Markets turbulence pushes Liz Truss to the brink
Senior Conservatives question whether prime minister
can survive U-turn on her fiscal plans
© FT
Montage/Getty Images
https://www.ft.com/content/062bb647-14fa-4e8d-bb2f-397edada5dc2
When Kwasi
Kwarteng told the media in Washington he was “not going anywhere”, Conservative
MPs joked about whether the chancellor meant he was staying in his job or
remaining abroad. One Whitehall official quipped: “Maybe he can seek political
asylum.”
Although
Kwarteng, speaking on Thursday at the annual IMF meetings, insisted “our
position has not changed” on his £43bn of unfunded tax cuts, the government’s
“mini” Budget has unleashed turmoil on financial markets and forced Liz Truss
to consider a U-turn on the proposals.
The chaos
has also raised questions about whether Truss and Kwarteng can survive: at
Westminster, Conservative MPs were discussing who could replace Truss as prime
minister, with some also saying the chancellor would have to go. The Tories’
ratings have plunged in opinion polls since the “mini” Budget.
Conservative
party rules would have to be changed to oust Truss quickly. But one veteran
Tory official said if Sir Graham Brady, chair of the 1922 committee of
backbench Conservative MPs that organises leadership elections, received more
than 100 letters of no confidence in Truss, “he would have no choice but to do
something about it”. She has been prime minister for 37 days.
Truss’s
allies warned that her whole economic agenda would be hollowed out if she
performed a U-turn on the “mini” Budget unveiled on September 23. “It would
mean she is politically finished as a project,” said one senior Tory. “What
would be the point of a Truss government if it isn’t doing radical economic
reform?”
[A U-turn]
would mean she is politically finished as a project. What would be the point of
a Truss government if it isn’t doing radical economic reform?
Senior Tory
Government
insiders said Downing Street was considering jettisoning big chunks of
Kwarteng’s fiscal statement, including the proposal to reverse a planned rise
in corporation tax that would cost £18bn a year by 2026. Number 10, as with
Kwarteng, said nothing had changed.
But George
Osborne, a former Tory chancellor, said a significant retreat from the “mini”
Budget before Kwarteng sets out on October 31 how he will cut UK government
debt was inescapable.
“Given the
pain being caused to the real economy by the financial turbulence, it’s not
clear why it is in anyone’s interests to wait 18 more days before the
inevitable u-turn on the mini budget,” he wrote on Twitter.
Lord Norman
Lamont, who was the Tory chancellor on “Black Wednesday” in 1992 when John Major’s
government was humiliated by sterling’s ejection from the European exchange
rate mechanism, said a U-turn was the least worst option for Truss.
“Sometimes
it’s said that politics is the art of the possible. I think it’s the art of
choosing between the incredible and the utterly impossible,” he told the BBC.
One Truss
ally suggested that scrapping the corporation tax plan, if agreed, might be
presented as “a readjustment given global market conditions”. The government
has been keen to blame the market turmoil since the “mini” Budget on global
factors rather than accept it stems from UK specific issues.
There was
no consensus in Truss’s team about what precise elements of Kwarteng’s fiscal
statement should be dropped and how soon. “The U-turn has been briefed out
before the policy was decided,” said one official.
Some
government insiders blamed the chaos on a lack of senior officials in Number
10, with several of Truss’s aides on holiday and Kwarteng in Washington. One
civil servant described the mood in Number 10 on Thursday as “grim”.
The lack of
experience among Truss’s team was highlighted by MPs who claimed it was not
equipped for a crisis. “She has no good advisers,” said one Whitehall official.
One civil
servant said there was “a lack of decision-making in Number 10” and paralysis
across Whitehall. “There’s inexperience and naivety in [Truss’s] team not
realising what a mess they’ve created.”
Another
official added: “They simply don’t know how to govern.”
If Truss
ditches more of the “mini” Budget, after dropping her plan to scrap the 45p top
rate of income tax at the Tory conference following oppositions from MPs,
questions will immediately be raised about whether Kwarteng can remain as
chancellor. One Treasury veteran said: “The answer must be to blame him, fire
him and start again and hope that in two years' time [at the next election]
this is a distant memory.”
A
government insider said Truss did not have any alternative but to U-turn on the
unfunded tax cuts and fire Kwarteng. “Her only options politically are binning
much of the ‘mini’ Budget, sacking Kwarteng, blaming him. But I doubt she is
there yet,” he added.
Sajid
Javid, who briefly served as chancellor in Boris Johnson’s government, was
widely seen by ministers as the only viable contender to replace Kwarteng. “Saj
is the only one who is close enough to her agenda who can have some credibility
with markets,” said one minister.
But should
Kwarteng be forced out, attention is likely to rapidly focus on Truss and
whether she can survive as prime minister. Sir John Curtice, a leading
psephologist, said Truss was now as unpopular as Major in the aftermath of
Black Wednesday.
“She is
more unpopular than Boris Johnson was at the worst period of his premiership,
which was in the middle of January this year when the partygate scandal was at
its height,” Curtice told the BBC.
Senior
Tories were sceptical about Truss’s prospects if Kwarteng were to be forced
out. “The idea that the prime minister can junk her ‘mini’ Budget and her
chancellor without taking responsibility herself is for the birds,” said one
former minister. “She is first lord of the Treasury. It was her Budget and her
catastrophic error of judgment.”
Paul
Goodman, editor of the ConservativeHome website, suggested that a potential
joint ticket of former chancellor Rishi Sunak and leader of the Commons Penny
Mordaunt could unite to oust Truss.
But few
Tories see an obvious successor to Truss, or an easy way to install a new party
leader and prime minister without further turmoil.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário