quarta-feira, 22 de julho de 2026

Fakir Abderrahim dies in handcuffs in Bologna: police officers and medical staff under investigat..


Details of the Incident

  • The Arrest: On July 19, 2026, police were called to the Pilastro neighborhood in Bologna, northern Italy, after residents reported a man behaving aggressively and damaging a vehicle.
  • The Death: Bystander video footage widely shared on social media showed officers pinning Fakir face-down on the pavement while he desperately screamed for help and pleaded that he could not breathe. He subsequently lost consciousness and died at the scene. Reports indicate he may have been experiencing a psychiatric episode, panic, or an asthma attack.

Aftermath and Repercussions

  • Protests: The incident has drawn strong comparisons to the 2020 killing of George Floyd in the United States. It sparked massive, widespread anti-police demonstrations and severe civil unrest in Italian cities like Bologna, Milan, and Turin.
  • Investigations: Bologna prosecutors launched a manslaughter investigation. At least six people—including two police officers and four emergency medical crew members who stood by—have been placed under preliminary investigation.
  • Diplomatic Action: Morocco’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs officially intervened, demanding that Italian authorities provide full clarity and establish strict legal responsibility for Fakir's death

Chaos erupts on the streets of Italy as anti-police protesters turn violent

 

Local resident after deadly shooting near the Four Days Marches: 'This is really impactful' / Man arrested after fatal shooting near Vierdaagse festivities


Man arrested after fatal shooting near Vierdaagse festivities

July 22, 2026

https://www.dutchnews.nl/2026/07/man-arrested-after-fatal-shooting-near-vierdaagse-festivities/

 

Police in Nijmegen have arrested a man in connection with a fatal shooting on Tuesday evening, just outside the area where the Vierdaagsefeesten, the street festivities accompanying the annual four-day marches, were taking place.

 

A young man was shot at around 10pm on the Graafseweg and died later in hospital despite the efforts of ambulance crews and a trauma helicopter team, broadcaster NOS reported. The arrested man is suspected of involvement in the shooting, police said. The circumstances remain unclear.

 

The city centre was busy at the time because of the marches, which began on Tuesday, and the accompanying festivities. Police told news agency ANP they saw no link between the shooting and the event itself.

 

The area around the Graafseweg remained cordoned off on Wednesday morning for forensic investigation. Police are looking into whether more people were involved and have appealed for witnesses to come forward.


Trump Declares New TRADE WAR On Canada

Spain in REVOLT as 1.3 MILLION migrants FLOOD coast and prosecutors LOCK UP 'corrupt' politicians

How is Spain’s mass migration experiment going?

Scandal after scandal lands Spain’s Sánchez on the ropes

 


Scandal after scandal lands Spain’s Sánchez on the ropes

 

It’s becoming increasingly difficult for coalition allies to stick with the prime minister as the scale of alleged Socialist party corruption swells.

 

May 28, 2026 4:00 am CET

By Guy Hedgecoe

https://www.politico.eu/article/scandal-after-scandal-lands-spain-pedro-sanchez-on-the-ropes/

 

MADRID — Pummelled by corruption crises and stinging defeats in regional elections, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is running out of road.

 

Investigators raided the headquarters of his Socialist party on Wednesday in a probe into the misuse of party funds. That would have been bad enough in itself, but it’s only the latest episode in a blizzard of corruption scandals weighing on the party.

 

Conservative opposition leader Alberto Núñez Feijóo said the government is now in its “death throes” and demanded that Sánchez resign and call elections. “How many more raids? How many more kickbacks?” he asked.

 

For now, Sánchez’s fragile coalition is holding firm but it is becoming increasingly awkward for his allies to stick with him as the scale of the alleged Socialist party corruption comes into focus. Officially, Spain does not have to hold elections until next August but the prime minister may be forced for move earlier.

 

Much attention will center on a particularly high-profile case involving former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. He is due to appear in court on June 17 and the revelations are proving increasingly damaging for Sánchez.

 

It’s a complicated saga, but POLITICO will guide you through the key elements of the scandals that are submerging Spain’s leader.

 

Let’s start with Zapatero. What happened there?

An investigating judge suspects former Prime Minister Zapatero of leading a criminal network that used his influence to secure a €53 million Covid-era government bailout for Plus Ultra airline in 2021. Zapatero, investigators allege, received a total of €2.6 million from the network, which had links to Venezuela and China. The judge alleges much of the money went through companies run by his jogging partner, Julio Martínez, while a firm belonging to the former prime minister’s two daughters received a large portion of the funds. Zapatero, who has been charged with criminal organization, influence peddling and falsifying documents, denies any wrongdoing.

 

But Zapatero isn’t in the government, so this shouldn’t be too bad for Sánchez, right?

Wrong. Zapatero, who governed Spain from 2004 to 2011, has become a close ally of Sánchez, fiercely defending his government’s policies and being deployed to manage delicate negotiations with Basque and Catalan parliamentary allies. He is seen as an ideological soul-mate of Sánchez. What’s more, Sánchez was in government when the airline was bailed out, so questions are going to be asked about whether due process was followed when that decision was made.

 

What does Sánchez himself say about this?

So far, he’s stood resolutely by his predecessor. He has declared his administration’s “full cooperation with the justice system, full respect for the presumption of innocence of Mr Zapatero and all my support for [him].”

 

This isn’t the only scandal affecting the Sánchez government, is it?

No. Last June, Sánchez was forced to apologize after it emerged that his confidant and Socialist Party No. 3, Santos Cerdán, was under investigation for involvement in a massive public contract kickback scheme. Also caught up in that scandal was José Luis Ábalos, a former senior figure in the Socialist Party and transport minister, who had already been under investigation. Deepening the party’s embarrassment, evidence also emerged that Ábalos paid prostitutes on a number of occasions. Both men have denied involvement in the kickback scheme.

 

Ábalos has already gone on trial once, alongside his former adviser, Koldo García and businessman Víctor de Aldama, accused of taking kickbacks from the purchase of €50 million-worth of facemasks during the pandemic. They are awaiting the verdict but are expected to face trial again in the future over other probes.

 

That all sounds pretty serious.

It is, although the immediate fallout from Ábalos’ involvement was mitigated by the fact he had left the cabinet in 2021 and was kicked out of the party soon after he came under suspicion, in 2024. The Cerdán case was worse because Sánchez had defended his innocence in the face of lurid media reports, right up until details of the investigation were made public, when he was still a senior figure in the party.

 

So the Socialist Party is in the center of the storm here?

Yes, and on Wednesday, police seized documents from the Socialist headquarters in central Madrid as part of a probe into allegations that party money had been used to pay journalist Leire Díez to wage a campaign to undermine legal cases affecting the government and its allies. She denies any wrongdoing and has claimed she was researching a book. Among those named as suspects in this case are Cerdán and Ana María Fuentes, the Socialist Party’s federal director. Separately, Díez is being investigated for misuse of public funds.

 

Are there any more cases affecting Sánchez?

Yes, actually. In November, the attorney general, Álvaro García Ortiz, a government pick, was found guilty of revealing secrets in a highly controversial case. García Ortiz was accused of making public the tax affairs of the boyfriend of Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the populist, conservative president of the Madrid region, who had committed tax fraud. Although no direct evidence against García Ortiz was presented, he was barred from office for two years.

 

OK, but at least Sánchez himself is not directly implicated in any of these cases, is he?

No, but some of his family are. Since 2024, a judge has been zealously investigating the business and professional affairs of his wife, Begoña Gómez, naming her as a suspect in several alleged crimes. Also, Sánchez’s musician brother, David, is currently on trial in the southern city of Badajoz, accused of influence peddling in his appointment to a local musical director post in 2017. Among his co-defendants are several local Socialist Party members. Sánchez has drawn a distinction between probes such as those into Ábalos and Cerdán, and those he deems politically motivated, like the cases involving his brother and his wife, the latter. He has described the latter as an “obscene farce.”

 

So how bad is all this for Sánchez?

Patience is wearing thin. Feijóo’s comments that Sánchez should go are entirely expected as are, to an extent, calls for next year’s general election to be brought forward by former Socialist Prime Minister Felipe González and the party’s powerful president of Castilla-La Mancha, Emiliano García-Page, both regular Sánchez critics. The key question is where the coalition and parliamentary partners stand. So far, there is no sign of an outright rebellion, but tensions are rising. The Basque Nationalist Party is warning it would be “very difficult” for Sánchez to see out the full legislature. The far-left Sumar party and the Republican Left of Catalonia are also warning that solid evidence of illegal party financing will be a red line for them.

 

Besides the legal cases, how are Sánchez and the Socialists doing?

It’s been a painful election season. A recent quartet of regional elections only deepened the gloom for Sánchez. In all four, the Socialists lost to the People’s Party. Earlier this month in Andalusia, once a Socialist stronghold, the party slumped to its worst result ever, under the candidacy of former Deputy Prime Minister María Jesús Montero — seen as a sign that the national leadership brand could be toxic. Polls suggest that if a general election were held tomorrow, the People’s Party would win and could form a majority with the far-right Vox party.

 

Can Sánchez hang on?

Much will hinge on how the current investigations play out, particularly the one involving Zapatero, with its potential to embroil the government. If illegal party financing is confirmed that is also likely to break the coalition. Sánchez is vowing to dig in and serve out the full term until summer 2027, saying he will only call a vote when it is in “the general interest of the citizens.” In truth, however, his hand may be forced by events.

The all family of Pedro sanchez is rotten to the core

 


The all family of Pedro sanchez is rotten to the core

The family of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is currently at the center of high-profile legal battles and corruption investigations. While the conservative and far-right opposition parties argue that these cases reveal systemic corruption within his inner circle, Sánchez and his supporters maintain that the allegations are part of a politically motivated smear campaign ("lawfare").

The legal situations involving his immediate family members include:

David Sánchez (Brother)

  • The Conviction: On July 14, 2026, David Sánchez, a classical musician, was convicted of administrative misconduct by a court in Badajoz.
  • The Penalty: He was handed a nine-year ban from holding public office
  • The Case: The court ruled that a public-sector musical director role was specifically "tailor-made" for him in 2017 without any genuine administrative or public need. However, the court dismissed the more severe charge of influence peddling, which could have carried prison time.

Begoña Gómez (Wife)

  • The Status: Begoña Gómez is facing a jury trial for corruption and influence peddling.
  • The Restrictions: In June 2026, an investigating judge ordered her to surrender her passport and barred her from leaving Spain.
  • The Case: Following a two-year investigation, she is accused of using her influence as the prime minister's spouse to secure a position at Madrid’s Complutense University and to improperly benefit companies with which she had personal and professional ties. She strongly denies any wrongdoing.

Political Context

These family scandals are compounded by separate investigations into Sánchez’s broader political circle, including a 24-year prison sentence handed down to his former transport minister and right-hand man, José Luis Ábalos, in June 2026 for a pandemic-era face mask kickback scheme.

The opposition, led by the center-right People's Party (PP), has used these developments to demand Sánchez's immediate resignation. Prime Minister Sánchez, who initially came to power in 2018 on an anti-corruption platform, has not been directly implicated or named in any of the cases. He has vowed to defend his family's innocence and intends to serve out his full term until August 2027.

 

Spain’s Political Crisis Explained | Interview with Pablo SimónTitle Goes Here

The One Question That Changes Everything About Immigration

Rupert Lowe on Mass Deportations & Disagreeing with Nigel Farage and official Reform Party Policy

 

Oxford's Top Migration Expert Fact Checks Britain's Immigration Debate

 


New Book: What Is Immigration Policy For? By Madeleine Sumption

Published 31 March 2026

https://www.anthro.ox.ac.uk/article/new-book-what-immigration-policy-madeleine-sumption

 

A deeply researched look at the debate around immigration policy, and possible paths forward.

 

Does political rhetoric on immigration policy match what is actually happening on the ground? Why do well-intentioned plans fail? Could immigration policy be done better?

 

This book explores what immigration policy seeks to achieve and why so many people end up unhappy with the outcome. Drawing on decades of research and examples from high-income countries around the world, it exposes the unavoidable trade-offs governments face, and the impacts of their choices on people and communities.

 

It reveals how we got here, why the policy challenge is so difficult, and how we get to a better place.

 

Dr Madeleine Sumption is the Director of the Migration Observatory at the Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, and a world-renowned expert on migration.


New Book: What Is Immigration Policy For? By Madeleine Sumption

Published 31 March 2026

https://www.anthro.ox.ac.uk/article/new-book-what-immigration-policy-madeleine-sumption

 

A deeply researched look at the debate around immigration policy, and possible paths forward.

 

Does political rhetoric on immigration policy match what is actually happening on the ground? Why do well-intentioned plans fail? Could immigration policy be done better?

 

This book explores what immigration policy seeks to achieve and why so many people end up unhappy with the outcome. Drawing on decades of research and examples from high-income countries around the world, it exposes the unavoidable trade-offs governments face, and the impacts of their choices on people and communities.

 

It reveals how we got here, why the policy challenge is so difficult, and how we get to a better place.

 

Dr Madeleine Sumption is the Director of the Migration Observatory at the Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, and a world-renowned expert on migration.


‘He’s made enemies’ – inside Burnham’s brutal Cabinet purge | Quite right!

 

While the timeline of events looks undeniably dramatic, calling Keir Starmer's resignation a "machiavellian trap" overstates his agency.

 


While the timeline of events looks undeniably dramatic, calling Keir Starmer's resignation a "machiavellian trap" overstates his agency. Starmer was backed into a corner by internal party pressure and poor local election results, but his sudden exit intentionally denied Burnham’s team the long, quiet transition they desired.

Why the Quick Exit Felt Like a Trap

  • Burnham's Unpreparedness: Starmer’s camp decided "not to give them that luxury" of a long summer to transition, forcing Burnham into office without a fully formed cabinet or a clear manifesto.
  • The Defence "Bomb": Right before resigning, Starmer's government pushed through a defence investment plan with a nearly £5 billion funding black hole, which was described by Burnham's allies as an "unexploded bomb" left for the new administration.

The View from Within Labour

  • Reluctant Departure: Starmer actually tried to resist calls to step down initially, only ceding to the "intense pressure" of his MPs after significant discontent.
  • Burnham’s Own Faults: Even political analysts noted that Burnham's own "lightning-quick march on No. 10" contributed to his unpreparedness, as he delayed key personnel decisions upon taking office.

 

'A source said...' Keir Starmer's SECRET PLOT to Destroy Burnham | Daily Expresso

Reaction to Alastair Campbell, Nigel Farage and Andy Burnham as PM

This is the most interesting choice Andy Burnham has made | Andrew Neil reacts

Andy Burnham U-TURNS on tax just DAYS after becoming PM

Trump May Need To Use Marines To Reopen Strait Of Hormuz | David Hale

Trump ‘Totally Incapable’ Of Understanding Iran War | Retired US General

 

Prince Mohammed has vowed he would build nuclear weapons if Iran does so, even insisting in one interview he would do so “without a doubt.”

 


Prince Mohammed has vowed he would build nuclear weapons if Iran does so, even insisting in one interview he would do so “without a doubt.”

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman made this exact pledge during a landmark CBS "60 Minutes" interview, stating, “Saudi Arabia does not want to acquire any nuclear bomb, but without a doubt, if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible.” This position has served as a foundational element of Saudi Arabia's strategic defense posture amid its regional rivalry with Iran.

The Context and Strategic Pivot

The Crown Prince's long-standing warning heavily shapes current geopolitical alignments in the Middle East:

  • Balancing Regional Power: The Kingdom views potential nuclear weapons acquisition strictly as a security necessity to offset Iranian capabilities.
  • The U.S. Diplomatic Accord: In a major development, the United States has finalized a broad civilian nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia, commonly referred to as a "123 Agreement".
  • Uranium Enrichment Breakthrough: This newly finalized deal establishes a framework that could grant Riyadh access to domestic uranium enrichment capabilities.
  • Nonproliferation Debate: The agreement has fueled intense scrutiny from arms control organizations, such as the Arms Control Association, due to concerns that it could inadvertently set off a regional nuclear arms race.

 

Saudis Reach Deal With U.S. That Could Let Them Enrich Nuclear Fuel


Prince Mohammed has vowed he would build nuclear weapons if Iran does so, even insisting in one interview he would do so “without a doubt.”



Saudis Reach Deal With U.S. That Could Let Them Enrich Nuclear Fuel

 

U.S. lawmakers and Israeli officials have expressed opposition to such a plan, to be announced Wednesday, fearing that the kingdom could use a civilian nuclear project to develop nuclear weapons.

 

David E. SangerEdward WongWilliam J. Broad

By David E. SangerEdward Wong and William J. Broad

David Sanger reported from Washington, Edward Wong from Manila, where he is covering a diplomatic trip by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and William J. Broad from New York.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/21/us/politics/trump-saudi-nuclear-deal.html

July 21, 2026

 

The Trump administration plans to announce Wednesday that it has reached a broad nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia that could lead to the country enriching its own fuel for nuclear reactors, U.S. officials said.

 

The accord is intended to further bind the United States with the Saudi government as the war with Iran strains the relationship. The Trump administration, according to officials, estimates it will provide billions of dollars for the U.S. nuclear industry — starting with Westinghouse, which designs many of the reactors sold abroad.

 

The Trump administration plans to formally sign and announce the agreement with the Saudis on Wednesday, said two U.S. officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy. It would announce the details to Congress soon afterward.

 

Although the agreement likely would have support among many Republicans, some U.S. lawmakers from both parties along with Israeli officials have expressed opposition to such a plan, fearing that the kingdom could use a civilian nuclear project to eventually develop nuclear weapons.

 

The accord has been under discussion for years, and during the Biden administration it was envisioned as part of a broader deal that would include Saudi diplomatic recognition of Israel. But after the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel by Hamas, that prospect receded. President Trump separated the proposal for U.S.-Saudi civilian nuclear cooperation from any demand that Saudi Arabia recognize Israel.

 

The agreement will require review by Congress, which under the Atomic Energy Act has the power to vote a resolution of disapproval. But as a practical matter, the agreement would likely pass, because Congress would have to assemble a veto-proof majority to override Mr. Trump’s initiative.

 

Nonetheless, debate over the accord is likely to be fierce. To get the deal done with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the country’s 40-year-old de facto leader, Mr. Trump had to agree to terms that may limit international inspectors from going to any sites in the country that they think could be a pathway to diverting fuel to weapons projects.

And he agreed that, after a joint study with Saudi Arabia on the economics of producing nuclear fuel, the Saudis may be allowed to enrich uranium or reprocess plutonium on their soil.

 

The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday night that Mr. Trump had approved the agreement.

 

Prince Mohammed has vowed he would build nuclear weapons if Iran does so, even insisting in one interview he would do so “without a doubt.”

 

Iran has had a nuclear program that it says is intended for civilian use, though it has enriched uranium to near weapons grade following Mr. Trump’s withdrawal in 2018 from an Obama-era nuclear deal. Mr. Trump then ordered U.S. forces to join with Israel to attack Iran’s nuclear sites in June 2025, and to start a war against Iran this February.

 

Mr. Trump and Prince Mohammed agreed to proceed with U.S.-Saudi civilian nuclear cooperation during a visit to the White House by the prince last November. U.S. and Saudi officials have been in talks on a plan since then. They were finalizing the details this spring and summer, and aimed to share the plan with Congress soon, The New York Times reported earlier this month.

 

The agreement includes two secret side letters reached with the Saudis. The administration is expected to argue they contain proprietary business information and deal with sensitive national security issues. But some members of Congress may not be willing to vote for the accord until the letters are all made public.

 

The type of deal that the Trump administration has reached with Saudi Arabia is called a 123 Agreement (pronounced 1-2-3), which establishes a legally binding framework between nations on nuclear cooperation. The obligations of such an agreement are aimed at ensuring non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. The United States has 26 such agreements with 51 governments and the International Atomic Energy Agency.

 

Mr. Trump’s concessions to the Saudis on the terms of the nuclear deal are significant. When the United States entered into a similar agreement with the United Arab Emirates, which went into force in 2009, there were far more restrictive conditions. The U.A.E. agreed to the stringent inspections, signing what is called an “additional protocol” with the International Atomic Energy Agency. And it agreed to forgo the right to produce its own fuel, cutting off the possibility that it would have the infrastructure to produce a weapon.

 

That agreement became known as the “gold standard” for nuclear nonproliferation. And while the administration plans to argue that it will have other restrictions in place — including joint partnerships with the Saudis that will allow Washington to keep a close eye on the kingdom’s program — the fact remains that Mr. Trump has retreated from the restrictions negotiated by the Bush and Obama administrations.

 

While the bulk of the negotiations with the U.A.E. took place while President George W. Bush was in office, it was finished by President Barack Obama and went into effect in 2009.

 

During the first Trump administration, Thomas J. Barrack Jr., a businessman and top fund-raiser for Mr. Trump, proposed to the White House that U.S. companies, including his own private equity firm, help Saudi Arabia build nuclear power plants. That proposal stalled, in part because of Saudi reluctance to agree to American nonproliferation policies.

 

The Biden administration had talks with the Saudis on a civilian nuclear deal as part of a proposal that would have the kingdom recognize Israel.

 

In April 2025, soon after Mr. Trump returned to office, Chris Wright, the energy secretary, discussed a proposal with Prince Mohammed on a visit to the kingdom, six months before the prince’s visit to Washington, U.S. officials said.

 

Mr. Trump and Prince Mohammed clashed in May over U.S. aggression in the Iran war. The prince refused to let the U.S. military use Saudi airspace for an operation to escort commercial tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran’s forces essentially control. The civilian nuclear agreement helps put U.S.-Saudi relations on more stable ground again.

 

During the Biden administration, the United States and Saudi Arabia were also discussing a mutual defense agreement, as part of the broad plan that would include nuclear cooperation in exchange for Saudi recognition of Israel. The Saudis have long pressed U.S. officials for a mutual defense agreement that would be ratified by the Senate, so that future American presidents could not easily back out of one. Saudi officials wanted such an agreement in part to deter against Iranian aggression.

 

Mr. Trump and Prince Mohammed reached an understanding during the White House meeting last November on a defense arrangement between the two governments, which would include the sale of advanced F-35 fighter jets to the kingdom. But that fell short of a treaty that the administration would present to the Senate for ratification.

 

During the Iran war this year, Saudi Arabia has relied on the United States to provide interceptor missiles for air defense against Iranian projectiles. However, Saudi officials have concerns about whether American policy in the Middle East, including the U.S. partnership with Israel, is increasing risks to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Arab nations.

 

In part because of that, Saudi diplomats have been trying to hold talks with Iran. The two countries normalized diplomatic relations in 2023, in a deal brokered by China.

 

David E. Sanger covers the Trump administration and a range of national security issues. He has been a Times journalist for more than four decades and has written four books on foreign policy and national security challenges.

 

Edward Wong reports on global affairs, U.S. foreign policy and the State Department for The Times.

 

William J. Broad has reported on science at The Times since 1983. He is based in New York.


Kimi K3 explained in 13min..

Moonshot's Kimi K3 Model Surprises Wall Street and Silicon Valley

 

The current panic among Silicon Valley tech executives stems from the mid-July 2026 launch of Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 model, a Chinese breakthrough that has effectively erased the exclusive lead long held by American companies like OpenAI and Anthropic.

 


Tech Oligarchs MELTDOWN After China ERASES AI Edge

The current panic among Silicon Valley tech executives stems from the mid-July 2026 launch of Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 model, a Chinese breakthrough that has effectively erased the exclusive lead long held by American companies like OpenAI and Anthropic.

🤯 The Root of the Meltdown

The release of Kimi K3 has shocked the tech industry due to unexpected performance milestones:

  • Frontier Performance: Kimi K3 is performing at parity with leading closed-source American models, upending assumptions that export bans on high-end hardware would stall Chinese progress.
  • Disappearing Moats: Venture capitalists like David Sacks have openly warned that the U.S. risks permanently losing its AI dominance.
  • The ROI Crisis: Big Tech has spent tens of billions on hardware, but the rapid closing of the gap by Chinese labs threatens the pricing power and future IPO valuations of closed-source U.S. startups.

⚖️ The Geopolitical Backlash

The sudden erosion of the American edge has triggered an immediate response from Washington:

  • Sanctions Threats: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that Chinese AI firms face looming sanctions if investigations reveal they extracted or "stolen" proprietary data from U.S. frontier models to train their own systems.
  • Policy Escalation: Trump administration officials are actively moving to block American developers and users from accessing any open-weight or closed-source Chinese AI models over national security concerns.

 

Tech Oligarchs MELTDOWN After China ERASES AI Edge

ASEAN sounds alarm as US-Iran fighting threatens energy supplies | DW News

Oil Prices Rise as Trump Downplays Iran Peace Talks | Horizons Middle East & Africa 7/22/2026

 

How the Iran War Is Rewiring the Oil Market

 

Oil Buyers Battered by the Iran War Energy Crisis Race to Build Buffers




Oil Buyers Battered by the Iran War Energy Crisis Race to Build Buffers

 

As rising fuel costs clobber their economies, the Philippines and other developing countries in Asia are pushing to build strategic petroleum reserves to cushion against future shocks.

 

River Akira Davis

By River Akira Davis

River Akira Davis has covered the energy shocks around the world stemming from the war in Iran. She reported from Tokyo and Manila.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/21/business/asia-strategic-oil-reserves.html

July 21, 2026

 

Rodela Romero was attending an event at her church in northern Manila when her phone rang. It was a local reporter asking her to comment on what was being described to her as a nightmare scenario.

 

Ms. Romero, who oversees the oil industry at the Philippine Department of Energy, had been following news of the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran that day in late February. Now, the reporter told Ms. Romero, the Strait of Hormuz — the vital maritime choke point through which the Philippines imports enormous amounts of crude oil — had been shut.

 

“We import almost 100 percent of our petroleum products,” said Ms. Romero, 64. “We’re so vulnerable,” she recalled thinking at the time.

 

In the ensuing weeks, government officials scrambled to secure supply from alternative producers, at great cost. Gasoline prices doubled and diesel prices tripled, triggering transit strikes in Manila and a sudden spike in inflation that experts warned could push more than a million Filipinos into poverty.

 

 

On March 24, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. declared a national energy emergency. The Philippines was the first country to take such a step, highlighting the view that, outside the Middle East, the economic effects of the U.S.-Iran war are primarily a crisis for Asia.

 

Developing nations across Asia have been hit hard by the monthslong throttling of energy flows because of their deep reliance on Middle Eastern oil and gas. As clashes between the United States and Iran ramp up again, and shipping traffic in the Persian Gulf nears a halt, regional capitals in Asia are assessing how to prepare for a future of protracted instability.

 

The Philippines is leading what is expected to be a wave of developing nations seeking to build strategic petroleum reserves — stockpiles of crude oil that can be tapped during disruptions. Japan is offering financing and technical expertise, and officials in Tokyo say they are holding similar talks with Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam.

 

Japan’s involvement is part of an effort to bolster its regional energy security, according to Taro Han, a former official at Japan’s trade ministry, who recently joined The Asia Group, a consulting firm. Even with its own substantial stockpiles, Japan remains deeply dependent on Southeast Asian supply chains for goods made with oil byproducts, including medical supplies.

 

Just as the 1970s oil shocks transformed the global energy architecture — spurring 16 of the world’s largest economies to establish the International Energy Agency, which requires member states to hold a 90-day cushion of net oil imports — a similar structural shift is underway today.

 

The question is whether, as electrification and renewable energy proliferate, it is the right time for a wave of fast-growing, energy-hungry countries to commit hundreds of millions of dollars to amass fossil-fuel reserves.

 

Over the past five decades, the maintenance and periodic deployment of these reserves have helped stabilize global supply and prices. In March, the I.E.A. set off the largest coordinated release in its history to help steady oil markets after the outbreak of fighting in the Middle East.

 

Yet the release had a muted impact on economies in Asia that are heavily dependent on Persian Gulf imports but don’t have national strategic reserves. In the Philippines, the first and most dramatic effects were felt by drivers who faced soaring fuel costs.

 

“The impact on drivers’ incomes has been huge,” said Mody Floranda, the national president of Piston, a labor coalition representing drivers of jeepneys — the flamboyant, chrome-plated utility vehicles that zigzag along the streets of Manila. Jeepney drivers charge a base fare of about 13 pesos, or 21 U.S. cents, to ferry passengers who hop onto the open backs of their vehicles.

 

Mr. Floranda, 60, was speaking from the group’s headquarters in Manila, a wood-paneled room littered with megaphones, cardboard sardine boxes and protest signs calling for economic relief and an end to “the U.S. war of aggression.”

 

He said that the daily wage needed to support a family of five in the Philippines was estimated to be around 1,200 pesos, or $20, but given the current fuel prices, a driver who works 12 to 18 hours a day takes home only about 400 to 600 pesos. “This is obviously not enough,” he said.

 

In April, Piston filed a petition to raise fares by 10 pesos per ride to reflect higher diesel prices. The group is awaiting official government approval. “Ten pesos does not affect income that much,” Mr. Floranda said. “It’s merely to survive the high price of oil.”

 

The Philippine Institute for Development Studies, a state-run think tank, warned in a report in April that crude prices of around $105 a barrel could push more than 1.3 million Filipinos into poverty. Global oil prices rose above that level in the early stages of the war, and though they have recently traded lower, at around $90 a barrel, an uptick in fighting has incited renewed volatility.

 

While the acute-phase supply panic appears to have subsided, the economic damage is lingering as higher fuel costs bleed through the economy, inflating the price of everything, including food. “The impacts on poverty, welfare and growth are still unfolding,” said Adoracion Navarro, a senior research fellow at P.I.D.S.

 

The Asian Development Bank expects rising commodity costs to drag down growth. In a report released this month, the bank lowered its growth forecast for developing economies in Asia and the Pacific to 4.9 percent in 2026, a slowdown from 5.5 percent growth in 2025.

 

Recent A.D.B. board meetings have been dominated by discussion about how best to support the Philippines and other developing Asian countries particularly vulnerable to oil-supply disruptions. Officials have debated whether to help countries build emergency stockpiles or accelerate the transition away from oil.

 

Strategic petroleum stockpiles are expensive and time-consuming undertakings. Building a 90-day reserve is expected to cost nearly half a billion dollars for the Philippines. Crude oil also has a shelf life in storage, meaning that costs are ongoing.

 

Albert Park, the A.D.B.’s Manila-based chief economist, said he was cautious about recommending support for stockpiling oil.

 

“If you have an option to just scale up renewable energy and reduce dependence, that’s another way to build resilience,” he said. “Not to say you shouldn’t do it, but you’d better have a clearheaded understanding of the costs and benefits of that strategy because it’s expensive.”

 

Mr. Han, the former Japanese trade ministry official, said that Tokyo was advocating reserves that meet the I.E.A. benchmark of 90 days’ worth of demand. “We need a more long-term, comprehensive approach in order to strengthen our energy security in the region,” he said. Helping Asia build up reserves “is at the very core of our diplomacy at this particular moment,” he said.

 

At the Philippine Institute for Development Studies, Ms. Navarro thinks the answer is to build a modest level of strategic reserves, while also pushing for investments in energy efficiency, electric vehicle charging infrastructure and Manila’s skeletal rail networks.

 

“A 90-day reserve is a lot of money,” she said. “It’s I.E.A. levels, and we’re not yet an economically advanced country.”

 

The legislature in Manila is still conducting hearings on how to codify a strategic petroleum reserve policy into law. The Department of Energy is also looking into how to encourage the construction of more refineries, so that the Philippines will have the capacity to turn crude reserves into refined products like gasoline and diesel, according to Ms. Romero, the department official.

 

That was another vulnerability exposed recently, when China halted exports of refined petroleum products in March. It was a big blow to the Philippines, which relies on China’s diesel supplies.

 

In her office, tucked away in the back of a sun-bleached compound in Manila, Ms. Romero recounted when she received the news of China cutting off exports via another call from a local reporter.

 

That time she wasn’t at church. “Otherwise, I would have just prayed,” she said. “Prayed for a miracle.”

 

River Akira Davis covers Japan for The Times, including its economy and businesses, and is based in Tokyo.

We Are on the Edge of A Crisis

WAR UPDATE: Military Insider Gives Terrifying Prediction & Reveals How Unprepared America Truly Is


Nihilistic western leaders have been pushing for decades to have a major war with Russia. Former Royal Navy commander Steve Jermy says they’re about to get that war, and lose badly.

 

As a young naval aviator, Commodore Steve Jermy's first operational deployment was in the Falklands War flying from HMS Invincible. As a senior naval officer, his final operational deployment was in Afghanistan as Strategy Director in the British Embassy, Kabul. In between: at sea, he commanded 4 ships and a destroyer squadron; ashore, he served in 4 policy appointments in Britain’s Ministry of Defence and led British naval aviation as Commodore Fleet Air Arm. After leaving the navy, he worked for 15 years in the offshore energy sector. His qualifications include an MPhil from Cambridge University in International Relations, including International Economics, and he is the author of Strategy for Action: Using Force Wisely in the 21st Century. Having stepped down from the offshore energy sector, he now writes a Substack - https://stevejermy.substack.com - and is a regular YouTube interviewee on geopolitics, war, economics, energy, and their intersection. https://stevejermy.substack.com/p/principl...


Peter Magyar Calls For Unity President | Chess Legend Judit Polgar Considered

 

Hungary's Viktor Orban urges supporters to stand up against PM Magyar's 'tyranny'

 


Hungary's Viktor Orban urges supporters to stand up against PM Magyar's 'tyranny'

By Reuters

July 22, 20269:59 AM GMT+2Updated 1 hour ago

https://www.reuters.com/world/hungarys-viktor-orban-urges-supporters-stand-up-against-pm-magyars-tyranny-2026-07-22/

 

BUDAPEST, July 22 (Reuters) - Hungary's former nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who was ousted after 16 years in power in an election in April, has urged his supporters to restore democracy in the country which he said had been crushed by the new government.

In his first strong political statement since his landslide election defeat, Orban late on Tuesday issued a "Statement of Resistance" on Facebook shortly after his Fidesz party said prosecutors had raided offices housing its internet servers.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

Prosecutors told Reuters in an emailed response that the action was linked to an investigation into "misappropriation and other criminal offences" at the National Culture Fund under Orban's government.

Orban told reporters that prosecutors had taken servers containing a database and emails of party members, which he said was a politically motivated move to make it legally impossible for Fidesz to operate.

"The National Culture Fund issue was just a pretext for this," Orban said, adding that there had been no wrongdoing.

In his Facebook post, Orban said Hungary had "ceased to be a democratic state" after the new centre-right government of Prime Minister Peter Magyar passed a constitutional amendment ending the mandate of the president and the head of the constitutional court.

Tisza denies taking an authoritarian stance towards political opponents. It has pledged to curb corruption, which it says was rampant under Orban's administration, part of Tisza's drive to bring Hungary back into the EU mainstream.

Orban himself faced heavy criticism during his rule over democratic standards in Hungary, and was in frequent conflict with the EU over issues such as the rule of law and minority rights.

Orban has denied the corruption allegations.

"The new political system created this way is illegitimate...Fidesz will use all peaceful tools against abuse of power inside parliament and outside parliament," Orban said.

Magyar's Tisza party has a supermajority in parliament, which enables it to roll back changes introduced by Orban that Magyar says harmed democracy.

The constitutional amendment ended President Tamas Sulyok's term, citing society's "serious loss of confidence" in a leader elected in 2024 by lawmakers from Orban's Fidesz party. Parliament will soon elect a new president.

Magyar's Tisza commands huge public support, with a poll by pollster Median earlier this month showing 60% support, against 18% for Fidesz. Since the election, Fidesz has been in disarray, with its parliamentary group leader resigning last week.

Media Actions Taken

 


Clarifying the Facts

  • Political Context: Following the April 2026 landslide election, Péter Magyar and his centre-right, pro-EU Tisza party took office in May 2026, ending 16 years of rule by Viktor Orbán.
  • Media Actions Taken: Instead of arresting journalists, PM Magyar actually suspended state public media broadcasts. He took this action to structurally overhaul what he described as an “entrenched illiberal propaganda system” and a "factory of lies" built under the previous administration.
  • Origin of Arrest/Espionage Allegations: The rumors regarding state-targeted journalists stem from an entirely separate incident prior to the election. In March 2026, the outgoing Orbán administration filed controversial espionage charges against prominent investigative journalist Szabolcs Panyi. Panyi had exposed sensitive details regarding Russian influence operations within Orbán's cabinet.

The Current State of Hungarian Governance