Do
heatwaves, wildfires and travel costs signal the end of the holiday abroad?
Leading
researcher forecasts ‘beginning of the age of non-tourism’ despite industry
returning to pre-pandemic highs
Ajit
Niranjan
Ajit
Niranjan
Sat 23
Aug 2025 12.00 BST
It was a
prediction nobody wanted to hear. On the main stage of the world’s biggest
tourism fair, Stefan Gössling, a leading researcher in sustainable transport,
had just calmly announced the looming death of the holiday industry.
“We have
already entered the beginning of the age of non-tourism,” said Gössling, to an
uneasy audience of travel agencies, car rental companies, cruise operators and
hoteliers.
That
prophecy may sound fanciful to holidaymakers in Europe and North America who
have been jetting off this summer – as well as to industry executives delighted
to see international tourism return to pre-pandemic highs last year – but
Gössling argues that as carbon pollution stokes heatwaves, fuels wildfires and
ruins harvests, the cost of foreign travel will soar, and fewer people will be
able to afford it.
“Eighty
years ago, mass tourism started in Europe,” said Gössling, a professor at the
business and economics school at Linnaeus University in Sweden, who has
consulted for the UN and the World Bank. “Eighty years from now, I’m doubtful
there will be much tourism left in the world.”
Gössling
is not short of examples of destinations already feeling the squeeze. Warm
weather is melting snow that keeps Alpine ski resorts alive. Coastal erosion is
stripping sand from southern European beaches. Droughts are forcing Spanish
hotels to ship in fresh water as swimming pools lie empty, while wildfires are
setting scenic Greek islands ablaze.
The South
Aegean islands in Greece, which include the tourist favourites Kos, Rhodes and
Mykonos, are the “single most critical” hotspot on the continent, according to
a study Gössling co-authored last month combining exposure to climate hazards
with dependence on tourism. Next are the Ionian islands, which include Corfu.
The
financial strain caused by these issues, which travel companies will probably
pass on to customers, will be compounded by the rising cost of food – from
coffee to chocolate to olive oil – and the increasing need for insurance
against extreme weather.
“At the
moment, it’s locally concentrated,” said Gössling, speaking to the Guardian
earlier this year at the ITB Berlin, the world’s largest gathering of tourism
companies. “But in the future, it will become more frequent, cover more places,
and turn into something disruptive.”
Whether
this rise in costs could outpace expected growth in global incomes is up for
debate – some damages can be avoided through adaptation, though this, too,
comes at a price – but tourists may feel the pinch even in scenarios that keep
volatile weather under control. If carbon pollution does fall sharply –
necessary to stop global heating – it will cost the most in sectors such as
aviation, which is limited by physical constraints.
Some
governments hope to slap carbon taxes on flights to help finance the energy
transition and compensate poor countries for damage caused by fossil fuels, and
green groups are pushing for a frequent flier levy, which would increase duties
for each extra flight in a year.
Despite
Gössling’s blunt assessment of the tourism industry’s efforts to decarbonise –
“what the whole sector is doing is greenwashing” – he is seen as a crucial
voice in the industry, with the conference billing his speech a “must-hear
session for anyone who cares about the future of travel and our planet”.
Some
things are moving in the right direction, he added, such as hotels putting
solar panels on their roofs and people beginning to acknowledge the problem.
“We have
a huge difficulty making the step from there to action,” said Gössling. “But
people have realised they are running into risks, and want to understand
business risks. The message is not welcome, but it certainly makes people
think.”
In
academic circles, Gössling is best-known for studies that put numbers on the
growing carbon footprint of tourism (8.8% of planet-heating pollution) and the
inequality in aviation emissions (only 2-4% of people fly abroad in a given
year). His finding that 1% of the world population are responsible for half the
emissions from air transport has underlined activists’ calls for governments to
make premium and business travel a priority.
“If that
group travelled half as much – which still is a lot, it probably would still be
sufficient even for business travellers – we could cut [aviation] emissions by
25%,” he said. “Just by making a very tiny group travel a little less.”
But he is
also quick to counter arguments that ordinary people in rich countries can keep
flying to far-flung places and justify it by pointing to even more polluting
demographics. “Our headache is long-haul travel,” he said, mentioning gap years
and Gen Z influencers who sell travel as an aspirational lifestyle.
“Everyone
sees tourism as a system, where governments and companies are responsible,”
said Gössling. “But we are the system. It’s our individual actions that
accumulate to global problems.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário