In a speech to a gathering of conservatives near
Orlando, Fla., Mr. Pence said on Friday that “the time has come to focus on the
future.”
In a speech to a gathering of conservatives near
Orlando, Fla., Mr. Pence said on Friday that “the time has come to focus on the
future.”Credit...Jacob Langston for The New York Times
Lisa Lerer
By Lisa Lerer
Feb. 4, 2022
Updated
5:38 p.m. ET
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/us/politics/pence-trump-election.html
Former Vice
President Mike Pence on Friday offered his most forceful rebuke of Donald
Trump, saying that Mr. Trump is “wrong” that Mr. Pence had the legal authority
to change the results of the 2020 election and that the Republican Party must
accept the outcome and look toward the future.
Speaking to
a gathering of conservatives near Orlando, Fla., the former vice president said
he understands “the disappointment so many feel about the last election” but
repudiated Mr. Trump’s false claims that Mr. Pence could reject the Electoral
College results and alter the outcome last year.
“President
Trump is wrong,” said Mr. Pence, in his remarks before the Federalist Society,
a conservative legal organization. “I had no right to overturn the election.”
The
comments marked the strongest rejection of Mr. Trump’s efforts to overturn the
2020 election by his former vice president. Mr. Pence refused to give in to Mr.
Trump’s pressure campaign on Jan. 6 to change the results. Since then, he has
remained relatively quiet about that decision, largely declining to directly
attack Mr. Trump or assign him any blame for inciting the deadly siege on the
Capitol. In public appearances last year, Mr. Pence defended his role in
resisting Mr. Trump but did not go further than saying the two men will never
“see eye to eye about that day.”
But
tensions have been rising in recent days between the two men. As Mr. Pence
positions himself for a possible presidential bid in 2024, Mr. Trump has pushed
more intensely a false narrative aimed at blaming his former vice president for
failing to stop President Biden from taking office.
Mr. Pence
cast his opposition on Friday as larger than the immediate political moment,
implying that the false claims pushed by Mr. Trump and his followers threatened
to undermine American democracy.
“The truth
is there’s more at stake than our party or our political fortunes,” he said.
“If we lose faith in the Constitution, we won’t just lose elections — we’ll
lose our country.”
In a speech
that largely focused on attacking the policies and record of the Biden
administration, Mr. Pence described Jan. 6 as a “dark day” in Washington. Such
a description runs counter to an attempt by some on the right to rewrite
history by describing the siege as a peaceful rally and by calling the rioters
“political prisoners.” And he urged Mr. Trump and his party to accept the
results of the last election.
“Whatever
the future holds, I know we did our duty that day,” Mr. Pence said. “I believe
the time has come to focus on the future.”
But Mr.
Pence stopped short of completely breaking with the right-wing base that
remains deeply influenced by Mr. Trump.
Mr. Pence
did not explicitly say Mr. Trump lost the election and declined to address the
false claims of election fraud still being pushed by the former president and
his supporters. The carefully constructed wording of his rebuke shows an effort
by Mr. Pence to defend his own actions on Jan. 6, while not completely
alienating a Republican base that remains animated by conspiracy theories of a
stolen election. Their support could be crucial in any 2024 primary contest.
His
comments came just hours after the Republican Party voted to censure two
Republican lawmakers for taking part in the House investigation of the Jan. 6
attack. The lawmakers, Representatives Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger
of Illinois, were censured for participating in what the party’s resolution
described as the “persecution of ordinary citizens engaged in legitimate
political discourse.”
Legal
scholars and officials from both parties say the vice president does not have
the power to overturn elections. Mr. Pence agrees with that interpretation of
the law: In a letter to Congress sent the morning of the Capitol attack, Mr.
Pence rejected the president’s claims, writing that the Constitution
“constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral
votes should be counted and which should not.”
On Sunday,
Mr. Trump falsely claimed that Mr. Pence could have “overturned the election”
in a statement denouncing a bipartisan push to rewrite the Electoral Count Act
of 1887. The former president and his allies misinterpreted that century-old
law in their failed bid to persuade Mr. Pence to throw out legitimate election
results. And on Tuesday, Mr. Trump said the congressional committee
investigating the role of his administration in the violent Jan. 6 attack on
the Capitol should instead examine “why Mike Pence did not send back the votes
for recertification or approval.”
Mr. Trump’s
attempts to influence his vice president have become a focus of the House
committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack, with some members seeing the
participation of Mr. Pence’s team as vital to deciding whether it has
sufficient evidence to make a criminal referral of Mr. Trump to the Justice
Department. Two of Mr. Pence’s aides testified privately before the committee
this week and Mr. Pence’s lawyer and the panel have been talking informally
about whether the former vice president would be willing to speak to
investigators.
The Justice
Department has also been examining the ways in which Mr. Trump’s attacks on Mr.
Pence influenced the mob on Jan. 6. In recent plea negotiations in some Jan. 6
cases, prosecutors have asked defense lawyers whether their clients would admit
in sworn statements that they stormed the Capitol believing that Mr. Trump
wanted them to stop Mr. Pence from certifying the election.
As the
attackers raided the Capitol that day, some chanted “Hang Mike Pence.” Mr.
Trump initially brushed aside calls from aides and allies to call them off.
Since then, Mr. Trump has defended the chants as understandable because, as he
said in an interview with ABC News’s Jonathan Karl, “the people were very
angry” about the election.
Lisa Lerer
is a national political correspondent, covering campaigns, elections and
political power. @llerer
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário