By
stealing a march, Juncker sets the agenda
With
his legacy at stake, Commission president is driving the discussion.
By DAVID M.
HERSZENHORN 3/9/17, 4:10 AM CET
The Berlaymont is
battling back.
As EU leaders gather
for a summit Thursday, European Commission President Jean-Claude
Juncker has stunned allies and rivals alike by seizing the initiative
— and the narrative — on the future of Europe, starkly
challenging critics within the bloc to choose if they want the EU
“more or less reduced to a free-trade area.”
It’s a turnaround
for Juncker, a former prime minister of Luxembourg, who has at times
seemed wobbly in the first half of his five-year term and
occasionally struggled to project confidence and competence. It is
also a gamble by a man who has little time left to reshape a legacy —
dented by Brexit and tax scandals back home — that will hinge on
his ability to hold Europe together.
Juncker’s
so-called white paper laying out five scenarios for the future was
initially not planned for publication until the spring. But with
Brexit negotiations expected to be triggered later this month and
leaders planning to use Thursday’s meeting to discuss their own
declaration about the future, Juncker and his closest aides sped up
the document, in hopes of driving the conversation.
In doing so, the
Commission capitalized on a moment when officials in major capitals,
including Berlin, Paris and The Hague, have been focused on upcoming
national elections and European Council President Donald Tusk has
been at least somewhat preoccupied with his own bid for reappointment
to a second term.
“This
summit is not a crisis summit, and we’re very happy and grateful
for that” — Senior EU diplomat
Juncker’s move
raised eyebrows among some ambassadors who expected the leaders would
get a chance to discuss their vision of the future first. But, by all
accounts, he appears to have succeeded — at least for now.
“He’s a
political fox; he has put the ball very clearly in the hands of the
member states,” a senior Commission official said, adding: “It’s
a crucial moment.”
There are other
signs that Juncker is off the ropes.
Economic data paint
a brightening picture across the Continent, with growth, however
slight, in all 28 EU countries. The migration crisis that fueled
nationalist backlashes and spawned poisonous in-fighting seems under
control, thanks largely to a tenuous deal with Turkey and recent
outreach to African governments. The eurozone crisis, while hardly
resolved, has largely become a matter of maintaining a slow but
steady comeback in Greece. Meanwhile, the external challenges of
Brexit and U.S. President Donald Trump’s Euroskepticism have given
the remaining members of the bloc reasons to rally together.
“This summit is
not a crisis summit, and we’re very happy and grateful for that,”
a senior EU diplomat said. “Crisis management seems to be put on
the back burner this time, and we think this is a positive thing.”
But while giving
some credit to the Commission for steering the bloc through recent
crises, the diplomat accused Juncker of maneuvering — successfully
— to preempt the conversation among EU leaders about the future.
“Let me be quite
frank,” the diplomat said. “Our original understanding was that
the white paper would come after this European Council. I think that
was everybody’s understanding, and we took it as a kind of
gentleman’s agreement to do it this way.”
“Now as for how
viable or, if you like, credible his five scenarios are, you make
your own judgments,” the diplomat continued. “My judgment is that
some of them are pretty fictitious, and my judgment is also that the
EU in the next decade will not be able to follow any one of his five
scenarios.”
Aides to Juncker
said that was precisely his point: to present a set of options, not
one of which would necessarily stand on its own. Instead, taken
together, the scenarios would spark a conversation across the
Continent. Most strategically, it was aimed at silencing some of the
bloc’s most cranky internal critics by forcing them to take a
position in favor of some vision of Europe, rather than just carping
about what they don’t like at the moment.
In some ways,
Thursday’s summit will showcase Juncker’s recent success.
While Juncker has
not expressed a preference among the five scenarios (other than his
clear opposition to becoming the manager of a free-trade zone), the
white paper pointedly excluded any disintegration scenario, despite
the existential questions about the bloc’s future that seemed to be
raised by Brexit and Trump. “If we Europeans are doubting the
future of Europe,” the senior Commission official said, describing
Juncker’s thinking, “there’s nothing left.”
In some ways,
Thursday’s summit will showcase Juncker’s recent success. Leaders
are expected to send a pointed pro-trade message that is partly aimed
at Trump. They are also expected to give a green light to the
creation of a European Public Prosecutor’s Office, even though not
all EU countries approve — an example of European integration at
different speeds.
And the leaders will
also discuss the issue of food standards — a vivid, real-life
example that Juncker has helped draw up of how, in his view, the EU
should play an important but limited regulatory role.
That Juncker, who
served nearly 19 years as prime minister of Luxembourg before taking
the helm at the Commission, had spotted his moment and managed to
seize it was perhaps best confirmed by the generally positive
response to the white paper from the European Council across the
street.
Aides to Juncker
said that one reason for the positive response was that he had
consulted closely with Tusk and Maltese Prime Minister Joseph Muscat,
who currently holds the EU’s rotating presidency, ensuring that
they had opportunity for input and feedback. There was similar
outreach to Paris and Berlin.
The Italian
government had already prepared a position paper on the declaration
to be issued by EU leaders in Rome, while Tusk’s office had also
pulled together a concept paper, effectively calling on EU countries
to renew their wedding vows. Both have been vastly overshadowed by
Juncker’s document.
For Juncker,
however, the white paper may be most important in how it illustrates
his commitment to the idea of Ordnungspolitik — a German word that
generally refers to a philosophy of limited government but is
difficult to translate into English. Juncker presented the word as a
challenge to EU translators during recent remarks when he thanked
them for their work, including on the white paper, telling them “it
means nothing and everything at the same time.”
Calling language a
crucial tool of politics, Juncker added, “It is by words that we
can try to influence the direction of where things are going.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário