Denmark
announces one of the world’s most ambitious climate targets, while the rest of
the EU looks away
Governments
across the continent have attacked green rules with increasing ferocity – all
while professing their commitment to existing climate targets
Ajit
Niranjan
Ajit
Niranjan, Europe environment correspondent
Wed 19
Nov 2025 15.44 GMT
To little
fanfare and few international headlines, Denmark just announced one of the
world’s most ambitious climate targets.
The
unusually wind-powered and cycle-friendly Nordic nation – whose ruling Social
Democrats suffered a setback in elections on Tuesday – promised on Monday to
cut planet-heating pollution by at least 82% by 2035 from 1990 levels. The goal
inches past the UK’s landmark 81% target for that year and races ahead of the
EU’s rather wide goal of 66.3% to 72.5%.
Those
numbers may seem strange to celebrate given that most countries the UN
classifies as developed have already promised to reach net zero emissions by
the middle of the century. But climate scientists have long warned that the
path to a clean economy matters as much as the exact end date. Delay too much
action till the 2040s, as cash-strapped governments are wont to do, and even
those who go fully green by 2050 will risk having already pumped out too much
pollution.
Despite
these warnings, announcements such as Denmark’s are a rarity among the European
ministers attending the Cop30 climate summit in Brazil this month. Governments
across the continent have attacked green rules with increasing ferocity over
the past two years, rolling back existing policies and watering down new ones –
all while professing their commitment to existing climate targets.
The EU,
meanwhile, is energetically “simplifying” (read: rolling back) ambitious
climate policies under the banner of increasing the bloc’s competitiveness.
The
beating that Europe’s famous Green Deal is taking at home has begun to
undermine its pleas for urgent climate action on the world stage. European
countries are some of the biggest historical polluters of greenhouse gas, but
have long championed stronger action at UN summits. Last week, as negotiators
converged on the Amazonian city of Belém, situated on the edge of the
beleaguered rainforest, the European parliament voted to weaken a law to stop
deforestation in supply chains and to restrict the scope of its green business
rules.
The blow
to the corporate sustainability directive – the first of several “omnibus”
deregulation packages pushed by the commission – attracted anger from green
groups for removing an obligation on companies to create climate transition
plans. These would force firms to explain how they are aligning business
practices with the 1.5C global heating target, which countries agreed at a
landmark climate summit in Paris 10 years ago.
Adding
fuel to the fire, the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP) voted with the
far-right – who centrists have traditionally shunned – to win the vote. The
surprise breakdown of the EU firewall comes one month after the fraying cordon
sanitaire gave way in France, and in a year in which Germany’s Brandmauer has
been chipped.
Alberto
Alemanno, a law professor and founder of the Good Lobby, which last week
launched a tracker to monitor centre-right collaborations with the far-right,
said the vote “not only dismantles the Green Deal, but also redefines the
political majority governing Europe from now until 2029”.
“For the
first time in EU history, the pro-EU centrist parties that have built and
governed the EU since its inception are being sidelined,” he said. “And they
bear responsibility for their own demise.”
The
positions adopted last week will still need to be negotiated with the 27 EU
governments and the commission before final versions of the laws come into
force. And while the political firewall may be cracking, Europe has not
abandoned its efforts to stop heating the planet.
The EU’s
new climate target, also voted through by lawmakers last week, is ambitious
enough for diplomats to brag about in Brazil. It aims for a 90% drop in
greenhouse gas emissions by 2040 from 1990 levels – the minimum that its
scientific advisers recommend – though it leaves the door open for 5% of those
cuts to come from foreign carbon credits that scientists and journalists have
repeatedly found to be junk.
The
inclusion of such “flexibilities” – a compromise to win over member states
reluctant to sign off on a high headline figure – meant that the EU did not
turn up to Cop30 empty-handed. That in itself puts it ahead of other big
polluters such as China, which has become a clean energy powerhouse but refuses
to commit to ambitious targets, and the US, which did not even show up.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário