Israel Is
Likely to Continue Attacks in Lebanon, U.S. Intelligence Concludes
The new
cease-fire between the United States and Iran calls for an end to fighting in
Lebanon, but U.S. intelligence officials do not expect Israel to halt its
strikes on Hezbollah.
Julian E.
Barnes
By Julian
E. Barnes
Reporting
from Washington
June 19,
2026
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/19/us/politics/israel-lebanon-trump-cease-fire.html
Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel is likely to continue military action
against Hezbollah, despite the cease-fire deal between the United States and
Iran that specifically calls for a halt to fighting in Lebanon, according to a
recent U.S. intelligence report, American officials said.
Mr.
Netanyahu is under intense domestic pressure to continue operations against
Hezbollah’s ongoing attacks on northern Israel. Israel views Hezbollah, the
potent militia and political group in Lebanon funded by Iran, as a critical
threat, and officials there do not believe the attacks can go unanswered.
U.S.
intelligence agencies believe Israel is likely to continue such operations,
even if they hinder negotiations between Iran and the United States that are
supposed to address elements of Iran’s nuclear program and secure a permanent
peace deal, according to the officials.
The
cease-fire deal is deeply unpopular in Israel, where commentators criticize its
failure to address Iran’s missile program, its requirement that U.S. forces
leave the region and, especially, its constraints on Israeli military
operations in Lebanon.
Israel is
not a party to the accord, which was signed this week. But the Israeli
ambassador to the United States, Yechiel Leiter, said on Friday that his
country had committed to an immediate cease-fire and “halted all offensive
operations” in Lebanon. He insisted Israeli forces would remain in southern
Lebanon and said Israel would never compromise on its security.
Want to
stay updated on what’s happening in Iran, Israel and Lebanon? Sign up for Your
Places: Global Update, and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.
The
recent intelligence assessments show the skepticism inside American spy
agencies that such commitments will hold, given the security concerns.
Earlier
on Friday, Israel had conducted airstrikes in Lebanon, after a Hezbollah drone
strike killed four Israeli soldiers in an ambush in Israeli-controlled southern
Lebanon. The Israeli strikes killed at least 47 people. The strikes followed
other Israeli military operations against Hezbollah.
Those
clashes led to a postponement of talks between U.S. and Iranian officials,
which had been set to begin Friday in Switzerland.
The new
intelligence assessment was reported earlier by The Washington Post.
Those
recent intelligence reports outline what has been obvious in public: Mr.
Netanyahu and other Israeli security officials are uncomfortable with the
memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran. At the same
time, relations between President Trump and Mr. Netanyahu are strained, even if
there is little indication the Israeli prime minister will give up on the
relationship.
Officials
said Mr. Netanyahu was counting on relations with Mr. Trump strengthening once
more before he faces Israeli voters this fall. Mr. Netanyahu’s standing and
influence with Mr. Trump has waxed and waned before, though the high stakes of
the accord with Iran appears to have pushed relations to a low.
The most
recent intelligence report was written before Vice President JD Vance strongly
criticized Mr. Netanyahu on Thursday.
At a news
conference to promote the U.S. deal with Iran, Mr. Vance lashed out at members
of Mr. Netanyahu’s cabinet who had criticized the United States or Mr. Trump
over the cease-fire.
“Donald
J. Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to
the nation of Israel at this moment in time, and he happens to be the head of
state of the world’s superpower,” Mr. Vance said. “If I was in the cabinet of
the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I
have anywhere left in the entire world.”
Representatives
of the Israeli Embassy in Washington did not immediately return a request for
comment. But Israeli officials have said their operations in Lebanon are
defensive in the face of attacks by Hezbollah.
Julian E.
Barnes covers the U.S. intelligence agencies and international security matters
for The Times. He has written about security issues for more than two decades.
.webp)

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário