Poles
refuse to back down in confrontation with Commission
Polish
delegation travels to Brussels for last-ditch talks.
By JAN CIENSKI
5/31/16, 9:33 PM CET
Poland on Tuesday
dug in its heels in a standoff with the European Commission over the
country’s constitutional crisis, with a Polish government
delegation in Brussels taking a tougher line than just a few days
ago, sources told POLITICO.
The Polish
delegation met with Commission officials ahead of a planned Tuesday
evening phone call between Frans Timmermans, the Commission’s first
vice president, and Polish Prime Minister Beata Szydło.
The rush of
diplomacy comes before a regular meeting of all 28 European
commissioners on Wednesday, when Timmermans may decide to continue
pressing the right-wing Polish government to end the confrontation
over the country’s top constitutional court.
However, the terms
presented by the Poles on Tuesday were tougher than had been
discussed last week in Warsaw, when Timmermans met with Szydło.
The new Polish
position mirrors the stance Jarosław Kaczyński, the leader of the
ruling Law and Justice party and the country’s most powerful
politician, spelled out in a recent Polish press interview.
“Kaczyński’s
stance is much tougher,” said a Commission source.
In that interview,
Kaczyński also cast doubt on the Commission’s right to carry out
its unprecedented rule-of-law procedure against Poland, launched in
January over concerns that the authorities in Warsaw were violating
the EU’s democratic rules. He called it a “made up” procedure
and threatened to challenge it in the European Court of Justice.
The sources said the
new Polish government standpoint doesn’t meet the requirements set
out by the Venice Commission, the legal arm of the Council of Europe,
which earlier this year issued a report on the crisis.
Ending the crisis
The Venice
Commission called for the government to recognize three judges
elected to the 15-judge Constitutional Tribunal by the last
parliament. It also said the government should respect the tribunal’s
March 9 verdict which found that a new law regulating the way the
tribunal works was unconstitutional. That law was widely criticized
for preventing the tribunal from properly functioning, eroding its
ability to vet laws passed by parliament.
Szydło and
Kaczyński have refused to recognize the March 9 verdict, saying that
it did not meet the requirements of the new law, which demanded
verdicts be reached by a two-thirds majority, not by a simple
majority.
The government
insists that three judges chosen by the new parliament and sworn in
by President Andrzej Duda are legitimate. The delegation in Brussels
discussed how to seat the disputed judges without displacing the new
ones.
It also talked about
how to treat the March 9 verdict.
One option is to
publish more recent tribunal verdicts, which have also been
disregarded by the government, and then to only publish the March 9
decision once a new law regulating the court is in place.
However, that
position varies significantly from the recommendations of the Venice
Commission.
The European
Commission has also stressed it will not accept tribunal voting rules
that water down the principle of a simple majority being enough to
issue a verdict.
That presents a
conundrum for Timmermans, who is guided by the Venice report. He is
due to discuss the Polish situation with his fellow commissioners on
Wednesday.
Timmermans was given
permission to send an opinion to Warsaw last week, which would note
the Commission’s concerns and give the Polish government two weeks
to respond.
It’s the first
part of a three-step process that theoretically could end with Poland
losing its EU voting rights under an Article 7 procedure. However,
that decision has to be approved by all other 27 EU member countries,
and Hungary has said it will back Poland.
A Commission
official said that moving that far is a “nuclear option” which
Brussels will do what it can to avoid.
The Commission held
back on sending the opinion last week, after a leak of the draft
provoked fury in Poland. Warsaw has portrayed the probe as an unfair
attack by Brussels bureaucrats on a legitimately elected conservative
government.
Jacopo Barigazzi
contributed to this article.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário