Trump
ridiculed after accusing Kamala Harris of mistreating Mike Pence
Harris
campaign responds: ‘In a stunning senile moment Trump suggested it was Harris
who treated Pence poorly’
Robert Tait
in Washington DC
Mon 2 Sep
2024 17.01 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/sep/02/trump-hypocrisy-harris-pence
Donald Trump
has drawn ridicule and accusations of hypocrisy after accusing Kamala Harris of
mistreating Mike Pence, the former vice-president who his supporters said
should be hanged during the January 6 insurrection that he incited.
The
Republican’s nominee’s comments came in an interview with Fox News, when he
also singled out Harris’s 2018 cross-examination of Brett Kavanaugh during
Senate confirmation hearings after Trump, then president, nominated him as a
justice on the US supreme court.
“They say
she has many deficiencies, but she’s a nasty person,” Trump told the
interviewer, Mark Levin. “The way she treated Mike Pence was horrible. The way
she treats people is horrible. The way she treated Justice Kavanaugh in that
hearing – in the history of Congress, nobody’s been treated that way.”
Trump’s
comments prompted a response from Harris’s campaign, which appeared to
interpret it an example of age-related confusion and evidence that the former
president, who is 78 and now the oldest presidential candidate in US history
following Joe Biden’s withdrawal, is in mental decline.
“In a
stunning senile moment, Donald Trump just suggested it was Kamala Harris who
treated Mike Pence poorly,” the campaign posted on X, linking to video footage
of Trump’s comments.
“Donald
Trump clearly cannot remember anything. Retweet to make sure all Americans see
this hypocritical and senile moment.”
In fact,
Trump may have been referring to a 2020 vice-presidential debate between Harris
and Pence, when the now Democratic nominee twice told her opponent “I’m
speaking” when he tried to interrupt her as she articulated an argument.
However, the
comments evoked social media references to Trump’s notorious treatment of Pence
after his presidential election defeat to Biden, when he tried to pressure the
vice-president into refusing to certify the results in Congress, as dictated by
the US constitution, and then egged on a mob to attack the US Capitol while
Pence was inside.
Posting on
social media, David Corn, a journalist with Mother Jones, wrote: “What? Did she
call him the p-word and incite the violent mob that chanted ‘Hang Mike Pence’?
Because if she did, she probably should drop out of the race.”
On the
morning of the 6 January 2021 Capitol attack, Trump reportedly told Pence: “You
can either go down in history as a patriot, or you can go down in history as a
pussy.”
Later, with
the crowd baying for the vice-president’s blood, Trump allegedly told aides
that “Mike Pence deserves it”.
Last year,
Trump renewed his assault against Pence at a time when the former
vice-president – who has refused to endorse his current presidential bid – was
running for the Republican nomination, calling him “delusional” and “not a very
good person”.
Speaking to
CNN last week along with her running mate, Tim Walz, Harris – who Trump has
called “nasty” several times – confirmed to interviewers Dana Bash that she and
and the former president have never met.
His allusion
to her treatment of Kavanaugh – one of three conservative justices Trump
appointed to America’s highest court – referred to Harris’s question to him
over abortion at the 2018 confirmation hearing, which took place when she was a
senator.
“Can you
think of any laws that give government the power to make decisions about the
male body?” Harris asked Kavanaugh, who parried by asking for “a more specific
question”.
When Harris
persisted, Kavanaugh – one of six supreme court justices to vote in favour of a
landmark ruling striking down a woman’s legal right to abortion in 2022 –
haltingly acknowledged that he could not think of any “right now.”
Harris has
put restoring abortion rights at the centre of her presidential campaign.
Trump also
suggested in the Fox News interview that he “had every right” to interfere in
trying to annul the 2020 election results.
“Who ever
heard you get indicted for interfering with a presidential election, where you
have every right to do it,” he said.
Joyce Vance,
a former federal prosecutor and US attorney during the Obama administration,
posted on X: “There’s no right to ‘interfere’ with a presidential election.
This is the banality of evil right here – Trump asserting he can override the
will of the voters to claim victory in an election he lost.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário