An FBI
wanted poster is displayed at a bus stop near the US Capitol. Photograph: Gamal
Diab/EPA
Seditionaries: FBI net closes on Maga mob that
stormed the Capitol
A huge investigation has so far arrested 235 people,
including far-right militants, members of the military – and otherwise
unremarkable Trump fans
Ed
Pilkington
Ed
Pilkington in New York
@edpilkington
Sat 6 Feb
2021 10.00 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/06/us-capitol-insurrection-fbi-investigation
As
prosecutors from the House of Representatives prepare to present their case
against Donald Trump at his impeachment trial next week for incitement of
insurrection, supporters who heeded his call on 6 January to “fight like hell”
and went on to storm the Capitol Building are finding themselves in far greater
legal peril.
The trial
that kicks off in the US Senate on Tuesday could lead to a further vote that
would permanently debar Trump from holding office in the future. By contrast,
the mob of fervent Maga acolytes who broke into the US Capitol following an
incendiary rally headlined by Trump could face prison for up to 20 years.
All 56 FBI
field offices are engaged in a huge investigation that ranks alongside the
biggest the bureau has conducted. As Michael Sherwin, acting US attorney for
Washington DC which is leading the hunt, has put it: “The scope and scale of
this investigation are really unprecedented, not only in FBI history but
probably DoJ history.”
David
Gomez, a former FBI national security executive who spent years countering
domestic terrorism, told the Guardian that the bureau would classify and handle
the search as a “major case”.
“It is
probably one of the largest investigations since 9/11,” he said.
Already the
number of people who have been arrested, either by the FBI, Capitol police or
local Washington DC officers has reached 235, spanning more than 40 states. As
the investigation widens and deepens, the focus is tightening on anyone
considered to have acted as a coordinator of the action in an attempt to take
out the ringleaders.
The FBI has
set up a special strike force of experienced federal prosecutors who have been
given the express instruction to pursue aggressive sedition and conspiracy
charges. So far at least 26 people have been charged with conspiracy or
assault.
“Sedition
is the most serious crime that anybody could be accused of from 6 January,”
Gomez said. “It’s advocating the overthrow of the US government. It involves
not just talking about overthrowing democracy but having the means and
wherewithal to carry out those actions.”
As more has
become known about those arrested, the strategy being pursued by the FBI has
also revealed itself. In several cases, people who participated in the storming
of the Capitol were picked up and charged with relatively minor offenses such
as trespassing or theft of mail simply as a means to get them into
prosecutorial clutches.
Once in the
system, more serious charges could then be added as intelligence came in. That
pattern of escalating charges can be seen in the cases of Nicholas DeCarlo from
Texas and Nicholas Ochs from Hawaii.
Initially,
the pair were accused of unlawful entry into federal property. But new
conspiracy charges were added this week in which they are alleged to have
planned out their travel across state lines, raised money to pay for it, and
then made the trip to Washington DC in a premeditated attempt to obstruct the
certification of Joe Biden as winner of the US presidential election.
If
convicted, DeCarlo and Ochs each face maximum sentences of 20 years in prison
and a $250,000 fine.
Prosecutors
have made clear that they are ramping up the charges against select individuals
as a means of discouraging further violence from Trump supporters and their
far-right and white supremacist allies. “We are going to focus on the most
significant charges as a deterrent, because regardless of if it was just a
trespass in the Capitol or someone planted a pipe bomb, you will be charged and
you will be found,” Sherwin said.
The FBI’s
work has been greatly assisted by the plethora of intelligence swirling around
online – in many cases posted by the suspects themselves. Take the hapless duo,
DeCarlo and Ochs.
A photo of
the pair, posing thumbs up in front of the memorial door of the US Capitol on
which they had scrawled the words “MURDER THE MEDIA”, was easily found online.
It has been included in the indictment against them, and earned them the
special attentions of the media assault strike force set up by federal
prosecutors to investigate violent threats against members of the media.
That photo
is one of at least 200,000 digital media tips that have poured into the FBI
from across the country, some coming from friends and even family members who
recognized individual rioters from the profusion of video and stills footage
plastered across the internet and promptly informed on them.
As federal
agents work their way through this mountain of digital information they are
starting to get a feel for the kinds of people who were present that fateful
day on the Hill. As feared, the leadership role played by far-right and white
supremacist groups has veered into sight.
At least 10
members of the extremist group the Proud Boys are among the mounting number of
those arrested, including Ochs, who according to the justice department claims
to have founded a Honolulu chapter of the network. This week’s Washington state
arrest was also of a self-declared Proud Boys leader – Ethan Nordean calls
himself “sergeant of arms” of the Seattle chapter and is accused in court
documents of having led a group of rioters into the Capitol.
On the back
of mounting evidence of the Proud Boys’ leadership role in the attack, the
Canadian government this week moved to designate the group as a terrorist
organization.
Meanwhile,
several members of the Oath Keepers, one of the largest far-right militia
groups in the US, have also been arrested.
Another
chilling element emerging from the indictments is the number of current and former
law enforcement officers and military personnel who are among them. An analysis
of the first 150 people to be arrested by CNN found that at least 21 had
military experience, some ongoing.
Of those,
eight were former marines, underlining the danger of elite military training
designed to defend the country from international threats being turned back on
itself and used to attack the heart of US democracy at home.
At least
four law enforcement officers who were actively serving in their positions at the
time of the 6 January attack have been accused, and have left their jobs. They
include a Houston, Texas, police officer and a corrections officer from New
Jersey.
One of the
emerging truths that FBI detectives and prosecutors will have to wrestle with is
that, despite the substantial presence of white supremacists and military
personnel, most of those who have been arrested are what might be described as
unremarkable Americans with no previous criminal records or history of
extremist behavior.
Political
scientists at the University of Chicago who studied the profiles of arrestees
and published their conclusions in the Atlantic found that many were
middle-class and middle-aged – with an average age of 40. Almost 90% of them
had no known links with militant groups. Some 40% were business owners or with
white-collar jobs, and they came from relatively lucrative backgrounds as
“CEOs, shop owners, doctors, lawyers, IT specialists, and accountants”.
The one
common denominator uniting this large group is not any extremist group, website
or media outlet, but an individual – Donald Trump. This is why the connection
between the pending impeachment trial and the ongoing FBI roundup of suspects
is so critical.
The link
has been made overtly in the defense cases being compiled by lawyers on behalf
of several of the arrested rioters. Take Jacob Chansley from Arizona, the
self-styled “QAnon Shaman” who went shirtless and wore a furry headdress with
horns as he battled as far as the Senate dais during the Capitol assault.
His lawyers
have offered him up as a witness during Trump’s trial. They say Chansley, who
faces six charges including civil disorder, used to be “horrendously smitten”
by Trump but now feels betrayed by him. They are also likely to use the
argument that Chansley was misled by the then US president as a central
argument in his own defense.
But Gomez
is doubtful that the ploy will prove effective.
“I don’t
think that’s going to hold water in federal court,” Gomez said. “‘I only robbed
that bank because somebody told me to do it’ – I’ve never heard that line
working for any crime.”


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário