Preocupados com os 49,50 graus centigrados atingidos na
pequena cidade de Lytton no Canadá, pequena cidade que entretanto ardeu
completamente ?
Sim ? Então leiam isto:
OVOODOCORVO
How climate change will widen Europe’s divides
The south of the Continent will be harder hit than the
north, driving a wedge into one of the European Union’s deepest fault lines.
BY KARL
MATHIESEN, KALINA OROSCHAKOFF, GIOVANNA COI AND ARNAU BUSQUETS GUÀRDIA
July 2,
2021 4:30 am
https://www.politico.eu/article/how-climate-change-will-widen-european-divide-road-to-cop26/
Europe’s
north will struggle with floods and fires, even with warming at the lowest end
of expectations — the Paris Agreement limits of 1.5 or 2 degrees above the
pre-industrial global average. But the south will be hammered by drought, urban
heat and agricultural decline, driving a wedge into one of the European Union’s
biggest political fault lines.
The draft
IPCC report — due for release next year — predicts a ferocious century of
climate impacts, particularly in poor countries. The broad findings of the
draft are likely to be the same in the final published report, but some numbers
and the language used by the scientists might be changed as the report is
reviewed by governments over the latter half of this year.
The world’s
leading climate scientists warn that billions of people are at risk of chronic
water scarcity, tens of millions exposed to hunger and places near the equator
will experience unsurvivable heat, unless steps are taken to build up defenses
against climate shocks and cut emissions fast.
Just
because things may be worse somewhere else doesn’t mean Europe is safe.
“The whole
European population doesn’t have a good understanding of this yet,” said Piers
Forster, director of the Priestley International Center for Climate at Leeds
University. “They don’t know how climate change will affect them personally.”
Forster, who is a lead author on a section of the IPCC report, was commenting
without knowledge that POLITICO had obtained the leak.
The latest
science reveals that everywhere in Europe will change — especially if
appropriate countermeasures are not taken immediately — and that those
disruptions will deepen existing divides, with profound implications for the
Continent’s grand political project.
Chapter 1:
Killer heat
During la
canicule, the heat wave of 2003, European cities cooked their people. It was
the hottest August in at least half a millennium, temperatures in the high 30s
squatted over much of the continent for weeks. The EU estimates that something
like 80,000 people died. French President Jacques Chirac attended a somber
burial service for 57 people whose bodies were never claimed.
Under any
future warming scenario, a summer like 2003 will be disturbingly normal.
According to EU research, at 1.5 degrees of warming, around one in every five
people in the EU and U.K. will experience similar heat in any given year. At 3
degrees, that rises to more than half the population.
The heat is
literally maddening. Italian researchers found a strong link between
psychiatric emergencies and daily temperature. Suicides doubled in Moscow
during a heat wave in 2010. In Madrid, incidents of domestic violence and women
being murdered by their partners jump when the temperature goes over 34
degrees. Hot nights bring climate insomnia.
We aren’t
helping ourselves. An increasing share of Europeans have made their homes in
giant, heat-concentrating concrete crucibles. Cities are typically 5 to 10
degrees warmer than the surrounding countryside. If little is done to reduce
global emissions, Europe’s cities could warm 6 to 10 degrees on top of that.
The south will see the greatest increases. In Rome and other Mediterranean
cities, the heat will become so intense that traditional architectural systems
relying on natural ventilation will no longer function.
It’s bad
timing for an experiment in heat endurance. Not only are millions migrating
from rural areas into cement cities; Europe is also getting older and more
vulnerable. Better medicine and falling birth rates mean the number of
Europeans older than 65 is expected to rise by around 40 million by 2050, even
as the overall population slowly declines.
The elderly
are at high risk of dying from heat stress and heatstroke. Old bodies also get
worn down by heat, making them more susceptible to asthma or cardiovascular and
respiratory diseases. Hot days see spikes in hospitalizations for age-related
complaints. Aging populations are also more likely to be diabetic; heat causes
blood vessels to dilate, absorbing insulin and dragging down blood sugar.
The world
has barely warmed by more than 1 degree. But in 2010, the heat killed 54,000 in
Russia and Central Europe. Eight years later, during a brutal heat wave that
climate change made five times more likely, 104,000 died — the most in any
region of the world that year. Germany alone recorded around two-thirds of the
heat-related deaths of India, the Lancet medical journal reported, despite
having a population 16 times smaller.
At these
lower temperature increases, deaths are concentrated in Southern and Central
Europe. If warming reaches 3 degrees, 200 million Europeans, not only in the
south, but many in the north and the U.K., will live at high risk of heat
stress. Without rapid changes to the built environment, the EU says extreme
heat could kill 95,000 Europeans every year — more than 30 times the current
average rate.
Of course,
there are things we can do. The immediate answer is air conditioning. But that
brings its own problems. Energy use for cooling buildings in the Mediterranean
— already a big source of carbon emissions — will double by 2035. In Southern
Europe a new cooling poverty gap is already opening up between those who can
afford to beat the heat and those who can’t.
Europe is
destined to become a hot continent. Even though Northern Europeans face less
steep temperature increases, they need to start thinking like southerners.
Buildings designed to trap heat in winter do the same in summer. It costs four
times as much to build passive cooling into an existing home than it does to
fit it to a new build, according to the U.K.’s Committee on Climate Change. To
cope, the streets of London, Copenhagen and Brussels will need to acquire the
romantic, eyelidded feel that heavy wooden shutters bring to Rome and Marseille
or the utilitarian look of roller blinds in Athens, Seville or Naples.
Hunger games
The good
news, for at least some of Europe’s farmers, is that climate change can deliver
winners. Warmer winters, longer growing seasons and more rain mean parts of
Europe, in particular the north, will produce more food than today.
For other
parts of the continent, however, a warmer world spells disaster. Climate change
will draw a curtain of rain across Europe. Higher latitudes will get wetter,
while Southern Europe dries up. Droughts are expected to get more frequent and
more extreme, creeping across Europe’s southern and central plains.
At 2
degrees warming, 9 percent of Europe’s population may be competing over
inadequate water supplies. In Southern Europe, the IPCC draft warns, more than
a third of the population will have less water than they need. If temperatures
rise by 3 degrees, regions suffering from droughts in Europe could double from
13 percent to 26 percent.
The areas
bordering the Mediterranean will be hardest hit, with the proportion of land
regularly experiencing droughts expanding from 28 percent to 49 percent in the
most extreme cases. Dry spells there would also last longer — nearly half of
every year, up from two months today. Some parts of the Iberian Peninsula could
experience drought for more than seven months every year.
The loss of
rain will make it harder to grow many staple crops in Southern Europe. Farmers
will see traditional crops flee north ahead of the advancing Sahara, which is
already jumping the Mediterranean Sea. At 2 degrees warming, agricultural
biomes will shift north at a rate of 25 kilometers to 135 kilometers a decade.
Yields of
wheat in Southern Europe — where successive civilizations have cultivated it
for thousands of years — will fall by 12 percent while growing 5 percent in the
north. Under extreme warming scenarios, southern wheat production collapses by
as much as half. But even at 1.5 degrees it will be near impossible to grow
maize across much of Spain, France, Italy and the Balkans without irrigation.
In a cultural catastrophe for Italy, the best tomatoes might one day be German.
Far-sighted
farmers are trying to hold water on the land by scraping small dams or planting
trees. Farms with irrigation will hold out longer. But when those adaptations
meet the rolling water shortages on the Mediterranean rim, they will eventually
fail.
Farms are
already being abandoned across the continent. In the south, the EU views
climate change as a major new factor driving families from the land, perhaps
into increasingly hotter cities. Rural communities and their traditions wither.
Farms, managed for generations, now run wild, creating new habitats, but also
stocking the land with dry fuel and increasing the risk of mega fires. The
European Court of Auditors found in December 2018 that three-quarters of Spain
faces desertification. In Cyprus, 99 percent of the land could turn to lifeless
dust.
Researchers
at the University of Antwerp in Belgium illustrated the differing fortunes of
European farming’s haves and have-nots by mapping changes in land value across
the rest of the century.
The divide
runs along similar lines to the division between Europe’s Catholic and
Protestant realms. The consequences may endure for as long. In the increasingly
sun- and rain-drenched north, land values rise by around 9 percent for every
degree of temperature rise. If no efforts are made to change farming techniques
to suit the new climate, land values in large parts of Spain, southern France,
Italy and Greece could stagnate or fall over the next 80 years. By far the
largest downturn will be in Italy, currently one of Europe’s biggest producers.
Meanwhile,
farmers outside the southern desiccation zone might be entering a gilded era.
As temperatures rise, other parts of the world that were once productive —
including Punjab, the Middle East, Africa’s Sahel and Southeast Asia — will be
growing less and less of anything. Global supply will be squeezed, increasing
food prices that deliver an apocalypse windfall to Northern Europe. Southern
agriculture will be dying on the vine, even as farmers in Ireland, Denmark and
the Netherlands cash in.
Floods and fires
Home will
no longer be safe. Extremes of heat, dryness and rainfall will expand Europe’s
floodplains and fire zones, making the lives and properties of millions of
people more precarious.
Hot air
holds more water. Projections over this century suggest most parts of Europe
will experience up to 35 percent more extreme rainstorms in the winter,
particularly in the north. If warming continues beyond 1.5 degrees, floods
could become an annual problem for about 5 million Europeans, the IPCC draft
report says, rather than once a century.
Cities are
already scrambling to protect their people from growing risks.
Europe’s
sewers weren’t built for climate change. When extreme rainfall hits concrete
cityscapes, drains and sewage systems can’t cope. In 2011, rain in Copenhagen
flooded houses, damaged railways, roads and the subway, racking up millions in
costs. Despite an adaptation plan, overwhelmed city authorities were regularly
releasing human waste into the sea during heavy rains, until nearby Sweden
asked them to stop.
Buildings,
concrete or asphalt seal the soil, leaving fewer escape routes for rain. That’s
a risk for Paris, Thessaloniki, Bucharest and Barcelona, the European
Environment Agency warned a few years ago. Floods are especially dangerous for
poorer households, which tend to be more exposed as they settle in cheaper
flood-prone areas and lack insurance.
If warming
reaches 3 degrees by the end of the century, river floods could hit nearly half
a million people annually, up from 170,000 now. Damage could jump sixfold, from
€7.8 billion a year today, the Commission’s research arm has warned. In 2002,
floods along Central Europe’s major rivers — the Elbe and Danube — killed
dozens of people, destroyed homes, and racked up billions in damages in
Austria, Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary, Romania and
Croatia.
River
flooding will be concentrated in Northern and Central Europe and the U.K. and
Ireland, while the south roasts.
Rain isn’t
the only water problem. Sea level rise is also driving up the risks of extreme
and permanent flooding along Europe’s coasts — especially for people living in
low-lying cities in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium and some of the world’s
top tourist hotspots along the northern Italian coast. That’s going to cost
governments dearly even if they succeed in cutting emissions and boosting flood
defenses. Coastal flood damage could rise at least 10-fold by the end of the
century, the IPCC writes.
In the
Mediterranean, the sea level could rise by as much as 1.1 meters by 2100,
depending on how much the planet warms. That exposes 42 million people
currently living in low-lying areas, accounting for 37 percent of the
coastline. Scandinavia will suffer less from sea level rise because its
landmass is still rebounding after being covered by heavy ice sheets in the
last ice age.
Flooding
also puts Europe’s ancient heritage is at risk. Ravenna, once the capital of
the West Roman Empire, Venice, and 47 other UNESCO World Heritage sites are in
the flood zones of the future.
As parts of
Europe drown, others will burn.
Fires
destroyed nearly 178,000 hectares of forests and land in the EU in 2018. Sweden
experienced the worst forest fire season in its reporting history that year,
with fire brigades battling flames as far north as the Arctic. As temperatures
rise and many parts of Europe become drier, such fires will last longer and
spread farther.
Northern
and Western Europe will not be immune, but again the Mediterranean region is at
particular risk. Dry forests in Spain, France, Italy, Greece and Croatia burn
more easily than in the north. Forest fires swept Portugal in 2017, killing 64
people and sparking a political crisis.
Smoke can
be deadly too, blanketing cities in toxic clouds. While data on the health
impacts of Europe’s wildfires is limited, the IPCC suggests that more than 100
people died prematurely in Portugal as a result of poor air quality exacerbated
by the forest fires.
Burning
forests also poses a challenge to one of Brussels’ favorite climate solutions:
You can’t lock away carbon in trees if they’re going up in smoke.
Chapter 4:
New epidemics
Mosquitoes
live short, ravenous lives — on average two weeks — but lower temperatures make
them less deadly. The viruses that cause dengue fever, West Nile virus and
chikungunya incubate in the gut of mosquitoes before creeping back up to the
saliva glands, ready to infect their next victim. How long this process takes
depends on temperature.
Europe’s
cooler climate previously made life tough for many mosquito species and the
diseases they carry. But rising temperatures have spurred the advance of a
particularly prolific disease carrier: the Asian tiger mosquito, so named for
the white stripes that run across its body. Known as the world’s most invasive
mosquito, it arrived in Italy in 1990 and is now established across the
Mediterranean and is pushing as far north as Belgium and the Netherlands. At 18
degrees, the tiger mosquitoes won’t spread chikungunya — a painful, aching
fever for which there is no vaccine or treatment — but at 28 degrees they most
definitely can.
Researchers
at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control expect chikungunya
will spread in Europe as the temperature warms. Alongside will come dengue
fever and West Nile virus — a major outbreak of the latter during the 2018 heat
wave killed 180 people in 10 countries. Similar to mosquitoes, the range of
ticks carrying encephalitis and Lyme disease is expected to creep northward
into Scandinavia (although it’s likely to become too hot for them in the south)
and into higher altitude Alpine regions.
Then there
is the return of malaria, which Europe eradicated through a huge post-war
program of insecticide spraying, swamp draining and drug therapy. The
Mediterranean remains entirely suitable for malaria transmission, and with
warming, the insects and the parasites in their stomachs could reclaim their
place in Europe.
Climate
change might be the public health crisis of the future, but scientists are
still researching whether it played a part in the emergence of the COVID-19
pandemic of today. There has been “insufficient time to know,” the IPCC’s draft
report says, in a special section dedicated to the coronavirus. But in general
it says, “climate change has increased the risk of emerging infectious diseases
by driving the movements of new species, including vectors and reservoirs of
diseases, into novel human populations and vice-versa.”
Chapter 5:
The widening gap
For a
Continent obsessed with its divisions, the European Union has paid little
attention to the way climate change cleaves into one of its greatest fractures.
The IPCC and the European Commission warn climate change will deepen
north-south inequality; the same rupture that nearly swallowed the eurozone
during the last decade.
“I think
this will be the greatest challenge to European Union cohesion that we’ve
seen,” said Dara Murphy, a former Europe minister for Ireland, now a senior
adviser at Rasmussen Global, a political consultancy. “Greater even than the
economic challenge” of the 2008 financial crash.
Analysts
working in the European Commission are also concerned. In 2020, they published
a report that found the economic impact of climate change would be several
times larger in the south than in the north — mostly because of heat-related
deaths. Between 2000 and 2015, the IPCC draft says, Europe lost $300 billion
every year because of climate change. At 3 degrees, the report warns, “economic
losses for Europe are multiple times larger” than at 1.5 degrees. This will
have the effect of “amplifying existing economic disparities among European
regions.”
Labor
productivity will decline, particularly in the Mediterranean, according to the
IPCC. The heat already makes outdoor work hard and potentially deadly. Last
week, Camara Fantamadi, a 27-year-old farmworker from Mali, collapsed and died
cycling home from his tomato picking job in Puglia, southern Italy. The region
has responded by ordering farms to stop work during the hottest hours of the
hottest days.
Unlike
cyclical downturns, the climate deficit will happen every year. At 2 degrees,
that will be a damaging reality the north will have to bear. But in the south,
which is already struggling with the debt limits enforced by Brussels, it will
be a permanent economic handbrake.
That “could
become a structural problem for the European Union,” said Desmond Dinan, author
of an “Ever Closer Union,” which would “exacerbate the north-south fault line.”
Dinan, whose book is taught to many students trying to understand the
challenges of holding the union together, added: “It’s an embarrassment that I
hadn’t thought about it myself.”
The
European Commission, said Heather Grabbe, director of the Open Society European
Policy Institute, has thus far failed to communicate this risk in a way that
will motivate a response. It’s “a big problem,” she said, if the analysis
“doesn’t get translated into the political narrative.”
European
policymakers are waking up to the fact that the EU’s emissions reductions won’t
shield the bloc from climate nightmares. The European Commission came out with
a new adaptation strategy in February that will provide the building blocks for
the response. But “the speed of adaptation is lagging the speed of climate
change,” the IPCC report said, adding that even the most full-blooded effort
can’t outpace all the impacts of warming.
All the
experts that POLITICO spoke with suggested that Europe’s more fortunate
northerners would eventually be called upon to support their sweaty southern
neighbors, just as it has offered payments for fossil fuel-producing regions to
help workers ease out of polluting jobs.
That moment
could come sooner than many expect. In Spain, the countryside is being consumed
by desert, and Minister for the Ecological Transition Teresa Ribera is charged
with holding back the sand. Unless Europe invests now in protecting the most
affected places, she said, it risks a “worst-case scenario” and “a terrible
political debate — all across Europe” over where to save and “where we must
give up.”
“I hope
Southern Europe is not left behind,” she said.
All
illustrations by Celeste Colborne for POLITICO.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário