‘It’s a fucking trap!’ The Great Euro Conspiracy
Theory
Are we marching toward a digital dictatorship? Will
they stop you buying meat?
BY BJARKE
SMITH-MEYER
AUGUST 29,
2023 7:00 AM CET
BRUSSELS ―
A conspiracy theory is spreading across Europe. It has nothing to do with
lizards in human form or the Freemasons or COVID, and there’s every chance
you’ve never heard of it. But give it time. You will.
It is why
Marc Friedrich, a 47-year-old bestselling finance author, is warning about
microchips being implanted under people’s skin and why Jörg Meuthen, a member
of the European Parliament, is raising the specter of secret government
surveillance. Already, public rallies have been held in Amsterdam.
On the
surface, the issue is unlikely to inspire much excitement. But that, its
detractors say, is exactly why it's so invidious. It’s a digital version of the
euro — “cash” stored and used for payments on a smartphone, as opposed to
purchases made by credit card or bank transfer or by old-fashioned paper and
coins — which the European Central Bank hopes to introduce in 2026. At the last
count, only about a third of people in Europe have heard of it, let alone
understand it.
Friedrich
does. “It’s a fucking trap,” he said, by way of explanation.
The
47-year-old German is making a name for himself opposing digital currencies on
YouTube where his videos have amassed more than 350,000 subscribers. For him,
this isn't a conspiracy theory, it's genuine fear about where the world's
heading. “They’ll say, ‘Hey, it’s easier, it’s tidier, you don’t have to put
your fingers on these dirty notes and you don’t get COVID virus’ or something
like that. ‘A robber can’t steal your money anymore — but you can have a chip
under your skin.’
“It’s the
perfect tool for surveillance and a digital dictatorship.”
It should
be made clear at this point that the ECB's plan does not include putting chips
under people's skin.
According
to psychologists, many of the same groups who associated themselves with
non-mainstream views during the pandemic have latched onto this issue too. The
question is why.
While
there’s no easy way to decide where legitimate criticism ends and conspiracy
theories begin — justifiable reasons to oppose the digital euro continue to be
put forward — psychologists say it’s noteworthy that an otherwise niche topic
has become a lightning rod for people who have become increasingly agitated by
such things.
Something
changed during the pandemic. A study published in the science journal Plos One
last October suggested COVID conspiracies acted like a gateway drug to other
theories.
“If you
believe the government lied to you about COVID numbers or that they leaked the
virus intentionally … what else could they have lied about?” said Javier
Granados Samayoa, a postdoctoral fellow at the Annenberg Public Policy Center
of the University of Pennsylvania and lead author of the report. “And when
you’re out there looking for information and communicating with [like-minded]
people, they are most likely to get information about other conspiracy theories
and that can lead them down the rabbit hole.”
This is
exemplified by viewers’ comments on Friedrich’s YouTube videos, which include
remarks like, “If you don’t need your eyes to see NOW, you’ll need them later
to cry;” “I believe the decline is consciously brought and wanted;” and “I
fight for freedom!”
The digital
euro is an ideal fit for people afraid that those in charge have malevolent
intent, Granados Samayoa said.
“Bankers
are a perfect representation of people who have power over you, and you don’t
really know what’s going on,” he said. “These kinds of stories match the
conspiracy theorists' general concerns.”
That’s a
view shared by Peter Ditto, professor of psychological science at the
University of California and a specialist in political conspiratorial thinking,
who suggested that the tumult of recent years has contributed to a new era of
old theories. Even putting the COVID pandemic aside, the financial crisis, the
Donald Trump U.S. presidency, Brexit, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have
upended many old certainties.
When people
feel they’re living through “politically chaotic” times, conspiracy theories
flourish, he said — and especially when they are already suspicious about
ulterior motives of the media, governments and the courts.
That makes
it easier to believe there are “global elites who are trying to create a
digital money so there won’t be any more real money in the world,” he said.
Loonies, idiots
Policymakers
insist one of the benefits of the digital euro and other so-called CBDCs
(central bank digital currencies), such as those being floated in the U.K.,
U.S. and Russia, is to ensure there's a form of digital cash backed by the
state amid cryptocurrencies and plans by Big Tech to introduce their own money.
Legislation
to allow the digital euro’s introduction will come before European lawmakers in
the coming months. EU Finance Commissioner Mairead McGuinness has already urged
MEPs to dial back the “Big Brother” rhetoric while the Commission has outlined
design features it says will safeguard payment privacy and has proposed laws
that would force retailers to still accept cash.
Michiel
Hoogeveen, a Dutch MEP who will lead scrutiny of the laws on behalf of the
European Conservatives and Reformists group and is skeptical about the project,
said there was a difference between those who peddle conspiracy theories and
those who have legitimate concerns.
"We
had people who were protesting against COVID, they had a podium, they were very
successful on being on social media as an influencer, donations were pouring
in, and now COVID is gone, the rules were lifted, so they need to move to the
next big thing," he said. “My job is to read about their concerns, listen
to their concerns … not by saying, ‘You’re a looney, you’re an idiot,’ but to
say, ‘OK, I understand where you’re going,’ … and try to lure people into a
more acceptable area of the debate.”
As people
decide the real reasons for digital currencies may be more sinister than they
first appear — and politicians realize egging them on can be a vote-winner —
authorities might find it harder to convince the public they will protect
privacy and safeguard the use of cash.
“My
impression is that in fact they do not even want to do that, because government
surveillance and a cashless society is their final aim,” said Meuthen, a German
Center Party member of the European Parliament. “I'm deeply worried that the
project of the digital euro is not only a project to develop a useful
additional instrument of future payments, but that the real intention is the
start of replacing any kind of cash payments.”
Undesirable purchases
Among
people's biggest concerns ― roundly rejected by governments and central banks ―
is that digital currencies will allow the state to restrict what people can
buy. In Europe those allegations often relate to meat or fuel, as a way of
controlling obesity or climate change. In the U.S. populist politicians argue
some sectors of society could be prevented from buying guns.
“It will
allow them to prohibit undesirable purchases like fuel and ammunition,” Florida
Governor Ron DeSantis, Donald Trump’s chief rival for the Republican bid for
the White House, said during a debate. “The minute you give them the power to
do this, they're going to impose a social credit system on this country. CBDC
is a massive threat to American liberty.”
And in the
U.K., Nigel Farage, one of the architects of Britain's departure from the EU,
used a BBC interview about the closure of his bank account in July to bring up
the unrelated issue of the digital pound.
"I am
now a champion and a crusader for men and women who have been closed down by
the banks and I want cultural changes within the banks and I want legal changes
and I do not want cash driven out of the system in a push towards central bank
digital currencies," he said.
Nazi Germany
In the face
of such remarks, policymakers fear an uphill battle.
Responses
to a recent consultation on the digital pound “suggest concern about a desire
by the authorities to reach into people’s privacy, which is absolutely at odds
with what we should do, and indeed would," Bank of England Governor Andrew
Bailey said in a speech in July. "There are stories of skepticism around
the benefits to be expected from the iPhone, and going further back, railways.”
The Bank of
England and Treasury are considering the conclusions of the consultation. A
decision on whether to move ahead with a digital version of the pound won’t be
taken for a couple of years. Negotiations over the legislation in the EU are
expected to go beyond June's Parliament elections.
Back in
Germany, Friedrich warned “liberty and our democracy are in danger” — and he
can see some ugly historical parallels.
“I hope
there is no plan but for me it makes no sense to create a digital euro unless
you want to control people,” he said. “When my grandfather was dying I asked
him everything about Nazi Germany. I know how it happens.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário