This Is Going to Hurt
Inflation is expected to remain high later this
year even as the economy slows and layoffs rise. Already, signs of financial
stress are surfacing.
Credit...Jeff
Hinchee
Jeanna
Smialek Ben Casselman
By Jeanna
Smialek and Ben Casselman
June 17,
2022
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/17/business/economy/inflation-economy-recession.html
Kat
Johnston didn’t expect the pandemic to make her less stressed about her
finances. After all, she temporarily lost her job at the library where she
worked full time. But, like many Americans, she found an unexpected reprieve
from money worries: Months at home limited her spending, and she received
expanded unemployment insurance and two one-time checks from the government.
“When I
first came back to work, I had probably $2,200 in savings — which I know is not
much, but it’s more than I’d had in a while,” she said. But it was no match for
the inflation that has come since. “That savings is pretty much gone now. As
things have gotten so expensive, it’s been almost a paycheck-to-paycheck life.”
Ms.
Johnston, 31, lives in the Dallas area in a studio apartment and had hoped to upgrade
to a one-bedroom — her cat will occasionally use her bed as a litter box, so
being able to shut the door would be good. Yet rent is increasing enough that
she is considering moving in with a roommate instead.
Gas is so
expensive that she is buying just a quarter of a tank at a time. Her $65,000 in
student loans from undergraduate and graduate school were in forbearance before
the pandemic because she was struggling to afford them on her roughly $40,000
annual income. She has been able to continue not paying them because of a
government moratorium, but she knows that may not last forever.
She’d like
to find a better-paying job, but she’s unsure about leaving a secure position —
and embarking on a draining job search — at a moment when economists and
investors warn of an impending recession. “It does feel like whatever I was
thinking I was going to do is on hold,” she said.
.
Kat
Johnston has returned to work full time but her savings are depleted. She’s
thinking about getting a roommate as rents in the Dallas area climb
sharply.Credit...Dylan Hollingsworth for The New York Times
Millions of
Americans are feeling similarly stuck as their savings run low and their cost
of living runs high. Now, the economy appears poised to slow — potentially
sharply — in ways that could limit wage growth and cause job losses even as
prices remain elevated. But instead of rushing to the economy’s aid by giving
Americans money, as they did in March 2020, policymakers are engineering this
slowdown. Then, the problem was a global pandemic; now, it’s stubbornly high
inflation, and the main way the government knows to solve that is by inflicting
some economic pain.
In other
words, the long-predicted “cliff” may finally have arrived.
When the
first round of pandemic aid programs began to expire in the summer of 2020,
economists warned of a looming cliff facing both Americans who still needed
government help and the pandemic-addled economy that was not yet ready to stand
on its own. They repeated those warnings last fall, when Congress allowed
unemployment benefits to expire for millions of workers, and again in January,
when monthly payments for families with children came to an end.
The loss of
those programs and others, including enhanced nutrition benefits, was painful
for many families. But for the economy as a whole, the cliffs turned out to be
more like potholes. Consumers kept on spending, in part because trillions in
government aid had allowed many Americans to build up at least a small
financial buffer — as Ms. Johnston did — and in part because a record-setting
recovery in the job market gave workers an income boost that helped offset the
loss in government aid.
Now, as
savings run dry and consumers struggle under the weight of higher prices and
rising interest rates, early cracks are beginning to show — and are likely to
widen from here.
Pay gains
have been falling behind inflation for months. Credit card balances, which fell
early in the pandemic, are rising toward a record high. Subprime borrowers —
those with weak credit scores — are increasingly falling behind on payments on
car loans in particular, credit bureau data show. Measures of hunger are
rising, even with unemployment still low and the overall economy still strong.
“It’s a
grim picture already,” said Elizabeth Ananat, an economist at Barnard College
who has studied the pandemic’s impact on low-income families. “Families are
doing much worse than they were a few months ago.”
Matrice
Moore-Carr, a registrar at a public hospital in Nashville, Tenn., kept her job
during the pandemic, and even managed to get a bit ahead, thanks to stimulus
checks that helped her pay off her electric bill and stop worrying, at least
for a little while, about whether she could afford gas for her car.
When prices
began to rise last year, Ms. Moore-Carr took on overtime shifts in the
emergency room to make ends meet. When that wasn’t enough, she took a part-time
job as a hotel receptionist. Now she is working seven days a week, often
multiple jobs in one day, and still struggling to pay her bills.
“That’s
what’s been helping me keep the gas in the car and food on the table and the
electricity going,” she said. “I’ve been making it work. I’m tired, I’ll tell
you that. I’m so sleepy.”
Ms.
Moore-Carr, 52, owns her home, which she said is the only thing that allows her
to keep living in Nashville, where both rents and home prices have soared in
the pandemic. But the price of everything else has gone up — she joked about
buying a horse to save on gas. On Tuesday, she stopped by the bank and turned
in $47 in pennies.
What she
said she really worries about is the prospect of losing her overtime hours.
“I don’t
know what I’m going to do if anything gets any worse than it is now,” she said.
“Am I going to have to cut my meals back? Am I going to have to eat once a day
as opposed to three? I don’t know. It’s just tough.”
Low-income
households, at least on average, emerged from the first two years of the
pandemic in remarkably strong financial shape. Trillions of dollars in
government aid ensured that poverty fell in 2020, despite the loss of tens of
millions of jobs. New rounds of assistance in 2021, including monthly payments
through an expanded Child Tax Credit, led to a sharp drop in measures of
childhood poverty and hunger.
Those
programs came from a very different economic moment, however. In 2020, and to a
lesser degree in 2021, the needs of individual households and the needs of the
broader economy were aligned: Stimulus checks and other forms of government aid
helped jobless workers and their families avoid eviction, while at the same
time helping businesses avoid bankruptcy, landlords avoid foreclosure, and
cities and states avoid a collapse in their tax revenue.
Today, that
alignment has broken down. Giving people money now might help them pay their
bills, but it could also make inflation worse by adding to demand as businesses
are already failing to produce enough goods and hire enough workers.
The Federal
Reserve is instead trying to cool off the economy by raising interest rates,
making it more expensive to borrow money to buy a house or expand a company.
Weaker business activity will slow hiring, leading to slower wage growth and,
most likely, more layoffs. It could also allow America’s goods and services —
limited for more than a year by supply chain snarls and labor shortages — to
catch up to demand, putting a damper on rising prices.
Fed
policymakers argue that this strategy is necessary to put the economy on a more
sustainable path. But even as conditions take a turn for the worse, inflation
will probably take a while to slow, and Fed officials themselves think it will
still be elevated at the end of the year.
“The
transition is going to be very difficult,” said Seth Carpenter, global chief
economist at Morgan Stanley and a former Fed economist. “At least historically,
it takes a really long time for inflation to come down, even after the economy
slows.”
Even if the
Fed can avoid causing a recession, a weakening labor market will bring hardship
for many. Job losses can be devastating, often setting off a downward spiral of
eviction and debt. Those who keep their jobs are likely to get fewer hours of
work and to lose bargaining power.
“Low-income
workers, workers with low levels of education, Black and brown workers are the
first to lose their jobs and the last to get them back,” said Diane Whitmore
Schanzenbach, a Northwestern University economist who studies anti-poverty
programs.
What is
inflation? Inflation is a loss of purchasing power over time, meaning your
dollar will not go as far tomorrow as it did today. It is typically expressed
as the annual change in prices for everyday goods and services such as food,
furniture, apparel, transportation and toys.
What causes
inflation? It can be the result of rising consumer demand. But inflation can
also rise and fall based on developments that have little to do with economic
conditions, such as limited oil production and supply chain problems.
Is
inflation bad? It depends on the circumstances. Fast price increases spell
trouble, but moderate price gains can lead to higher wages and job growth.
How does
inflation affect the poor? Inflation can be especially hard to shoulder for
poor households because they spend a bigger chunk of their budgets on
necessities like food, housing and gas.
Can
inflation affect the stock market? Rapid inflation typically spells trouble for
stocks. Financial assets in general have historically fared badly during
inflation booms, while tangible assets like houses have held their value
better.
Fed
officials have warned that the alternative — allowing inflation to remain high,
and possibly letting it spring further out of control — would be even worse.
“You really
cannot have the kind of labor market we want without price stability,” Jerome
H. Powell, the Fed chair, said at a news conference on Wednesday. Wages are
being eaten away by price increases, for one thing.
And
inflation, too, is uniquely difficult for poorer families, who have less
flexibility to adjust their spending in response to higher prices. That is
especially true right now, when inflation is concentrated in essential
categories like rent, food and fuel.
“This
should not be an abstract conversation,” said Michelle Holder, president and
chief executive of the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, a progressive
research organization. “This is a very real burden for families, particularly
low-income families. People are making tough choices in terms of what do they
cut back on, and for lower income families there’s not a lot of wiggle room
there.”
Many
progressives initially resisted calls for the Fed to raise rates, arguing that
the strong labor market — and the rare bargaining power that it gave to workers
— was worth a brief period of rapid price increases. That has begun to shift as
inflation worsens. Some economists who focus on labor issues now say the Fed is
right to try to contain it, but that the government should simultaneously
provide support to the families who need it the most.
“The hunger
of children is not a necessary cost to pay to bring down inflation,” Ms.
Ananat, of Barnard, said.
Republicans,
meanwhile, have blamed the Biden administration — and in particular, the $1.9
trillion American Rescue Plan that Democrats passed early last year — for
making inflation worse. Many economists, among them Democrats, agree that the
spending did drive at least some of the inflation, making the politics of
economic aid even more fraught.
The economy
remains strong for now, but early signs of a pullback are surfacing. Job
growth, while fast, is slowing. Jobless claims, still low, have picked up.
Evictions are mounting in some cities where bans have expired, and retail sales
fell in May.
“I think we
are starting to see indications that the good times are coming to an end for
some people,” said Karen Dynan, a former Treasury Department chief economist
who is now at Harvard University. “There will be some generalized pain.”
For many
families, that pain has already arrived, and it feels very specific.
Brandy
Sandersfeld gave birth to a boy in March 2020 — the same week that her older
son’s school shut down because of the pandemic, and the month that her
husband’s pizza business had to close for good.
After a few
months of trying to ride out the pandemic, Ms. Sandersfeld and her husband,
Kurtis, moved to a more rural part of their home state of Arkansas, where they
owned some land. Unemployment benefits helped pay for the move, and last year
the expanded child tax credit provided a much-needed financial cushion. Those
payments ended in January — just before Ms. Sandersfeld, 37, hit a deer in her
S.U.V. Replacing it wiped out their savings.
“We were
really broke after that, and we just haven’t been able to build anything up,”
she said.
Living out
in the country, the family has felt acutely the rise in gas prices — a trip to
town and back now costs $25 in gas. Mr. Sandersfeld took on a second job this
year, leaving her to handle the children while also working from home. They
worry about what will happen if the economy slows and one of them loses a job.
Ms.
Sandersfeld, the first in her family to go to college, said that before the
pandemic, she was proud of having built some stability for her family. Now, she
wonders if it is slipping away.
“You always
want to do better for your children than what you had, and you want them to
have more opportunity and be in a better position in life, and I felt like I
was headed that way,” she said. “And now I feel like we’ve been kicked back
down the mountain. We have the whole mountain to climb again.”
Correction:
June 17, 2022
An earlier
version of this article misstated the given name of Brandy Sandersfeld’s
husband. It is Kurtis, not Kris.
Jeanna
Smialek writes about the Federal Reserve and the economy for The Times. She
previously covered economics at Bloomberg News.
@jeannasmialek
Ben
Casselman writes about economics, with a particular focus on stories involving
data. He previously reported for FiveThirtyEight and The Wall Street Journal. @bencasselman
• Facebook




Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário