Donald Trump launches attack on judge who stopped 'Muslim travel ban': 'If something happens blame him'

Donald Trump launches attack on judge who stopped 'Muslim travel ban': 'If something happens blame him'

The President criticised the US judicial system – the third branch of government that acts as a check for the Executive Branch – for the second day in a row via his preferred method of communication: Twitter

Feliks Garcia New York @feliksjose

President Donald Trump criticised the federal judge who halted his executive order that temporarily banned travel and immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

The signing of the order more than a week ago resulted in global confusion as hundreds of travellers and visa-holding immigrants were detained in airports across the US. It sparked massive protests and several lawsuits against the Trump administration.

His first major defeat as president, Mr Trump did not take news of the restraining order against his action well, and wrongly suggested that any future attack on the US would be the result of the court's action.

"Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril," he wrote, tweeting while on vacation at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. "If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!"

He added that the courts were making the Department of Homeland Security's job "very difficult".

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump

Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!

9:39 PM - 5 Feb 2017

22,763 22,763 Retweets 101,660 101,660 likes

Mr Trump's Twitter attack follows Judge James Robart's blocking of the executive order, plunging the new administration into a crisis and challenging the President's authority – which is not immune to the Judicial Branch of the government.

However, the Trump administration argued to the contrary in their appeal over the weekend.

Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued that presidential authority is "largely immune from judicial control" regarding immigration to the US. But the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco did not agree with that assessment and denied the Justice Department's request to stay the Mr Robart's decision.

The state of Washington was the first to file a lawsuit against the executive order, over which Mr Robart – a George W Bush appointee – presided. In his order, Mr Robart said the states "have met their burden of demonstrating that they face immediate and irreparable injury as a result of the signing and implementation of the Executive Order".

Mr Robart added it is not the court's job to "create policy or judge the wisdom of any particular policy promoted by the other two branches," but rather to make sure that an action taken by the government "comports with our country's laws".

The President was quick to condemn the judge's decision on Twitter.

"The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!" he said.

The President's executive order sought to ban all travel from Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Syria, Libya, Sudan, and Somalia for 90 days. It placed a 120-day ban on refugee admittance from six of those countries, while placing an indefinite halt to acceptance of Syrian refugees.

Trump's effort to roll back Dodd-Frank is futile, says Barney Frank

'Muslim ban' block shows that Trump will not always get his own way

It also resulted in the revocation of at least 60,000 visas, according to the State Department. The Department of Justice, however, had said that as many as 100,000 had been revoked.

Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson celebrated the judge's decision on Friday.

"The Constitution prevailed today," he told reporters. "No one is above the law – not even the President."