News
Analysis
A Novice
Defense Secretary Lectures the Brass on What It Takes to Win
Senior
officers, summoned from around the world, are entrusted to manage complex
military operations. They got a lecture on fitness and grooming standards.
Greg
Jaffe
By Greg
Jaffe
Reporting
from Washington
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/30/us/politics/hegseth-military-officers.html
Sept. 30,
2025
Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth has long maintained that the U.S. military badly needed
a leader with dust on his boots to shake up a force that has gone soft and
“woke.”
On
Tuesday, he faced a room of hundreds of generals and admirals, whom he had
summoned from across the globe, and made the case that he was that leader.
Mr.
Hegseth’s vision of the military and what it should be was almost entirely
defined by his 12 months of service in Iraq and his experience as a major in
the Army National Guard.
Much of
his address focused on the kinds of issues he would have dealt with as a young
platoon leader in the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq or as a company commander
in the Guard. He talked about grooming standards. “No more beards, long hair,
superficial, individual expression,” he told the brass. “We’re going to cut our
hair, shave, shave our beards and adhere to standards.”
He
preached the importance of physical fitness. “Frankly, it’s tiring to look out
at combat formations, or really any formation, and see fat troops,” he said.
“Likewise, it’s completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the
halls of the Pentagon.”
He
maintained, without presenting any evidence, that standards had been lowered
across the force over the last decade to meet arbitrary racial and gender
quotas.
Fixing
these problems, Mr. Hegseth said, was the first step toward repairing a
military that, since World War II, had lost the ability to win wars.
To some,
Mr. Hegseth’s speech was poorly matched to his audience of senior officers who
in most cases are responsible for complex military operations such as the
maintenance of nuclear submarines, the management of America’s global alliances
or the development of complex air-tasking orders, such as the one needed for
the strikes on Iran’s nuclear program earlier this year.
The
military officers assembled in the room listened silently. It is likely,
though, that at least some of them were seething at his suggestion that their
collective failure to enforce basic standards had caused, or even contributed
to, the military’s failings in Afghanistan and Iraq.
“I mean,
first of all, that’s like an insane insult to his senior officers, who all made
their bones fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan,” said Elliot Ackerman, who led
Marines in the second battle of Falluja and served with a Marine special
operations unit in Afghanistan. “Those guys have got a lot more dust on their
boots than he does.”
Mr.
Hegseth’s speech mirrored his leadership style over his first eight months in
office, during which he has focused less on meeting with his foreign
counterparts around the world and more on doing pull-ups and early morning runs
with troops that are posted on the Pentagon’s social media feed.
“If the
secretary of war can do regular, hard P.T., so can every member of our joint
force,” he told the generals, using the military abbreviation for physical
training.
His
speech preceded a long, rambling address from President Trump, who bashed his
predecessor, President Joseph R. Biden Jr., for the U.S. military’s chaotic
withdrawal and defeat in Afghanistan. “I think it was the most embarrassing day
in the history of our country,” he said. “And now we’re back. We’re not going
to have any of that crap happen, I can tell you. That was terrible, so
terrible.”
Both Mr.
Trump and Mr. Hegseth were reckoning with the aftermath of one of the longest,
most costly and disappointing stretches of war in American history.
Mr. Trump
addressed the senior officers as a politician who had bested his hated rivals.
Mr. Hegseth spoke largely from the perspective of a junior officer still
burdened by the anger, pride and deep frustration of his service in Iraq nearly
two decades earlier.
“He views
the world from the point of view of a not terribly successful major in the
National Guard,” said Eliot Cohen, a military historian who served in the State
Department under President George W. Bush. “For him it’s push-ups, pull-ups and
pugil sticks. It’s aggressiveness.”
Mr.
Hegseth delivered his speech at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Northern Virginia
clad in an American flag belt buckle and standing in front of a giant American
flag. The backdrop mirrored the portrayal of Gen. George S. Patton in the 1970
movie bearing his name.
That film
opened with excerpts from General Patton’s famous speeches to the Third Army
before the Allied invasion of France during World War II. Those addresses were
intended to motivate inexperienced troops who were preparing for brutal combat.
In them, General Patton sought to convince every soldier from the truck driver
to the cook that they were essential to victory.
“Every
man is a vital link in the great chain,” General Patton famously preached,
adding: “Every man does his job. Every man serves the whole. Every department,
every unit, is important in the vast scheme of this war.”
Mr.
Hegseth, though, wasn’t speaking to green soldiers, but rather a roomful of
senior officers with thousands of years of combined experience leading troops
around the world. Much of that experience, he said, had been corrupted by
“decades of decay, some of it obvious, some of it hidden,” inflicted on the
military by “woke” political and military leaders.
Mr.
Hegseth said one of his major tasks has been to separate those officers who
were truly invested in the changes that he believed had weakened the force and
those who were grudgingly following lawful orders.
In his
2024 book, “The War on Warriors,” Mr. Hegseth maintained that women were not
mentally suited to combat roles. “Women bring life into the world,” he wrote.
“Their role in war is to make it a less deathly experience.”
In his
speech to the generals, Mr. Hegseth struck a slightly different tone, arguing
that the military had improperly loosened standards to accommodate women who
may not be as able to carry a rucksack or lift a casualty on the battlefield.
“War does
not care if you’re a man or a woman,” Mr. Hegseth said. “Neither does the
enemy.”
But he
insisted that he did not want to prevent women from serving in combat roles.
Rather, Mr. Hegseth said, he wanted to hold them to the “highest male
standard.”
“If that
means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it,” he added.
His goal
seemed to be to turn back the clock to the simpler, more straightforward World
War II era. He noted repeatedly that this was the last time the United States
won “a major theater war.”
The
nostalgia-soaked speech, though, did not acknowledge how much had changed in
the past 75 years. In World War II, the entire country mobilized to fight the
fascist Axis forces in a war that would change the course of history.
Today,
the military Mr. Hegseth leads faces a world of complex and shifting security
challenges that require the Pentagon to work through allies and partners. Often
the enemies’ actions in cyberspace or the information domain are intended to
weaken American resolve and credibility without tipping into all-out war.
Mr.
Hegseth’s vision of military strength left little room for these subtleties.
Nor did it mention the recent deployment of National Guard soldiers to places
like Washington, D.C., where they have been tasked with “beautification”
missions, such as raking leaves and picking up trash.
Mr.
Hegseth seemed to divide his senior leaders into two categories: “the woke” and
the war fighters. Most of the senior officers in the room, he said, fell into
the latter category.
“You are
hereby liberated to be an apolitical, hard-charging, no-nonsense,
constitutional leader that you joined the military to be,” he told them.
Greg
Jaffe covers the Pentagon and the U.S. military for The Times.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário