How Turkey’s Erdoğan uses social media to cling
onto power
The president and his ruling party passed new EU-style
rules to cement their control over digital platforms ahead of this month’s
election.
BY MARK
SCOTT
MAY 15,
2023 4:39 PM CET
In his
campaign to hold onto Turkey's presidency, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has a secret
weapon: a social media crackdown partly inspired by Europe.
As the
country heads toward a run-off between Erdoğan and Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, his
reform-minded rival, the Turkish leader's increasing control of social media
has become another tool to help him extend his 20-year reign.
Over the
weekend, Erdoğan's government ordered Twitter to block the accounts of roughly
a dozen local opposition public figures over the weekend — a move that
triggered a backlash against Elon Musk for complying with the directive.
In truth,
Erdoğan's efforts to control social media go back more than a decade.
That push
culminated in October when Turkey's ruling party passed wide-ranging social
media rules that, in part, mirrored similar legislation recently passed in the
European Union. Both the Turkish and European regimes aim to clamp down on
harmful online posts, stop the spread of disinformation and increase
transparency around how the likes of Instagram and YouTube serve content to
their users. The EU's rules, known as the Digital Services Act, also include
fines of up to 6 percent of a company's revenue for potential wrongdoing.
Ankara's
rulebook often mimics Brussels' policymaking language word-for-word. But it
goes significantly further in restricting online speech in ways that favor
Erdoğan's effort to hold onto the Turkish presidency.
That
includes prison sentences of up to five years if people post content online
that spreads "information that is inaccurate" in ways that
"disrupt Turkey's domestic and external security." Journalists could
similarly face prison time for writing stories not favorable to Turkey's ruling
AK Party. And Kılıçdaroğlu, who secured 45 percent of Sunday's nationwide vote,
already has faced a criminal complaint under the new regime for spreading
"fake news" about the government.
"There
is a lot at stake around Turkey’s disinformation law," wrote Alper Coşkun,
a senior fellow at the the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a
Washington-based think tank. Erdoğan and his political party "should not
succumb to short-term political interests and be tempted to utilize this
legislation to suppress dissenting views."
In
response, Turkish government officials reject criticism they are taking over
social media for their own political gain. Many refer to other online content
rules — particularly those within the EU — as examples of how politicians
elsewhere are also pushing back against tech giants in the name of reducing the
spread of harmful content among local populations.
Similar
laws to those within Turkey "are being implemented in many parts of the
world, especially in developed countries," said the country's Directorate
of Communications.
It's
unclear whether the country's new social media rules tilted the scales in favor
of Erdoğan in this weekend's tightly fought first-round vote, which represents
the greatest threat to the Turkish president's rule since an attempted coup in
2016.
Yet the
increasing control of what people see online marks a continuation of repeated
social media bans that Ankara has imposed on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube,
often in ways that favor the country's ruling party.
The government
instituted a short nationwide ban on these digital platforms after a deadly
attack in Istanbul in November. A Twitter-focused ban followed in the wake of
Turkey's massive earthquake February, which also led to 78 arrests after people
shared "provocative posts." Similar digital platform bans date back a
decade, and mirror Erdoğan's wider control of the media landscape to quell
opposition voices.
Turkey
joins other increasingly authoritarian governments, including those in Russia
and Saudi Arabia, that have similarly borrowed heavily from Europe's social
media playbook, but have tweaked those rules to favor repressive regimes.
Moscow, for instance, recently passed onerous legislation, which includes up to
15 years in jail, for those spreading "falsehoods" about the
country's military.
"The
passing of the so-called disinformation bill is expected to assist the
governing alliance in silencing opposition parties and critical media
coverage," according to a report on Turkey by Freedom House, a nonprofit organization
that tracks global human rights issues.
.jpg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário