This article
is more than 3 months old
Britain’s
universities are in freefall – and saving them will take more than funding
Gaby
Hinsliff
Fundamental
restructuring must happen, along with an honest debate about what – and who –
higher education is really for
Fri 29 Mar
2024 06.00 GMT
Imagine a
beach before the tsunami. Out at sea, the wave is gathering force, yet on the
sand people are still sunbathing, blissfully unaware. That’s how it feels, one
professor tells me, to be working in higher education. Academics by their
nature don’t look outwards much, he argues, so not all have registered the risk
to their profession. “But something absolutely dreadful is coming.”
As a
scientist working in cancer research at a top British university, he’s not the
kind of academic I expected to be worried about the recent nationwide flurry of
threatened redundancies in higher education, the scrapping of what, so far, are
mainly arts and language courses, or shrill political attacks on supposedly
“woke” campus culture. But lately almost everyone in higher education seems
jumpy.
This week,
it was the University of Essex’s turn to hit the headlines by forecasting a
£13.8m shortfall, blaming a 38% drop in applications from foreign postgrad
students for its plans to freeze pay and promotions. But it merely joins the
University and College Union’s growing list of, so far, 39 institutions
planning cuts, ranging from ancient Russell Group names to relative minnows,
and from modest voluntary redundancy schemes to the £100m savings that Coventry
University plans to find over the next two years. What’s striking is that it’s
seemingly solid, middle-ranking research institutions, not those bumping along
the bottom of league tables, that are starting to hit the panic button.
At best, a
miserable summer beckons for lecturers at risk of losing their jobs – another I
spoke to was preparing to mark his students’ finals and reapply for his post in
the same anxious week – while students face a no-frills future of fewer choices
and more uncertainty. (A friend’s son found out only halfway through his gap
year that the history and politics degree he was due to start this autumn has
been ditched for a distinctly stripped-back version).
At worst,
some are asking how the sector would cope if an established university goes
bust. Since that’s never happened before, nobody seems entirely sure how it
would work: what would happen to students halfway through their degrees, or
whether one failure might spook creditors into pulling the plug on others.
What has
happened to Britain’s supposedly world-beating universities is partly the old
post-Brexit story of the young suffering the consequences of something they
overwhelmingly didn’t vote for. But it’s complicated by austerity, and arguably
by some vice-chancellors biting off more than they can chew.
The story
starts with the freezing of tuition fees in 2017, creating a growing hole in
university finances that many plugged by recruiting more foreign students (who
pay more than British teenagers for the same degree). That kept the show on the
road until the resulting immigration numbers became politically toxic,
prompting a government clampdown on visas and a sudden 33% fall in foreign
student numbers compared with the same time last year. In February, I wrote
that we were about to find out what happens when young people stop coming to a
country publicly hostile to them, and now here we are: the net result isn’t
more choice for British teenagers but, if anything, the reverse, given that
foreign students were effectively subsidising them.
Meanwhile,
middle-ranking universities have long complained of grander institutions
stealing their lunch, by expanding humanities courses – which are relatively
cheap to provide – and taking in teenagers who would otherwise have gone to the
next tier of universities down. Some borrowed heavily to expand and make
themselves more attractive, only to be caught out by rocketing inflation and
borrowing costs. Put all of that together and it’s no surprise that an
independent report commissioned by Universities UK from the accountants PwC
notes 40% of English and Northern Irish universities (plus 36% of Scottish
ones, operating under a different fee system) are expected to go into the red
this year, adding that “it may be inevitable that there is some loss of provision”.
And in a mockery of what was understood by levelling up, students from poorer
backgrounds may be hardest hit: they’re disproportionately likely either to go
to post-1992 institutions, or to choose the nearest university so that they can
save on rent by living at home. If it scraps the course they wanted, what then?
Perhaps you
find it hard to care about universities at a time when the NHS is on its knees
and everything in public life seems broken. Or perhaps you think teenagers with
middling A-level results are better off not racking up debt for degrees that
might not help their job prospects all that much. (Though, even as Britain
argues about whether 35% of teenagers going to college is too much, Australia
is debating the case for 55%.)
What we’re
seeing isn’t some slow, careful rebalancing of the system, done with teenagers’
best interests at heart. Instead, it’s just another messy, confused decline of
something Britain was genuinely once good at, which contributed billions to the
economy while projecting soft power abroad. Fixing it will take more than just
funding, although a rise in tuition fees now seems inevitable. What’s needed is
a more fundamental restructuring, and an honest debate about exactly what – and
who – a modern university education is really for. Right now, that’s the essay
question to which nobody seems to have a clear answer.
This article was amended on 11 April 2024 to
clarify that the University of Essex has forecasted, rather than declared, a
shortfall.
Gaby Hinsliff is a Guardian columnist This article was amended on 11 April 2024 to
clarify that the University of Essex has forecasted, rather than declared, a
shortfall.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário