FBI
director to testify on Trump wiretapping claim and Russia campaign
links
James
Comey to appear before House of Representatives committee amid
inquiry into Russia’s role in US election
Julian
Borger in Washington
Monday
20 March 2017 06.29 GMT
The FBI director is
due to appear on Monday morning before a congressional committee
which will ask him whether Donald Trump was wiretapped and whether
there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow.
James Comey’s
appearance in the House of Representatives, alongside intelligence
chiefs past and present, will be a climactic moment in the
investigation of Russia’s role in last year’s US presidential
election, that has dogged the early weeks of the Trump
administration. But it is unclear how many of the key unanswered
questions will be resolved.
One of the first
questions Comey is likely to be asked is whether Trump or his
campaign was subject to a wiretap, as the president has repeatedly
claimed over the past fortnight, without providing evidence. Comey is
reported to have told members of Congress in private that there is no
grounds for that claim and ABC News predicted on Sunday he would say
so officially in the first few minutes of his testimony.
If so, it would be a
striking repudiation of a sitting president’s claims by his own FBI
director, coming on the heels of a heated denial from the British
government and its electronic intelligence agency, GCHQ, that it had
spied on Trump on the Obama administration’s behalf. That was a
claim made by a Fox News commentator, which had been read out at a
White House briefing by spokesman, Sean Spicer.
“I hope that we
can put an end to this wild goose chase, because what the president
said was just patently false,” Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on
the House intelligence committee told the NBC’s “Meet the Press.
“It’s continuing to grow in terms of damage, and he needs to put
an end to this.”
Comey will be joined
at the committee hearing by director of the national security agency,
Admiral Michael Rogers, John Brennan, the Obama administration’s
CIA director, and James Clapper the former director of national
intelligence.
The US intelligence
community came to the conclusion in December that Vladimir Putin’s
government had intervened in the election with the intention of
skewing it in Trump’s favour. Comey and the intelligence chiefs
will be questioned on Monday on the scope of that intervention and
whether members of his campaign or any of his associates had colluded
with Moscow.
On that explosive
issue, there are less likely to be definitive answers.
Counter-intelligence investigations can continue for months or years
without leading to a public conclusion or any arrests.
There is no question
there were contacts between Trump aides and Russian officials,
despite blanket denials of such contacts by the Trump camp. The
administration’s first national security advisor, Michael Flynn,
was forced to resign in mid-February over his communications with the
Russian ambassador in Washington, Sergei Kislyak, and for failing to
give an accurate account of them in public or to Vice President Mike
Pence. The conversations were intercepted by US authorities and their
contents leaks, demonstrating that they had discussed punitive
measures imposed on Russia by the outgoing Obama administration,
something Flynn had denied.
Flynn is not due to
appear before the committee, but the Flynn affair is certain to be
covered. Another of the witnesses appearing on Monday will be Sally
Yates, former acting attorney general, who is reported to have warned
the White House in late December that Flynn was vulnerable to
blackmail because of his contacts with Kislyak.
Yates - who was
fired for refusing to defend Trump’s travel ban - will be asked
about those warnings, which if confirmed, will raise questions over
why Trump and his team ignored them until the story leaked to the
press, and whether Trump authorised Flynn’s contacts, something he
has denied.
The intelligence
committee hearings will also provide an arena for a partisan clash
between Schiff, who will seek to focus the hearing on potential Trump
campaign collusion with Russia and the intelligence committee’s
Republican chairman, Devin Nunes, who wants to concentrate on the
string of leaks from the intelligence agencies about the Trump camp’s
Moscow contacts.
“That’s the only
crime we know has been committed right now,” Nunes said on Fox News
Sunday.
Schiff said that the
congressional investigation into hacking had so far turned up
“circumstantial evidence of collusion” and direct evidence that
the Trump campaign aides had sought to cover up contacts with
Russians.
“There is
certainly enough for us to conduct an investigation,” Schiff said.
“The American people have a right to know and in order to defend
ourselves, we need to know whether the circumstantial evidence of
collusion and direct evidence of deception is indicative of more.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário