Principles for Dealing with the Changing World
Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail
Author(s):
Ray Dalio
Release
Date:
November
30, 2021
Reviewed by:
Craig R.
Roach
“Dalio’s
philosophical foundation for choosing investments is a sprawling, holistic
study of how the world has worked over hundreds of years of history.”
Ray Dalio
is among the world’s most successful investors, and in his new book, Principles
for Dealing with the Changing World Order, he reveals how he and his colleagues
at Bridgewater Associates choose investments for the future. His approach,
however, is not what you would get from the standard-issue Wall Street stock
picker. Dalio’s philosophical foundation for choosing investments is a
sprawling, holistic study of how the world has worked over hundreds of years of
history. What he found is that dominant countries—or what he calls “empires”—
inevitably rise and fall over long segments of time. Nothing is forever,
including, as Dalio documents, America’s position as the leading world power
today.
The early
part of the book is all about convincing the reader that these cycles happen,
and that they make all the difference in which countries are rising and which
are falling at any point in time. Dalio focuses on three major historical
transitions: the rise of the Netherlands and its replacement by the United
Kingdom; the replacement of the United Kingdom by the United States; and the
pending (at least possible) replacement of the United States by China.
In his
“Archetypical Big Cycle,” Dalio lists the forces that drive an empire’s rise:
“a) relatively low levels of indebtedness; b) relatively small wealth, values,
and political gaps between people; c) people working effectively together to
produce prosperity; d) good education and infrastructure; e) strong and capable
leadership; and f) a peaceful world order that is guided by one or more
dominant world powers.”
He also
succinctly states that three forces might drive the American empire’s decline.
The first is a steadily increasing debt burden that financially weakens the
empire. The second is a widening gap in household income and wealth that
incites internal conflicts. The third is a rising external rival who is on
course to topple the declining but-still-ruling empire.
Dalio fills
many pages of his book with explanations and insights on the full impact of
money and credit on the rise and fall of empires. He explains three monetary
policies the US has used to boost the economy that have now become problematic.
The first policy is for the Federal Reserve to lower short-term interest rates;
the problem here is that short-term interest rates are already at zero. The
second is to lower long-term interest rates by buying long-term bonds so the
yield will fall; this “quantitative easing” is already substantially in place
with the Federal Reserve buying billons of dollar of bonds each month.
The third
policy is for the Federal Reserve essentially to print money and buy Treasury
bills and bonds directly; this “debt monetization” has become the policy of
choice in the US today. Monetization of debt has its risks in the context of
the fall of empires. As noted, short-term interest rates are at zero, so investors
are driven to purchase assets such as gold, property, and stocks, which drive
up asset prices; this exacerbates the politically sensitive income and wealth
gaps because only those who can afford the assets see an increase in wealth.
Moreover,
the US dollar is the world’s primary reserve currency—the favorite currency for
safely storing cash. If the US government drives the value of the dollar down
by printing more dollars, there is the risk that the US could lose its role as
the primary reserve currency and, thus, further undercut the ability of the US
to borrow. Dalio argues that the US has too much debt and writes “what does
that mean for the dollar (most importantly) and the other more minor reserve
currencies? Will they decline and others replace them? Most probably they will
decline analogously to past reserve currency declines: slowly for a long time
and then very quickly.”
Dalio also
highlights the essential link between monetized debt and productivity gains won
through technological innovation. He argues that all this debt must be spent on
investments that boost productivity: “an essential ingredient for success is
that the debt and money that are created are used to produce productivity gains
and favorable returns on investment, rather than just being given away.” If an
empire fails to do that “the money will be devalued to the point that it won’t
leave the government or anyone else with much buying power.”
Principles
for Dealing with the Changing World Order is not an easy read; it is a thicket
of historical discussion permeated with graph-after-graph of evidence on each
cycle. Despite this obstacle, Dalio’s balanced, often unique, and worrisome
analysis of the possible outcome of the now intense rivalry between the US and
China is timely. This rivalry resonates in the headlines every day, and Dalio
writes that “emotions have been running so high between the US and China that
many people have urged [Dalio] not to publish this chapter [on China].”
Dalio sees
the two countries in a tie. He writes that “China is now roughly tied with the
US in being the leading power in trade, economic output, and innovation and
technology and it is a strong and quickly rising military and educational
power. It is an emerging power in the financial sector but is lagging as a
reserve currency and financial center.”
He is
unique in his explanations of the differences in philosophy for the two countries;
but those differences are not what you expect. For example, Dalio opines that
“America is run from the bottom up (e.g., democracy) and optimized for the
individual; China is run from the top down and optimized for the collective.”
Dalio explains further that democracy has no roots in China, but capitalism (at
least meritocracy) does.
Finally,
Dalio argues that the United States and China are already engaged in “wars” on
seven fronts. Dalio writes that history has “taught us that there are five major
types of wars: 1) trade/economic wars, 2) technology wars, 3) geopolitical
wars, 4) capital wars, and 5) military wars. To these [Dalio] would add 6)
culture wars and 7) the wars with ourselves.” These war fronts, Dalio argues,
should be “recognized as interrelated conflicts that are extensions of one
bigger evolving conflict.”
Dalio wants
to define these different forms of conflict so that the world can avoid
escalation to a hot war. For example, with trade/economic wars, Dalio concludes
that “we haven’t seen the US-China trade war taken very far.” However, he
identifies high-risk actions when he writes that “the most dangerous part of
the trade/economic war comes when countries cut others off from essential
imports.” He writes that the US could cut off “China’s imports of oil, other
needed commodities, technologies.” And for its part “China could escalate by
cutting off companies like General Motors (which sells more cars in China than
in the US) and Apple.”
In
conclusion, Dalio identifies a positive force, new technology, that can offset
the negative forces in all the wars. He writes that “humanity’s inventiveness
will probably lead to great advances while the debt/economic cycle, the
internal order cycle, the external order cycle, and worsening acts of nature
will almost certainly pose problems. In other words, there will be a battle
between humanity’s inventiveness and these other challenges.” The pandemic
proves his point. Biotech saved our lives with vaccines. InfoTech saved our
jobs with platforms that enabled e-commerce and remote work.
Craig R.
Roach is an author of narrative nonfiction. His book Simply Electrifying: The
Technology that Transformed the World, from Benjamin Franklin to Elon Musk
(BenBella Books, 2017) won a 2018 Axiom Business Book Award Gold Medal.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário