has 120 seats, with lawmakers voted in through a system of proportional representation. No single party has ever claimed a majority of 61 seats, so Israel has always been governed by coalitions.

When the results are in, the president invites the party with the largest number of seats to try to agree a governing coalition.

Exit polls are released at 10pm Israeli time (8pm GMT), and the first indication of actual voting counts usually emerges in the early hours of the morning.

Getting full results could take much longer, with the outcome potentially hanging on the electoral fortunes of two small parties, which need to win 3.25% of the overall vote to take up seats in the Knesset. Polling puts both around this threshold. If they cross it, they each get four seats, which would have a significant impact on coalition building options.

The far-right Amcha Yisrael is led by the former general Ofer Winter, who has pledged to back Netanyahu for prime minister if he gets into the Knesset. The Reservists is a rightwing Zionist party focused on ensuring universal conscription whose leaders sit between the two blocs. They have ruled out joining any government supported by either the ultra-Orthodox – key Netanyahu allies – or Palestinian parties whose backing Eisenkot is likely to need.

If it goes down to the wire, counting could take more than a day.


How democratic is the vote – and who is being disenfranchised?

About 15 million people live in areas under Israeli control. Just over 7 million Jewish Israelis and 1.7 million Palestinian citizens of Israel live within the country’s pre-1967 borders, known as the “green line”, and have full voting rights.

In the occupied West Bank, more than 500,000 Israeli settlers can vote. They live among 3.1 million Palestinians who are subject to military rule and do not have the right to vote.

In occupied East Jerusalem more than 230,000 Israelis with voting rights live among 350,000 Palestinians who cannot vote.

Two million Palestinians in Gaza, who live under Israeli military occupation, according to the international court of justice, also have no vote.

 

Following his defeat in the presidential runoff election, Brazilian Senator Flávio Bolsonaro has been ordered by the Supreme Court to surrender his passports within 24 hours and is legally barred from leaving the country.

 


Brazil: defeated Flávio Bolsonaro ordered to surrender passports

Following his defeat in the presidential runoff election, Brazilian Senator Flávio Bolsonaro has been ordered by the Supreme Court to surrender his passports within 24 hours and is legally barred from leaving the country.

The Election Context

The passport order came directly after the official results of the 2026 presidential runoff election were certified:

26 Oct, 07:46

From Superior Electoral Court (TSE) via Reuters

2026 Brazil Presidential election Round 2

Lula wins. Superior Electoral Court (TSE) has called this race. 100,00% reporting. Official results.

Lula

51,79%

Workers' Party

64.256.232 votes


Flávio Bolsonaro

48,21%

Liberal Party

59.826.041 votes


Invalid/null

-

4.153.801 votes

Core Details of the Court Ruling

  • The Mandate: Issued by Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, the confidential ruling cancels all of Bolsonaro’s passports—including his diplomatic passport as a sitting congressman—and orders him to turn them over to the Federal Police.
  • Criminal Investigation: The ruling is tied to an ongoing federal criminal inquiry regarding a massive money-laundering and illegal foreign exchange scheme. The police suspect that hundreds of millions of pounds were laundered through links to betting companies.
  • Restricted Contacts: The court has explicitly prohibited Bolsonaro from having any contact with his associate, lawyer Willer Tomaz, who is a co-target in the money-laundering probe.
  • Flight Risk Concerns: The restriction reportedly stems in part from recent public remarks made by the candidate's brother, Eduardo Bolsonaro, who suggested during a podcast that Flávio should flee Brazil if he lost the election.

Bolsonaro's Response

Flávio Bolsonaro confirmed he received the police notification on Monday on the streets of Brasília right after visiting his father, former president Jair Bolsonaro (who is currently under house arrest). In a video broadcast on social media, the younger Bolsonaro denied any intention of fleeing the country, stated he would comply with the passport order, and vowed to legally defend himself against the corruption allegations

Brazil: defeated Flávio Bolsonaro ordered to surrender passports

 


Brazil: defeated Flávio Bolsonaro ordered to surrender passports

 

Far-right senator banned from leaving country as supreme court judge’s ruling makes reference to money-laundering case

 

Tiago Rogero in Brasília

Mon 26 Oct 2026 23.02 GMT

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/oct/26/flavio-bolsonaro-brazil-lula-election

 

The far-right senator Flávio Bolsonaro was banned from leaving Brazil and ordered to surrender his passports just hours after his dramatic loss in the presidential election to the leftist president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

 

The ruling was issued by supreme court justice Alexandre de Moraes, the same justice who oversaw the trial of the senator’s father, the former president Jair Bolsonaro, for attempting a coup.

 

Bolsonaro posted a video saying the decision was based on an interview his brother, Eduardo Bolsonaro, gave last Friday urging his brother to leave Brazil if he lost the election.

 

On Monday night, Bolsonaro’s party issued a statement acknowledging the election result, saying: “We recognise the presidential result proclaimed by the electoral court, but believe that the questions raised need to be properly clarified through a balanced and democratic political debate.”

 

Bolsonaro, like his father four years ago, has still not conceded defeat to Lula.

 

The court’s brief ruling regarding his passport only refers to a criminal case in which the federal police are investigating Flávio Bolsonaro over his possible involvement in a money-laundering scheme. The ruling orders him not to have any contact with his friend Willer Tomaz, a lawyer linked to betting companies that police suspect were being used to launder about £680m.

 

It also cancelled all of Bolsonaro’s passports, including the diplomatic one he holds as a congressman, and ordered him to hand them over within 24 hours.

 

Bolsonaro was the first to speak publicly about the matter, before Brazilian media were even aware of the judge’s decision.

 

In a video posted on social media, he said he had just left a visit to his father, who is under house arrest in Brasília, when “Lula’s federal police were at his door and in the middle of the street, and I was served with an order to hand over my passports and I am also prohibited from leaving the country”.

 

He added that, although his brother – who is in self-imposed exile in the US – told a US podcast on Friday that he favoured the senator leaving Brazil if he lost the election, “I never said that”.

 

When his Senate term ends early next year, Bolsonaro will be out of public office for the first time in 24 years, and therefore without the special jurisdiction afforded to officeholders.

 

He is under investigation in another criminal case, too, over what happened to the £20m he was captured on tape asking a disgraced banker accused of corruption to provide for a biopic about his father.

 

The Folha de S.Paulo newspaper reported that Flávio Bolsonaro had been persuaded to drop his plan to seek to annul the election, which he had announced after the result was declared on Sunday night.

 

Bolsonaro had claimed that the two-hour extension of voting – intended to allow voters who had been unable to access the mandatory free public transport to cast their ballots – had harmed the election, despite the fact that his own campaign had also argued for an extension.

 

According to the newspaper, allies and lawyers told him his argument was legally weak.

 

Bolsonaro had still not publicly reversed his demand for an annulment, and in the same video he said he would file another case to have Lula’s ticket disqualified over alleged abuse of economic power, a similar case to others his legal team brought during the campaign.