quarta-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2017

Conselheira de Donald Trump sugere despedimento de jornalistas / Steve Bannon is calling the shots in the White House. That's terrifying


Conselheira de Donald Trump sugere despedimento de jornalistas
Kellyanne Conway questionou a ausência de despedimentos em órgãos de comunicação social depois das notícias com "tendência jornalística."

31 DE JANEIRO DE 2017
10:20
Luís Alves Vicente

A conselheira de Donald Trump, e antiga diretora de campanha do presidente dos Estados Unidos, Kellyanne Conway, sugeriu que alguns dos jornalistas e comentadores que acompanharam as presidenciais norte-americanas deveriam ser demitidos. "Se isto fosse um negócio a sério e os órgãos de comunicação social principais estivessem no setor privado em expansão, que realmente gerasse dividendos, 20 por cento das pessoas tinham sido despedidas", exemplificou.

"As pessoas [jornalistas] deviam estar envergonhadas. Nem uma pessoa de uma estação foi despedida, nenhum comentador político que falou mal de Donald Trump foi demitido", denunciou Kellyanne Conway, perante o jornalista e entrevistador da Fox News, Chris Wallace. "Estão a comentar todos os domingos, estão nos canais todos os dias. Onde está o primeiro editor ou o primeiro blogger que vai ser despedido, que envergonharam os títulos para onde escrevem? Nós sabemos os seus nomes. Sou demasiado educada para os dizer. A eleição foi há três meses e ninguém foi despedido."

Antes ainda, a antiga CEO lamentou-se da cobertura jornalística em todos os momentos da corrida à Casa Branca: "Houve uma campanha anti-Trump enquanto candidato, presidente eleito e presidente. Os media falharam em entender a América. A tendência jornalística é fácil de ser detetada. Sinceramente ajuda-nos, porque a rejeição desta eleição é uma rejeição das elites e do status quo. Quem é que está a arrumar a casa? Qual vai ser a primeira estação a livrar-se destas pessoas que disseram coisas que não são verdade?"

A conselheira de Donald Trump denunciou ainda que "com a imprensa livre vem a responsabilidade e a responsabilidade é dar a história bem" e que "os media não fazem coberturas completas." Antes do discurso desenfreado, Wallace procurou defender os companheiros de profissão: "É ofensivo termos pessoas na Casa Branca há uma semana a dar-nos lições sobre o que devemos ou não devemos fazer e que devemos estar calados."

Esta tomada de posição por parte da administração norte-americana já é um padrão. Esta quinta-feira, o presidente norte-americano generalizou os media, dizendo que os jornalistas inventavam e reportavam notícias falsas. Também Steve Bannon, o responsável pela estratégia da Casa Branca, comentou que os media "deveriam estar envergonhados e humilhados e deveriam calar-se e ouvir de vez em quando."


Steve Bannon is calling the shots in the White House. That's terrifying
Lawrence Douglas
He is unvetted, unconfirmed but immensely powerful – all thanks to the undisciplined and distracted Donald Trump

Tuesday 31 January 2017 16.28 GMT

That didn’t take long. From no-drama Obama to all-trauma Trump: the shift has been seismic, leaving millions in this country and abroad frightened and struggling to make sense of America’s new political landscape.

Some of the upheaval appears to be the consequence of incompetence, the predictable result of an under-qualified real estate mogul struggling to master the most powerful and demanding job on the planet.

But not so with the travel ban. In this case, upheaval was the intent – not to the degree we have seen; that clearly caught the administration off guard. But it was upheaval nonetheless.

As we now know, the drafting and rollout of the travel ban was largely the work of Steve Bannon, the president’s chief political strategist. It was Bannon who reportedly overruled the proposal to exempt green card holders from the ban. And it was Bannon who pushed the order through without consulting experts at the Department of Homeland Security or at the state department.

The Nacht und Nebel quality of the ban’s announcement makes clear that the president’s chief strategist wanted to send tremors through the world. Here was bold proof that the portentous accents of Trump’s inaugural address, also Bannon’s work, was not mere rhetoric.

Now the world would know what “America First” means – not first in democracy or human rights; not first in recognizing an obligation to victims of humanitarian crisis (some of which we have helped create). No, this was America first in pugilism, parochialism and misplaced protectionism.

Some insist that all this is simply Bannon throwing meat to the president’s base, plucking a page from Karl Rove’s playbook. Rove, the chief strategist for George W Bush (for whom many are now feeling a once inconceivable nostalgia), famously sought to consolidate his boss’s power not by tacking toward the middle but by feeding the base.

Only it would be wrong to see Bannon as Rove 2.0. At his heart, Rove was a consummate political operator, for whom ideology was a tool, not an article of belief. Rove was a careerist and an opportunist, whose principal goal was the preservation and expansion of Republican political power.

Bannon is an altogether different creature. Listen to his early speeches. Bannon is a crusader, fighting to redeem a corrupt country betrayed by its feckless and greedy leaders. He once described himself as a “Leninist”, intent on destroying “all of today’s establishment”.

For Bannon, America is engaged in a pitched struggle against threats from within and without. It is a battle that will last years, and requires iron resolve and steely determination. If the free press, a bastion of democratic self-governance, does not grasp these elusive truths, then it should “keep its mouth shut”, he says.

Bannon is not the president’s servant. The president is his tool. For years, Bannon cast about for the proper vehicle to carry the fight forward. Sarah Palin, Rick Perry –they were considered possible material. Now in Donald Trump he has found adequate if imperfect stuff. Both are workaholics. Both share a protectionist mindset. Both are combative.

But Bannon, in contrast to the president, is not easily distracted. He is intelligent, articulate, focused in his ideology and dedicated to the struggle. And he has now been catapulted by an undisciplined president to the inner precincts of the National Security Council and its principals’ committee, assuming a position senior to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence.

Unvetted, unconfirmed but immensely powerful, Bannon may just be the most dangerous man in America.


Sem comentários: