UK one of 32 countries facing European court
action over climate stance
Six Portuguese young people claim inadequate policies
to tackle global heating breach their human rights
Sandra
Laville
Sat 23 Sep
2023 05.00 BST
A key plank
of the UK government’s defence against the biggest climate legal action in the
world next week has fallen away as a result of the U-turn by the prime
minister, Rishi Sunak, on green policies.
The UK is
one of 32 countries being taken to the European court of human rights on
Wednesday by a group of Portuguese young people. They will argue in the grand
chamber of the Strasbourg court that the nations’ policies to tackle global
heating are inadequate and in breach of their human rights obligations.
In its
defence to the legal action, which is the biggest climate case yet taken across
the globe, the UK government argues it is taking world-beating action to tackle
climate change, with a legally binding target to reach net zero by 2050.
In
documents submitted to the court, Kate Hughes, the director of international
climate change at the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy,
raises in evidence the government’s 10-point plan for a green industrial
revolution, as proof of the tough policies being taken by the UK. The plan, she
said, “has set out some of the concrete steps we will take to reach net zero
emissions by 2050”.
But key
policies in the plan, which was introduced by the former prime minister Boris
Johnson, have now been scrapped by Sunak. These include the 2030 ban on the
sale of new petrol and diesel cars and the policy to phase out the installation
of gas boilers by 2035.
Lawyers
representing the six young people taking the legal action are to present
evidence that the current policies of the 32 countries mean the world is on
track to reach 3C of global heating within their lifetimes and argue that the
governments’ failure to act quickly enough to reduce emissions breaches the
human rights of their clients.
The case
will be heard on Wednesday at a full-day hearing in front of 17 judges when the
removal of what is a key defence in the UK government’s case could become
significant.
Gerry
Liston, legal officer at Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), which is
supporting the claimants, said: “The UK’s emissions targets are already
inadequate. If every country pursues the same ambition level as the UK’s
targets reflect, global warming would reach a catastrophic 3 degrees by the end
of this century.
“Now is the
time to be increasing ambition, not rolling back on existing commitments –
especially when the Climate Change Committee has for some time now been
sounding the alarm that the UK is well off course to meet its 2030 target.
Rishi Sunak’s announcement is not only senseless and immoral, it is also
illegal.”
The UK
defence case against the claim argues the government is doing enough to meet
its obligations. “The UK has taken wide-ranging measures to address climate
change and, on any view is not in breach of its alleged obligations,” the
defence documents state. The government bolsters its case by reference to the
views of the independent Climate Change Committee (CCC), saying it has
described the UK’s net zero target as “a world-leading commitment, placing the
UK decisively on the path to net zero by 2050 at the latest”.
But the
retreat this week on several key policies designed to ensure the UK meets its
future carbon budgets and its legal obligation to reach net zero by 2050 has
brought the government into direct collision with the committee.
Chris
Stark, the chief executive of the CCC, said on Thursday: “It’s difficult to
escape the idea that we’ve moved backwards from where we were when we did our
last assessment of progress.
“We do that
every single year, and we did that in June with what was the government’s old
programme. And in June, what we said to the government was that it didn’t look
like we were on track for the government’s targets in 2030. Remember, these are
legal goals … it looks like those goals will be even harder to hit with this
softer package now around climate policy.”
Aged from
11 to 24, the six Portuguese claimants say they were driven to act by their
experiences in the wildfires that ripped through the Leiria region in 2017,
killing 66 people and destroying about 20,000 hectares (50,000 acres) of
forest.
Crowdfunded
by people around the world who have donated more than £100,000, they are
seeking a binding ruling from the judges to force the countries to rapidly
escalate their emissions reductions in what would be a historic milestone in
climate litigation.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário