It doesn’t matter who wins the election. The US
leaves the Paris climate deal at midnight.
By the time Tuesday’s presidential election closes
out, the US will be out of the global climate pact.
BY KARL
MATHIESEN
November 2,
2020 10:00 am
https://www.politico.eu/article/us-paris-agreement-what-does-that-mean/
It will be
bittersweet or the ultimate victory lap.
Finally,
1,253 days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to leave the Paris
climate deal, he will by Wednesday take his country out of the global
agreement.
What does
that mean?
The absence
of the second biggest polluter on earth and the largest economy from climate
geopolitics. That's bad for progress on cutting emissions, both in the U.S. and
overseas.
It gives
cover to big fossil fuel producers, such as Brazil, Saudi Arabia and Australia,
to do nothing. It gives others, such as India, a reason not to do more. It will
throw pressure onto Europe to shoulder diplomatic leadership.
The 2015
pact between 197 countries committed to a goal to halt warming “well below” 2
degrees Celsius, and strive to hold it at 1.5 degrees, by garnering
increasingly ambitious voluntary commitments from governments.
The U.S.
State Department will no longer be an active member at U.N. climate meetings on
the Paris deal. But it will remain an observer, allowed to sit in, and a member
of the U.N. Framework Climate Convention (of which the Paris deal is just a
part). No one really knows how this will work.
Is the
timing coincidental?
Yes,
totally.
Trump
declared his intention to withdraw from the deal on July 1, 2017, but nothing
actually happened. Under the rules of the Paris deal, any country wanting to
withdraw had to wait three years from November 4, 2016 — the date the deal
became international law.
The U.S.
duly filed its divorce papers on November 4 last year. That means the one-year
cooling-off period expires at midnight Eastern time on Tuesday: the same moment
Americans and the world will be watching the new chapter of history unfold.
What would
it take to go back in?
Democratic
presidential contender Joe Biden has vowed to reenter the deal on his first day
in office. He could do that through a brief executive order accepting the
accord on behalf of the U.S. — just as Barack Obama did in 2016.
But a
signature alone might not cut it. The U.S. would also need to submit a formal
plan for cutting emissions, known as a nationally determined contribution or
NDC. The rules aren’t clear about whether this is a prerequisite for joining or
would have to follow shortly afterward.
Biden would
have the Obama Administration’s NDC, which aimed to cut 26-28 percent of
emissions between 2005 and 2025, sitting on the shelf. But he wants to raise
the ambition of that pledge, along with much of the rest of the world, ahead of
the COP26 U.N. talks in November 2021.
To do that,
the administration would need a plan and policies — and, to implement it, the
support of the U.S. Congress.
Is it
really that easy?
There is
the question of money. The U.S. committed $3 billion to the U.N. Green Climate
Fund, which helps poorer countries cope with climate change and move to clean
energy. Obama paid $1 billion of that amount.
Biden has
said he will “recommit” to the fund, which implies back-paying the U.S. debt.
But that commitment is several years old and the hosts of COP26 — the U.K.
government — are calling for rich countries to double their previous climate
finance commitments.
Meanwhile,
the world is moving on. China’s President Xi Jinping last month declared his
country would set a goal for net-zero emissions by 2060 — an announcement seen
as an attempt to place Trump and the U.S. on the wrong side of a wave of
political and economic momentum. Japan and South Korea followed with 2050
goals, and the EU looks set to dramatically increase its 2030 target next
month.
There is
also a question of trust. The U.S. has walked away from two climate deals it
helped broker — Paris and the Kyoto Protocol. The world will take them back,
but things won't be the same.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário