Analysis
Orbán
problem pushes EU towards ‘coalitions of the willing’ on Ukraine
Jennifer
Rankin
in Brussels
As crisis
talks loom, Trump and the bloc’s own populist spoilers have driven it away from
its old quest for unanimity
Sun 2 Mar
2025 16.40 CET
A fortnight
after Vladimir Putin sent his troops to attack Ukraine, the 27 leaders of the
EU gathered at the palace of Versailles and condemned Russia’s invasion,
pledged support to the people of Ukraine – “we will not leave them alone” – and
vowed to “take more responsibility for our security”.
Three years
later, EU leaders are under pressure as never before to live up to those
promises. After a summit hosted by Keir Starmer on Sunday, the EU27 leaders
will gather in Brussels on Thursday for crisis talks. But trouble is ahead:
Hungary’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, has called on the EU to follow Trump’s
example and open direct talks with the Russian president.
Orbán also
wants the EU to junk a summit text intended to challenge Trump’s unilateralism.
“There can be no negotiations on Ukraine without Ukraine,” states the EU draft
text seen by the Guardian that Orbán objects to. “[Nor] negotiations that
affect European security without Europeans’ involvement.”
EU diplomats
say nothing surprises them about the Hungarian government. Only last week,
Hungary joined the US, Russia and Belarus in voting against a UN general
assembly resolution – drafted by European countries – that called for “a
comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine”.
At a time
when far-right parties are basking in attention from the Trump White House,
Orbán is not the only would-be spoiler. Slovakia’s populist prime minister,
Robert Fico, echoes Hungary’s pro-Moscow view on the Ukraine war, having
previously threatened to cut off humanitarian aid to Ukraine in a row over
Russian gas. The Czech Republic could also fall into that category if Andrej
Babiš, a billionaire populist allied with Orbán, is re-elected prime minister
this autumn, as opinion polls suggest.
As
geopolitical storm clouds descend, EU member states are increasingly interested
in “coalitions of the willing”, rather than seeking unanimity of all 27.
One senior
EU diplomat said they expected future military aid to Ukraine to be led by a
coalition of the willing as “we are moving more into the voluntary contribution
part”. The diplomat was referring to an initiative from the EU’s foreign policy
chief, Kaja Kallas, seeking to drum up billions in military aid for Ukraine in
2025.
But the idea
is also relevant when looking at European countries’ willingness to send troops
to Ukraine, as a peacekeeping or deterrent force. The UK (outside the EU) and
France are in, Poland is out and Germany, at the start of coalition
negotiations, remains a question mark.
“The EU at
27 is highly dysfunctional,” said Jana Puglierin, the head of the Berlin office
at the European Council on Foreign Relations. She expects Germany’s most likely
next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, will break with the approach of his Christian
Democrat predecessor Angela Merkel of “moving everybody along in lockstep”, an
approach that often led to “the lowest-common denominator”.
Janis
Emmanouilidis, the deputy chief executive at the European Policy Centre, said
the EU had too often pursued “a hollow unity” at the expense of ambition.
An EPC paper
he co-authored outlines a “supra-governmental avant garde” operating on chosen
topics like a mini-EU with binding rules and the involvement of EU
institutions. One area ripe for this approach, it is suggested, is European
defence cooperation funded by joint borrowing.
In the draft
summit communique being blocked by Orbán, EU leaders would call for proposals
for “additional funding sources for defence at EU level”. The document makes no
reference to common borrowing. Instead it mentions other proposals: loosening
the EU’s fiscal rules; greater flexibility in spending EU regional development
funds, and expanding the remit of the European Investment Bank, which is barred
from lending for weapons or ammunition.
The pressure
to find €500bn (£410bn) over the next decade for defence spending – the
European Commission’s estimate – means the common fund idea remains a talking
point.
Mujtaba
Rahman, the managing director for Europe at the Eurasia Group, expects EU
leaders to agree “ a common facility” worth between €100bn and €200bn by June
when a summit meeting earmarked for decisions on defence takes place.
In a note to
investors on Friday, Rahman wrote that the facility was more likely to be
intergovernmental, rather than EU. This set-up would get round central European
spoilers, assuage the qualms of EU countries outside Nato, and open the door to
the participation of non-EU countries, including the UK, Norway and Turkey.
Coalitions
of the willing are not a panacea. EU sanctions against Russia can only be
agreed and extended by unanimity. Emboldened by Trump, Orbán is threatening to
veto the rollover later this month of EU sanctions against more than 1,000
Russian officials and business people, including Putin.
Creating
coalitions of the willing also prompts awkward questions about who deserves to
join the club. Some EU countries question whether Spain and Italy should be
included in any new borrowing club, as they have not met the 2% GDP Nato
target.
But against
the harsh reality of a US president trashing the 80-year-old transatlantic
alliance, the EU will probably be forced to experiment with new formats. “It is
politically risky, maybe even legally risky,” Emmanouilidis said. “But we are
at a moment where it is increasingly difficult to follow the old logic.”
.jpg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário