terça-feira, 10 de março de 2026

Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff view global diplomacy through the lens of a real-estate venture, prioritizing a business mindset over traditional statecraft.

 


Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff view global diplomacy through the lens of a real-estate venture, prioritizing a business mindset over traditional statecraft. As President Trump’s primary envoys for major conflicts, including those in Gaza, Ukraine, and Iran, they operate on the belief that complex international issues can be solved by small, agile teams of "dealmakers" rather than large bureaucratic institutions.

 

Core Philosophy: Diplomacy as Real Estate

Business Relationships over Bureaucracy: They rely on personal, trusted relationships forged through decades of private-sector business. They explicitly reject the label of "conflict of interest" for their business ties in the Middle East, instead calling it "experience" that provides the necessary leverage for negotiations.

Simplicity vs. Complexity: Kushner has summarized their perspective by stating, "The issues are simple, and the people are complicated". They believe the technical details of peace—such as raising reconstruction funds for Gaza—are the "easy part" compared to managing the personalities involved.

Action-Oriented "Freewheeling": They often bypass traditional diplomatic protocols. Critics describe their approach as "freewheeling," which they defend as a necessary departure from "failed" traditional approaches.

 

Key Strategic Outlooks

The Middle East: Their view is heavily influenced by the Abraham Accords framework, focusing on economic normalization and regional "togetherness" between Israelis, Palestinians, and Arab states.

Peace through Reconstruction: For post-war Gaza, they envision a plan centered on massive reconstruction and building projects, leveraging their backgrounds as developers to drive the process.

Global Conflicts: They have been tasked with a "trifecta" of challenges—Gaza, Ukraine, and Iran—simultaneously. They see these not as separate geopolitical struggles, but as interconnected "intractable conflicts" that require a unified dealmaking strategy.

Their approach is characterized by a "Board of Peace" model, which they launched at the World Economic Forum to apply private-sector discipline to global stability.

How Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff see the world

 



How Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff see the world

 

The countries and actors may be different, but the general idea – that diplomacy is similar to a business deal – is the same.

 

By Diana Nerozzi

03/10/2026 05:00 AM EDT

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/10/how-jared-kushner-steve-witkoff-see-the-world-00820113

 

The failed attempt to secure a peaceful resolution with Iran has not shaken the president’s faith in the two men he put in charge of making peace around the world.

 

Special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, are in charge of solving some of the world’s most intractable conflicts and even as the war with Iran expands, the president insists his top diplomats are the best men for the task.

 

“I think they’re doing a great job,” President Donald Trump told POLITICO in a brief phone interview Friday. “People like that you can’t hire.”

 

The unprecedented dynamic of two men leading negotiations with Iran, Israel and Hamas and Ukraine and Russia – sometimes all in one afternoon – underscores how the Trump administration believes peace deals should be forged. It views diplomacy like a real-estate venture, requiring a business mindset and a small team tasked with securing a big development deal, according to two administration officials granted anonymity to explain how the president’s closest advisers think about their mission.

 

And if negotiations with one party fail as they did with Tehran, use the failure as leverage for another deal.

 

Trump, on Friday, did just that, suggesting that the war with Iran may prove a boon for Kushner’s notable first-term achievement – the Abraham Accords, which normalized diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco.

 

“A lot of people are going to be joining the Abraham Accords,” Trump said. “Now that Iran is decimated, because you know that was always a fear over that.”

 

Adding more countries to the Abraham Accords has long been a goal of the president to bring larger regional stability and peace to the Middle East.

 

Trump’s optimism comes as critics accuse the president of placing overwhelming trust in underwhelming men. While Kushner and Witkoff, a New York and Miami real estate developer, are widely lauded for shepherding the deal that brought home Israeli hostages, their brokered ceasefire remains fragile and Hamas is still a force in Gaza. Negotiations to end the Ukraine war have not produced a ceasefire. And attempts to persuade Iran to give up its uranium enrichment program were unsuccessful.

 

The breakneck pace leads to a “risk of overextension,” said former State Department negotiator Aaron David Miller, who served in both Republican and Democratic administrations. The volume of detail required to handle three negotiations at once is too much to place on two businessmen, and there is a risk that the administration’s top negotiators lack a sufficient understanding of history and psychology, “which is critically important to how the combatants in these conflicts actually see matters,” Miller said.

 

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the Iran deal the Obama administration negotiated and Trump has widely panned, was 159 pages long and took two years to hammer out.

 

But Trump’s confidence is unwavering. “They don’t have too much,” he said. “They actually have -- they have capacity for more, to be honest with you.”

 

The idea of working on three deals at once with only two men at the helm is unprecedented. And Trump’s use of “peace envoys” goes beyond usual practice, as he hand picks his top negotiators without congressional confirmation.

 

The Trump administration insists that a small team handling multiple fires around the world has a better chance of success than a phalanx of diplomats and experts tackling various regional conflicts, comparing high-stakes diplomacy to the kinds of projects the Trump family has long been associated with.

 

Witkoff and Kushner keep their teams small when negotiating major business deals and approach the world stage in a similar way. One of the administration officials noted that real estate deals begin at the top with a select few who have a vision.

 

“Then after that comes constructive managers and coordinating with engineers and architects and so forth,” the first official continued. “So I just think that we’re very good at understanding what the complicating features of a deal are. We talk about it, we address it, then we figure out how we’re going to solve it.”

 

Global negotiations, like development deals, have “similar rhythms for transactions,” said the second administration official.

 

“Some of these conflicts, they all move the same way,” said the first administration official, noting that the “game plan” receives input from Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and chief of staff Susie Wiles. There is also a working relationship with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine.

 

“We’ve had people say, ‘How can you have such a small team?’ Well the beginning of the decision making here on the game plan doesn’t require a big group,” the first administration official said.

 

Witkoff and Kushner’s one-size fits all approach was most evident last month in Geneva when the duo met with the Ukrainians, the Russians and the Iranians in one day, attempting to secure separate deals to end the four-year-war in Ukraine and halt Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

 

They met with the Iranians from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., met with the Ukrainians from 1 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and spoke to the Russians after that, the second administration official said. That was followed by a dinner with the Ukrainians and regional partners, including Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Switzerland. The dinner was followed by another meeting with the Russians from 9:30 p.m. to 11 p.m.

 

Witkoff and Kushner have “tried to take the approaches that work [in Gaza] and then bring them to these other conflicts. And obviously [they] have to modify them to the personalities and the dynamics,” said the second administration official.

 

The countries and actors may be different, but the general idea – that this is similar to a business deal – is the same.

 

That business approach doesn’t sit well with everyone, especially those accustomed to a traditional diplomatic approach with experts and fixed administration channels.

 

“A business mindset can be desirable for diplomatic negotiations – clear-eyed, no nonsense, results oriented,” said a State Department official in Trump’s first term, granted anonymity to express their views on the current administration. “But that should mean understanding with whom you’re doing business. Business experience is no substitute for understanding the region, Islam, and the interests of Hamas and Iran as they understand their interests.”

 

The two administration officials say a small team avoids damaging leaks and pushed back on the idea that Witkoff and Kushner don’t avail themselves of subject matter experts. The National Security Council staff worked on negotiations between Israel and Hamas and State Department officials are involved in negotiations around the Russia-Ukraine war.

 

“We always consult with Marco and his team and [deputy national security adviser] Robert Gabriel in terms of who the right team is in the government to support these efforts,” the second administration official said.

 

For the Iran negotiations, Witkoff and Kushner consulted with the CIA, DOD and State Department nuclear experts, the first official said.

 

But at other times, it’s just the two close friends of Trump, “sitting at a keyboard for a couple of hours” and typing up sensitive materials like the 20-point Israel-Gaza peace plan, per the second administration official.

 

“Their main asset, which is necessary but not sufficient, is their relationship with the president, and as a consequence of that relationship, their capacity to get through all of the bureaucratic hurdles that are imposed by our partners,” said Miller, currently a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

 

A Biden administration official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the Trump administration, agreed that Kushner and Witkoff have a leg up because everyone knows they are among a select few Trump listens to.

 

The modern geopolitical arena responds better to negotiators close ties to the president who can think outside the box, the person said, rather than textbook expertise in the issue -- something that can be gathered from experts working under them.

 

The administration contends that Witkoff and Kushner have had more success than they get credited for – pointing to Gaza, specifically. There was also a large prisoner exchange last week between Russia and Ukraine that Witkoff credited to their sustained diplomatic efforts.

 

With Iran, the administration notes, Tehran simply wouldn’t negotiate.

 

“They said, ‘we have the inalienable right to enrich,’” Witkoff said Saturday night aboard Air Force One. “They bragged about having 60 percent enriched fuel, enough for 11 bombs. They told me and Jared, ‘we’re not going to give you diplomatically what you take militarily.’”

 

And in Ukraine, officials insist that a breakthrough is just a matter of when, not if, and random events can become inflection points for a deal.

 

“These things are so mercurial. Things are changing all the time,” the first official said, explaining that the “inflection point” for the Israel-Hamas negotiations was Israel striking Qatar, not something that the U.S. planned or approved of.

 

That gives them faith that there is a chance — however slim — that something will break their way with Russia and Ukraine — and force Putin or Zelenskyy to change their political calculus.

 

Cheyenne Haslett contributed to this report.



US responsible for Iran school strike, new video suggests

Iran: New footage sheds light on deadly school strike

 

Fragments of U.S.-Made Missile Seen in Photos Taken by Iran Near Deadly School Strike

 




Visual Investigations

Fragments of U.S.-Made Missile Seen in Photos Taken by Iran Near Deadly School Strike

 

Iranian state media posted mangled remnants it claims were from the Feb. 28 attack in Minab. An analysis shows they have the markings of a missile made by American manufacturers

 


Christiaan Triebert Malachy Browne John Ismay

By Christiaan Triebert Malachy Browne and John Ismay

March 9, 2026

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/world/middleeast/iran-school-strike-us-missile.html

 

Mangled missile fragments purporting to be from the deadly strikes that hit a naval base and elementary school in southern Iran on Feb. 28 bear the markings of an American cruise missile, according to an analysis by The New York Times.

 

Photos of the fragments were posted to Telegram by Iran’s state broadcaster and were characterized as showing “the remains of the American missile that landed on the children of Minab school.”

 

The debris is displayed on a table near the shell of the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school, most of which was destroyed in a precision strike, according to an earlier analysis by The Times. At least 175 people, most of them children, were reportedly killed.

 

While it is not clear where or how the fragments were recovered — or whether they pertain specifically to the school strike — they contain serial numbers and other details that are consistent with how the Department of Defense and its suppliers categorize and label munitions. The remnants appear to be from a U.S.-made Tomahawk cruise missile manufactured in 2014 or later.

 

Evidence analyzed by The New York Times has been mounting that the school was hit during a series of U.S. strikes targeting an adjacent naval base. On Sunday, a video was uploaded by Iran’s semiofficial Mehr News Agency, that The Times and other outlets identified as a Tomahawk cruise missile striking a medical building in the naval base. The Pentagon categorizes the Tomahawk as a precision-guided munition.

 

The Defense Department released videos of U.S. Navy warships firing Tomahawks at Iran on Feb. 28, the first day of the strikes, and the day the school was hit, and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in two separate appearances last week that Navy-launched Tomahawks were used to attack targets along Iran’s southern coast during the opening hours of the war.

 

On Saturday, Mr. Trump made the assertion that the school was hit by Iran without offering any proof. On Monday, he again posited that scenario.

 

“Iran also has some Tomahawks,” he said in response to questions from a New York Times reporter at a news conference. “As you know, numerous other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us.”

 

In fact, Iran has no Tomahawks. Any country the U.S. has sold Tomahawks to would have to obtain authorization from the State Department before transferring them to a third party, like Iran.

 

Mr. Trump also added that he was made aware that the Minab incident was under investigation and that whatever the results of that show he was “willing to live with it."

 

Besides the United States, only two countries are known to have Tomahawk missiles: Australia and Britain. Two additional countries have agreed to purchase them — Japan in 2024, and the Netherlands in 2025.

 

In October, Mr. Trump openly mused about providing Tomahawks to Ukraine, but never followed through on the idea.

 

Even if Iran were able to somehow obtain a Tomahawk, it lacks the technical equipment and capabilities that are used to program their flight paths and upload that data into the missile’s onboard computer. Iran would also have to be in possession of a launcher capable of firing a Tomahawk without damaging it.

 

Iran has produced two models of cruise missiles for attacking land-based targets. But both of those weapons have design features that visually set them apart from a Tomahawk, even when viewed from a distance.

 

In the photos of the weapons debris, one remnant is marked SDL ANTENNA, or satellite data link antenna, part of a communications system installed in more modern versions of the Tomahawk. A number unique to Department of Defense contracts indicates that the component was supplied to the U.S. military as part of a 2014 order. The name of Ball Aerospace Technologies, a weapons manufacturer based in Boulder, Colo., that was acquired by BAE in 2024, is imprinted on the part.

 

Another remnant is stamped with “Made in USA” and bears the name of Globe Motors, an Ohio-based manufacturer. According to the official open-data source for American federal government spending, the company has been awarded millions of dollars in Department of Defense contracts for components, including the actuator motors used to move the guidance fins that steer Tomahawk missiles.

 

The photos match remnants documented in Tomahawk missile attacks in previous conflicts, including the Globe Motors component, as well as a circuit board, both photographed in Yemen, and archived by the Open Source Munitions Portal, a database of weapon fragments found in conflict zones. A similar Globe Motors component has also been found in Syria.

 

Trevor Ball, a former U.S. Army explosive ordnance disposal technician who works with the research collective Bellingcat, also identified the components as being part of a Tomahawk missile. He has identified similar missile remnants photographed at other attack sites in Iran since the start of the Israeli-U.S. war.

 

Shawn McCreesh contributed reporting.

 

Christiaan Triebert is a Times reporter working on the Visual Investigations team, a group that combines traditional reporting with digital sleuthing and analysis of visual evidence to verify and source facts from around the world.

 

Malachy Browne is enterprise director of the Visual Investigations team at The Times. He was a member of teams awarded the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting in 2020 and 2023.

 

John Ismay is a reporter covering the Pentagon for The Times. He served as an explosive ordnance disposal officer in the U.S. Navy.

Meghan McCain Begs Trump Admin to Ditch Lindsey Graham as an Iran War Surrogate: ‘He Is Scaring People’

 


Meghan McCain Begs Trump Admin to Ditch Lindsey Graham as an Iran War Surrogate: ‘He Is Scaring People’

 

Sean James

Sun, March 8, 2026 at 6:47 PM GMT+1

2 min read

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/meghan-mccain-begs-trump-admin-174705001.html

 

Meghan McCain urged President Donald Trump’s administration to stop Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) from going on TV and talking about the war against Iran — a war Graham cheered for in the months leading up to U.S. and Israeli forces killing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei last weekend.

 

The conservative pundit and daughter of late Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said Graham is “scaring people” with his Rambo-esque tough talk, rather than convincing Americans that attacking Iran was a shrewd move.

 

McCain could not contain her disgust with Graham following the senator’s  interview with Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures. Graham told viewers “just wait to see what comes in the next two weeks,” which led Bartiromo to ask what was coming next.

 

“We’re going to blow the hell out of these people,” Graham said.

 

That did not sit well with McCain, who jumped on X to voice her displeasure.

 

“I’ve known Lindsey Graham since I was a child. I am imploring anyone who will listen in the Trump administration to stop sending this man out as a surrogate,” McCain posted on X. “He is scaring people and doing damage to whatever message you’re trying to sell to the American public about the Iran war.”

 

Her comments came shortly after Graham said Iran’s theocratic regime is “in a death throw” and will soon be on its knees. Graham said toppling Iran’s theocracy will spur a new era of peace and prosperity — and he’s already looking ahead to the next anti-American regime that needs to go. The senator showed Bartiromo a new hat that read “Free Cuba” on it — which comes a few months after Graham was trotting out “Make Iran Great Again” hats.

 

In the meantime, Graham has been thrilled with Operation Epic Fury, after he called for President Trump to kill the ayatollah in the months leading up to last week’s strikes.

 

 

In a March 8, 2026, interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures", Senator Lindsey Graham discussed Operation Epic Fury, a joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign targeting Iranian infrastructure. Graham defended the operation’s significant costs and President Trump’s proposed defense spending as a necessary "investment" to dismantle the Iranian regime.

 


Graham Joins Maria Bartiromo to Discuss Operation Epic Fury & President Trump's Defense Budget

In a March 8, 2026, interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures", Senator Lindsey Graham discussed Operation Epic Fury, a joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign targeting Iranian infrastructure. Graham defended the operation’s significant costs and President Trump’s proposed defense spending as a necessary "investment" to dismantle the Iranian regime.

 

Key Points from the Interview

Defense Budget & War Costs: When questioned by Maria Bartiromo about the estimated $1 billion per day cost of the war and President Trump’s proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget for 2027, Graham called it the "best money ever spent" to neutralize a "religious Nazi regime".

Economic Opportunity: Graham claimed that toppling the Iranian government would lead to a "new Middle East" where the U.S. and its allies would "make a ton of money" through regional stability and new business deals, specifically mentioning potential peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Strategic Goals: He stated the operation aims to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, stop its support for groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, and protect the Straits of Hormuz.

Call to Action for Allies: Graham urged Arab allies, such as Saudi Arabia, to join the military efforts more directly, arguing they are also being targeted by Iranian aggression.

Timeline and Rhetoric: Graham predicted the regime would fall soon, warning that more aggressive strikes would occur in the coming weeks to "blow the hell out of these people".

 

Public and Political Reaction

Criticism: Some viewers and political commentators, including Meghan McCain, criticized Graham's rhetoric, suggesting his blunt talk about making money from war was "scaring people" and damaging the administration's messaging.

Casualties: The discussion occurred amid reports of the first confirmed American service member casualties in the conflict, which President Trump acknowledged as likely to increase before the operation concludes.