PM Costa: Blocking EU-China deal because of the
US would be a ‘terrible sign’
By Luísa Meireles
and Maria de Deus Rodrigues | Lusa.pt 7:00 (updated: 11:11)
This deal
could cause tension with the new US administration weeks after Joe Biden
proposed a transatlantic dialogue on "the strategic challenge posed by
China's growing international assertiveness". [EPA-EFE/TIAGO PETINGA]
Europe must
be an autonomous global actor and it would be “a terrible sign” if the EU
blocked a recently concluded investment agreement with China in order to
coordinate with Washington, Portuguese Prime Minister António Costa told
EURACTIV’s partner Lusa in an exclusive interview.
The EU and
China reached last Wednesday (30 December) an agreement in principle on
investment, which has been under negotiation for seven years.
However,
the deal could cause tension with the new US administration weeks after President-elect
Joe Biden proposed a transatlantic dialogue on “the strategic challenge posed
by China’s growing international assertiveness”.
EU seeks to
rebalance China ties with controversial investment agreement
The EU and
China agreed ‘in principle’ on Wednesday (30 December) to an investment deal
that will give European companies greater access to Chinese markets and help
redress what Europe sees as unbalanced economic ties.
“It’s a
process that was underway, it would also be a terrible signal for us to block
this negotiation or to condition this negotiation according to others,” Costa
said in response to a question about whether the EU should have coordinated
this negotiation with the new US administration.
“If Europe
wants to be a global actor, as it has to be, its strategic autonomy depends on
being able to speak with each of the other global actors. It must relate to the
United States, China, Australia and New Zealand, India, Africa. It has to
relate to everyone and not just talk through others”, he added.
According
to the Portuguese leader, whose country took over the rotating presidency of
the Council of the EU on 1 January, the agreement between Brussels and Beijing
“guarantees reciprocal security of market opening” and “investment relations
which ensure and respect all security rules on both sides”.
The
transatlantic relations
Referring
to the new US administration, he said Portugal has “every interest” in a “new
climate in the relationship with the United States”.
He said
Washington is the most important ally apart from the UK pointing out “positive
and encouraging signs”, such as Biden’s intention to return to the Paris
Agreement and “his multilateral vision”.
“Apart from
that, we also know that the difficulties have not disappeared forever either.
From a trade point of view, there will certainly be difficulties, from the
point of view of defence burden sharing, now what I am sure is that the
atmosphere will clearly change, the way we relate will change radically, and
this will create better conditions for us to overcome the differences that
exist,” he said.
Africa and
India top the agenda
Regarding
Africa, which tops Portuguese EU presidency’s external agenda, the prime
minister voiced hope that the evolution of the pandemic, which prevented
holding an EU-African Union summit in 2020, would be possible “in the spring”.
“We have
already told the President of the [European] Council, Charles Michel, that we
have every interest and willingness […] for this summit to take place during
our presidency, in Brussels of course, and we are working on that. I hope the
pandemic will allow this,” he said, emphasising that “other avenues”, such as
meetings with the different regional organisations of the African continent,
are not possible.
“But I
think it would be important, at a time when the African Union has signed a
continental free trade agreement. This would have been a fantastic time for a
meeting of the European Union and Africa”.
“The great
strategic partnership that Europe has to establish is with the African
continent, so I think it would be a mistake for Europe not to make holding this
summit as the top of its priorities”, he said.
Costa also
refereed to India, saying there are “all the conditions” for the EU-India
Summit. “It could be a milestone in the EU’s future relationship with the
Indian Union”.
EU
divisions and the rule of law
He admitted
that differences within the EU exist and must be accepted and resolved through
dialogue, as Brexit was a “big enough rift”.
“I think it
would be bad to try to pretend that there are no such differences, problems can
only be solved when they are accepted and talked about frankly”, he said,
adding that this reality should be accepted “without dramas and in all
tranquillity”.
“Do not
force anyone to make movements that they do not want to make, creating rifts.
Brexit was a big enough rift, and nobody wants any more”, he said.
“It is
obvious that today the 27 member states do not all have the same vision of what
Europe should be, nor do they all have the same will that Europe is what it is
[…] Perhaps the presence of the UK had concealed many of these national
positions, which were, shall we say, uncovered with the departure of the UK”,
he said, citing the differences on issues such as migration or budgetary
solidarity.
Costa: Some
countries defend UK’s EU future vision
In today’s
edition of the Capitals, find out more about the trial against former French
President Nicholas Sarkozy starting in France this week, Slovak Prime Minister
Igor Matovič and his party threatening to leave government, and so much more.
As for the
frictions over respect for the rule of law, which led to Hungary and Poland
blocking the approval of the EU budget and the recovery fund, the prime
minister said that “this is indeed one of the red lines because the Treaty on
European Union is very clear”.
The issue,
he said, is particularly sensitive for Portugal because “what motivated
Portugal to join the EU was not the euro, which did not even exist then, or the
internal market, which did not exist either”.
On the
contrary, he said, it was the values which allowed freedom and democracy to be
“consolidated”.
“When
unanimity is needed, there is only one way, and that is a compromise. Of
course, try to understand what others’ points of view are, make others
understand our points of view and find out what the point of understanding is”.
[Edited by
Sarantis Michalopoulos/Zoran Radosavljevic]


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário