OPINION
GUEST ESSAY
Why Is France Acting Like Marine Le Pen Is the
Adult in the Room?
May 15,
2023
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/opinion/france-macron-le-pen.html
For three
months, France has been in revolt: Demonstrators have marched; railroad workers
have blocked tracks; barricades and buildings have been set aflame; protesters
have done battle in the street with police. The most recent innovation has been
tamer: People have banged pots whenever the president has appeared. The cause?
President Emmanuel Macron’s measure raising the retirement age from 62 to 64.
This might
at first glance appear to be the work of a vibrant political left wing,
fighting pro-business, anti-worker policies from a center-right technocratic
government. Indeed, France’s labor unions — though representing a smaller share
of the work force than elsewhere in Western Europe — have been united in their
opposition, making them a redoubtable force. Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who leads the
left-wing coalition NUPES, has been a central figure in the parliamentary fight
against Mr. Macron, nearly bringing down his government with a no-confidence
vote in March.
And yet it
is not France’s left that has benefited from the popular rebellion. It is the
far right.
Recent
polls showed that if last year’s head-to-head presidential election were held
now, Marine Le Pen, the leader of the far-right Rassemblement National, would
beat Mr. Macron handily, 55 to 45 percent. Other polls that list all possible
candidates have shown that Mr. Mélenchon, despite his and his group’s support
for the anti-Macron movement, has gained a mere percentage point since last
year’s elections, hovering at around a quarter of the votes and, in some scenarios,
only 20 percent.
In a
situation that seems tailor-made for a resurgence of the left, how is it that,
for the moment, at least, it is not just the right but the far right that has
benefited?
Hatred of
the established order is no longer a marker of leftism, and France’s recent
history testifies to this. The Yellow Vests, France’s last mass protest
movement, which began in response to an eco-friendly hike in gas taxes in 2018,
was a strange hodgepodge of positions and attitudes, and its political leanings
varied from city to city and even differed from one roundabout to another where
the protesters gathered.
The
movement rejected attempts by politicians to join them and very early developed
a solid right-leaning conspiratorial element. Jacline Mouraud, whose October
2018 video helped spark the movement, later supported the far-right
presidential candidate Eric Zemmour, a committed racist. A direct outgrowth of
the Yellow Vests was the phenomenal popularity of the 2020 Covid conspiracy
film “Hold Up,” as was a vocal anti-mask movement.
The
right-wing populist current in the Yellow Vests from just a few years ago has
not vanished, and it is making itself felt in the new polls. The Rassemblement
National has been the face of the populist right since its beginnings, and its
history has been one of growth. These polls are a sign that this move has
continued, to the benefit of Ms. Le Pen.
Her rise
has been assisted by the missteps of her foes. How the increase in retirement
age was finally made law — bypassing a vote in the National Assembly — was seen
as a confirmation of Mr. Macron’s undemocratic, even authoritarian tendencies.
The political center and center right have been neutralized by their support
for the president’s unpopular measure. In response, the center and center right
are on the attack. It is their opponents, the centrists say, who are the true
threat to democracy: the left for its support of violent protests and the far
right by its very nature. Mr. Macron’s ministers hammer away at this idea in
the media.
For its
part, the left has been hampered by its own inadequacies. Mr. Mélenchon and his
coalition, betting heavily that anti-Macron sentiment will benefit them, have
lacked a coherent strategy, other than maintaining pressure through advocating
increased mobilization while adopting disruptive tactics in the National
Assembly. Last October, well before the current crisis, polls showed that their
rowdiness during legislative sessions had already led many to think left-wing
politicians were incapable of governing. This political mayhem has thus far
helped only the Rassemblement National, which is no longer universally viewed
as a political pariah.
Ms. Le Pen
and her party, remarkably, have become, in the eyes of many, the voice of la
France profonde, the voice of reason. She has condemned the violence on the
streets (though never the police’s), as well as Mr. Macron for “losing the
meaning of democracy,” adding, “When the ruler wants something and the people
don’t, it should not be done.” She has promised that she will reverse the
retirement age change if — when — she’s elected.
Her party’s
88 members of the National Assembly, the third-largest group in the legislative
body, have succeeded in further normalizing the far right by playing the role
of the adults in the room. The far right is managing to present itself as the
defenders of democracy, imperiled by Mr. Macron’s diktats, and of stability,
threatened by left-wing chaos.
Is this a
durable position? The Yellow Vest movement did not lead to the defeat of Mr.
Macron in 2022. But those elections did see Ms. Le Pen receive more votes than
her party ever had.
The
government’s mishandling of the pension overhaul, from failing to convince the
French that it was even necessary to forcing it through when it was unable to
obtain a legislative majority, has increased the people’s animus toward
politics and politicians. Over the past four decades, every political
alternative but the far right has been tried and found wanting — the Socialists
of François Mitterrand and François Hollande, the conservatives of Nicolas
Sarkozy and the center and Mr. Macron.
Though much
of this held true a year ago, the change in the retirement age touched
something fundamental in the French, cementing the divorce between the people
and politicians. Ms. Le Pen has never held power, and so she has never failed
her voters. She offers a fresh start and holds out the promise that, unlike
those who have ruled France till now, she will defend the people’s interests.
For now, at least, this argument is perhaps the clinching one in the minds of
many in France.
Mitchell
Abidor is a translator and a historian of French radical movements. Miguel Lago
is the executive director of the Institute for Health Policy Studies and
teaches at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
The Times
is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to
hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And
here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow The
New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.



Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário