Opinion
The
Editorial Board
Trump
Could Interfere With the Midterm Elections. You Can Help Defend Them.
Jan. 31,
2026
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/31/opinion/trump-midterms-election-security.html
By The
Editorial Board
The
editorial board is a group of opinion journalists whose views are informed by
expertise, research, debate and certain longstanding values. It is separate
from the newsroom.
Election
integrity in the United States can be a fraught subject. Merely raising the
prospect that a future election might be compromised makes many democracy
experts uncomfortable. It can undermine faith in our reliable, well-run
election system and amplify the false claims about fraud that often come from
President Trump. Even people who respect the sanctity of elections sometimes
malign them. Many Democrats, for example, have wrongly suggested that
voter-identification laws undermine the system by causing large declines in
turnout.
In truth,
American elections have never been more reliable or accessible. For every
election, thousands of principled election officials painstakingly update voter
rolls, mail information to households, train poll workers, oversee voting and
transport ballots with a documented chain of custody. Voter fraud is extremely
rare, and voter turnout in the past two presidential elections reached higher
levels than in any other over the previous century.
Yet it
would be naïve to assume that the status quo is guaranteed to continue. The
sanctity of the 2026 elections is indeed under threat. And the reason is Mr.
Trump.
Sign up
for the Opinion Today newsletter Get
expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world
every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
He has
repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to interfere with elections to benefit
himself and his party. He has broken the law to do so and broken longstanding
bipartisan traditions. Since he entered politics a decade ago, he has suggested
that election outcomes are fair only if his side wins. In 2020, after he lost
the presidential election, he attempted to direct a sprawling conspiracy to
overturn the result. As it was failing (thanks to the honesty of election
administrators from both parties), he encouraged protesters to march to
Congress when it was meeting to certify his defeat — and later celebrated their
violent attack.
Since he
returned to the presidency last year, he has if anything shown a willingness to
go further. He has pushed for extreme gerrymandering of congressional
districts, outside the normal 10-year cycle, to help Republicans hold the House
even if most voters want them out. His Justice Department is building an
unprecedented database of voter information that experts fear the
administration may use to cast unfair doubt on voters’ eligibility. He signed a
legally dubious executive order that could force states to reject some mail-in
ballots. He recently told The Times that he regretted not sending the National
Guard to seize voting machines after the 2020 presidential election.
The
threat took on a new urgency this week, when F.B.I. agents searched an election
center in Atlanta related to Mr. Trump’s baseless accusations of fraud in 2020.
Chillingly, his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, accompanied
agents on the search. As an article in The Times explained, the search “could
be used to justify a forced takeover of the elections operation” in Georgia’s
most populous county, which skews heavily Democratic. It is a reminder of Mr.
Trump’s willingness to use the tools of state power — prosecutors, national
security officials, National Guard members and F.B.I. and immigration agents —
in the service of his political interests.
To look
at this pattern and conclude that the 2026 midterm elections are safe is to
leave American democracy exposed. In a divided country where many elections are
close and congressional control could come down to a handful of races, a local
disruption affecting turnout or vote counting could have national consequences.
If you are somebody who has previously dismissed talk of election interference
as overwrought, we understand where you are coming from. Yet we urge you not to
assume that the past will repeat itself.
We are
relieved to see that an array of civic-minded Americans — including Democrats,
independents and Republicans — are responding to the threat and already taking
steps to protect the integrity of the 2026 elections. They need help in this
nonpartisan endeavor. They have far fewer resources at their disposal than the
president does. Much as the editorial board makes annual recommendations of
high-impact charities to support, we want to suggest several ways that you can
help safeguard democracy ahead of the midterms. We ask you to consider them.
Our first
set of recommendations involves actions rather than donations:
Work the
polls. In 2024, nearly half of the country’s election precincts said they
struggled to recruit poll workers. Shortages lead to longer voting lines and
overworked election administrators. We particularly encourage young and
middle-aged people to sign up: In the last three general elections, fewer than
a quarter of volunteers were 40 or younger. (In many states, you can become a
poll worker at 16 or 17.) The positions, which are nonpartisan, are paid. You
can find out how to apply with the recruitment look-up tool at this link.
Watch the
polls. In most states, political parties appoint poll watchers who observe
elections to ensure fairness. In some places, nonpartisan groups can also
select poll watchers. To find out how to volunteer, start by contacting the
Democratic or Republican committee in your county.
Don’t
spread dubious information. It’s surprisingly easy for misleading stories to
travel through trusted friends or relatives. Heather Gerken, president of the
Ford Foundation, notes that influential disinformation often arrives via a
well-meaning peer rather than a random bot. People from both political sides
are susceptible to this — whether it was Democratic conspiracy theories in 2004
about fraud in Ohio or the recent Republican conspiracy theories about 2020.
Double-checking information before hitting “share” can keep election
conversations grounded in reality.
You can
also support organizations that are helping to protect election officials and
safeguard the process. All the ones we recommend here are nonpartisan.
The
Election Official Legal Defense Network pairs election officials with pro bono
attorneys who can advise them on how to respond to threats and lawsuits, which
have increased in recent years. The network was founded in 2021 by a former
White House lawyer for Barack Obama and a former election lawyer for George W.
Bush. You can donate here.
The
Campaign Legal Center, founded in 2002 by a Republican lawyer who served as
chairman of the Federal Election Commission, works to ensure that election
rules remain fair. The group is fighting the Trump administration’s demands for
voter data and an executive order that would force states to change voter ID
requirements and ballot deadlines. There will probably be more litigation ahead
of the midterms, especially after a recent Supreme Court decision made it
easier for any candidate to challenge election rules. You can donate here.
The
Carter Center, founded in 1982 by Jimmy Carter, has brought its global election
monitoring program to the United States. This year, the Carter Center plans to
have nonpartisan observers watch elections in Georgia, Michigan, Montana,
Nevada and New Mexico. The center will also host civic education events and
offer resources for voters and election officials across the country. You can
donate to the Carter Center’s democracy program here.
In 1981,
Ronald Reagan began his first Inaugural Address by observing that the orderly
transfer of authority was “a commonplace occurrence” to most Americans but was
“nothing less than a miracle” to much of the world. Our elections remain both
commonplace and miraculous. This country should be proud that it can feel so
routine for a citizen to drop a ballot in the mailbox or walk down the street
to cast a vote. In 2026, we should guard that tradition.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário