'Waste of time': Senate Republicans plan to
ignore impeachment hearings
It'll be business as usual in the Senate, despite the
historic day in the House.
Mitch
McConnell
Majority
Leader Mitch McConnell said he’s going “be paying attention to what we’re doing
in the Senate.” | J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo
By BURGESS
EVERETT and MARIANNE LEVINE
11/12/2019
07:06 PM EST
Updated:
11/13/2019 10:33 AM EST
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/12/senate-republicans-ignore-impeachment-hearings-070347
The public
impeachment hearings Wednesday will be a must-watch for Johnny Isakson, the
retiring GOP senator from Georgia.
“As much as
I can,” Isakson said when asked if he'll tune in. “That’s my responsibility.”
But the
rest of the Senate doesn’t feel the same way.
As top
diplomats William Taylor and George Kent prepare to appear before the House in
the first public phase of the inquiry, few senators said they had plans to
watch most of the testimony on Wednesday.
And though
Democrats and a handful of Republicans said they would try to play catch-up if
they couldn't monitor in real time, a significant portion of the Senate GOP
said they have no plans to watch at all.
Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he’s going to “be paying attention
to what we’re doing in the Senate.” Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, the No. 3
GOP leader, said “not at all” when asked whether he’d watch.
“You should
show him my schedule. I don’t have time to watch that tomorrow,” Sen. Chuck
Grassley (R-Iowa) said to an aide, citing a Judiciary Committee hearing. “It’ll
be worth [following] when they decide to give due process to a minority party
the same way that we did when Clinton and Nixon” went through impeachment
hearings.
“They’re
kind of on a fishing expedition,” said Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). “So
I’ve just got other things I’ll be spending my time on.”
It’s a
continuation of a strategy Republicans latched on to last week as the House
began releasing transcripts of its impeachment interviews and most GOP senators
shrugged off a series of would-be bombshells. Many in the party now think
there’s no point in even trying to keep up.
“It’s a
political sideshow and I’ve got more important things to do,” said Sen. John Cornyn
(R-Texas). “The House has its job to do. And then when it comes to us, that’s
when our job kicks in.”
Both
parties have described the impeachment hearings in stark terms. Republicans
have argued the Democrats are trying to “overturn an election,” while Democrats
assert that President Donald Trump abused his power in asking Ukraine’s
president to probe former Vice President Joe Biden.
Yet at a
hair-on-fire moment for the nation’s political class, it’s business as usual
for senators. They will go to committee hearings, vote on a Department of
Homeland Security nominee and hold their regular party lunches. Some will talk
to the press, but many will decline to respond to Wednesday’s testimony because
they simply haven’t watched it.
Some
senators in both parties said they hope to watch a replay to understand what’s
transpired in the remarkable impeachment inquiry, or at least read the news
coverage. But few seemed concerned with letting a critical moment in history
pass them by.
“I hope to
be able to watch a little,” said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). “But it’s a pretty
hectic day, I’m not going to be able to sit glued.”
“I’m going
to try to,” said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). “Otherwise, I’m recording it.”
Kent and
Taylor have made remarkable assertions in their private testimony. Kent said
Trump ally Rudy Giuliani waged a “campaign of lies” about then-Ambassador to
Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, while Taylor said delivery of vital military aid to
Ukraine was contingent on the launching of political investigations into
Trump’s rivals.
“It’s a
political sideshow and I’ve got more important things to do. The House has its
job to do. And then when it comes to us, that’s when our job kicks in.”
Sen. John Cornyn
Their
testimony will be covered by major television networks, which announced plans
to cut into their normal programming to cover the historic moment. The Senate
is likely to be gone on Friday, when the next round of public testimony begins,
which might allow more senators to watch.
But for
some Republicans who will vote on Trump's fate, there’s nothing going on in the
House worth watching.
“It’s a
sham. It’s a show trial. Not even that,” said Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.).
“Nothing rises to the level of impeachment. So, this is just a big waste of
time.”
Even the
strongest Democratic supporters of impeachment don’t necessarily think it’s
must-see TV, because the Senate is likely to have its own trial and their
deliberations can begin there.
So while
the House may have history on its hands Wednesday, it’s just another day in the
Senate.
“I hope to
get to see some of it,” said Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.). “The truth is,
if it does come to the Senate, we are similar to jurors so we will have all the
evidence marshaled for us specifically if they do decide to vote on and
actually pass articles of impeachment. So I don’t think there’s a necessity to
do it now.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário