Uber risks death by a thousand court cases
The ride-hailing app faces of the prospect of losing
its core business model to Europe’s judges.
BY PIETER
HAECK
September
20, 2021
https://www.politico.eu/article/uber-platform-employees-workers-benefits/
If Uber becomes a traditional taxi company that owns
its cars and pays salaries to its drivers, would it still be Uber?
That's the
question its executives now face as courts across Europe decide on the status
of its drivers. With thousands of its drivers pushing to be recognized as
employees, a core component of the company's business — flexible drivers with
working flexible hours — is at risk.
Last week,
a Dutch judge ruled that Uber drivers should be classified as employees and are
entitled to benefits that come with that status. A similar ruling was delivered
by the U.K. Supreme Court in February, which reclassified drivers as “workers,”
meaning they are entitled to minimum wage, working time protections and holiday
pay. More than 100 similar court cases are progressing all over Europe, and
while many have sided with Uber, the majority are taking the side of drivers.
With Spain
passing a law that requires all platforms to recognize their couriers as
employees, the trend appears unpalatable for Uber, which warned that
independent work itself is at risk. The company “supports efforts to strengthen
independent work — rather than eliminate it — with industry-wide minimum
standards that protect all platform workers,” it said in an email on Thursday.
Balancing
the benefits of flexible work, like deciding when and how much to work, with
ensuring that workers have minimum protections and employment benefits — not to
mention maintaining value for customers — is something other countries like
Germany and France are also grappling with.
Brussels weighs in
And now,
the European Commission is wading into the debate too, which could set a precedent
across the Continent.
The bloc’s
executive body will present a legislative initiative in December that aims to
improve the working conditions of platform workers, which form more than a
tenth of the bloc's workforce. It's unclear what the Commission will propose,
given it has limited authority over labor policy. The Commission said it could
propose a directive, which requires member countries to come up with their own
laws to meet a goal the EU sets out.
It knows
the legal tides are changing.
“Court
rulings have gone in different directions, but most judges have decided in
favor of reclassifying nominally independent contractors as workers and
platforms as employers,” a Commission document said.
The
Commission “cannot ignore” these rulings, according to Valerio De Stefano, a platform
work researcher at KU Leuven. “This is not just one or two tribunals, it’s
supreme courts or courts of appeal. It’s a wave of judgments that have
confirmed that this kind of work is compatible with employment status. It will
definitely influence the Commission’s reaction.”
The company
says it's happy to negotiate benefits and other aspects of the job with its
drivers, but De Stefano said that won't work. “You can promise as many benefits
as you want, but employment protection is not a menu à la carte. You cannot
pick and choose what kind of protection you want to give. No employer is
allowed to do that.”
MEPs are
trying to nudge the Commission towards classifying workers as employees too. On
Thursday, the European Parliament adopted the recommendations of a report that
called for stronger rights for platform workers. The report, written by French
liberal MEP Sylvie Brunet, was dismissed by Uber as “harmful legislation.”
The crux of
the proposal is to allow a gig worker to challenge their status and place the
legal burden on the platform to justify why the worker wouldn't qualify as an
employee. The proposal doesn’t mean that every gig worker is automatically an
employee, but it does make it relatively easy for a worker to be classified as
one. “This will also, I think, change the comportment of the platforms,” Brunet
said in an interview. “Because they will have to be ready to be clear about the
status.”
It's
unclear if the Commission will integrate the Parliament's recommendations,
which are nonbinding, into its own legislation, but companies are fretting all
the same.
'The wrong issue'
Any “such
court decisions or potential legislative changes are addressing the wrong
issue,” according to a statement by Move EU, a lobby group representing ride-hailing
companies including Uber, Bolt and Free Now.
The group
argues that most drivers prefer to be self-employed, and the flexible hours the
status gives them. “Any decision to reclassify independent drivers as employees
is concerning given that this directly contracts what the vast majority of
drivers say they value the most: the flexibility and independence to work when,
where and for whom they want.”
The
Commission has limited authority over labor policy, which remains a national
competence, but the Commission's proposal is still likely to have clout, as
courts and legislators look across the Continent for direction and legal
precedent.
But some
countries have warned against reclassifying workers as employees, granting Uber
some powerful officials and governments who share their perspective. France,
for example, said governments should be careful "not to tip the world of
platforms into the world of employment, that is not reasonable
economically," according to Secretary of State for European Affairs
Clément Beaune.
In Spain,
where the so-called Rider Law is in effect, some couriers' unions have warned
that becoming reclassified as employees has actually threatened their
livelihoods as some companies, including Deliveroo, are considering leaving the
country.
But even if
the Commission and other countries don't adopt Spain's law, Uber's business
model is still under threat, according to Brunet, the MEP.
"It's
impossible to continue with this model ... because there will be more court
judgments."

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário