Inside McCarthy’s Shutdown Turnabout That Left
His Speakership at Risk
The Republican speaker opted to keep the government
open the only way he could — by partnering with Democrats — in a surprise
reversal that left him as politically vulnerable as ever.
Annie Karni
By Annie
Karni
Reporting
from the Capitol
Oct. 1,
2023
Updated
9:00 a.m. ET
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/01/us/politics/mccarthy-shutdown-turnabout.html
Speaker
Kevin McCarthy began the final day before a government shutdown pinned against
the ropes, facing dim prospects of passing any stopgap funding measure to avert
the crisis that was to go into effect when the clock struck 12:01 a.m. on
Sunday.
He ended it
still on the ropes, having bucked expectations and passed a spending bill to
keep the government open through mid-November — but only after being forced to
turn to Democrats for help pushing through the legislation that his detractors
denounced as a Republican surrender.
In between,
there was a game of chicken between the House and the Senate over their
competing stopgap spending plans, a fire alarm pulled by a progressive
congressman in the Capitol complex, a 50-minute filibuster by the House
minority leader as Democrats sought more time to figure out whether they wanted
to help pass Mr. McCarthy’s plan, and more threats by Representative Matt Gaetz
of Florida and his hard-right cohorts to call a vote to oust the speaker.
“If someone
wants to make a motion against me, bring it,” Mr. McCarthy said at a news
conference after the stopgap spending bill passed 335 to 91, with far more
Democrats than Republicans supporting it. “There has to be an adult in the
room.”
For weeks,
Mr. McCarthy had resisted that role, catering instead to the demands of the
faction of right-wing lawmakers who were willing to shut down the government to
make the point that Washington was broken and federal spending out of control.
Mr. McCarthy’s turnabout reflected a recognition that he — a people-pleasing
California Republican who more often reacts to events than drives them — was
out of options to avert a shutdown, and spare his party the political blowback
that would surely follow.
“If you’re
the one executing it, you fail,” Representative Patrick T. McHenry, Republican
of North Carolina and the speaker’s longtime sounding board, said of a shutdown
earlier in the week. “It’s been tried before.”
So after
suffering a resounding defeat on Friday, when right-wing lawmakers joined with
Democrats to defeat an ultraconservative temporary spending bill, Mr. McCarthy
decided to try a different approach. Convening Republicans in the basement of
the Capitol on Saturday morning, as a shutdown appeared all but inevitable, he
surprised his members by announcing that they were going to try again.
Gone from
the legislative text were some of the policy proposals Republicans had been
clamoring for, including severe immigration restrictions and steep spending
cuts that would have made it impossible for Democrats to support it.
Gone, too,
was the promise Mr. McCarthy had made in January to allow lawmakers 72 hours to
review any legislation before it came to a vote. Instead, members were given
about an hour to read and vote on a 71-page bill they had never seen before.
And it would be considered under special rules that required a two-thirds
majority for passage, meaning that it could not be approved without substantial
Democratic support.
That was no
sure thing.
“We’ll find
out,” Mr. McCarthy said when asked if he had the votes to pass it. “I like to
gamble.”
Mr.
McCarthy was in a rush. He wanted to pass the measure before the Senate voted
to advance a bipartisan stopgap measure that included $6 billion for Ukraine,
which it was planning to do later in the day. In a bow to growing Republican
resistance to funding Kyiv’s war effort, Mr. McCarthy’s bill did not include
any in his temporary spending patch.
Blindsided
Democrats were livid at the timing of it all, complaining that they needed much
more than an hour to review a bill delivered to them by a Republican speaker
they view as fundamentally untrustworthy and beholden to the far right.
“These guys
lie like a rug,” said Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts.
“I don’t trust them.”
As he left
the Democratic caucus meeting, Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the
minority leader, said that “the notion that we should accept the word of the
extreme American MAGA Republicans, who at every step of the way lie to the
American people, in this Congress is ridiculous.”
On the
floor, Democrats used the rules to buy themselves time to read the bill,
calling to adjourn the House so they could force a lengthy vote that would
effectively stall action on the floor. In the Cannon House Office Building
across the street, a fire alarm sounded, prompting an evacuation.
Representative
Jamaal Bowman, a progressive Democrat from New York and former principal who
regularly gets into screaming matches with far-right Republicans that create
brief sensations online, was caught on camera pulling the alarm, in what he
later claimed was an accident.
Republican
senators watched the drama from the other end of the Capitol, weighing their
options. If the House could pass a stopgap bill without aid for Ukraine, they
did not want to vote for a measure that included the money, which some
Republican senators also oppose. They, too, stalled action on the Senate floor,
putting out word that they planned to vote against the Senate plan.
A group of
hard-line G.O.P. House members, including Representatives Bob Good of Virginia,
Andy Biggs of Arizona and Matt Rosendale of Montana, made a rare visit to the
Senate where they huddled with Republican senators on the floor, encouraging
them to hold off on any action until the House had a chance to vote on its own
bill.
Across the
Rotunda, as they gathered in the Capitol basement weighing whether to back the
stopgap bill, House Democrats continued to play for time. Mr. Jeffries used
what is known as a “magic minute,” a privilege afforded to top party leaders
that allows them to speak on the floor for as long as they want, to deliver a
50-minute stemwinder in which he repeatedly decried “extreme MAGA Republicans.”
But
Democrats knew that if they opposed the bill, Republicans would claim they
cared more about sending money to Ukraine than they did about funding the
American government. They decided to embrace the measure as a win and claim
credit for forcing the G.O.P. to drop their massive proposed spending cuts and
tough border restrictions and averting a shutdown.
When the
vote was called, 209 Democrats voted for it, far more than the 126 Republicans
who did. When the final vote was recorded, both sides of the chamber cheered,
in a rare moment of bipartisanship on the deeply divided House floor.
Mr.
McCarthy even engaged in what looked like an amicable exchange with Mr.
McGovern, who in recent days had called him the weakest speaker in history and
said that calling his conference a clown show was doing a disservice to actual
clowns.
But Mr.
McCarthy, aware that he had put himself at considerable political risk, did not
stick around long. He quickly dispatched Republicans to adjourn the House,
leaving the Senate little choice but to take up and pass the stopgap measure —
and making it impossible for right-wing rebels to make an immediate motion to
remove him.
In a news
conference after the bill’s passage, leaders were still reeling from the twists
and turns that had averted the crisis. Representative Tom Emmer of Minnesota,
the No. 3 Republican, described the experience as akin to “riding a mechanical
bull all week.”
Mr.
McCarthy, for his part, lauded himself for having done the right thing, in
contrast to the rebels who he said had left him no choice but to partner with
Democrats.
“I’m a type
of conservative who wants to get things done,” Mr. McCarthy said. “It’s easy to
be a conservative who wants to do nothing.”
As the
House adjourned for the weekend, many Americans — including millions of federal
workers and military personnel who had been bracing to work without pay —
breathed a sigh of relief that the government was not going to shut down.
But Mr.
McCarthy’s fate was more of an open question than ever, as his foes signaled
they would soon move to depose him.
“He allowed
the DC Uniparty to win again,” Mr. Biggs wrote on X, formerly Twitter. “Should
he remain Speaker of the House?”
Annie Karni
is a congressional correspondent. She was previously a White House
correspondent. Before joining The Times, she covered the White House and
Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign for Politico, and spent a decade
covering local politics for the New York Post and the New York Daily News. More
about Annie Karni
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário