Opinion
Bret
Stephens
A Day of
American Infamy
Feb. 28,
2025
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/28/opinion/a-day-of-american-infamy.html
Bret
Stephens
By Bret
Stephens
Opinion
Columnist
In August
1941, about four months before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Franklin
Roosevelt met with Winston Churchill aboard warships in Newfoundland’s
Placentia Bay and agreed to the Atlantic Charter, a joint declaration by the
world’s leading democratic powers on “common principles” for a postwar world.
Among its
key points: “no aggrandizement, territorial or other”; “sovereign rights and
self-government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them”;
“freedom from fear and want”; freedom of the seas; “access, on equal terms, to
the trade and to the raw materials of the world which are needed for their
economic prosperity.”
The charter,
and the alliance that came of it, is a high point of American statesmanship. On
Friday in the Oval Office, the world witnessed the opposite. Volodymyr
Zelensky, Ukraine’s embattled democratic leader, came to Washington prepared to
sign away anything he could offer President Trump except his nation’s freedom,
security and common sense. For that, he was rewarded with a lecture on manners
from the most mendacious vulgarian and ungracious host ever to inhabit the
White House.
If Roosevelt
had told Churchill to sue for peace on any terms with Adolf Hitler and to fork
over Britain’s coal reserves to the United States in exchange for no American
security guarantees, it might have approximated what Trump did to Zelensky.
Whatever one might say about how Zelensky played his cards poorly — either by
failing to behave with the degree of all-fours sycophancy that Trump demands or
to maintain his composure in the face of JD Vance’s disingenuous provocations —
this was a day of American infamy.
Where do we
go from here?
If there’s
one silver lining to this fiasco, it’s that Zelensky did not sign the agreement
on Ukrainian minerals that was forced on him this month by Scott Bessent, the
Treasury secretary who’s the Tom Hagen character in this protection-racket
administration. The United States is entitled to some kind of reward for
helping Ukraine defend itself — and Ukraine’s destruction of much of Russia’s
military might should top the list, followed by the innovation Ukraine
demonstrated in pioneering revolutionary forms of low-cost drone warfare, which
the Pentagon will be keen to emulate.
But if it’s
a financial payback that the Trump administration seeks, the best place to get
it is to seize, in collaboration with our European partners, Russia’s frozen
assets and put them into an account by which Ukraine could pay for
American-made arms. If the United States won’t do this, the Europeans should:
Let the Ukrainians rely for their arms on Dassault, Saab, Rheinmetall, BAE
Systems and other European defense contractors and see how that goes over with
the “America First”-ers. Hopefully that could serve as another spur to
Europeans to invest, as quickly and heavily as they can, in their depleted
militaries, not simply to strengthen NATO but also to hedge against its end.
There is a
second opportunity: While Trump’s abuse of Zelensky might delight the MAGA
crowd, it isn’t likely to play well with most voters, including the almost 30
percent of Republicans who, even now, believe it’s in our interest to stand
with Ukraine. And while most Americans may want to see the war in Ukraine end,
they almost surely don’t want to see it end on Vladimir Putin’s terms.
Nor should
the Trump administration. A Russian victory in Ukraine, including a cease-fire
that allows Moscow to consolidate its gains and recoup its strength before the
next assault, will have precisely the same effect as the Taliban’s victory in
Afghanistan: emboldening American enemies to behave more aggressively. Notice
that, as Trump has ratcheted up pressure on Ukraine in recent weeks, Taiwan
reported a surge in Chinese military drills around the island, while Chinese
warships held live-fire exercises off the coast of Vietnam and came within 150
nautical miles of Sydney.
Those are
points honorable conservatives should press: Can Senator Mitch McConnell of
Kentucky and Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska — two Republicans who haven’t
sold their souls on Ukraine — lead a delegation of like-minded conservatives to
Kyiv?
More so,
this should be an opportunity for Democrats. Joe Biden was right when he called
this a “decisive decade” for the future of the free world; he just happened to
be too feeble and cautious a messenger.
But there
are tough-minded Democrats with military and security backgrounds —
Representative Jason Crow of Colorado, Representative Seth Moulton of
Massachusetts and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan come to mind — who can
restore the spirit of Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy to the Democratic Party.
It’s a message of toughness and freedom they might also be able to sell to at
least some Trump voters, who cast their ballots in November for the sake of a
better America, not a greater Russia.
Still,
there’s no getting around the fact that Friday was a dreadful day — dreadful
for Ukraine, for the free world, for the legacy of an America that once stood
for the principles of the Atlantic Charter.
Roosevelt
and Reagan must be spinning in their graves, as are Churchill and Thatcher.
It’s up to the rest of us to reclaim America’s honor from the gangsters who
besmirched it in the White House.
Bret
Stephens is an Opinion columnist for The Times, writing about foreign policy,
domestic politics and cultural issues. Facebook


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário