Trump, Under Oath, Says He Averted ‘Nuclear
Holocaust’
During a deposition in his civil case, the former
president offered a series of defenses, digressions and meandering explanations
of his political and professional dealings.
By Ben
Protess, Jonah E. Bromwich and William K. Rashbaum
Aug. 30,
2023
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/30/nyregion/trump-deposition-excerpts.html
Under oath
and under fire, Donald J. Trump sat for a seven-hour interview with the New
York attorney general’s office in April, part of the civil fraud case against
him and his company.
But as
lawyers from the office grilled Mr. Trump on the inner-workings of his family
business, which is accused of inflating his net worth by billions of dollars,
he responded with a series of meandering non sequiturs, political digressions
and self-aggrandizing defenses.
Asked about
his authority at the Trump Organization while he was in the White House, Mr.
Trump responded that he considered the presidency “the most important job in
the world, saving millions of lives.”
An empire
under scrutiny. Letitia James, New York State’s attorney general, has been
conducting a yearslong civil investigation into former President Donald Trump’s
business practices, culminating in a lawsuit that accused Trump of “staggering”
fraud. Here’s what to know:
The origins
of the inquiry. The investigation started after Michael Cohen, Trump’s former
personal lawyer and fixer, testified to Congress in 2019 that Trump and his
employees had manipulated his net worth to suit his interests.
The
findings. James detailed in a filing what she said was a pattern by the Trump
Organization to inflate the value of the company’s properties in documents
filed with lenders, insurers and the Internal Revenue Service.
Trump’s
lawsuit. In December 2021, Trump sued James, seeking to halt the inquiry on the
grounds that the attorney general’s involvement in the investigation was
politically motivated. In May, a federal judge dismissed the suit.
Invoking
the Fifth Amendment. In August, Trump faced questions by the attorney general
under oath. He declined to answer anything and invoked his right against
self-incrimination, leaving James with a crucial decision: whether to sue the
former president or seek a settlement.
Fraud
lawsuit. In September, James’s office rebuffed a settlement offer from Trump’s
lawyers. Days later, she filed a lawsuit against Trump and his family business,
accusing them of a sweeping pattern of fraudulent business practices. In
October, Trump filed a suit in Florida, accusing James of trespassing on his
right to privacy and seeking to halt her case.
The
possible penalties. James is seeking to bar Trump and three of his adult
children — Eric, Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr. — from ever running a business in
the state again. Her office has also referred the findings to federal
prosecutors in Manhattan.
“I think
you would have nuclear holocaust, if I didn’t deal with North Korea,” he
explained, and then added: “And I think you might have a nuclear war now, if
you want to know the truth.”
Although
Mr. Trump invoked his constitutional right against self-incrimination when
initially questioned by the office last year, he answered questions from the
attorney general, Letitia James, and her lawyers in the April deposition, a
transcript of which was unsealed on Wednesday.
The
transcript shows a combative Mr. Trump, who was named as a defendant in the
case alongside his company and three of his children, at times barely allowing
lawyers to get a word in. The former president frequently seems personally
offended by the idea that his net worth is being questioned.
Mr. Trump
is seeking to have the case thrown out. A judge could rule on that effort next
month, but for now, the case appears headed to trial in early October.
Below are
some of the highlights from the transcript of his deposition:
Mr. Trump
refers to his time in the Oval Office with a notable understatement.
The former
president was asked by Kevin Wallace, a senior lawyer in Ms. James’s office,
about his relationship to his company. He said that he was not the final
decision maker, though he later suggested he might be involved in “something
major, final decisions, whatever.”
KEVIN
WALLACE: Mr. Trump, are you currently the person with ultimate decision-making
authority for the Trump Organization?
DONALD J.
TRUMP: No.
MR.
WALLACE: Who would that be?
MR. TRUMP:
My son Eric is much more involved with it than I am. I’ve been doing other
things.
Mr. Trump
claims to have protected the world from nuclear war while in office.
In an
exchange soon after that, Mr. Trump acknowledged that those other things
included having been president.
MR. TRUMP:
I was very busy. I was — I considered this the most important job in the world,
saving millions of lives. I think you would have nuclear holocaust, if I didn’t
deal with North Korea. I think you would have a nuclear war, if I weren’t
elected. And I think you might have a nuclear war now, if you want to know the
truth.
Mr. Trump
declines to say who has expressed interest in buying Mar-a-Lago.
During the
deposition, Mr. Trump claimed to own “the greatest pieces of property in the
world” and said that if he were ever to put them up for sale, the prices
offered would be staggering. At one point, Mr. Wallace decided to test one of
those assertions.
MR. TRUMP:
I’ve had people say, if you ever sell Mar-a-Lago, please call me. That’s not
for sale.
MR.
WALLACE: Who, for example, has told you that?
MR. TRUMP:
Well, I rather not say because I don’t want to embarrass them, and I may be
putting some of these people on the stand.
Later in
the session, Mr. Trump said while he didn’t know who the specific people were
who had made such offers, “I know they’re very rich people.”
Mr. Trump
derides his annual financial statements, saying that he never felt they would
be taken seriously.
The
attorney general’s case against Mr. Trump focuses on his annual financial
statements, which she says overvalue his property by up to $2.2 billion each
year.
Each of Mr.
Trump’s financial statements includes a number of disclaimers, which
acknowledge that Mr. Trump’s accountants had not reviewed or authenticated his
claims. During the interview, Mr. Trump refers to those disclaimers, saying
that they essentially render the statements meaningless.
MR. TRUMP:
I never felt that these statements would be taken very seriously, because you
open it up and right at the beginning of the statement, you read a page and a
half of stuff saying, go get your own accounting, go get your own this, go get
your own that.
MR.
WALLACE: So why did you get these statements prepared?
MR. TRUMP:
I would say more for maybe myself just to see the list of properties. I think
more for myself than anything else. Sometimes an institution would like to see.
Mr. Trump
then went on to say that his properties were even more valuable than was
reflected in the statements themselves.
Mr. Trump
attacks the case.
The former
president frequently used the deposition to attack the case itself. At one
point he told Mr. Wallace that the banks from which he had received loans were
“shocked” at the lawsuit.
MR. TRUMP:
The banks — the banks are shocked by this case. That’s my opinion, because
they’ve never had anything like this. Do you know the banks were fully paid? Do
you know the banks made a lot of money? Do you know I don’t believe I ever got
even a default notice, and even during Covid, the banks were all paid? And yet
you’re suing on behalf of banks, I guess. It’s crazy. The whole case is crazy.
Mr. Trump
describes the value of his brand.
When asked
during the deposition what might have been left out of his annual financial
statements, Mr. Trump at first seemed to dispute the premise of the question,
saying, “They list everything in the kitchen sink here.” But he then
elaborated.
MR. TRUMP:
The biggest thing that is not included is my brand. My lawyers never bring it
up, but the brand is the biggest, and cause you can, maybe you can double or
triple my statement. But my brand is — if I wanted to create a good statement,
I would put — I’d start off with Sentence 1, my brand is worth billions and
billions of dollars.
Mr. Trump’s
friends say he is “the most honest person in the world.”
Asked about
policies and procedures to ensure that the Trump Organization complies with the
law, he said: “That’s why we have law firms. You know, we have law firms that
do this.”
MR. TRUMP:
And friends of mine have said, you are the most honest person in the world. So
we’ve done a good job. Don’t get credit for it. That’s OK.
The lawyers
fought.
Depositions
are often contentious, and there were a few highlights from the exchanges
between Mr. Wallace and lawyers for Mr. Trump, Christopher M. Kise and Alina
Habba.
CHRISTOPHER
M. KISE: We’re going to be here until midnight if you keep asking questions
that are all over the map.
MR.
WALLACE: Chris, we’re going to be here until midnight if your client answers
every question with an eight-minute speech. So let’s get down to business.
Ben Protess
is an investigative reporter covering the federal government, law enforcement
and various criminal investigations into former President Trump and his allies.
More about Ben Protess
Jonah E.
Bromwich covers criminal justice in New York, with a focus on the Manhattan
district attorney's office, state criminal courts in Manhattan and New York
City's jails. More about Jonah E. Bromwich
William K.
Rashbaum is a senior writer on the Metro desk, where he covers political and
municipal corruption, courts, terrorism and law enforcement. He was a part of
the team awarded the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News. More about
William K. Rashbaum
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário