Mass protests in London put other police
priorities at risk, MPs warn
Comments by home affairs select committee have
concerned defenders of civil liberties
Rajeev Syal
Home affairs editor
Mon 26 Feb
2024 19.01 EST
Frequent
and disruptive mass protests in central London are a drain on police resources
and are putting other policing priorities at risk, an influential committee of
MPs has claimed.
In comments
that have concerned defenders of civil liberties, the home affairs select
committee said the size and frequency of protests over the conflict in Gaza
have placed significant pressures on police resources as the Metropolitan
police attempt to implement a “culture change” and train thousands of new
officers.
The
committee proposed that the government should consider expanding the
requirements for protest organisers, such as increasing the minimum notice
period of six days, to enable the police to better prepare.
The
suggestion, which comes after a new law was introduced making it easier for the
police to put conditions on peaceful protests, has drawn staunch defences of
the right to demonstrate.
Tom
Southerden, Amnesty International UK’s law and human rights director, said:
“There has been a major crackdown on the right to peaceful protest in this
country, and yet more laws to curb protests and activism are being proposed.
“As it
stands, the problem with protest in this country is not that there’s too much
of it, but that the government has handed ever more sweeping powers to police
to curtail it.”
Ruth
Ehrlich, head of policy and campaigns at Liberty, said: “Protest is not a
burden on society or public bodies – it is one of the most fundamental parts of
our democracy and one we must proudly protect.”
In a report
released on Tuesday, the committee noted that the successive and large-scale
nature of the Israel-Gaza protests, as well as organisations such as Just Stop
Oil using disruptive tactics, had presented new challenges for the police.
The extra
demands come as the Met is “attempting to carry out a massive and necessary
culture change exercise, at the same time as it is failing to recruit its full
allocation of new officers as part of the police uplift programme”, the report
said.
Should the
Israel-Gaza protests continue indefinitely, police would be less able to carry
out the everyday neighbourhood and response policing, MPs said.
“If the
protests continue to take place as frequently at this scale, the Home Office
should consider amending requirements for protest organisers, such as
increasing the notice period for protest organisers to inform the police from
the current six days, to allow the police to prepare better,” the report said.
Senior
police officers told the committee that the wellbeing of officers was being put
at risk, with more than 4,000 rest days cancelled in a three-month period to
ensure protests could be policed safely.
MPs called
for police forces to be given greater support, with a comprehensive workforce
plan put in place to identify and respond to demand on resources nationwide.
The
committee also noted that the government’s hate crime action plan expired in
2020 and has not yet been updated. “Urgent action needs to be taken to set out
the government’s strategy for dealing with hate crime,” the report said.
The
committee also noted that there had been Israel-Gaza demonstrations outside
MPs’ homes and offices. “In a democratic society, elected representatives must
be able to do their job in accordance with their conscience and free from
intimidation,” the report said.
Diana
Johnson, the chair of the committee, said: “The hard-won right to protest is a
vital part of our democratic process and must be protected. So must the right
for everyone to feel safe on our streets, at their workplace or private home –
including elected representatives, their staff and families.
“It is
clear that the current demands on [police] resourcing and the level of
complexity in policing protests are unsustainable without proper reinforcement.
It is vital that the right framework is in place to ensure that protests can
continue without the burden on policing becoming intolerable and without
regularly taking resources away from communities that have their own local
crime-fighting challenges.”
.jpg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário