What happens if there’s no Brexit trade deal?
With significant differences remaining between both
sides, here are the implications for key policy areas and how they could be
resolved.
By POLITICO
10/2/20, 11:43 AM CET Updated 10/5/20, 8:24 AM CET
https://www.politico.eu/article/what-happens-no-brexit-trade-deal-eu-uk/
Brexit
talks grind on as the clock counts down to the end of the transition.
The last
formal round of talks between the U.K. and the European Union on their future
relationship ended Friday and the following day Prime Minister Boris Johnson
and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen ordered their teams to
keep talking. While both sides have consistently said they are keen to strike a
deal, several areas of disagreement remain.
Added to
that, the relationship between the two has been further poisoned in recent
weeks by the U.K.'s decision to put forward domestic legislation that would
give ministers powers to change aspects of the Withdrawal Agreement — the
divorce deal agreed by Brussels and London last year — that the government
concedes would breach international law. The EU on Thursday announced it was
beginning the process of legal action against the U.K. and gave London until
the end of October to respond.
Even if a
deal is struck, it then has to be ratified by parliaments on both sides. Chief
EU negotiator Michel Barnier and a number of others on the EU side have
indicated this might not be straightforward if the U.K.'s Internal Market Bill
is still in play.
While
neither side has walked away from talks yet, both say they are simultaneously
preparing for the possibility that no agreement is struck in time. But what
would that mean in practice?
POLITICO
walks you through implications for key policy areas and explains how the
resulting problems could be resolved.
Tariffs
How bad
could it be? 💥💥💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
Free trade
between the EU and U.K. ends on January 1, 2021 — and both sides fall back on
World Trade Organization terms. The U.K. has set out its Global Tariff Schedule
for imports from the EU (as well as all other nations it has no trade deal
with) and would be subject to the EU Common External Tariff for exports to the
EU.
The
administrative burden of tariffs, in addition to new customs checks, risks
having an impact on food supplies — in particular those heading to the EU,
because firms importing goods to Britain will be able to defer tariff payments
and some customs administration for the first six months.
The
additional costs of tariffs and delays will likely create problems for
companies, supply chains and retailers in almost every sector of the economy.
Prices in
shops will inevitably rise as a result, and some businesses could go bust.
What can they
do about it?
The two
sides would have to negotiate a trade deal to avoid the new tariffs. How
quickly that might happen would likely depend on the political context and how
trade talks broke down during the transition period. Once Britain is fully out
of the European Union, the two sides could, of course, start new trade
discussions at any time — provided they agree.
— Emilio
Casalicchio
Customs
checks
How bad
could it be? 💥
What
happens immediately?
U.K. goods
entering the EU will face full customs controls, including customs
declarations, animal product health paperwork and some border checks. Most of
that paperwork will be required whether or not there is a deal.
EU goods
entering the U.K. will not face full customs administration for the first six
months under a phased-in approach, but the requirements will ramp up between
January and July 2021.
Port
infrastructure and staff in Britain could be overwhelmed with the mass of new
processing, leading to disruption.
Trucks will
be expected to complete paperwork before heading to the border, but there are
fears that firms will not adequately prepare, leading to queues of 7,000 trucks
in Kent that could last for two days, by the U.K. government’s own admission.
What can
they do about it?
The two
sides could continue to negotiate a free-trade agreement, which could reduce
the need for some paperwork, but is unlikely to make a lot of difference given
the U.K. has decided to leave the EU's customs union.
Businesses
are expected to prepare to avoid disruption by registering for overseas trading
numbers, checking what they will need to pay and familiarizing themselves with
new electronic platforms (which the U.K. government is yet to unveil).
New
facilities are being built around ports to manage disruption.
— Emilio
Casalicchio
State aid
How bad
could it be? 💥💥
What
happens immediately?
Great
Britain is on the whole no longer bound by EU state aid rules, meaning it no
longer needs sign-off from the European Commission to make interventions to
support companies. However, Northern Ireland remains tied to EU rules under the
Withdrawal Agreement, and subsidies to firms in the rest of the U.K. that could
benefit firms in Northern Ireland could come under the scope of EU rules.
However, if
the U.K. government passes the Internal Market Bill, it will have written into
domestic law the unilateral ability to interpret how U.K. firms could be
subject to EU state aid rules, provided parliament agrees.
Any
investigations or proceedings launched by the EU against the U.K. before the
end of the transition can continue, and the EU can launch new probes or
proceedings for up to four years after the end of the transition, about any
support granted before the end of the transition.
The U.K.
will follow the World Trade Organization Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures, which are looser than EU state aid rules and apply
only to goods. The government has said it will follow any other state aid
agreements within its free-trade deals. It plans to publish details of its own
state aid regime in the future.
EU state
aid rules also protect U.K. nations from undercutting their own internal
market. Without a domestic equivalent, U.K. firms could be unprotected from
unfair subsidies from within the U.K.
On the EU
side, Brussels is set to expand its toolbox with a mechanism aimed at tackling
illegal foreign subsidies in any case and that would catch any unfair subsidies
from the U.K. So no deal wouldn't make a difference.
What can
they do about it?
The two
sides could continue to negotiate for a deal that would satisfy the EU demand
for a level playing field on state aid and satisfy the U.K. demand for
sovereignty over state aid.
The EU has
begun the process of legal action against the U.K. over the Internal Market
Bill. The EU might also bring legal challenges if the U.K. parliament passes
the bill and the government later uses the powers contained within the
legislation.
— Emilio
Casalicchio
Dispute
settlement
How bad
could it be? 💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
Disputes
between the two sides will fall under World Trade Organization rules and the
Withdrawal Agreement.
If the
issue is one of trade that does not fall under the Withdrawal Agreement and the
two sides cannot negotiate bilaterally or through the political bodies of the
WTO, they can use the WTO dispute settlement process.
If the
issue relates to the Withdrawal Agreement, the main forum for resolution is the
EU-U.K. Joint Committee. On matters of the interpretation of EU law, the Court
of Justice of the European Union can be consulted. For other matters, the
parties can go to arbitration if they do not agree.
What can
they do about it?
The two
sides should attempt to resolve differences bilaterally where possible.
— Emilio
Casalicchio
Health
How bad could
it be? 💥💥💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
Medicines
could be caught up in delays at borders. While medicines are not subject to
tariffs under the WTO rules, non-tariff barriers could hold up the movement of
everything from the chemicals making up a drug to the finished product.
Without a
mutual recognition agreement on good manufacturing practice and batch testing,
additional checks would be needed on medicines moving across the borders,
possibly causing a delay of four to six weeks as medicines are re-tested.
The
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency will become responsible for
all medicines regulation in the U.K. from January 1, 2021. The MHRA has
recently published guidance on what happens post-transition but the industry
has said that they need more detail to help them navigate the practicalities of
implementing the guidance due to the complexity of medicines' regulation.
There is
considerable uncertainty over what will happen to medicines moving into and out
of Northern Ireland. From January, new medicines approvals granted by the EU
will be applicable in Northern Ireland, while the MHRA will also be responsible
for regulating medicines there. Industry fears that medicines may not be able
to be legally dispensed in Northern Ireland.
The U.K.
government has yet to provide comprehensive details on how the Northern Ireland
protocol will work in practice for medicines.
What can
they do about it?
Companies
are beginning to prepare stockpiles of medicines in the event of delays. The
U.K. could also agree to recognize assessments from the European Medicines
Agency. A mutual recognition agreement on good manufacturing practice could be
agreed separately from a trade deal and the Northern Ireland protocol could be
phased in over a year for medicines, allowing industry more time to implement
the necessary changes.
— Ashleigh
Furlong
Air travel
How bad
could it be? 💥💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
Without an
EU-U.K. partnership in aviation, and in absence of unilateral contingency
measures, no flights would take place between the U.K. and the EU as the WTO
does not offer any fallback for air services.
British
airlines will no longer be under the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of
the EU or under the supervision of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA).
If no deal
is reached, U.K. operating licenses will no longer be valid in the EU.
Britain-based air operators will have to move their principal place of business
to an EU country and be majority EU-owned to continue operating in the EU.
Certificates,
licenses and registrations that were issued by the U.K.’s Civil Aviation
Authority on behalf of EASA for pilots, aircraft and aircraft parts will become
invalid and would have to be validated again by an EU member country.
What can
they do about it?
Before last
year's Withdrawal Agreement was struck, both the U.K. and EU confirmed plans to
allow flights to continue in a no-deal scenario, which gave passengers and
cargo operators certainty and confidence at the time.
Airlines
say they expect — and need — a similar form of connectivity mechanism, that
could ensure that operations can continue under any outcome.
The EU’s
mandate for negotiations is clear that a comprehensive agreement on aviation
(which airlines want) would require the U.K. to meet certain level playing
field provisions, on state aid, labor laws, the environment and competition.
— Mari
Eccles
Road
transport
How bad
could it be? 💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
When the
Brexit transition period lapses at the end of the year, so do EU Community
Licenses U.K. hauliers have been using for operations to the Continent. In the
absence of another arrangement, hauliers will have to rely on the multilateral
quota system of the European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT), which
distributes a fixed number of permits. However, it’s widely acknowledged that
those wouldn't come close to encompassing the number of trucks currently traveling
back and forth across the Channel.
ECMT
permits allow for cross-trade operations — meaning deliveries between countries
— but not so-called cabotage operations by foreign providers within another
country.
What can
they do about it?
The
International Transport Forum (ITF) is currently in talks to temporarily
increase the number of permits. But the Road Transport Group hasn’t reached a
compromise yet and, even if it did, the system wouldn’t be enough to secure
post-Brexit transport.
London
previously floated reviving former bilateral agreements with EU countries and
putting into place new ones. But the result would be complex; needless to say,
it wouldn’t be industry’s first choice.
The road
transport industry, which last week stressed that ending the transition period
without a deal “is not an option for our industry,” expects both sides to put
contingency measures in place that would ensure some market access.
— Hanne
Cokelaere
Security/intelligence
How bad
could it be? 💥💥
What
happens immediately?
U.K. police
will be slower to detain criminal suspects from the EU without a deal on
security. This is because the U.K. would no longer have access to the Schengen
Information System and the EU’s law enforcement agency Europol, the EU-wide law
enforcement databases on criminals and criminal activity.
Extradition
of criminal suspects will also be more difficult, because the U.K. won't part
of the European Arrest Warrant and no replacement has been agreed yet. London
wanted an agreement similar to that between the EU and Norway, which would
allow the U.K. to bring extra safeguards and conditions into the process.
Without a deal, the U.K. would rely on the 1957 European Convention on
Extradition, which places more importance on diplomacy than judicial procedures
and gives signatory countries more grounds to refuse to extradite their
citizens.
What can
they do about it?
Accepting
the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU is a prerequisite for access
to many of the EU’s systems for law enforcement and judicial cooperation.
Therefore, U.K. opposition to the court limits how much can be achieved in this
area.
The EU and
the U.K. could strike a separate security pact, but it is expected to be quite
thin. London is putting in place contingency measures for aspects of this
cooperation that are normally restricted to EU countries. The U.K. will rely on
Interpol, the international crime agency, rather than Europol.
— Cristina
Gallardo
Environment/climate
How bad
could it be? 💥
What
happens immediately?
The U.K.
will be released from the EU regime governing environmental protection. That
has raised concerns about a British government watering down rules that protect
nature, though the U.K. government has insisted it won't.
A no-deal
outcome could disrupt the export of millions of tons of waste to facilities in
the EU, so this will have to go to landfill. That would harm the environment
and pile millions of pounds of extra costs onto local councils in the U.K.
The U.K.
will find itself outside the EU’s Emissions Trading System. It is unclear if
the U.K. Emissions Trading System will operate as a standalone scheme, or if a
carbon emissions tax will be implemented. Downing Street has said that it
remains committed to having a scheme in place that is “at least as ambitious as
the existing” one, but it is not clear when it will be operational.
What can
they do about it?
Under the
so-called level playing field clause in the Withdrawal Agreement, both sides
agreed they would uphold environmental standards.
The EU is
also likely to demand that goods and services traded across the border comply
with its standards. The U.K. is in the process of establishing a new Office of
Environmental Protection to take over the regulatory functions once performed
by the EU.
— Aitor
Hernández-Morales, Eline Schaart and Karl Mathiesen
Energy
How bad
could it be? 💥
What
happens immediately?
While
cross-border power will continue to flow across electricity interconnectors, it
will no longer be governed by EU legislation. Transmission System Operators
(TSOs) will use alternate trading arrangements, but these are expected to be
less efficient than those guaranteed within the current system.
Since 2013
the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland have been joined in the Single
Electricity Market (SEM). The Northern Ireland protocol establishes that, in
the case of a no-deal Brexit, the SEM will be preserved and that Northern
Ireland will follow EU rules in order to maintain electricity trading with the
rest of the island.
At the end
of the transition period, the U.K. will be fully out of Euratom, the European
Atomic Energy Community. That means reduced access to nuclear fuel,
interruptions to the supply of medical isotopes used in nuclear medicine, and
reduced participation in nuclear research schemes like ITER, the world’s most
important nuclear fusion project.
What can
they do about it?
Not much.
Energy was one of the few areas where EU and U.K. negotiators largely agreed,
but without a broader Brexit agreement and no mini-deals on the table, the
British energy sector has no choice but to try to reach arrangements on their
own.
— Aitor
Hernández-Morales
Fish
How bad
could it be? 💥💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
The U.K.
can cut off access to its exclusive economic zone, which would mean that EU
fishermen would no longer be allowed to fish in U.K. waters. That would be a
major blow to them, as 42 percent of all fish caught by EU fishing crews are
plucked out of British waters. That figure is even higher for fishermen from
nearby coastal countries like Belgium and the Netherlands. According to the
European Fisheries Alliance, this could slash the net profits for European
fleets in half and lead to job losses for at least 6,000 people.
U.K.
fishermen, fish processors and retailers would have reduced access to the EU
market and would have to pay tariffs on their fish exports imposed by the EU.
This would hurt the U.K. fishing industry severely, as about 75 percent of its
exported seafood is destined for the European market.
EU
countries that export fish or fish products to the U.K. would also be hit by
tariffs imposed by the U.K.
A no-deal
also significantly increases the risk of overfishing because of a lack of
agreement on quotas.
What can
they do about it?
The U.K.'s
waters will exclusively become its own again under the U.N. Convention on the
Law of the Sea. Under that convention, countries that share borders are
supposed to jointly manage shared fish stocks. So even in the case of a no
deal, the U.K. would need to negotiate with its former EU partners over how to
accomplish that.
To reduce
its dependency on the EU market, the U.K. could also try to develop new markets
for its fish through trade deals with other countries. For EU coastal
countries, it will be hard to start fishing in other waters.
— Barbara
Moens
Digital
How bad
could it be? 💥💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
Free mobile
phone roaming across the 27-country bloc will no longer be a legal right for
U.K. residents, though most of the major carriers have pledged to not hike fees
when people use their devices in the European Union. London would have to agree
to a new arrangement with Brussels to remove these roaming charges.
New
restrictions would be placed upon data that can be moved between both sides,
potentially harming billions of euros/pounds worth of commerce (related to tech
companies, banks and broad parts of the economy). London has pledged to
continue to allow U.K.-based digital information to move to the EU, though no
reciprocal arrangement has yet been reached. Legal challenges are expected,
associated with how EU data is handled by British national security agencies —
something that has already happened with how U.S. spies collect and use EU
data.
With fewer
EU-wide restrictions, the U.K. could go it alone on a number of digital briefs,
with the country’s antitrust agency already laying out a claim for being the
Western world’s most aggressive enforcer on digital competition and the role of
Big Tech in people’s lives.
What can
they do about it?
On roaming,
the U.K. must sign a one-off agreement with Brussels, though that looks
unlikely given the political poisoning of relations in the event of a no-deal
Brexit. Expect angry headlines from Brits traveling overseas who are stung by
eye-watering bills.
On data,
without an agreement in place, such digital transfers become fraught with legal
uncertainty for the entire economy, and both sides will be under pressure to
reach a deal as quickly as possible.
On new
regulation, the U.K. does have a chance to become a global trendsetter,
particularly as it would have more freedom to go its own way on rules and
enforcement. So far, the U.K. government has said it does not intend to diverge
significantly on digital regulation and it is also unclear whether other
countries would be willing to follow where London leads if it did.
— Mark
Scott
Finance
How bad
could it be? 💥💥
What
happens immediately?
The
financial services sector is not part of the trade discussions, so in many ways
January 1, 2021 will put the industry in a no-deal situation regardless of
whether Brussels and London strike a trade agreement.
Many
contingency measures have been put in place on either side to mitigate a
possible shock to markets. British clearinghouses have been given until at
least 2022 to continue working with EU clients, and other contracts that
depended on EU membership have been redrafted or moved by the firms under a
newly licensed subsidiary in the single market.
“Passporting”
for the banking sector will end, and that means EU residents who use British
banks will likely see their accounts closed, unless the bank expands its
operations to the member country in question.
Personal
data transfers, essential for the conduct of finance operations, will become
illegal without mutual adequacy assessments, which have yet to be made to date
(see Digital, above).
Trade in
other financial areas could be smoothed over with “equivalence” rulings, which
generally don’t grant market access on their own, but allow a lighter
regulatory regime for areas ranging from auditing to insurance to financial
conglomerates.
What can
they do about it?
Striking a
free-trade deal will have an indirect positive impact on financial services
because it would set the mood to solve the other issues — such as data flows,
share and derivative trading, and investment banking equivalence findings —
constructively.
Without a
trade deal it is likely that negotiations would end in acrimony and neither
side would be inclined to keep negotiating administrative pacts regarding
financial services.
— Matei
Rosca
Citizens'
rights/immigration
How bad
could it be? 💥💥
What
happens immediately?
The rights
of U.K. citizens in the EU and vice-versa will be protected for as long as the
Withdrawal Agreement stays in place. But an abrupt end to trade talks could
make it harder to solve outstanding immigration issues — most importantly
what’s going to happen to EU nationals who miss the application deadline in
June 2021 for the U.K.’s EU Settlement Scheme. Campaigners and lawyers in the
U.K. have lobbied the Home Office to extend the application period to minimize
the number of EU nationals who could be left unprotected.
The future
relationship negotiations also cover a range of sensitive social security
matters, which would be up in the air if talks fall apart, including the mutual
recognition of professional qualifications, the export of benefits and pensions
and the rights of people who live in one member country but work in a another.
Until the
end of the transition, British parents have legal powers to challenge the
abduction of their child by a spouse from another EU country under a regulation
known as the Brussels II system. But these legal powers will go unless the U.K.
and the EU reach an agreement on cross-border civil justice cooperation. This
would make abduction cases much slower and bureaucratic for U.K. parents.
Under the
EU’s Dublin Regulation, participating countries can send asylum seekers back to
another member country if there is proof the claimant previously claimed asylum
there or lived there for five months or more. This will no longer apply to the
U.K. after the Brexit transition ends and no replacement rule has been agreed.
What can
they do about it?
Both sides
could commit to shielding citizens’ rights from any fallout from the trade
talks and agree to work constructively to solve outstanding problems.
Individual
EU countries could also negotiate separate social security rules with the U.K.
But this could lead to a very complex situation for those who work in many
different jurisdictions, and could also increase their social security
contributions if they have to pay taxes in more than one country.
On asylum,
the U.K. could seek bilateral agreements with individual EU countries to send
back asylum claimants. France, Ireland and Greece would be probably high on the
list — but a no-deal end to the transition could limit the appetite for such
deals.
— Cristina
Gallardo
Science and
education
How bad
could it get? 💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
U.K.-based
researchers funded by the EU's Horizon 2020 program will continue to receive
cash for the duration of their projects, provided the Withdrawal Agreement
remains in place.
A collapse
of trade talks would likely affect negotiations for the U.K.’s association to
the next EU R&D program, Horizon Europe, which starts on January 1, 2021.
The EU could make it harder for the U.K. to join the scheme; or Britain could
snub the EU and reject participation altogether. Missing the start of the
scheme could lead to a brain drain, as researchers try to preserve their
ability to apply for EU grants. The U.K. has said it would launch domestic
schemes as close to January 1, 2021 as possible to compensate for the loss of
EU cash.
Talks for
continued U.K. participation in the student exchange program Erasmus would also
likely be impacted by a breakdown in trade talks. An alternative scheme,
involving the U.K. and non-EU countries, could be launched as a replacement.
The U.K.
will lose access to Galileo, the EU’s navigation satellite scheme, and will
most likely rely on the U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS) for position, navigation
and timing services until it can put in place an alternative. London is trying
to negotiate third-country membership of Copernicus, the EU’s other big
satellite scheme, in its trade talks with Brussels. If this fails, the British
space industry would only be allowed to participate in the procurement of the
R&D elements of the Sentinels satellites, but they would be banned from
taking part in the recurring manufacturing stages, a very lucrative part of the
procurement process.
What can
they do about it?
Mini-deals
on U.K. participation in EU schemes could be struck later provided there’s
still willingness from both sides. It is not completely clear yet which EU
programs the U.K. wants to take part in. The European Defence Fund for defense
R&D and the cultural scheme Creative Europe appear to have been ruled out.
When it
comes to Horizon Europe, it could be easier for the U.K. to join as a third
country rather than as an associate member. But this would likely exclude it
from some parts of the scheme and prevent U.K. researchers from leading
consortiums.
— Cristina
Gallardo
Pet travel
How bad
could it get? 💥
What
happens immediately?
The U.K.
government has submitted its application to the European Commission to join a
system that allows dogs, cats and ferrets with valid EU pet passports to travel
with their owners between EU countries without undergoing quarantine.
If this is
rejected, holidays with pets will be much more complicated because they will
need to be microchipped, vaccinated against rabies, and have their blood tested
for rabies. Blood samples would be sent to an EU-approved blood testing
laboratory and owners in the U.K. would have to wait for up to three months for
approval to travel.
What can
they do about it?
The two
sides could continue to negotiate after the end of the transition period — this
process is technically separate to trade talks.
— Cristina
Gallardo
Gibraltar
How bad
could it get? 💥💥💥
What
happens immediately?
Failure of
the future relationship talks could lead to Spain shutting down its border with
Gibraltar.
Without a
bilateral deal or an alternative such as Gibraltar’s association to the
Schengen passport-free area, the circulation of citizens would be seriously
restricted, since the EU’s freedom of movement would end.
What can
they do about it?
Negotiations
on Gibraltar’s post-Brexit status are taking place in parallel to the trade
talks and involve the governments of the Rock, Spain and the U.K., which
handles Gibraltar’s foreign policy. So any deal on Gibraltar should be included
in any wider deal about the future relationship between the U.K. and the EU,
which means a no-deal would derail these discussions too and Gibraltar would
just have to hope for a restart.
— Cristina Gallardo


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário