Opinion
Guest
Essay
Could
This Unserious,
Mischievous,
Frightening
Man Be
Britain’s
Next
Prime Minister?
By Samuel
Earle
Mr. Earle
is the author of “Tory Nation: The Dark Legacy of the World’s Most Successful
Political Party.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/opinion/nigel-farage-britain-reform.html?searchResultPosition=1
Nigel
Farage has always been a master of political innuendo. As a schoolboy in South
London in the early 1980s, when neofascists and racists rioted across Britain,
Mr. Farage’s favorite prank was to scrawl “NF” on the classroom chalkboards.
The joke was that these were his initials and those of the National Front, the
leading neofascist group at the time. The splendor of Mr. Farage’s school,
Dulwich College, added to the transgression. Designed by the son of the
architect that built the Palace of Westminster, the school — all haughty
buildings and pristine grounds — surely seemed a world away from far-right
thuggery. Yet Mr. Farage has always been curious about the potential for
combustion, comic and otherwise, when those two worlds collide.
Today,
the far right is once again on the march in Britain and Mr. Farage’s initials
are once again all over the place. Now his playground is Westminster itself,
where he finally won a seat last year. Since then, Mr. Farage has led his
insurgent party, Reform U.K., to the top of opinion polls and become an
inescapable influence. His face is everywhere: newspaper front pages,
television bulletins and social media feeds. The ruling Labour Party,
buttressed by an enormous parliamentary majority and yet anxious about its
fragile popularity, cannot stop talking about him. Its leaders repeatedly
explain why Mr. Farage should not be taken seriously — a fixation suggesting
exactly the opposite. More and more, Mr. Farage is treated as leader of the
opposition and even as prime minister in waiting.
Mr.
Farage’s success is both a symptom and a cause of the newly febrile mood in
Britain. The turmoil of the past decade, with its succession of six prime
ministers, had already stripped the country of its reputation for stable and
competent government. Lately, things have felt wilder and more menacing. Last
summer, anti-immigration riots broke out across the country, recalling the
heyday of the National Front, and there have since been recurrent
demonstrations outside hotels where people seeking asylum are housed. In
September, over 100,000 far-right protesters gathered in London for “a free
speech festival” organized by Tommy Robinson, a far-right extremist who has
served multiple prison sentences.
The
simmering rage has many sources, old and new. Ever since the 2008 financial
crisis upended Britain’s economy, a rotating cast of political leaders has
pledged to raise wages and reduce immigration. And yet wages have remained
static and immigration has continued to rise. The 2016 referendum to leave the
European Union — in which Mr. Farage played a starring role — galvanized
nationalists and then, when it failed to deliver its promise of a patriotic
wonderland, stoked their frustrations. Labour’s assumption of power last year
only inflamed nationalist paranoia. While Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s critics
on the left see a meek leader wedded to the status quo, the mere sight of a
Labour politician in Downing Street is enough to provoke panic on the far right.
Mr.
Farage leads this angry mob, mostly by way of insinuation. He channels its
apocalyptic undercurrents while maintaining a careful distance. He doesn’t
attend protests or affiliate publicly with any of their organizers. He is quick
to condemn acts of violence. But he does not hide his sympathy for the extreme
anti-migrant sentiment that underwrites them. He has voiced concerns about “a
growing Muslim vote in Britain” and “the safety of women and children.” And he
repeatedly warns that, if he isn’t listened to, more violence is bound to come.
“Remember, I am the moderate, reasonable, democratic, experienced, grown-up
face of the fight back,” he said in July. “If I lose, just you wait.”
Mr.
Farage’s growing appeal is about more than anger. Like his friend President
Trump, whom he draws on for inspiration, Mr. Farage entertains his supporters.
Through the pomp and ceremony of his rallies, the half-serious transgressions
of his comic routines and a creative embrace of social media, Mr. Farage
suggests that politics doesn’t have to be boring, that the public doesn’t have
to swallow its frustration. With a conniving grin, and usually a pint of lager
in his hand, Mr. Farage issues an invitation. Yes, the political establishment
is rotten and the country is going to the dogs. But pull up a chair — and let’s
plot some mischief.
Mr.
Farage is a veteran of British politics, a fringe fixture for three decades.
But until recently, the idea that he could ever be prime minister was, frankly,
inconceivable. Before the 2024 election, Mr. Farage’s numerous failed attempts
at winning a seat in Parliament — seven across 30 years — were a running joke.
His place in the history books seemed fixed: a noisy outsider who wielded
remarkable influence by pestering those in power. He might be a persistent
thorn in the establishment’s side, but never a man on the inside.
Mr.
Farage first entered politics in the early 1990s, after a hedonistic decade in
the City of London as a trader. (“The booze culture was mega,” he later
recalled.) He was a founding member of the U.K. Independence Party, a
single-issue party committed to taking Britain out of the European Union. For
the next 20 years, the party was dismissed as ridiculous and shambolic — most
famously by David Cameron, the Conservative leader at the time, as “a bunch of
fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists.” But Mr. Farage patiently built his
movement, survived countless controversies — usually concerning racist, sexist
or homophobic statements from fellow UKIP politicians — and, at last, won his
main demand: an in/out referendum on E.U. membership.
Mr.
Farage’s new party, over which he holds total sway, has required no such
patience. Started in 2018 to exploit political gridlock after the referendum,
initially as the Brexit Party, it soon won the European elections, pressured
the Conservatives into appointing a more Brexit-friendly prime minister and
helped to secure Britain’s formal exit from the bloc in early 2020. Renamed
Reform in 2021, it secured five seats and 14 percent of the vote in the 2024
election, comprehensively won local elections earlier this year and now leads
the national opinion polls. Although forecasts come with the heavy caveat that
an election is several years away, one recent poll suggested Reform could win
373 lawmakers at the next vote — a comfortable majority.
Given
this newfound ascendancy, it’s interesting that — absent the anti-E.U. rhetoric
— Mr. Farage’s pitch to voters is mostly the same as it ever was. Immigration,
he intones, poses a grave threat to the country, and the two main parties,
Labour and Conservative, are indistinguishably contemptible. The first message
has always had wide purchase, amplified by Britain’s right-wing media. The
second message now reaches an ever larger and more receptive audience. The two
main parties have never been so unpopular. Support for the Conservatives has
collapsed and Labour’s dour and directionless year in power, defined by a
centrism of the blandest variety, has led Mr. Starmer’s approval ratings to
reach record lows in record time.
If Mr.
Farage’s message has remained consistent, the manner in which he delivers it
has transformed. Here, Mr. Trump’s influence is unmissable. Mr. Farage is more
of a showman than he once was. Where he used to take the stage with little
ceremony, now he tours the country with elaborately choreographed rallies,
featuring booming music and pyrotechnics. “Unlike everybody else, I like to
plunge in the crowds,” he has said. He has taken to referring to his opponents
by nicknames: Mr. Starmer is “Two-tier Keir,” referencing a far-right
conspiracy theory that the prime minister disproportionately criminalizes
nationalist protesters; Robert Jenrick, a senior Conservative politician widely
tipped to be its next leader, is “Robert Generic,” comically deflating his
efforts to mold himself into a Faragist.
On X and
TikTok, where he has 2.2 million and 1.3 million followers each, Mr. Farage
cultivates a closer relationship with his supporters, sharing quick-fire
responses to news events and occasionally embracing the more feral aspects of
social media. He recently shared an A.I.-generated video of himself rapping in
a white fur coat. “You thought it was Farage — nah mate, Nigel Garage,” his
avatar sings. “Prime minister of the pub, of the pint, of the people. Bo
selecta.” Union Jacks beam from his eyes. Mr. Farage also invites his
supporters to join “Reform FC,” one of the party’s most prominent initiatives:
a fictional soccer team that sells Reform-colored jerseys with Mr. Farage’s
name on the back, emulating a MAGAesque fandom. “What a season we’re having,”
he says in one recent video.
Much of
Reform’s policy agenda has a distinctly Trumpian hue. Although Mr. Farage is
well-versed in stirring up fears about immigration and crime, the calls for
“large-scale raids” and “mass deportations” — along with the suggestions that
“our worst violent criminals” could be sent to places like El Salvador — are
obvious imports. Reform’s unembarrassed appropriation of “DOGE” makes explicit
its debt to America’s new brand of conservatism. Reform has also discussed
restricting access to abortion, which is barely a political issue in Britain,
and positioned itself as the party of cryptocurrency deregulation, with Mr.
Farage announcing his intentions to make London a “crypto powerhouse.” He even
promotes a meme coin that carries his name.
Reform’s
interest in cryptocurrencies reflects another of its most notable traits: its
deep ties to the financial sector. Richard Tice, its deputy leader, is a former
property investor; Zia Yusuf, its head of policy and former head of DOGE,
previously worked at Goldman Sachs; and Arron Banks, a longtime ally of Mr.
Farage, made his fortune in insurance and wants a “big beautiful Reform bill.”
Though they join in the immigrant-bashing, they probably find Mr. Farage’s
economic promises more exciting. Despite occasional feints left, his instincts
are libertarian and bear a striking resemblance to those of the Conservatives’
shortest-lived prime minister, Liz Truss. Her program of tax cuts and financial
deregulation — which Mr. Farage lauded at the time — was so disastrous that she
was forced to resign almost immediately.
Yet Mr.
Farage’s economic proposals receive scant attention amid his repeated
prophecies of civil war. While reassuring his friends in finance that even
bigger bonuses are to come, he foments a dangerous sense of persecution among
his base of supporters. He insists that anti-immigration protesters are singled
out for punishment by the state because of their patriotism, when by far the
highest number of political arrests in the past year have applied to those
demonstrating in support of Palestine. He declares that the political
establishment — “the uniparty,” as he calls it — showers people seeking asylum
with luxury at the expense of struggling British citizens, whom it disdains. He
warns, again and again, of a “growing anger” out on the streets, while apparently
doing everything he can to grow it.
In
December 2003, several senior E.U. officials received letter bombs from
anonymous protesters, narrowly avoiding injury. The next month, Mr. Farage
issued a controversial statement essentially saying that the bloc had it
coming. “We have spent 10 years warning that the route the European Union has
chosen for itself, to swallow up nation states without giving the people of
Europe the final say, was destined to end in civil unrest and violence,” he
said. “It would appear that that prediction is now coming true.”
Twenty
years on, the people of Britain have had their say. Britain is outside the
European Union. But Mr. Farage is still warning that unless he is listened to,
more violence is coming. “Without action, without somehow the contract between
the government and the people being renewed, without some trust coming back,
then I fear deeply that that anger will grow,” he declared in August. “In fact,
I think there is now, as a result of this, a genuine threat to public order.”
Mr.
Farage’s concerns are hard to take seriously when he finds so many ways to
profit from them. Besides leading his insurgent party, he boasts an impressive
array of side hustles. He is a news anchor for GB News, an increasingly
influential television channel inspired by Fox News that has accelerated the
Americanization of British conservatism. He is the face of Direct Bullion, a
precious metal dealer, which he suggests investing in because “if you get a big
capital gain, you don’t have to pay any tax on it.” He will say almost anything
on Cameo, the short-video app, for $95. And he also has a line of spirits,
Farage Gin, although it seems that this venture is winding down after little
consumer interest.
His
unseriousness is a strength rather than a weakness, allowing him to draw from
the darkest reaches of British politics without being overshadowed by them. A
recent interview was illustrative. In September, a journalist asked Mr. Farage
whether he thought it was true that Haitian immigrants in America were “eating
cats and dogs.” The Reform leader replied with a hypothetical. “If I said to
you that swans were being eaten in royal parks in this country,” Mr. Farage
said, “by people who come from cultures that have a different …,” he trailed
off. The journalist asked if he was referring to tabloid stories about “Eastern
Europeans” doing exactly that. “So I believe,” Mr. Farage said, before bursting
out laughing and throwing his hands in the air. “But, you know, I’m not saying
that, I’m just putting it back as an argument!”
This
peekaboo prejudice — now you see it, now you don’t — is reminiscent of another
master of political mischief and innuendo, Boris Johnson. Mr. Johnson and Mr.
Farage share several qualities: blokey personas that elide their elite
backgrounds, senses of humor that evade accountability, a narcissistic pleasure
in transgression and destruction. But they belong to different parts of the
political spectrum. While Mr. Johnson’s buffoonish populism allowed him to lean
further right than his colleagues, he remained a Conservative. Mr. Farage,
starting from the radical right, leans toward something altogether more
dangerous and extreme.
The
popularity of his program should not be overstated. His ascendancy is premised,
above all, on the collapse of faith in both major parties and the concealment
of his economic agenda by his anti-immigration policies. But Mr. Farage’s quest
for power is clearly gaining velocity. It took his first party, UKIP, 20 years
to upend one pillar of British politics: its membership in the European Union.
His second party, Reform, has upended two more in a quarter of the time: the
two-party system, which has held pretty much for 100 years, and the dominance
of the Conservative Party, which has been one of the two main parties for the
entire history of Britain’s democracy. It is now possible to imagine Mr. Farage
as part of a frightening far-right sweep across Europe, claiming France and
Germany, in the near future.
What will
emerge from the wreckage? Mr. Trump’s presidency may offer some clues as to
what an “NF” premiership could stand for: mass deportations, attacks on
democratic institutions, reckless tax cuts and privatizations, total disregard
for environmental policies, emboldened racism and nativism, a political
atmosphere that seethes with recriminations and resentment. But perhaps the
most terrifying aspect of Mr. Farage in power is peculiar to Britain. Unlike
Mr. Trump, he would have no formal constitution — no rigorous system of checks
and balances — to stand in his way. He does not even have a political party to
constrain him. Unlike a Labour or Conservative leader, Mr. Farage is his party.
By razing
Britain to its bare foundations — dynamiting its main parties, its ties to
Europe, its public infrastructure, its financial regulations — Mr. Farage may
hope to have the last laugh. Perhaps, underneath the rubble, he will even find
what he’s looking for. Or maybe destruction is the point. Because for all his
apocalyptic warnings, Mr. Farage has never looked happier.
More on
Britain and Nigel Farage
Samuel
Earle is the author of “Tory Nation: The Dark Legacy of the World’s Most
Successful Political Party” and a Ph.D. candidate at the Columbia Journalism
School.



Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário