‘Scoop’ Review: The Story Behind That Prince
Andrew Interview
In 2019, the prince went on air to respond to
accusations involving Jeffery Epstein. The drama here is in how the BBC
convinced him to do it.
By Ben
Kenigsberg
April 4,
2024
Scoop Directed
by Philip Martin Biography, Drama Not Rated1h 42m
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/04/movies/scoop-review-prince-andrew-bbc.html
The exposés
that brought public attention to Watergate, the predations of Harvey Weinstein
and the abuse tolerated by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston have all
been the subjects of movies. The drama revolved, in part, around the difficulty
of getting people to talk.
Now comes
the story of how the BBC program “Newsnight” landed its bombshell interview
with Prince Andrew in 2019. Over a bizarre 49-minute segment, he unconvincingly
addressed his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the financier and convicted sex
offender, and repeatedly denied accusations by Virginia Roberts Giuffre that,
at 17, she had sex with the prince after being trafficked to him by Epstein.
The interview was less world historic than David Frost’s conversations with an
out-of-office Richard Nixon (themselves the basis for a play-turned-movie), but
the fallout was real. Faced with widespread criticism, Prince Andrew resigned
from public duties just days later.
How do you
score an interview with a scandal-plagued royal? “Scoop,” directed by Philip
Martin, chronicles the determined efforts of the producer Sam McAlister (Billie
Piper), on whose book, “Scoops,” the film is based. Attending meetings at
Buckingham Palace may lack the grit of shoe-leather reporting, but there is
genuine psychology involved in convincing a famous figure that countering
disapproval requires acknowledging it, and that the questions asked will be
fair. Sam makes her case over multiple discussions with the prince’s personal
secretary, Amanda Thirsk (Keeley Hawes), and eventually in a pitch to the
prince himself (Rufus Sewell in significant makeup) alongside Emily Maitlis
(Gillian Anderson), the journalist who hopes to interrogate him.
The film
finds sufficient suspense in these negotiations and in Maitlis’s preparations
for the encounter, a grilling that, in real life, she skillfully pulled off
without ever registering as discourteous. Why Prince Andrew’s answers were so
tone-deaf — he was panned for not expressing sympathy for Epstein’s victims —
is a mystery that “Scoop” sidesteps. (McAlister and Thirsk exchange ambiguous
glances as the taping concludes.)
What
“Scoop” offers is the modest pleasure — to which any journalist is susceptible
— of rooting for a reporting team to get a story. That, and mimicry:
exceptional on Anderson’s part, less on that of Sewell, who has a raspier voice
and a more passably serious manner than the prince displayed on TV.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário